Agnel (071
Agnel (071
Prepared by :
Dr G Srinivasan
Professor , Department of Chemical Engineering
PUDUCHERRY TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
STEADY STATE HEAT CONDUCTION
Course Contents
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Thermal resistance
2.3 Thermal conductivity of
material
2.4 General heat conduction
equation
2.5 Measurement of thermal
conductivity (Guarded hot
plate method)
2.6 Conduction through a plane
wall
2.7 Conduction through a
composite wall
2.8 Heat flow between surface and
surroundings: cooling and
heating of fluids
2.9 Conduction through a
cylindrical wall
2.10 Conduction through a
multilayer cylindrical wall
2.11 Conduction through a sphere
2.12 Critical thickness of insulation
2.13 Solved Numerical
2.14 References
2.1 Introduction
The rate of heat conduction in a specified direction is proportional to the
temperature gradient, which is the rate of change in temperature with distance in
that direction. One dimensional steady state heat conduction through homogenous
𝑑𝑡
material is given by Fourier Law of heat conduction:
𝑄 = −𝑘𝐴
𝑑𝑥
𝑄 𝑑𝑡
𝑞 = = − − − − − − − (2.1)
�−𝑘 𝑑
𝑥
Where, �
𝑞 = heat flux, heat conducted per unit time per unit area, 𝑊⁄𝑚2
The ratio 𝑑𝑡⁄𝑑𝑥 represents the change in temperature per unit thickness, i.e.
dx = thickness of material along the path of heat flow, m
the temperature gradient.
The negative sign indicates that the heat flow is in the direction of negative
temperature gradient, so heat transfer becomes positive.
The proportionality factor k is called the heat conductivity or thermal conductivity of
material through which heat is transfer.
The Fourier law is essentially based on the following assumptions:
1. Steady state heat conduction, i.e. temperature at fixed point does not change
with respect to time.
2. One dimensional heat flow.
3. Material is homogenous and isotropic, i.e. thermal conductivity has a constant
value in all the directions.
4. Constant temperature gradient and a linear temperature profile.
5. No internal heat generation.
𝑑𝑡
The Fourier law helps to define thermal conductivity of the material.
𝑄 = −𝑘𝐴
𝑑𝑥
Assuming 𝑑𝑥 = 1𝑚; 𝐴 = 𝑚 and 𝑑𝑡 = 1℃, we obtain
2
𝑄=𝑘
Hence thermal conductivity may be defined as the amount of heat conducted per
unit time across unit area and through unit thickness, when a temperature
difference of unit degree is maintained across the bounding surface.
Unit of thermal conductivity is given by:
𝑘 = − 𝑄 𝑑𝑥
𝐴 𝑑𝑡
𝑊 𝑚 𝑊
∴ [𝑘] = 2 =
𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑔 𝑚 − 𝑑𝑒𝑔
2.2 Thermal Resistance
In systems, which involve flow of fluid, heat and electricity, the flow quantity is
directly proportional to the driving force and inversely proportional to the flow
resistance.
In a hydraulic system, the pressure along the path is the driving potential and
roughness of the pipe is the flow resistance.
The current flow in a conductor is governed by the voltage potential and electrical
resistance of the material.
Likewise, temperature difference constitutes the driving force for heat conduction
through a medium.
Mechanical forming (i.e. forging, drawing and bending) or heat treatment of metal
cause considerable variation in thermal conductivity. Conductivity of hardened steel
is lower than that of annealed steel.
At elevated temperatures, thermal vibration of the lattice becomes higher and that
retards the motion of free electrons. So, thermal conductivity of metal decreases
with increases of temperature except the aluminium and uranium.
For uranium, heat conduction depends mainly upon the vibrational movement of
atoms. With increase of temperature vibrational movement increase so, conductivity
also increase.
According to kinetic theory of, conductivity of gases is directly proportional to the
density of the gas, mean molecular speed and mean free path. With increase of
temperature molecular speed increases, so conductivity of gas increases.
Conductivity of gas is independent of pressure except in extreme cases as, for
example, when conditions approach that of a perfect vacuum.
Molecular conditions associated with the liquid state are more difficult to describe,
and physical mechanisms for explaining the thermal conductivity are not well
understood. The thermal conductivity of nonmetallic liquids generally decreases with
increasing temperature. The water, glycerine and engine oil are notable exceptions.
The thermal conductivity of liquids is usually insensitive to pressure except near the
critical point.
Thermal conductivity is only very weakly dependent on pressure for solids and for
liquids a well, and essentially dependent of pressure for gases at pressure near
standard atmospheric.
Non-metallic solids do not conduct heat as efficiently as metals.
The ratio of the thermal and electrical conductivities is same for all metals at the
same temperature; and that the ratio is directly proportional to the absolute
temperature of the metal.
Guarded heater 𝐻g which surrounds the main heater on its ends. The guarded
temperature by electrical energy which can be metered.
heater is supplied electrical energy enough to keep its temperature same as that of
main heater.
Function of the guarded heater is to ensure unidirectional heat flow and eliminates
Test specimens 𝑆1 and 𝑆2 which are placed on both sides of the heater.
the distortion caused by edge losses.
Cooling unit plates 𝐶1 and 𝐶2 are provided for circulation of cooling medium. Flow
of cooling medium is maintained to keep the constant surface temperature of
specimen.
Thermocouples attached to the specimens at the hot and cold faces.
Desired measurement
𝑑𝑡 𝑘𝐴
From the Fourier’s law of heat conduction
𝑄 = −𝑘𝐴
(𝑡ℎ − 𝑡𝑐)
= 𝑋
𝑑𝑥
𝑄 𝑋
∴𝑘 = − − − − − − − (2.46)
𝐴 (𝑡ℎ − 𝑡� �
)
So to measure thermal conductivity k following measurements are required
Heat flow Q from the main heart through a test specimen; it will be half of the total
electrical input to the main heater
Temperature drop across the specimen (𝑡ℎ − 𝑡𝑐); subscripts h and c refer to the hot
Thickness of the specimen X
and cold faces respectively
Area A of heat flow; the area for heat flow is taken to be the area of main heater
plus the area of one-half of air gap between it and the guarded heater
For the specimen of different thickness, the respective temperature at the hot and
cold faces would be different and then the thermal conductivity is worked out from
𝑄 𝑋 𝑋
the following relation:
𝑘= ) − − − − − − − (2.47)
( 1 +
2
Alternatively, The Fourier rate equation may be used directly to determine the heat
reference plane. Temperature difference across the strip is dt, and temperature
gradient is dt⁄dx.
