0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

Why Did The Victorious Chinese Army Withdraw in 1962?

notes

Uploaded by

kirtivyas.ec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

Why Did The Victorious Chinese Army Withdraw in 1962?

notes

Uploaded by

kirtivyas.ec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Why did the victorious Chinese army withdraw in 1962?

Sixty years ago, on November 21, 1962, with advancing Chinese columns virtually on the outskirts of
Tezpur and the Indian Army in full retreat, Beijing unexpectedly declared a unilateral ceasefire and
undertook to withdraw its forces 20 kilometres (km) behind the McMahon Line. This amounted to a
declaration of victory, riding on the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA’s) October attack on the handful of
Indian soldiers of 7 Infantry Brigade, which was deployed on the Namkha Chu river north of Tawang.

To this day, opinion is divided on what motivated Beijing to call off the game at the moment of victory.
Indian Army units deployed at Dirang and Mandala were racing for the exits, their attention focused on
putting the Brahmaputra River between the PLA and themselves. Barely one-tenth of India’s fighting
forces had been committed to battle against the Chinese, but the fullness with which the PLA had put
them to the sword made it seem as if the entire Indian military had been thoroughly vanquished. New
Delhi’s discomfiture was complete after Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru appeared to have declared
defeat in a radio broadcast on the eve of the ceasefire.

“We have had reverses at Walong, Se La and today Bomdila, a small town in NEFA, has also fallen. We
shall not rest till the invader goes out of India or is pushed out. I want to make that clear to all of you,
and especially our countrymen in Assam, to whom our heart goes out at this moment,” said Nehru in a
choked voice.

Tezpur, the first major Assam town, presented a scene of chaos. Flames flickered in the night as
government officials frantically burnt documents. Outside the treasury, there was a bonfire of
banknotes. The doors of the local “lunatic asylum” were thrown open to save “lunatics” from falling into
Chinese hands. Tezpur was where the Indian public had received the Dalai Lama in 1959, so it was felt
that the PLA would exact revenge here. The ferry across the Brahmaputra, operated by a private
company – the RSN&IGN Company – was packed to capacity with fleeing citizens. Prominent locals, such
as tea garden managers (many of them European) flew out in Indian Airlines flights, cramming them to
capacity. Towards the end, the notables were leaving their vehicles at the airport with keys inside; they
never thought they would come back and see their cars again.

Compared to this chaos, the area north of Bomdila was a picture of calm. Chinese troops had marched
in and distributed themselves between villages, with individual units charged with administering specific
jurisdictions. Acting on clear instructions to win the hearts and minds of the local Monpa people,
Chinese soldiers helped locals with fetching water, harvesting crops and looking after livestock. The PLA
had clear orders to win over the Monpas, which was evident from the similarity in PLA behavior all
across the border from Walong to Tawang. Unfortunately for the Chinese, the Monpas accepted their
help but gave no loyalty in return. The reason, Monpas still say, was simple: The Chinese are
untrustworthy! After subjugating Tibet in the 1950s the PLA had similarly tried to woo over the locals.
But, very quickly, they revealed their true faces to the Tibetans. With no love forthcoming from the
Monpas, the PLA saw no benefit in a long-term presence in Tawang.

A simultaneous PLA ploy was to highlight the Indian administration’s abandonment of Tawang in the
face of the Chinese offensive. The Indian government, which fled ignominiously, was incapable of looking
after them, argued the Chinese to the Monpas. However, given China’s treatment of the Tibetans in the
1950s, the Monpas clearly preferred the “cowardly” Indians.

Each of these reasons mutually reinforced an ever more compelling administrative case for the Chinese
to vacate Tawang, having “taught India a lesson”. Ultimately, however, it is likely to have been a tactical-
operational consideration that took the PLA back across the McMahon Line in December 1962.
Withwinter setting in rapidly, the PLA’s extended supply line was becoming a vulnerability. Soon, the
snowed-under passes would have made it extremely difficult to maintain troops across the McMahon
Line.

Meanwhile, in response to Jawaharlal Nehru’s plea to US President John F Kennedy, American arms,
ammunition and extreme cold clothing were flowing into India and being transported to Assam. The
handful of Indian soldiers that had been defeated by the PLA was being replaced, reinforced and
equipped with US weaponry.

At the extended points in Assam that the PLA reached on 20 November 1962, logistics would have made
it easier for India to mobilise reserve formations, equipped with heavy artillery and tanks. The PLA faced
the unappealing prospect of fighting US-equipped Indian forces without a route of withdrawal across the
Himalayas. Deciding to quit while they were ahead, the PLA declared victory and withdrew to Tibet.

You might also like