Mohd Sharjeel Sofi Kuldeep Singh Rautela Sami Ullah Bhat Irfan Rashid Jagdish Chandra Kuniyal
Mohd Sharjeel Sofi Kuldeep Singh Rautela Sami Ullah Bhat Irfan Rashid Jagdish Chandra Kuniyal
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05217-w
Received: 17 February 2021 / Accepted: 4 June 2021 / Published online: 29 June 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
Abstract Himalaya is one of the youngest and tion rate and generates morphometric parameters
greatest mountain ranges in the world and is one like drainage network, geometry, drainage texture,
of the world’s most erosion-prone regions. Reliable aerial, and relief characteristics in the Sindh River
information on the basin hydrology, physico-chem- basin of Kashmir Himalaya, to understand the ero-
ical weathering, and runoff dynamics is essential sion dynamics of the basin. The basin is dominated
to develop an appropriate policies for sustainable, by a dendritic drainage pattern with a drainage den-
socially acceptable, ecological, and economically sity of 2.60 km/sq km. The aerial parameters such
viable development of the mountainous rivers. The as elongation ratio, circulatory ratio, compactness
current study uses a numerical model and GIS tools coefficient, and rotundity factor show that the basin
to estimate run-off volume and sediment produc- is elongated in shape with a lower peak flow period,
and the basin is structurally complex with high rela-
tive relief. The estimated basin run-off volume and
M. S. Sofi · S. U. Bhat (*) sediment production rate of 11.31 (sq.km-cm/sq.km)
Department of Environmental Science, University
of Kashmir, Srinagar Pin‑190006, India and 0.002 (ha-m/100 sq.km/year), respectively, sug-
e-mail: samiullahbhat11@gmail.com gest that the Sindh basin can be categorized under
M. S. Sofi the low run-off zone and less soil erosion occurs
e-mail: Sharjeel03@rediffmail.com when compared to other Indian Himalayan rivers.
The paper aims to fill the knowledge gap concern-
K. S. Rautela · J. C. Kuniyal ing the estimation of hydro-sedimentological flows
Govind Ballabh Pant National Institute of Himalayan
Environment (NIHE), Kosi‑Katarmal Almora, in the Sindh basin. In this context, present work to
Uttarakhand Pin‑263643, India estimate run-off volume and sediment production
e-mail: kuldeeprautela007@gmail.com rate was carried out using morphometric features to
J. C. Kuniyal help the decision-makers in framing sustainable land
e-mail: jckuniyal@gmail.com use policies and practices for the region.
I. Rashid
Department of Botany, University of Kashmir,
Keywords Sediment production rate · Cation
Srinagar Pin‑190006, India weathering · Soil erosion · River management · Land
e-mail: ecoirfan@gmail.com use policy
Vol.:(0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
280 Page 2 of 11 Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280 Page 3 of 11 280
the Sindh basin of Kashmir Himalayas and is expected valley of the River Jhelum (Dada et al., 2013). The
to provide essential information for the conservation of uppermost tributaries of the river originate below
land and water resources to sustain any developmental the high peaks near Zoji La (3256 m) which are
activity for public benefits. joined by other streams originating from Amarnath
(5270 m), Kolahoi (5425 m), and Panjtarni snow-
2 Study Area fields. At Sonamarg—a famous tourist destination,
known as the ‘meadow of gold’, the water flows
The Sindh River basin is located in the valley of through a contracted river channel with deep slit
Kashmir towards the northern side of India. The caves in the adjoining rocks along the banks. Further
length of the Sindh River is 116 km and consists of downstream, the river deepens more to undertake the
about 1683 km2 of the basin area. The river flows in characteristics of a gorge. Eventually, these tributar-
a south-westerly direction through the greater Hima- ies join together near Sonamarg—a famous hill sta-
layan region (Rashid & Pandit, 2008) and is consid- tion to form the Sindh River, a key tributaries of the
ered as one of the most developed and largest side River Jhelum (Baba et al., 2011). The River Sindh
Fig. 1 Showing a drainage pattern, b flow direction, and c digital elevation of the Sindh watershed
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
280 Page 4 of 11 Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280 Page 5 of 11 280
(1945). To evaluate the morphometry of the drainage where CWR is the chemical weathering rate (t/100sq.