Heat transfer through the strip is given by
𝑄 = −𝑘 𝐴 𝑑𝑡
𝑑𝑥
Fig. 2.6 Heat conduction through plane wall
transfer through the wall. So integrate the equation between the limits, t = t1
For steady state condition, heat transfer through the strip is equal to the heat
at x = 0 and t = t2 at x = δ, thus
𝑡2
𝑄 ∫ 𝑑𝑥 = −𝑘 𝐴 ∫ 𝑑𝑡
ẟ
0 𝑡1
𝑄𝛿 =𝑘 𝑘 𝐴 (𝑡1 − 𝑡2)
𝐴( 𝑡1 − ); 𝑄 = − − − − − − − (2.53)
𝛿
𝑡2
To determine the temperature at any distance x from the wall surface, the Fourier
𝑄 ∫ 𝑑𝑥 = −𝑘 𝐴 ∫ 𝑑𝑡
0
𝑡1
𝑄 𝑥 = 𝑘 𝐴( 𝑡1 𝑘 𝐴 ( 𝑡1
− 𝑡); 𝑄−=𝑡)
𝑥
Substituting the value of Q in above equation
𝑘 𝐴 ( 𝑡1 − 𝑡2 𝑘 𝐴 ( 𝑡1 − 𝑡)
=
𝑡2 − 𝑡1
∴ 𝑡 = 𝑡1 + ( ) 𝑥 − − − − − − − (2.54)
𝛿
The expression for the heat flow rate can be written as
𝑡1 − 𝑡2 𝑡1 −
𝑄 =
𝛿⁄𝑘 𝐴 𝑡2 − − − − − − − (2.55)
=
𝑅𝑡
Where Rt = δ⁄k A is the thermal resistance to heat flow. Equivalent thermal circuit
for flow through a plane wall has been included in figure 2.6.
Let us develop the condition when weight, not space, required for insulation of a
plane wall is the significant criterion.
For one dimensional steady state heat condition
𝑘 𝐴 (𝑡1 − 𝑡2) 𝑡1 − 𝑡2
𝑄= =
𝛿 𝛿⁄𝑘 𝐴
𝑊
𝑅𝑡 =
𝜌𝑘𝐴2
𝑊 = (𝜌𝑘)𝑅𝑡𝐴2 − − − − − − − (2.56)
From the equation when the product (ρk) for a given resistance is smallest, the
weight of the wall would also be so. It means for the lightest insulation for a
specified thermal resistance, product of density times thermal conductivity should
be smallest.
The layers have thickness δ1, δ2, δ3 and their thermal conductivities correspond to
tightly fitted to one another.
The surface temperatures of the wall are t1 and t4 and the temperatures at the
the average temperature conditions.
𝑄 𝛿1 𝑄 𝛿2 𝑄 𝛿3
Rewriting the above expression in terms of temperature drop across each layer,
𝑡1 − 𝑡2 = 1 ; 𝑡2 − 𝑡3 2 ; 𝑡3 − 𝑡4 =
𝑘 =
𝐴 𝐴 𝑘 𝐴
𝑘 3
Summation gives the overall temperature difference across the wall
𝑡1 − 𝑡4 = 𝑄 ( 𝛿1 𝛿3
+ 𝛿 + )
𝑘1𝐴 𝑘2 𝑘3𝐴
2
𝐴
(𝑡1 − 𝑡4)
Then
𝑄=
+ 𝑘2 + 𝑘3 𝐴
ẟ1 ẟ2 ẟ3
𝑘1 𝐴
𝐴
𝑄= (𝑡1 − 𝑡4) ( 𝑡1 −
𝑡4) − − − − − − − (2.58)
𝑅𝑡1 + 𝑅𝑡2 + =
𝑅𝑡
𝑅𝑡3
Where Rt = Rt1 + Rt2 + Rt3, is the total resistance.
Analysis of the composite wall assumes that there is a perfect contact between
layers and no temperature drop occurs across the interface between materials.
𝑄 = 𝑡𝑠 − 𝑡𝑠 −
𝑡𝑓 = 𝑡𝑓 − − − − − − − (2.60)
1 𝑅𝑡
ℎ𝐴
Where Rt = 1⁄h A is the convection resistance.
The heat transfer through a wall separating two moving fluids involves: (i) flow of
heat from the fluid of high temperature to the wall, (ii) heat conduction through the
wall and (iii) transport of heat from the wall to the cold fluid.
𝑘𝐴
Under steady state conditions, the heat flow can be expressed by the equations:
1 𝛿 1
Summation of these gives
𝑡𝑎 − 𝑡𝑏 = 𝑄 ( + + )
ℎ𝑎 𝑘 ℎ𝑏 𝐴
𝐴 𝐴
∴𝑄 = (𝑡𝑎 − 𝑡𝑏)
1 1 − − − − − − − (2.61)
+ +
ẟ
ℎ𝑎𝐴
𝑘 ℎ𝘣𝐴
𝐴
Let thickness of this elementary ring be dr and the change of temperature across it
be dt.
