A Postcapitalist Politics 1st Edition J. K. Gibson-Graham 2025 Full Version
A Postcapitalist Politics 1st Edition J. K. Gibson-Graham 2025 Full Version
Gibson-
Graham 2025 full version
https://ebookfinal.com/download/a-postcapitalist-politics-1st-
edition-j-k-gibson-graham/
★★★★★
4.7 out of 5.0 (76 reviews )
ebookfinal.com
A Postcapitalist Politics 1st Edition J. K. Gibson-Graham
Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebookfinal.com/download/cyberpunk-and-visual-culture-1st-
edition-graham-j-murphy/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/an-ecological-approach-to-perceptual-
learning-and-development-1st-edition-eleanor-j-gibson/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/clinical-tests-of-respiratory-
function-hodder-arnold-publication-3rd-edition-g-j-gibson/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/joan-robinson-s-economics-a-
centennial-celebration-bill-gibson/
Pattern Recognition 1st Edition William Gibson
https://ebookfinal.com/download/pattern-recognition-1st-edition-
william-gibson/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/leopard-watch-1st-edition-j-k-
bannavti/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/a-gathering-of-promises-1st-edition-
ben-graham/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/marketing-strategy-and-competitive-
positioning-4th-edition-edition-graham-j-hooley/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-philosophy-of-poetry-1st-edition-
gibson/
A Postcapitalist Politics 1st Edition J. K. Gibson-Graham
Digital Instant Download
Author(s): J. K. Gibson-Graham
ISBN(s): 9780816648047, 0816648042
Edition: 1
File Details: PDF, 3.75 MB
Year: 2006
Language: english
A Postcapitalist Politics
This page intentionally left blank
A Postcapitalist Politics
J. K. Gibson-Graham
Minneapolis • London
See pages 263–64 for copyright information on previously published material in this book.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording,
or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
12 11 10 09 08 07 06 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
For Bernice, Don, Elspeth, Eve, Helen, Jack, K, Megan, and Ramonda
This page intentionally left blank
Contents
Notes 197
Bibliography 241
Index 265
This page intentionally left blank
Preface and
Acknowledgments
—Isabelle Stengers,
“A ‘Cosmo-Politics’—Risk, Hope, Change”
This is a hopeful book written at a time when hope is finally getting a hearing
but also a battering. Between the completion of the manuscript and the writ-
ing of this preface, the seemingly intractable nature of the world’s problems has
impressed itself on us quite powerfully. A recently aired BBC documentary on
“global dimming” showed how airborne industrial pollutants are blocking sun-
light from reaching the earth; as these pollutants are reduced, global warming
will presumably proceed at a much faster rate than is currently projected. Ac-
cording to the documentary, the Ethiopian famine that killed ten million people
in the early 1980s was due to the failure over more than a decade of the year-
ly monsoon, as the water-laden tropical air mass was prevented from moving
northward by the northern hemisphere’s pollution haze—a shocking wake-up
call about global responsibility. On top of all the environmental news, one of us
has just discovered that she is not exempt from what feels like a breast cancer
epidemic in women of the “developed” world. From the global scale to the place
closest in, we have been presented with the enormity of “what pushes back at us”
(to use the words of our inspirational activist friend Ethan Miller) when we at-
tempt to imagine and inhabit a world of economic possibility.
Both of these “events” highlight in different ways the ethical imperatives and
challenges of the interdependence that this book attempts to bring into focus.