basin, various parameters like stream number, stream km/year), Q estimated runoff (q.km-cm/sq.km),
length, stream order, stream length ratio, bifurcation icaverage average concentration of cations (meq), and k
ratio, basin area, basin length, relief ratio, elongation conversion factor.
ratio, stream frequency, drainage density, circularity ratio,
and form have been calculated using the standard meth-
ods (see Supplementary Table 1). Sediment production
rate and run-off were estimated based on Jose and Das 4 Results
(1982) method using the following equations (Fig. 2).
The Geomorphometric parameters of the water-
Run‑Off (Q) Run-off in the Sindh basin was esti- shed such as drainage parameters, drainage texture,
mated by using geomorphic, drainage, and topo- shape parameters and relief, SPR, and erosion rates
graphic parameters as per the following equation are shown in the following sections.
(Jose & Das, 1982):
Log Q = 2238.43 + 22.12 {Log (100 + Rf)} − 608.28 {Log (100 + Rc)} − 530.02{Log (100 + Cc)}
Log SPR = 4919.80 + 48.64 Log (100 + Rf) − 1337.77 Log (100 + Rc) − 1166.64 Log (100 + Cc)
where SPR is the sediment production rate in Stream Length (Lb), Mean Stream Length (Lsm),
ha-m/100 sq.km/year, Rf is the rotundity factor, and Stream Length Ratio As shown in Table 1,
Rc is circularity ratio, and Cc is the compactness the total stream length of the basin is 4378.99 km;
coefficient. first-order is 2435.50 km, 1014.26 km for second-
order, 515.68 km for third-order, 200.52 km for
Chemical (Cation) Weathering Rate Calculation fourth-order, 87.72 km for fifth-order, 88.18 km for
of chemical (cation) weathering rate was estimated sixth-order, and 37.13 km for seventh-order. The
by using mean cation concentration of C a2+, Mg2+, mean stream length (Lsm) is the ratio of the total
+ +
K , and N
a in meltwater discharge and the catch- stream length of order ‘u’ to the number of streams
ment (Singh & Hasnain, 1998; Singh et al., 2015). of order ‘u + 1’ (Strahler, 1964). The stream length
Calcium ion (Ca2+), and magnesium ion ( Mg2+) were ratio, which is defined as the ratio of the mean length
determined by the EDTA titrimetric method (APHA, of streams of a given order (Lu) to the mean length of
2005). The concentrations of N a+ and K
+ were meas- the streams of the following lower order (Lu-1), has a
ured with the help of a flame photometer (APHA, close relationship with the surface flow and different
2005; Bhat & Pandit, 2018). Five replicates were erosional stages of the watershed (Horton, 1945). The
run for cation analysis on the calibrated instruments. variation in stream length ratio between consecutive
The standard error for Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, and Na+ were streams order is due to differences between slope and
0.75, 0.48, 0.29, and 0.30, respectively. CWR was topographic features of the watershed (Vittala et al.,
estimated by using the following equation: 2004). The stream length ratio of the Sindh basin var-
ies from 1.26 to 4.36.
CWR = k.Q.icaverage
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
280 Page 6 of 11 Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280
Bifurcation Ratio (Rb) The ‘Rb’ is a dimensionless shape. The shape index of Sindh basin is 6.92, and
unit and represents the number of the stream units of the form factor is 0.21. Compactness coefficient artic-
a given order to the number of streams in the subse- ulates the correlation of a basin with that of a circular
quent higher order (Strahler, 1964). Normally natural basin of the same area. Cc of 1 indicates that the basin
drainage systems have bifurcation ratio values rang- entirely behaves like a circular basin. The ‘Cc’ of the
ing between 3.0 and 5.0. The higher ‘Rb’ value for Sindh basin is 2.12.