𝑄 = −𝑘𝐴 𝑑 𝑑𝑟
𝑡 = −𝑘(2𝜋𝑟𝑙)
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑟
𝑑𝑟
𝑄 = 𝑑𝑡
𝑘(2𝜋𝑟𝑙)
Integrate the equation within the boundary condition
𝑄 𝑟 𝑡2
2 𝑑
2𝜋 = ∫ 𝑑𝑡
∫𝑟
𝑘𝑙
𝑟1 𝑟
𝑡1
𝑄 𝑟
𝑙𝑜𝑔 2 = − 𝑡 )
(𝑡
2𝜋𝑘𝑙 𝑒
𝑟1 1 2
𝑟
For conduction in hollow cylinder, the thermal resistance is given by:
𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑒 21⁄𝑟
𝑅𝑡 = − − − − − − − (2.69)
2𝜋𝑘𝑙
Special Notes
Heat conduction through cylindrical tubes is found in power plant, oil refineries and
most process industries.
The boilers have tubes in them, the condensers contain banks of tubes, the heat
exchangers are tubular and all these units are connected by tubes.
Surface area of a cylindrical surface changes with radius. Therefore the rate of heat
conduction through a cylindrical surface is usually expressed per unit length rather
than per unit area as done for plane wall.
Logarithmic Mean Area
It is advantageous to write the heat flow equation through a cylinder in the same
form as that for heat flow through a plane wall.
Then thickness 𝛿 will be equal to (𝑟2 − 𝑟1) and the area 𝐴 will be an equivalent area
Fig. 2.10 Logarithmic mean area concept
𝐴𝑚. Thus
𝑘𝐴 (𝑡1 − 𝑡2)
𝑄 = (𝑡 − ) = − − − − − − − (2.70)
𝑡 𝑘𝐴
𝛿 1 2 𝑚
(𝑟2 − 𝑟1)
𝑄 = 2πkl = 𝑘𝐴
log r2⁄r1 2 − 𝑟1)
𝑚
(𝑟
e
2π(𝑟2 − 𝑟1)𝑙 𝐴2 − 𝐴1
𝐴𝑚 = − − − − − − − (2.71)
log r2
⁄ log A2⁄A
1
e
r=
e
Where 𝐴1 and 𝐴2 are the inner and outer surface areas of the cylindrical tube.
The equivalent area 𝐴𝑚 is called the logarithmic mean area of the tube. Further
2π(𝑟2 − 𝑟1)𝑙
𝐴𝑚 = 2𝜋𝑟𝑚𝑙 =
log r2⁄r1
e
Obviously, logarithmic mean radius of the cylindrical tube is:
(𝑟2 − 𝑟1)
𝑟𝑚 =
log r2 r − − − − − − − (2.72)
e
⁄1
Fig. 2.11 Steady state heat conduction through a composite cylindrical wall
Figure 2.11 shows conduction of heat through a composite cylindrical wall having
three layers of different materials.
There is a perfect contact between the layers and so an equal interface temperature
for any two neighbouring layers.
For steady state conduction, the heat flow through each layer is same and it can be
(𝑡1 − 𝑡2)
described by the following set of equations:
𝑄 = 2𝜋𝑘1𝑙 𝑟
log 2⁄𝑟 1
𝑒
(𝑡2 − 𝑡3)
= 2𝜋𝑘2𝑙
log 𝑟3⁄𝑟
2
𝑒
(𝑡3 − 𝑡4)
= 2𝜋𝑘3𝑙
log 𝑟4⁄𝑟3
𝑒
These equations help to determine the temperature difference for each layer of the
composite cylinder,
(𝑡 � 𝑙𝑜 𝑟2
−𝑡 )= � 𝑔
1 2
2𝜋𝑘1𝑙 𝑒
𝑟1
(𝑡 𝑄 𝑙𝑜 𝑟3
−𝑡 )=
𝑔
2 3
2𝜋𝑘2𝑙 𝑒
𝑟2
(𝑡 𝑄 𝑙𝑜 𝑟4
−𝑡 )=
𝑔
3 4
2𝜋𝑘3𝑙 𝑒
𝑟3
1 𝑟2 𝑟3 𝑟4
From summation of these equalities;
11 12 3
𝑡1 − 𝑡4 = 𝑄 + +
[ 1𝑙
𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑒 2𝜋𝑘 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑒 2𝜋𝑘 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑒 ]
2𝜋𝑘 𝑙 𝑙 𝑟
𝑟 2
𝑟 3
𝑡1 − 𝑡4
Thus the heat flow rate through a composite cylindrical wall is
𝑄 = 1 𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝑟2 + 1 + 𝑟4 − − − − − − − (2.73)
𝑟3 1
𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝑙𝑜𝑔
2𝜋𝑘1𝑙 𝑒 2𝜋𝑘2 𝑒 2𝜋𝑘3 𝑒 𝑟
𝑟1 𝑙 𝑟2 𝑙
3
The quantity in the denominator is the sum of the thermal resistance of the different
𝑡1 − 𝑡4
layers comprising the composite cylinder.
𝑄= − − − − − − − (2.74)
𝑅
𝑡
Fig. 2.12 Heat conduction through cylindrical wall with convection coefficient
If the internal and external heat transfer coefficients for the composite cylinder as
shown in figure 2.12 are hi and ho respectively, then the total thermal resistance to
𝑅𝑡 = 1 1 𝑟2 1 𝑟3 1
heat flow would be:
2𝜋𝑟 𝑙ℎ + 2𝜋 𝑘 𝑙𝑟
𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑒 + 2𝜋 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑒 + 2𝜋𝑟 𝑙ℎ
𝑘 𝑙𝑟
1 𝑖 1 1 2 3 𝑜
2
and heat transfer is given as
𝑄 = (𝑟𝑡𝑖 − 𝑡1𝑜)
1
+
1
𝑙𝑜𝑔 2
+ 𝑟3 1 − − − − − − − (2.75)
𝑙𝑜𝑔 +
2𝜋𝑟1𝑙ℎ𝑖 2𝜋𝑘1 𝑒 2𝜋𝑘2 𝑒 2𝜋𝑟3𝑙ℎ𝑜
𝑙 𝑟1 𝑙 𝑟2
Since the flow area varies for a cylindrical tube, it becomes necessary to specify the
area on which U is based.