All too clearly we are being presented with the unintended effects of “develop-
ment.” All too starkly we can see that increased consumption, with its promise of
heightened well-being, is bought at the expense of the destruction of the global
ix
x . . . Preface and Acknowledgments
atmospheric commons we have taken for granted over the past two centuries. It
is not only African families who have borne the brunt of “our” development, but
perhaps also women in wealthy countries and cancer sufferers in general, whose
bodies are registering something counterintuitive—the downside of a “good
life.” We can only feel awed by and grateful for the complexes of committed and
competent surgeons, oncologists, radiographers, and their instruments and
institutions that interact with a state and privately supported knowledge com-
mons to address breast cancer (something the feminist movement has made a
priority). We can only feel ashamed that our respective nations (Australia and
the United States) are the two industrialized countries that have refused to sign
the Kyoto Protocol to limit greenhouse gas emissions and begin to arrest global
warming. How is it that the wealth of nations readily flows into tackling one
piece of this interdependent picture and is vigilantly restricted from addressing
the other? In our bitter moments we are tempted to relate this asymmetry to
the perceived workings of the economic growth machine in which low-cost coal
and oil burning are seen to be central and women’s post–childbearing bodies are
basically irrelevant. Our respective governments are prepared to direct resources
into breast cancer research and treatment, and will even foot the bill for much of
the scientific research that has identified the interactions of global dimming and
global warming, but agreeing to put in place the already existing technology and
regulations that could halt destruction of our environmental commons is at pres-
ent beyond them. For us, this is a matter for urgent discussion and a case where
rethinking what constitutes an “economy”—if we are willing to countenance the
continued existence of such a domain—may actually be crucial.
In this book, we broach global and local interdependence around eco-
nomic issues of necessity, surplus, consumption, and commons. We bring these
issues out of the realm of abstract theorizing and into everyday practices of liv-
ing together and building alternative futures. Our own interdependence as the
collective author J. K. Gibson-Graham gives us the fortitude (foolhardiness?) to
address such monumental issues and the embodied insights into processes of
self-cultivation that might equip us to become ethical subjects of a postcapitalist
order. Emerging from the mutuality of our relationship and especially our inter-
dependence with others, the book is the neatly bound tip of a ramshackle iceberg.
We recognize that publishing and affixing our name to this volume consigns its
contributing factors to subaqueous obscurity. “Authored, authorized, and au-
thoritative,” as Sadie Plant cautions, “a piece of writing is its own mainstream”
(1997, 9). What is wondrous to contemplate is its emergence at the confluence of
events, people, relationships, and things, and to watch it flow toward the pooling
oceans of anonymity, to be dispersed and taken up once again in the hydrological
cycle of de- and retextualization, and eventually transmuted into other streams
and icebergs.
In less watery but no less embracing terms, we might simply acknowl-
edge our understanding that “all and everything is naturally related and inter-
Preface and Acknowledgments . . . xi
connected” (Plant 1997, 11; quoting Ada Lovelace) and leave it at that. But we will
not get away so easily. Gratitude is not entailed in a moment of metatheoretical
recognition; it is an orientation toward the world, indistinguishable from its em-
bodiment in everyday practices. Here we wish to indulge in a practical exercise of
gratitude by tracing a few of the interdependencies that made this book.
We’ll start with the interdependence between A Postcapitalist Politics and
its predecessor, The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of
Political Economy, published in 1996. We are immensely appreciative of the
offer of the University of Minnesota Press to reprint that book along with A
Postcapitalist Politics, and we especially value Carrie Mullen’s bracing enthusi-
asm for both projects. Separated by a decade of thinking, researching, and liv-
ing, these two volumes are intricately interconnected and yet very different. In
The End of Capitalism, J. K. Gibson-Graham was the quintessential “theory slut,”
happily and carelessly thinking around, playing with “serious” and consequen-
tial subjects like political economy, loving the theory she was with, offering ebul-
lient arguments and heady claims about representations of capitalism and their
politically constraining performativity. We spoke to our readers as somewhat
wayward feminists who seemed to relish their positioning as mildly outrageous,
quirkily funny, and ambiguously gendered. It might come as a shock, then, that
A Postcapitalist Politics has a completely different feel; it reads like a wholesome,
even earnest, treatise on how to do economy differently. The authorial stance is
open, exposed, even vulnerable, entirely different from the shimmering armor
of the earlier book (and much less fun, we fear). In writing that book we felt a
perhaps unwarranted confidence, conferred by our lengthy training in political
economy, that no one could say things about capitalism that we hadn’t heard be-
fore and didn’t have a response to. This book offers us no such safe havens.