river basins is the result of a difference in frequencies
between consecutive orders and designates the mature Circularity Ratio (Rc), Elongation Ratio (Re), and
topography (Magesh and Chandrasekar, 2014). The Rotundity Factor (Rf) The circularity ratio for the
value of Rb value ranged between 3.00 and 4.85 for Sindh basin is 0.22. Values of the elongation ratio
the successive orders of the Sindh River basin. are congregated into three categories, viz. circular
(> 0.9), oval (0.9–0.7), and less elongated (< 0.7). For
4.2 Drainage texture the Sindh basin, the value of elongation ratio is 0.52
which shows the basin is elongated in shape and rep-
Drainage texture aspects considered for the present resents high relief with steep slopes. The value of the
study comprises of drainage density, stream fre- rotundity factor is 3.707 for the Sindh basin.
quency, and texture ratio are described as follows:
Run‑off, Sediment Production Rate, and Cation
Drainage Density (Dd), Stream frequency (Sf), (Chemical) Weathering Rate Run-off of a basin
and Texture Ratio Drainage density indicates the depends on the hydrological parameters such as pre-
closeness of streams. The drainage density of the cipitation, evaporation, infiltration, and transpiration,
Sindh basin is 2.60 km/sq km which is categorized but these hydrological parameters are themselves
under high drainage density. Stream frequency or affected by the climatic conditions, lithology, struc-
drainage frequency has been related to permeability, ture, relief, and slopes. From the analysis of the data,
infiltration capacity, and relief of watersheds. A high run-off value obtained for the Sindh basin is 11.31
value of stream frequency indicates larger surface (sq.km-cm/sq.km), and the SPR is 0.002 (ha-m/100
run-off that is early peak discharge, and low stream sq.km/year). The average cation concentration in the
frequency indicates high permeability and low relief run-off volume is 27.17 g/l with a chemical (cation)
(Soni, 2017). The stream frequency of the Sindh weathering rate of the order of 0.003 (ha-m/sq.km/
basin is 3.60. Horton (1945) defined texture ratio as year).
the total number of stream segments of all orders in a
watershed to the perimeter of the watershed. It helps
to understand the relative spacing of drainage lines. 5 Discussion
The Sindh watershed shows a texture ratio of 18.28
per km. The current study was carried out with the aim to cal-
culate various morphometric parameters of the river
4.3 Shape Parameters Sindh and to estimate run-off, SPR, and chemical
weathering rate of the whole basin to understand the
The shape parameters of any basin are very important erosion dynamics of the basin. Stream order is con-
morphometric features. In terms of hydrology, the sidered as the beginning of morphometric analysis
shape of the basin determines the peak of the hydro- constructed on the hierarchical ranking of streams.