Thus depending upon whether the inner or outer area is specified, two different
∴ 𝑈𝑖 = 𝑡𝑜)
+ − − − − − − − (2.77)
1 𝑟1
+
𝑟2 𝑟1
𝑟3 𝑟1
𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝑙𝑜𝑔 +
ℎ𝑖 𝑘 𝑒 𝑘 𝑒 𝑟3ℎ𝑜
Similarly 𝑟1 𝑟2
(𝑡𝑖 − 𝑡𝑜)
1 2
𝑈𝑜 =
+ 𝑙𝑜𝑔 + − − − − − − − (2.78)
𝑟3 𝑟3 𝑟2
𝑟3 1
𝑟3
𝑙𝑜𝑔 +
𝑟1ℎ𝑖 𝑘 𝑒 𝑘 𝑒 ℎ𝑜
𝑟1 𝑟2
1 2
1
Overall heat transfer coefficient may be calculated by simplified equation as follow
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡
conduction
𝑄 = −𝑘𝐴 = −𝑘(4𝜋𝑟2)
𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟
𝑄 𝑟2 𝑑𝑟
Separating the variables and integrating within the boundary conditions
𝑡2
∫ = − ∫ 𝑑𝑡
4𝜋𝑘 𝑟1 � 2 𝑡1
�
𝑄 1
− ) = (𝑡1 − 𝑡2)
1
(
4𝜋𝑘 𝑟1 𝑟2
4𝜋𝑘(𝑡1 − 𝑡2)𝑟1𝑟2 ( 𝑡1 −
∴𝑄 = )
𝑡2=
(𝑟 − 𝑟 ) (𝑟 − 𝑟 )
1 ⁄
2 1 2
4𝜋𝑘𝑟
1 𝑟
2
Heat conduction through composite sphere can be obtained similar to heat
conduction through composite cylinder. Heat conduction through composite sphere
will be:
𝑄= (𝑡1 − 𝑡2)
𝑅𝑡1 + 𝑅𝑡2 +
𝑅𝑡3
𝑄= ( 𝑡1 −
) 𝑡2) − 𝑟3 ⁄) − − − − − (2.83)
(𝑟 2 − 𝑟1⁄ 4𝜋 4𝜋 𝑟
𝑘 𝑟𝑟 +
(𝑟3 − 𝑟2 ⁄) 𝑟
𝑟 +
(𝑟4 𝑘 𝑟
4𝜋
𝑘
1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4
(𝑡1 − 𝑡2)
Further, if the convective heat transfer is considered, then
𝑄=𝑅 +𝑅 +𝑅 +𝑅
𝑡𝑖 𝑡1 𝑡2 𝑡3
− − − − − − −(2.84)
2.12 Critical Thickness of Insulation
There is some misunderstanding about that addition of insulating material on a
surface always brings about a decrease in the heat transfer rate.
But addition of insulating material to the outside surfaces of cylindrical or spherical
walls (geometries which have non-constant cross-sectional areas) may increase the
To establish this fact, consider a thin walled metallic cylinder of length l, radius 𝑟𝑖
heat transfer rate rather than decrease under the certain circumstances.
𝑡𝑜.
temperature
Where ℎ𝑖 and ℎ𝑜 are the convection coefficients at inner and outer surface
respectively.
The value of 𝑘, 𝑟𝑖, ℎ𝑖 and ℎ𝑜 are constant; therefore the total thermal resistance
The denominator represents the sum of thermal resistance to heat flow.
will depend upon thickness of insulation which depends upon the outer radius of the
arrangement.
It is clear from the equation 2.85 that with increase of radius r (i.e. thickness of
insulation), the conduction resistance of insulation increases but the convection
resistance of the outer surface decreases.
Therefore, addition of insulation can either increase or decrease the rate of heat
flow depending upon a change in total resistance with outer radius r.
𝑑𝑅𝑡
= 𝑑 [ 1 + 1 𝑙𝑜𝑔 � + 1 ]
𝑑𝑟 𝑑 2𝜋𝑟𝑖𝑙 2𝜋 � 2𝜋𝑟𝑙ℎ𝑜
𝑟 ℎ 𝑘𝑙 𝑟
𝑒 1
𝑖
1 1
= − 𝑖
2𝜋𝑘𝑙 𝑟 2𝜋𝑟2𝑙ℎ�
1 1 1
∴ − = 0
�
2𝜋𝑘𝑙 𝑟 2𝜋𝑟2𝑙ℎ
�
1 1 1
=
�
2𝜋𝑘𝑙 𝑟 2𝜋𝑟2𝑙ℎ
�
𝑘
∴𝑟=
�
− − − − − − − (2.86)
ℎ
𝑜
𝑘
𝑎𝑡 𝑟 =
�
ℎ
𝑜
𝑑2𝑅𝑡 1 2𝑜 2 1
=− ( ) 𝜋
𝑑𝑟 2𝜋 ℎ
+ 𝑘3 𝜋𝑙ℎ𝑜
2
𝑘𝑙 𝑘2 𝑙
= ℎ𝑜
2
3
(
ℎ
)
𝑜
𝑘3
which is positive, so 𝑟 = 𝑘⁄ represent the condition for minimum resistance and
ℎ𝑜
consequently maximum heat flow rate.
The insulation radius at which resistance to heat flow is minimum is called critical
ℎ𝑜.
𝑘
∴ 𝑟 = 𝑟𝑐 =
ℎ𝑜
transfer rate increases and reaches the maximum at 𝑟 = 𝑟𝑐 and then it will
From the above equation it is clear that with increase of radius of insulation heat
decrease.
Two cases of practical interest are:
When 𝑟𝑖 < 𝑟𝑐
It is clear from the equation 2.14a that with addition of insulation to bare pipe
increases the heat transfer rate until the outer radius of insulation becomes equal to
the critical radius.
Because with addition of insulation decrease the convection resistance of surface of
insulation which is greater than increase in conduction resistance of insulation.
of insulation (𝑟*).
peak value but it is still greater than that of for the bare pipe until a certain amount
So insulation greater than (𝑟* − 𝑟𝑖) must be added to reduce the heat loss below
the bare pipe.