What, apart from menopause and inevitable aging, has contributed to this
shift in stance and affect? Perhaps it has been our awakening to the different kinds
of politics that are possible, along with an enhanced ability to hear as well as
speak. In our own relationship, which has spanned almost three decades as well
as the Pacific Ocean, time differences of fourteen to sixteen hours (depending
on daylight savings), and countless other spatiotemporal dis- and con-junctures,
an opening up to listening to each other has had transformative micropolitical
effects. As with the projects we review in this book, we have been confronted by
the challenges of collaboration—the comforts and discomforts of collectivism,
the bounds and liberties of (joint) identity, the struggle to make collaboration
work not just for itself but for its participants. Our relationship has become a
space for the exploration of techniques of self-cultivation that help us to observe
ourselves more closely, listen to each other more openly, and constitute ourselves
more proactively. From the theory sluts of 1996 to the self-help junkies of 2006,
we have navigated a personal path that ever enriches as new challenges of relating
and thinking/writing together arise.
This never-ending process of becoming has developed and extended our
xii . . . Preface and Acknowledgments
understanding of politics. It has affirmed the importance of the politics of the per-
sonal and the spaces closest in—the self-narratives that can plague and restrict or
release and enable our experiments, the material and psychic interdependencies
that we can celebrate and amplify or exploit and deplete. Both of us have been
blessed with the gift of domestic communities that sustain and contribute to our
collaboration. In the United States, the twelve or so members of the Cooleyville
community have shared weekly Monday night dinners and interpersonal support
with us for three decades, constituting a home and non-kin-based family that is
a community economy. In Australia the small clan of David, Daniel, and Lillian
Tait has provided a loving practice space for the best and worst performances of
self and ethical decision-making by the mother of us, and a welcoming site for
the enactment of our unusual (at least to suburban Canberra) collaboration.
Space and place have been crucial ingredients in our collaboration. In a
relationship that spans the globe, neither can ever be taken for granted. Indeed,
the materiality of distance has been an ever-present factor, and this is perhaps
why we feel the need to acknowledge the places where we have met to work, for
each has contributed its special quality to our thinking and feeling in this book:
the large welcoming house on Town Farm Road in Shutesbury, Massachusetts;
the end-of-the-road caravan at Merry Beach, New South Wales; Ann’s Stepping
Stones B & B in New Hampshire, with its astonishing two acres of flowers and
shrubs; the family-sized swap house on College Hill in Eugene, Oregon; the
little house graciously added on to 307 Antill Street in Canberra; tiny Tiri Crest
on Waiheke Island and the comfortable big house in Moeraki, two New Zealand
places with inspiring ocean views; the lovely garden cottage on Phillip Island,
Victoria; the elegant sufficiency of the Maranese in Bellagio, Italy; and the
Plymouth Harbor retirement community with its waterbirds and poetry read-
ings in Sarasota, Florida.
In the attempt to enact a postcapitalist politics, the environment of academia
has been a powerful and permissive factor in creating the world of possibility that
enables “other worlds” to actually arise. Despite the encroaching commercializa-
tion, casualization, and rationalization of our institutions, academia in general
and geography in particular have offered us a nurturing communal backwater
in which to float our half-baked ideas and hare-brained projects. In our own and
other departments and disciplines, we and our colleagues are free to attend each
other’s talks, offer and receive comments on each other’s papers, teach and learn
from each other’s students, visit and speak in each other’s lecture series, and draw
on an intellectual commons that benefits from what Harvie calls “convivial com-
petition” (2004, 4). None of these activities is free of dysfunction and some may
be prone to it, but they nevertheless constitute a platform for “commons-based
peer production” that values collaborative engagement, and respects and requires
the sharing/gifting of output.