graph (i.e. the shape of the basin controls the run-off The higher number of first and second-order streams
at the outlet) and regulates erosion rate. The shape points to the existence of young topography neigh-
parameters of the Sindh basin are given below. bouring the concerned stream. The sudden decrease
observed in the later order streams indicates towards
Shape Index (Si), Form Factor (Ff), and Compact‑ the morphological variation (Mahala, 2020). Stream
ness Coefficient (Cc) Shape index depends on the length shows the sequential stages of stream segment
length and relief of the basin so that the run-off rate development (Castillo et al., 1988) and is a measure
and the sediment yield are influenced by the basin of the hydrological characteristics of the bedrock and
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280 Page 7 of 11 280
the extent of drainage (Rai et al., 2017). The length pattern (Chavare & Shinde, 2013), and its lower
of the stream is indirectly proportional to the stream value indicates a poor drainage network (Thomas
order. It is generally found that the first-order streams et al., 2010). The stream frequency of the Sindh
have more length as compared to higher orders. As basin is 3.60 which may be attributed to the high
the order of stream increases, the length of streams slope and greater rainfall in mountainous regions
decreases; a similar pattern was observed in the Sindh (Bali et al., 2011). Texture ratio is influenced by
basin. The mean stream length (Lsm) values of the a number of factors like rainfall, vegetation den-
watershed varied between 0.56 and 37.13 km. It is sity, type of soil, infiltration capacity, geomorphic
clearly evident that the cumulative stream length is development stage, and relief (Smith, 1950). The
more in first-order streams and gradually decreases texture ratio of 18.28 per km of the Sindh basin
as the stream order increases; a similar trend was reveals that the basin is characterized by very fine
observed in Kanha River Basin, India (Rai et al., texture, high drainage density, and high relief with
2017). The values obtained for stream length ratio steep slopes (Smith, 1950). For a perfectly circu-
of the Sindh basin indicate young to mature stage lar basin, the form factor is about 0.7854. If the
of geomorphic development (Ahmed & Srinivasa, value of the form factor approaches unity, the basin
2015), and the variation in stream length ratio may be is more elongated in shape with a high peak flow
attributed to change in slope and topography (Vittala of shorter duration, whereas a low value of form
et al., 2004) and indicate towards the early stage of factor results in a lower peak flow of longer dura-
geomorphic developmental phase of the basin hav- tion. The values of form factor, rotundity factor,
ing the high potential of recurrent imminent changes and elongation ratio indicate that the Sindh basin is
(Mahala, 2020). Variation in the bifurcation ratio is more elongated in shape with lower peak flow for
affected by the variation in the watershed geometry a longer duration (Chopra et al., 2005; Rymbai &
and lithology. A high bifurcation ratio indicates early Jha, 2012).
peaks in the hydrograph which is related to the flash The estimated run-off of the Sindh basin is 11.31
flooding during storm events, and a low bifurcation (sq.km-cm/sq.km) which indicates the basin area is
ratio indicates delayed peaks in the hydrograph. The categorized by low run-off, which may be due to the
mean bifurcation ratio of 4.1 for the Sindh basin indi- reasonable geological control over the run-off pat-
cates that geology is reasonably homogeneous and tern. The sediment production rate of the basin is
there is strong structural control over the drainage 0.002 (ha-m/100 sq.km/year) which is categorized
development (Kottagoda & Abeysingha, 2017). under the low category (Rymbai & Jha, 2012). The
Drainage density is the measure of the near- high contribution of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the cation
ness of channels within a basin (Horton, 1945). It composition depicts that most of the ion chem-
is a vital indicator of landform elements and offers istry of meltwater draining from Himalayan gla-
an arithmetic assessment of run-off potential- ciers is mainly controlled by carbonate weathering
ity and landscape dissection. If the drainage den- (Singh et al., 2013). The estimated cation (chemical)
sity is more, it indicates that subsurface material weathering rate of the basin is 0.003 (ha-m/sq.km/
has weak and impermeable regions (infiltration is year) which is high as compared to other Himalayan
very low or no infiltration), sparse vegetation, and basins owing to the geology and geomorphology of
mountainous relief, whereas low drainage density the basin. The current SPR and the chemical weath-
indicates permeable material (infiltration is pos- ering rate indicate that there is significant geologi-
sible) having a vegetation cover and low relief. cal control over these parameters. Results obtained
The high drainage density of 2.60 km/sq km in the provide clear evidence of the sensitivity of hydro-
Sindh basin is due to the presence of mountainous sedimentological flows, and cation weathering rate
terrains with sparse vegetation, weak, and imper- was also conditional to the morphometric parameter
meable subsurface material as the additional con- and terrain slope in the catchment. Thus, it is vital
tributing factors (Magesh & Chandrasekhar, 2014; to emphasize on these parameters to evolve suitable
Parveen et al., 2012). Stream frequency is governed institutional apparatus for scientific management,
by rainfall pattern, relief, resistivity, and drainage conservation, and development of land resources in
density of the basin. It is an indicator of drainage the region.