This may happen when insulating material of poor quality is applied to pipes and
wires of small radius.
This condition is used for electric wire to increase the heat dissipation from the wire
which helps to increase the current carrying capacity of the cable.
When 𝑟𝑖 <
Fig. 2.15 Critical radius of insulation for electric wire
𝑟𝑐
It is clear from the figure 2.14b that increase in insulation thickness always decrease
the heat loss from the pipe.
This condition is used to decrease the heat loss from steam and refrigeration pipes.
Critical radius of insulation for the sphere can be obtain in the similar way:
𝑅𝑡 = 1 1 1 1
[ − ]
4𝜋 𝑟 + 4𝜋𝑟 ℎ𝑜
𝑟
𝑘 1 2
𝑑𝑅𝑡
= 𝑑 1 1 1 1
𝑑𝑟 [ [ − ] ]
𝑑 4𝜋 𝑟 + 4𝜋𝑟 ℎ𝑜
𝑑𝑅𝑡 𝑟 𝑘 1 𝑟 2
1 2
= − = 0
𝑑𝑟 4𝜋𝑘𝑟2 4𝜋𝑟3ℎ�
�
∴ 𝑟3ℎ𝑜 = 2𝑘𝑟2
2𝑘
∴ 𝑟 = 𝑟𝑐 = − − − − − − − (2.87)
ℎ𝑜
2.13 Solved Numerical
𝑋4 12 × 10−3
Resistance of glass,
= = 5×
−3
𝑅4 = ℃⁄𝑊
𝑘 4𝐴g𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠
1.2 × 2
10
𝑡𝑜 − 40 − 15
∴ 𝑄g𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 =
𝑡𝑖 = = 5000 𝑊
5 × 10−3
𝑅4
Ex 2.2.
A cold storage room has walls made of 200 mm of brick on the outside, 80 mm of
temperatures are 25℃ and −3℃ respectively. If the outside and inside
plastic foam, and finally 20 mm of wood on the inside. The outside and inside air
1 1
Convection resistance of outer surface
𝑅 = = = 1 × 10−3 ℃⁄𝑊
ℎ𝑜 10 ×
𝑜
𝐴 100
𝑋 0.2
Resistance of brick,
= 2 × 10−3 ℃⁄𝑊
𝑅 = 1 =
1
𝑘1𝐴 1.0 × 100
𝑋2 80 × 10−3
Resistance of plastic foam,
= = 40 ×
−3
𝑅2 = ℃⁄𝑊
𝑘 10
2𝐴 0.02 × 100
𝑋3 20 × 10−3
Resistance of wood,
= = 1.176 ×
−3
𝑅3 = ℃⁄𝑊
𝑘 10
3𝐴 0.17 × 100
Convection resistance of inner surface
𝑅𝑖 1 1
= = = 0.333 × 10−3 ℃⁄𝑊
ℎ𝑖 30 ×
𝐴 100
= 𝑅𝑜 + 𝑅1 + 𝑅2 + 𝑅3 + 𝑅𝑖
1
𝑈𝐴 −3
= 1 × 10−3 + 2 × 10 + 40 × 10−3 + 1.176 × 10−3 + 0.333 × 10−3
= 44.509 × 10−3
1
∴𝑈= = 0.224 𝑊⁄𝑚2℃
44.509 × 10−3 ×
100
𝑄= 𝑡𝑜
− 𝑡1
𝑅𝑜
𝑡1 = 𝑡𝑜 − 𝑄 × 𝑅𝑜 = 25 − 627.2 × 1 × 10−3 = 24.37℃
Temperature of middle plane 𝑡2
𝑄 = 𝑡1 −
𝑡2
𝑅1
𝑡2 = 𝑡1 − 𝑄 × 𝑅1 = 24.37 − 627.2 × 2 × 10−3 = 23.11 ℃
Temperature of middle plane 𝑡3
𝑄 = 𝑡2 −
𝑡3
𝑅2
𝑡3 = 𝑡2 − 𝑄 × 𝑅2 = 23.11 − 627.2 × 40 × 10−3 = −1.97 ℃
Temperature of inner surface 𝑡4
𝑄 = 𝑡3 −
𝑡4
𝑅3
𝑡4 = 𝑡3 − 𝑄 × 𝑅3 = −1.97 − 627.2 × 1.176 × 10−3 = −2.70 ℃
Ex 2.3.
with thermal conductivity of 1.65, k and 9.2 𝑊⁄𝑚℃ respectively. The inside is
A furnace wall is made up of three layer of thickness 250 mm, 100 mm and 150 mm
1 1
Convection resistance of inner surface
𝑅𝑖 = = = 0.04 ℃⁄𝑊
ℎ 𝐴� 25 × 1
𝑋 0.25
�
Resistance of layer 1,
𝑅 = 1 = = 0.1515 ℃⁄𝑊
1
𝑘1𝐴 1.65 × 1
𝑋2
Resistance of layer 2,
= 0.1⁄ ℃⁄𝑊
0.1
𝑅 = =
2
𝑘2𝐴 𝑘2 × 𝑘2
1
𝑋 0.15
Resistance of layer 3,
𝑅 = 3 = = 0.0163 ℃⁄𝑊
3
𝑘3𝐴 9.2 × 1
1 1
Convection resistance of outer surface
𝑅𝑜 = = = 0.083 ℃⁄𝑊
ℎ𝑜 𝐴 12 × 1
Heat transfer by convection is given by
𝑄 = 𝑡𝑖 − 1250 −
𝑡1 = 1100 = 3750 𝑊
𝑅𝑖 0.04
𝑡𝑖 − 𝑡0
Heat transfer through composite wall is given by
𝑄=
𝑅𝑖 + 𝑅1 + 𝑅2 + 𝑅3 + 𝑅0
1250 − 25
3750 = 0.04 + 0.1515 + 𝑅2 + 0.0163 + 0.083
∴ 0.1⁄ = 0.0358
𝑘2
∴ 𝑘2 = 0.1⁄0.0358 = 2.79 W⁄m℃
ii. Overall heat transfer co-efficient U
= 𝑅𝑖 + 𝑅1 + 𝑅2 + 𝑅3 + 𝑅𝑜
1
𝑈𝐴
= 0.04 + 0.1515 + 0.0358 + 0.0163 + 0.083 = 0.3103
1
𝑈= = 3.222 𝑊⁄𝑚2℃
0.3103 ×
1
Temperature of inner surface 𝑡1 = 1100℃
iii. All surface temperature
Under the steady state condition heat generated by the heater is equal to the
𝑄 = 𝑄𝐴 + 𝑄𝐵
heat transfer through the slab A and slab B.