That the academic commons is hard won and not to be taken for granted is
brought home to us daily by the evidence of what currently threatens it. Today,
Preface and Acknowledgments . . . xiii
for example, we discovered that a colleague in political science has patented his
solution to a game theory problem. The gift economy of academia (Harvie 2004)
is neither a pleasant nor a productive place to be without an open affective dispo-
sition and a desire to relate to, rather than dismiss or colonize, the work and spe-
cializations of others. As an environment for creativity, the commons does not
maintain itself, but requires a continual investment of effort and particular tech-
nologies to shape and replenish it. In the innovative philosophical workshops
at Isabelle Stengers’s institution, for example, the convenors promote a practice
of slowing down, to allow for “people not just to express what they were think-
ing anyway but to feel their thought becoming part of the collective adventure”
(2003, 252). By creating rules to preclude people “knowing what they think,” the
stewards of this environment allow for events in thought and feeling to emerge
out of a “kind of collective stammering” (252).
Both at home and away we have been privileged to be in many such envi-
ronments. One current instance is the seminar “The Rule of Markets” at New
York University, chaired by Timothy Mitchell. Tim shares with us an interest in
denaturalizing the “economy,” pushes us to acknowledge the recent materializa-
tion of such an entity via the operation of a complex set of technologies and prac-
tices, and encourages us (as does Michel Callon, another participant) to pursue
and develop our economic experiments. Another is the ongoing multiyear gradu-
ate seminar at the University of Massachusetts, including Ken Byrne, Kenan
Erçel, Stephen Healy, Yahya Madra, Ceren Özselçuk, Joe Rebello, Maliha Safri,
Chizu Sato, and Peter Tamas, in which the collective stammering occurs mainly
at the intersection of psychoanalysis, poststructuralist Marxism, and the theory
and practice of community economies. The Department of Human Geography
in the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies at the Australian National
University provides yet another such environment, in which ongoing field and
dissertation research and seminars produce events in thought that nourish, jolt,
and transform the projects we are engaged in.
From friends and colleagues we have received what is necessary to our
survival: new and old ideas, reactions, suggestions, criticisms, references, inclu-
sion in other projects, intellectual support of all kinds, and the warmth and gen-
erosity of appreciation. So lavish have Jack Amariglio and George DeMartino
been with their appreciation that our joint sense of possibility will never be the
same. A central ingredient of our economic theorizing is the Marxian theory of
class developed by our friends, colleagues, and coeditors Steve Resnick and Rick
Wolff. Their anti-essentialist class language allowed us in The End of Capitalism to
denaturalize capitalist dominance, opening the way to queering economic space
and producing a language of economic diversity. In this book we foreground the
class language more prominently in an alternative (counterhegemonic) discourse
of economic difference and activate its core concern for an economics of surplus
as a focus for the ethical dynamics of a community economy.
An economics of surplus is one of the major theoretical contributions of
xiv . . . Preface and Acknowledgments
members of the Association for Economic and Social Analysis (AESA), an orga-
nization of economists and others that produces the journal Rethinking Marxism
and has provided us with a great store of friendship and fun not usually associ-
ated with the dismal science. We would be unable to think and write as we do
were it not for the insights of Jack Amariglio and Antonio Callari on (economic)
subjectivity, among many other topics; Steve Cullenberg on diverse economies
and class processes; George DeMartino and David Ruccio on imperialism, glo-
balization, ethics, and politics; Kevin St. Martin on class and community; Yahya
Madra on rethinking communism; Ceren Özselçuk on mourning and class poli-
tics; and many other AESA members whose work has added to and enriched the
ideas presented in this book.
Arturo Escobar’s ability to know what we are arguing before we do has
had countless benefits for our work, for which we are truly grateful. One of the
many catalysts for this book was the invitation to participate in the Women and
the Politics of Place project, led by Arturo and Wendy Harcourt (editor of the
journal Development) and involving more than twenty feminist activists and
academics around the world. In the face of our reluctance to become involved in
yet another project, Arturo twisted our arms ever so compassionately, bringing
us into a conversation that eventually helped us to crystallize the feminist politi-
cal imaginary we articulate in A Postcapitalist Politics.