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
280 Page 8 of 11 Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280 Page 9 of 11 280
Geomorphology, 67(1–2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10. Dada, M. A., Ahmad, U. F., Rather, M. A., & Kuchhay, N. A.
1016/j.geomorph.2004.07.010. (2013). Topographic and Geomorphological Mapping
Baba, A. I., Sofi, A. H., Bhat, S. U., & Pandit, A. K. (2011). of River Sindh a Study of Himalayan River of Jammu
Periphytic algae of river Sindh in the Sonamarg area of & Kashmir. International Journal of Remote Sensing &
Kashmir valley. Journal of Phytology, 3(6), 01–12. Geoscience (IJRSG), 2(6), 1–7.
Bali, R., Agarwal, K. K., Ali, S. N., Rastogi, S. K., & Krishna, Dar, R. A., Paul, O., Omar, K., & Romshoo, S. A. (2017).
K. (2011). Drainage morphometry of Himalayan Glacio- Glacial-geomorphic study of the Thaj was glacier valley,
fluvial basin, India: Hydrologic and neotectonic implica- Kashmir Himalayas, India. Quaternary International, 44,
tions. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(4), 1163–1174. 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.05.021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1324-1. Dar, S. A., Bhat, S. U., Aneaus, S., & Rashid, I. (2020a). A
Bastia, F., & Equeenuddin, S. M. (2016). Spatio-temporal vari- geospatial approach for limnological characterization of
ation of water flow and sediment discharge in the Maha- Nigeen Lake, Kashmir Himalaya. Environmental Moni-
nadi River, India. Global and Planetary Change, 144, toring and Assessment, 192(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.
51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.07.004. 1007/s10661-020-8091-y.
Bhat, S. U., Sofi, A. H., Yaseen, T., Pandit, A. K., & Yousuf, A. Dar, S. A., Bhat, S. U., Rashid, I., & Dar, S. A. (2020b). Cur-
R. (2011). Macro invertebrate community from Sonamarg rent status of wetlands in Srinagar City: threats, manage-
streams of Kashmir Himalaya. Pakistan Journal of Bio- ment strategies, and future perspectives. Frontiers in Envi-
logical Sciences, 14(3), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.3923/ ronmental Science, 7, 199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.
pjbs.2011.182.194. 2019.00199.
Bhat, S. U., & Pandit, A. K. (2018). Hydrochemical character- Dar, S. A., Rashid, I., & Bhat, S. U. (2021). Land system trans-
istics of some typical freshwater springs-A case study of formations govern the trophic status of an urban wetland
Kashmir Valley springs. International Journal of Water ecosystem: Perspectives from remote sensing and water
Resources and Arid Environments, 7(1), 90–100. quality analysis. Land Degradation & Development, 1–18.
Bo, L., Qi, H., Wang, W., Zeng, X., & Zhai, J. (2011). Variation https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3924.
of actual evapotranspiration and its impact on regional Hauer C., Leitner P., Unfer G., Pulg U., Habersack H., & Graf
water resources in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze W. (2018) The role of sediment and sediment dynam-
River. Quaternary International, 244(2), 185–193. https:// ics in the aquatic environment. In: Schmutz S., Sendzi-
doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.02.039. mir J. (eds) Riverine Ecosystem Management. Aquatic
Calsamiglia, A., García-Comendador, J., Fortesa, J., López- Ecology Series, vol 8. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/
Tarazón, J. A., Crema, S., Cavalli, M., Calvo-Cases, A., & 978-3-319-73250-3_8.