Heat transfer through the slab A, 𝑄𝐴∶
𝑋𝐴 18 × 10−3
Resistance of slab A,
𝑅𝐴 = = = 0.0145 𝐾⁄𝑊
�𝐴 𝐴 55 × 22.5 × 10
−3
𝑡1𝐴 − 𝑡𝑜𝐴
22.5 10
∴ 𝑄𝐴 =
�𝐴 + 𝑅𝑜𝐴
�
𝑋𝐵 10 × 10−3
Resistance of slab B,
𝑅𝐵 = = = 2.22 𝐾⁄𝑊
�𝐵 𝐴 0.2 × 22.5 × 10−3
Convection resistance of �
1 = 1 = 0.987 𝐾⁄𝑊
outer surface of slab B
𝑅𝑜𝐵 = 𝐴 45 × 22.5 × 10−3
ℎ𝑜𝐵
𝑡1𝐵 − 𝑡𝑜𝐵
∴ 𝑄𝐵 =
� 𝐵 + 𝑅𝑜𝐵
𝑡�1𝐴 − 𝑡𝑜𝐴 𝑡1𝐵 − 𝑡𝑜𝐵
∴ 𝑄 = 𝑄𝐴 + 𝑄𝐵 +
= � + 𝑅 + 𝑅𝑜𝐵
�𝐴 𝑅𝑜𝐴 𝐵
𝑄𝐴 = = = 745.07 𝑊
�𝐴 + 0.0145 + 0.222
� 𝑅𝑜𝐴
Outside surface temperature of slab A, 𝑡2𝐴
𝑡1𝐴 − 𝑡2𝐴
𝑄𝐴 =
𝑅𝐴
𝑡2𝐴 = 𝑡1𝐴 − 𝑄𝐴 × 𝑅𝐴 = 203.21 − 745.07 × 0.0145 = 192.4 ℃
𝑄 = 𝑄𝐴 + 𝑄𝐵
Heat transfer through slab B
Ex 2.5.
240
Given data:
r1 = 120 mm = 0.12 m
= 2
r2 = 120 + 50 = 170 mm = 0.17 m, r3 = 170 + 50 = 210 mm = 0.21 m
k1 = 0.092 W⁄m℃ , k2 = 0.062 W⁄m℃
L = 200 m, t1 = 340 ℃, t3 = 35 ℃
𝑟
ln 2⁄1𝑟 ln(0.17
Resistance of high temperature insulation
R = = ⁄ = 0.3012 × 10−3 ℃⁄W
0.1
)
2
1
2𝜋𝑘1𝐿 2𝜋 × 0.92 × 200
𝑟
ln 3⁄𝑟
Resistance of low temperature insulation
0.21⁄ = 2.712 × 10−3 ℃⁄W
0.1
)
7
ln( 2
R = =
2
2𝜋𝑘2𝐿 2𝜋 × 0.062 × 200
𝑡1 − 𝑡3 340 −
35 = 101221.3 𝐽⁄𝑠
∴𝑄= =
𝑅1 + 𝑅2 0.3012 × 10−3 + 2.712 × 10−3
= 101221.3 × 3600⁄1000 = 364.39 × 103 𝐽⁄ℎ𝑟 = 364.39 𝑘𝐽⁄ℎ𝑟
ii. The heat loss per 𝑚2 of pipe surface
Heat Transfer (-) 2. Steady State Heat Conduction
𝑄 101221.3
= = = 671.24 𝑊⁄𝑚2
2𝜋𝑟1 2𝜋 × 0.12 ×
𝐿 200
iii. The heat loss per 𝑚 of outer surface
𝑄 101221.3
2
= = = 383.56 𝑊⁄𝑚2
2𝜋𝑟3 2𝜋 × 0.21 ×
𝐿 200
𝑡1 − 𝑡2
iv. The temperature between interfaces of two layers of insulation
∴𝑄 =
𝑅1
𝑡2 = 𝑡1 − 𝑄 × 𝑅1 = 340 − 101221.3 × 0.3012 × 10−3 = 309.51 ℃
Ex 2.6.
A hot fluid is being conveyed through a long pipe of 4 cm outer dia. And covered
with 2 cm thick insulation. It is proposed to reduce the conduction heat loss to the
surroundings to one-third of the present rate by further covering with some
insulation. Calculate the additional thickness of insulation.
Solution:
4
Given data:
r1 = = 2 cm = 0.02 m
2
r2 = 2 + 2 = 4 cm = 0.04 m, r3 =?