In our perennial search for more freeing and complex understandings of
affect, we revisited a familiar location, the writings of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick,
ever our muse. Her thoughts on queer theory guided us in The End of Capitalism,
and her wonderful exploration of reparative and paranoid thinking in the book
Touching Feeling enabled us to process the reception of our work in positive
ways. That book draws to some extent on her earlier coauthored work on Silvan
Tomkins, a psychologist who productively fails to distinguish the theory-affect
interactions generated by individuals processing their own experiences from the
interplay of intellect and emotions in what usually passes for “theory.”
William Connolly and Jane Bennett have been inadvertent collaborators
with us in writing A Postcapitalist Politics, their work having provided both
philosophical and practical encouragement to take heed of micropolitical shifts
in affect and to chart a politics of possibility in the face of incredulity and some-
times disdain.
Our long-standing project of rethinking economy has gained force, clarity,
and insight from the work of many others who are similarly engaged. Economic
anthropologist Stephen Gudeman’s important book The Anthropology of Economy
and his earlier writings with Alberto Rivera have influenced our thinking in pro-
found ways, encouraging us to conceptualize a community in terms of its com-
mons and stimulating us to pursue action research as a conversation with both
the voices in the air and those on the ground. Steve Gudeman, Tim Mitchell, and
J. K. Gibson-Graham have been drawn into a loose affiliation of academics and
Preface and Acknowledgments . . . xv
Catharina Williams, have provided scholarly input into the clarification and ap-
plication of ideas around the community economy.
A number of social researchers have helped us to understand and practice
action research as a collaborative endeavor. We learned from Steve Gudeman to
experience social research as a form of conversational interaction; from Ceren
Özselçuk to steer a path between pressing one’s own agenda and refusing out
of fear or guilt to intervene in a community; from Michel Callon to think about
practicing research alongside rather than on a group or organization, collabo-
rating with what he calls “researchers in the wild,” not by becoming an activist,
but by maintaining the specificity of one’s activities as a social scientist and mak-
ing connections with other knowledge producers.
In all of our action research projects we encountered the wonderful gener-
osity and interest of local residents who participated in the processes we initiated.
For this input we are immensely grateful. Our experience of research as a series
of orchestrated conversations in localities/sectors confirms our intuition that the
power dynamics often represented as contaminating the academic/nonacademic
relation are neither as simple to understand, nor as difficult to negotiate ethically,
as some might think.
Our work on diverse economies has been extended and developed by par-
ticipants in the “diverse economies conversation” within English-speaking geog-
raphy, a loose association formed after a series of sessions organized with Andrew
Leyshon at the annual meetings of the Association of American Geographers in
2003. This growing network of geographers includes old and new colleagues who
are excited by the prospect of researching and performing diverse political and
economic geographies. Recent conferences and conference sessions co-organized
by Andrew Jonas, Roger Lee, and Colin Williams have stimulated the activities
and interactions of this emerging research community.
Over the period of gestation of this book we have been generously sup-
ported by many institutions and their support staffs. Most consistently our homes
in the Department of Human Geography in the Research School of Pacific and
Asian Studies at the Australian National University and the Department of
Geosciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst have hosted our writing
retreats, supported our research leaves and fieldwork visits, and offered congenial
environments for our joint work. Sandra Davenport from the Australian National
University has contributed her excellent copyediting, bibliographic, and index-
ing skills to our book and for this, as well as for her ever cheerful and encouraging
aura, we are deeply grateful. With little more than strong European chocolate as
an incentive, Peter Tamas of UMass spent hours clipping and tailoring the film
stills for chapter 1 to our demanding specifications. Cartographer Kay Dancey
from the Australian National University contributed her design expertise with
enthusiasm and grace to the figures and maps that illustrate the book.
A collaborative writing residency at the Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio
Study and Conference Centre in 2005 provided a once-in-a-lifetime experience
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
History - Quick Reference
Winter 2023 - Laboratory
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookfinal.com