Estrany, J. (2018). Effects of agricultural drainage systems Higaki, D., Karki, K. K., & Gautam, C. S. (2005). Soil erosion
on sediment connectivity in a small Mediterranean low- control measures on degraded sloping lands: A case study
land catchment. Geomorphology, 318, 162–171. https:// in Midlands of Nepal. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Man-
doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.06.011. agement, 8(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634
Casalí, J., Giménez, R., Díez, J., Álvarez-Mozos, J., Valle, D., 980500208184.
de Lersundi, J., Goñi, M., Campo, M. A., Chahor, Y., Horton, R. E. (1932). Drainage basin characteristics. Transac-
Gastesi, R., & López, J. (2010). Sediment production and tions of the American Geophysical Union, 13, 348–352.
water quality of watersheds with contrasting land use in Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and
Navarre (Spain). Agricultural Water Management, 97, their drainage basins: Hydro-physical approach to quan-
1683–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.05.024. titative morphology. Geological Society of American
Castillo, V., Diazsegovia, A., & Alonso, S. G. (1988). Quan- Bulletin, 56, 275–370. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-
titative study of fluvial landscapes, case study in Madrid, 7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2.
Spain. LandscUrb Plan, 16, 201–217. Jiang, L., Yao, Z., Liu, Z., Wu, S., Wang, R., & Wang, L. (2015).
Chavare, S., & Shinde, S. (2013). Morphometric analysis of Estimation of soil erosion in some sections of Lower Jinsha
Urmodi basin, Maharashtra using geo-spatial techniques. River based on RUSLE. Natural Hazards, 76(3), 1831–
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 1847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1569-6.
4(1), 224–231. Jose, C. S., & Das, D. C. (1982). Geomorphic prediction mod-
Chopra, R., Dhiman, R. D., & Sharma, P. K. (2005). Morpho- els for sediment production rate and inter soil erosion
metric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur District, properties of watersheds in Mayurakshi catchment. Pro-
Punjab using remote sensing and gis techniques. Journal ceedings Inernational Symposium Hydrology, University
of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33, 531–539. Roorkee, 1, 15–33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990738. Keesstra, S. D., van Dam, O., Verstraeten, G., & van Huisst-
Chorley, R. J., Malm, D. E. C., & Pogorzelski, H. A. (1957). A eden, J. (2009). Changing sediment dynamics due to natu-
new standard for measuring drainage basin shape. Ameri- ral reforestation in the Dragonja catchment, SW Slovenia.
can Journal of Science, 255, 138–141. CATENA, 78, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.
Dabral, P., Baithuri, N., & Pandey, A. (2008). Soil erosion 2009.02.021.
assessment in a hilly catchment of North Eastern India Kisi, O., & Shiri, J. (2012). River suspended sediment estimation
using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resources by climatic variables implication: Comparative study among
Management, 22(12), 1783–1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/ soft computing techniques. Computers and Geoscience, 43,
s11269-008-9253-9. 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.007.
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
280 Page 10 of 11 Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280
Kondolf, G. M., Gao, Y., Annandale, G. W., Morris, G. L., Mountain Region, southern Ningxia, China. Frontiers of
Jiang, E., Zhang, J., ... & Yang, C. T. (2014). Sustainable Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 5(4),
sediment management in reservoirs and regulated rivers: 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0348-9.
Experiences from five continents. Earth’s Future, 2(5), Rai, P. K., Mohan, K., Mishra, S., Ahmad, A., & Mishra, V.
256-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000184. N. (2017). A GIS based approach in drainage morpho-
Kottagoda, S. D., & Abeysingha, N. S. (2017). Morphometric metric analysis of Kanhar River Basin, India. Applied
analysis of watersheds in Kelani river basin for soil and Water Science, 7, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/
water conservation. Journal of the National Science Foun- s13201-014-0238-y.
dation of Sri Lanka, 45(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4038/ Rashid, H., & Pandit, A. K. (2008). Ecology of plankton com-
jnsfsr.v45i3.8192. munity of river Sindh in Kashmir Himalaya. Journal of
Magesh, N. S., & Chandrasekhar, N. (2014). GIS model-based Himalayan Ecology and Sustainable Development, 3,
morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani sub basin, 11–22.
Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arabian Jour- Roth, G., La Barbera, P., & Greco, M. (1996). On the descrip-
nal of Geosciences, 7, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/ tion of the basin effective drainage structure. Journal of
s12517-012-0742-z. Hydrology, 187, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-
Mahala, A. (2020). The significance of morphometric analysis 1694(96)03090-9.
to understand the hydrological and morphological charac- Roy, A., & Lamarre, H. (2011). Fluids, flows and fluxes in
teristics in two different morpho-climatic settings. Applied geomorphology. In K. Gregory & A. Goudie (Eds.),
Water Science, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/ The SAGE Handbook of Geomorphology (pp. 310–325).
s13201-019-1118-2. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/97814
Micheletti, N., & Lane, S. N. (2016). Water yield and sediment 46201053.n18.
export in small, partially glaciated Alpine watersheds in Rymbai, P. N., & Jha, L. K. (2012). Estimation of sediment pro-
a warming climate. Water Resources Research, 52(6), duction rate of the Umbaniun Micro-watershed, Megha-
4924–4943. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018774. laya, India. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning,
Milliman, J. D., & Farnsworth, K. L. (2013). River discharge 5(11), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP12.024.
to the coastal ocean: A global synthesis. Cambridge Uni- Schumm, S. A. (1956). Evolution of drainage systems and
versity Press. slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geologi-
Oki, T., & Kanae, S. (2006). Global hydrological cycles and cal Society of America Bulletin, 67, 597–646. https://doi.
world water resources. Science, 313(5790), 1068–1072. org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128845. Singh, V. B., Ramanathan, A. L., Sharma, P., & Pottakkal, J. G.
Pan, C., Ma, L., Shangguan, Z., & Ding, A. (2011). Determin- (2013). Dissolved ion chemistry and suspended sediment
ing the sediment trapping capacity of grass filter strips. characteristics of meltwater draining from Chhota Shi-
Journal of Hydrology, 405, 209–216. https://doi.org/10. gri Glacier, western Himalaya, India. Arabian Journal of
1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.027. Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1176-y.
Pandit, M. K. (2013). The Himalayas must be protected. Singh, A. K., & Hasnain, S. I. (1998). Major ion chemistry and
Nature, 501(7467), 283–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/ weathering control in a high altitude basin: Alaknanda
501283a. river, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Hydrological Sciences
Parveen, R., Kumar, U., & Singh, V. K. (2012). Geomor- Journal, 43(6), 825–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626
phometric characterization of Upper South Koel Basin, 669809492181.
Jharkhand: A remote sensing & GIS approach. Journal of Singh, V. B., Ramanathan, A. L., & Sharma, P. (2015). Major
Water Resource and Protection (JWARP), 4, 1042–1050. ion chemistry and assessment of weathering processes of
https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2012.412120. the Patsio glacier meltwater, Western Himalaya, India.
Persichillo, M. G., Bordoni, M., Meisina, C., Bartelletti, C., Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 387–397. https://doi.
Barsanti, M., Giannecchini, R., D’Amato Avanzi, G., Gal- org/10.1007/s12665-014-3432-1.
anti, Y., Cevasco, A., Brandolini, P., & Galve, J. P. (2017). Smith, K. G. (1950). Standards for grading texture of erosional
Shallow landslides susceptibility assessment in different topography. American Journal of Science, 248(655), 668.
environments. Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk, 8, https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.248.9.655.
748–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.126501. Sofi, M. S., Bhat, S. U., Rashid, I., & Kuniyal, J. C. (2020).
Piao, S., Ciais, P., Huang, Y., Shen, Z., Peng, S., Li, J., et al. The natural flow regime: A master variable for maintain-
(2010). The impacts of climate change on water resources ing river ecosystem health. Ecohydrology, 13(8), e2247.
and agriculture in China. Nature, 467(7311), 43. https:// https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2247.
doi.org/10.1038/nature09364. Soni, S. (2017). Assessment of morphometric characteristics
Piao, S., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., of Chakrar watershed in Madhya Pradesh India using
Labat, D., & Zaehle, S. (2007). Changes in climate and geospatial technique. Applied Water Science, 7(5), 2089–
land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO2 on 2102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0395-2.
global river runoff trends. Proceedings of the National Strahler, A. N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geo-
Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15242–15247. https://doi. morphology. Transactions American Geophysical Union,
org/10.1073/pnas.0707213104. 38, 913–920. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913.