𝑄1
i. Heat loss with existing insulation
𝑟2
ln ⁄𝑟
=
Resistance of existing insulation
1
R
1
2𝜋𝑘1
𝐿
𝑄1 = 𝑡1 −
𝑡2
ii. Heat loss with additional insulation 𝑄2
Resistance of existing insulation 𝑅1
𝑟3
ln ⁄ 𝑟
2
R =
2
2𝜋𝑘1𝐿
𝑡1 −
𝑄2 = 𝑡2
𝑅2
But, 𝑄1 = 1⁄3
𝑄2
𝑡1 − 1 𝑡1 − 𝑡2
𝑡2 = ×
3 𝑅2
𝑅1
1
𝑟 3 𝑅2 =
𝑅1 3 𝑟2
𝑟
ln ⁄𝑟2 1 ln ⁄ 1
= ×
𝑟3 2𝜋𝑘1 3
𝐿 1 2𝜋𝑘1𝐿
0.04
1 𝑟2
ln ⁄𝑟2 = × ⁄𝑟1 = × ln ⁄0.02 = 0.231
ln 3 3
𝑟3
⁄𝑟2 = 𝑒 = 1.259
0.231
insulating material of thickness 2 cm, having conductivity of 0.2 𝑊⁄𝑚 𝐾. The outer
steel tube of outside diameter 8 cm and thickness 1.3 cm. It is covered with an
55 𝑊⁄𝑚2 𝐾.
surface of insulation is exposed to ambient air at 25℃ with convection coefficient of
Calculate: (1) Heat loss to air from 5 m long tube. (2) The temperature drop due to
Solution:
8
Given data:
r2 = = 4 cm = 0.04 m
2
r1 = 4 − 1.3 = 2.7 cm = 0.027 m, r3 = 4 + 2 = 6 cm = 0.06 m
k1 = 50 W⁄mK , k2 = 0.2 W⁄mK, ℎ𝑖 = 222 𝑊⁄𝑚2 𝐾, ℎ𝑜 = 55 𝑊⁄𝑚2 𝐾
L = 5 m, ti = 330 ℃, to = 25 ℃
i. Total heat loss to air from 5 m long tube, Q
1 1 1
Convection resistance of hot gases
Ri = = = = 5.31 × 10−3 ℃⁄W
ℎ𝑖𝐴 ℎ𝑖2𝜋𝑟1 222 × 2𝜋 × 0.027
1 𝐿 ×5
𝑟2 0.04⁄ )
Resistance of steel
𝑟 0.027
ln ⁄ 1 = 0.25 × 10−3 ℃⁄W
ln( =
1R =
2𝜋𝑘1𝐿 2𝜋 × 50 × 5
𝑟3 0.06⁄ )
Resistance of insulation
ln ⁄𝑟2 0.04
ln( = 64.53 × 10−3 ℃⁄W
R = =
2
2𝜋𝑘2𝐿 2𝜋 × 0.2 × 5
1 1 1
Convection resistance of outside air
Ro = = = = 9.64 × 10−3 ℃⁄W
ℎ𝑜𝐴 ℎ𝑜2𝜋𝑟3 55 × 2𝜋 × 0.06
𝑜 𝐿 ×5
∴𝑄= 𝑡𝑖 − 𝑡𝑜
𝑅𝑖 + 𝑅1 + 𝑅2
+ 𝑅𝑜
330 − 25
= = 3825.4 𝑊
5.31 × 10−3 + 0.25 × 10−3 + 64.53 × 10−3 + 9.64 × 10−3
ii. Temperature drop
𝑡𝑖 − 𝑡1
Temperature drop due to thermal resistance of hot gases
𝑄=
𝑅𝑖
∴ 𝑡𝑖 − 𝑡1 = 𝑄 × 𝑅𝑖 = 3825.4 × 5.31 × 10−3 = 20.31 ℃
𝑡1 − 𝑡2
Temperature drop due to thermal resistance of steel tube
𝑄=
𝑅1
∴ 𝑡1 − 𝑡2 = 𝑄 × 𝑅1 = 3825.4 × 0.25 × 10−3 = 0.95 ℃
𝑡2 − 𝑡3
Temperature drop due to thermal resistance of insulation
𝑄=
𝑅2
∴ 𝑡2 − 𝑡3 = 𝑄 × 𝑅2 = 3825.4 × 64.53 × 10−3 = 246.85 ℃
𝑡3 − 𝑡𝑜
Temperature drop due to thermal resistance of outside air
𝑄=
𝑅𝑜
∴ 𝑡3 − 𝑡𝑜 = 𝑄 × 𝑅𝑜 = 3825.4 × 9.64 × 10−3 = 36.87 ℃
Ex 2.8.
A pipe carrying the liquid at −20℃ is 10 mm in outer diameter and is exposed to
ambient at 25℃ with convective heat transfer coefficient of 50 W⁄m2 K. It is
0.5 W⁄m K. Determine the thickness of insulation beyond which the heat gain will
proposed to apply the insulation of material having thermal conductivity of
be reduced. Also calculate the heat loss for 2.5 mm, 7.5 mm and 15 mm thickness of
insulation over 1m length. Which one is more effective thickness of insulation?
Solution:
10
Given data:
�
10 mm t = rc − r1 = 10 − 5
�
= 5 mm
ii. Heat loss for 2.5 mm thickness of insulation, Q1
ln 𝑟⁄2𝑟 ln(0.0075 ⁄ )
0.005
Resistance of insulation
R = = = 0.129 K⁄W
1
1
2𝜋𝑘𝐿 2𝜋 × 0.5 × 1
1 1 1
Convection resistance of outside air
Ro = = = = 0.424 K⁄W
ℎ𝑜 𝐴 ℎ 2𝜋𝑟2𝐿 50 × 2𝜋 × 0.0075 × 1
𝑡𝑜 − 𝑡𝑖 25 − (−20)
𝑜 𝑜
∴ Q1 = = = 81.37 𝑊
𝑅1 + 0.129 + 0.424
𝑅𝑜
iii. Heat loss for 7.5 mm thickness of insulation, Q2
ln𝑟⁄3𝑟 ln(0.0125 ⁄ )
0.005
Resistance of insulation
R = = = 0.291 K⁄W
1
2
2𝜋𝑘𝐿 2𝜋 × 0.5 × 1
1 1 1
Convection resistance of outside air
Ro = = = = 0.254 K⁄W
ℎ𝑜 𝐴 ℎ 2𝜋𝑟3𝐿 50 × 2𝜋 × 0.0125 × 1
𝑜 𝑜
𝑡𝑜 − 𝑡𝑖 25 − (−20)
∴ Q2 = = = 82.56 𝑊
𝑅2 + 0.291 + 0.254
𝑅𝑜
iv. Heat loss for 15 mm thickness of insulation, Q3
ln𝑟⁄4𝑟 ln(0.02⁄ )
0.005
Resistance of insulation
R = = = 0.441 K⁄W
1
3
2𝜋𝑘𝐿 2𝜋 × 0.5 × 1
1 1 1
Convection resistance of outside air
Ro = = = = 0.159 K⁄W
ℎ𝑜 𝐴 ℎ 2𝜋𝑟4𝐿 50 × 2𝜋 × 0.02 × 1
𝑡𝑜 − 𝑡𝑖 25 − (−20)
𝑜 𝑜
∴ Q3 = = = 75 𝑊
𝑅3 + 0.441 + 0.159
𝑅𝑜
Hence the insulation thickness of 15 mm is more effective
2.14 References:
[1] Heat and Mass Transfer by D. S. Kumar, S K Kataria and Sons Publications.