Quan, B., Römkens, M. J. M., Li, R., Wang, F., & Chen, J. Strahler, A. N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage
(2011). Effect of land use and land cover change on soil basins and channel networks. In V. T. Chow (Ed.), Hand-
erosion and the spatio-temporal variation in Liupan book of applied hydrology (pp. 439–476). McGraw-Hill.
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Water Air Soil Pollut (2021) 232: 280 Page 11 of 11 280
Thomas, J., Joseph, S., & Thrivikramaji, K. P. (2010). Morpho- 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.07.
metric aspects of a small tropical mountain river system, 006.
the southern Western Ghats, India. International Journal Youssef, A., Pradhan, B., & Hassan, A. (2011). Flash flood
of Digital Earth, 3(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/ risk estimation along the St. Katherine Road, Southern
17538940903464370. Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite
Turner, B. L., Clark, W. C., Kates, R. W., Richards, J. F., Mat- imagery. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62, 611–623.
thews, J. T., & Meyer, W. B. (1990). The earth as trans- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0551-1.
formed by human action. Cambridge University Press. Yu, X., Xie, X., & Meng, S. (2017). Modeling the responses
Vittala, S. S., Govindaiah, S., & Gowda, H. H. (2004). Mor- of water and sediment discharge to climate change in the
phometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pavagada area upper Yellow River Basin. China. Journal of Hydrologic
of Tumkur District, South India using remote sensing and Engineering, 22(12), 05017026. https://doi.org/10.1061/
GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote (ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001590.
Sensing, 32(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF030 Zhang, Q., Xu, C., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Liu, C., & Lin, H.
30860. (2008). Spatial and temporal variability of precipitation
Walling, D. E. (2009). The impact of global change on ero- maxima during 1960–2005 in the Yangtze River basin and
sion and sediment transport by rivers. The United Nations possible association with large-scale circulation. Jour-
World Water Assessment Programme: Side Publications nal of Hydrology, 353(3–4), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.
Series. From https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf000 1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.023.
0185078. Accessed 12 Jan 2020. Zhang, X. F., Yan, H. C., Yue, Y., & Xu, Q. X. (2019). Quan-
Wang, G., Zhang, J., Pagano, T., Lin, J., & Liu, C. (2013). tifying natural and anthropogenic impacts on runoff and
Identifying contributions of climate change and human sediment load: An investigation on the middle and lower
activity to changes in runoff using epoch detection and reaches of the Jinsha River Basin. Journal of Hydrology:
hydrologic simulation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineer- Regional Studies, 25, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ing, 18(11), 1385–1392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) ejrh.2019.100617.
HE.1943-5584.0000559.
Ward, P. J., van Balen, R. T., Verstraeten, G., Renssen, H., & Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard
Vandenberghe, J. (2009). The impact of land use and cli- to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
mate change on late Holocene and future suspended sedi- affiliations.
ment yield of the Meuse catchment. Geomorphology, 103,
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”),
for small-scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are
maintained. By accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use
(“Terms”). For these purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or
a personal subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or
a personal subscription (to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the
Creative Commons license used will apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data
internally within ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking,
analysis and reporting. We will not otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of
companies unless we have your permission as detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that
Users may not:
1. use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to
circumvent access control;
2. use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil
liability, or is otherwise unlawful;
3. falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by
Springer Nature in writing;
4. use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
5. override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
6. share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer
Nature journal content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates
revenue, royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain.
Springer Nature journal content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal
content on a large scale into their, or any other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any
information or content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or
without notice. Springer Nature may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature
journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express
or implied with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or
warranties imposed by law, including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be
licensed from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other
manner not expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at
onlineservice@springernature.com