[2] Heat Transfer – A Practical Approach by Yunus Cengel & Boles, McGraw-Hill
Publication.
[3] Principles of Heat Transfer by Frank Kreith, Cengage Learining.
HEAT TRANSFER FROM EXTENDED
SURFACES
Course Contents
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Steady flow of heat along a
rod (governing differential
equation)
3.3 Heat dissipation from an
infinitely long fin
3.4 Heat dissipation from a fin
insulated at the tip
3.5 Heat dissipation from a fin
losing heat at the tip
3.6 Fin performance
3.7 Thermometric well
3.8 Solved Numerical
3.9 References
3.1 Introduction
i Increase the temperature difference (𝑇0 − 𝑇𝑎) between the surface and the fluid.
Therefore, to increase the convective heat transfer, one can
Many times, when the first option is not in our control and the second option (i.e.
increasing h) is already stretched to its limit, we are left with the only alternative of
increasing the effective surface area by using fins or extended surfaces.
Fins are protrusions from the base surface into the cooling fluid, so that the extra
surface of the protrusions is also in contact with the fluid.
Most of you have encountered cooling fins on air-cooled engines (motorcycles,
portable generators, etc.), electronic equipment (CPUs), automobile radiators, air
conditioning equipment (condensers) and elsewhere
3.2 Steady Flow of Heat Along A Rod (Governing Differential
Equation)
Consider a straight rectangular or pin fin protruding from a wall surface (figure 3.1a
and figure 3.1b).
𝐴𝑐 = 𝑏𝛿 ; 𝑃 = 2(𝑏 + 𝛿)
Thus for a rectangular fin
π 2
and for a pin fin
Ac = d ; P = πd
4
The temperature at the base of the fin is T0 and the temperature of the ambient
fluid into which the rod extends is considered to be constant at temperature Ta.
The base temperature T0 is highest and the temperature along the fin length goes
on diminishing.
Analysis of heat flow from the finned surface is made with the following
assumptions:
i Thickness of the fin is small compared with the length and width; temperature
gradients over the cross-section are neglected and heat conduction treated one
dimensional
ii Homogeneous and isotropic fin material; the thermal conductivity k of the fin
material is constant
iii Uniform heat transfer coefficient h over the entire fin surface
iv No heat generation within the fin itself
the wall
vi Negligible radiation exchange with the surroundings; radiation effects, if any, are
considered as included in the convection coefficient h
vii Steady state heat dissipation
Heat from the heated wall is conducted through the fin and convected from the
sides of the fin to the surroundings.
Consider infinitesimal element of the fin of thickness dx at a distance x from base
wall as shown in figure 3.2.
𝑑𝑡
Heat conducted into the element at plane x
𝑄𝑥 = −𝑘 𝐴𝑐 ( ) − − − − − − − −(3.1)
𝑑𝑥 ��
Heat conducted out of the element at plane (𝑥 + 𝑑𝑥)
𝑑𝑡
𝑄𝑥+𝑑𝑥 = −𝑘 𝐴𝑐 )
(
𝑑
𝑥+𝑑𝑥
𝑥
𝑑 𝑑𝑡
= −𝑘 𝐴𝑐 (𝑡 + 𝑑𝑥) − − − − − − − −(3.2)
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥
Heat convected out of the element between the planes x and (𝑥 + 𝑑𝑥)
𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣 = ℎ (𝑃 𝑑𝑥)(𝑡 − 𝑡𝑎) − − − − − − − −(3.3)
Here temperature t of the fin has been assumed to be uniform and non-variant for
the infinitesimal element.
According to first law of thermodynamic, for the steady state condition, heat
𝑄𝑥 = 𝑄𝑥+𝑑𝑥 + 𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣
transfer into element is equal to heat transfer from the element
𝑑𝑡 𝑑 𝑑𝑡
−𝑘 𝐴𝑐 = −𝑘 𝐴𝑐 (𝑡 + 𝑑𝑥) + ℎ (𝑃 𝑑𝑥)(𝑡 − 𝑡𝑎)
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥
𝑑𝑡
𝑑𝑡 𝑑2𝑡
−𝑘 𝐴𝑐 = −𝑘 𝐴𝑐 − 𝑘 𝐴𝑐 𝑑𝑥 + ℎ (𝑃 𝑑𝑥)(𝑡 − 𝑡𝑎)
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥2
Upon arrangement and simplification
𝑑2𝑡 ℎ𝑃
− (𝑡 − 𝑡𝑎) = 0 − − − − − − − −(3.4)
𝑑𝑥2 𝑘 𝐴�
�
Let, 𝜃(𝑥) = 𝑡(𝑥) − 𝑡𝑎
As the ambient temperature is constant, so differentiation of the equation is
𝑑𝜃 𝑑𝑡 𝑑2𝜃 𝑑2𝑡
= ; =
𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥2 𝑑𝑥2
Thus
𝑑2𝜃
− 𝑚2𝜃 = 0 − − − − − − − −(3.5)
Where 𝑑𝑥2
ℎ𝑃
𝑚=√
𝑘 𝐴𝑐
Equations 3.4 and 3.5 provide a general form of the energy equation for one
dimensional heat dissipation from an extended surface.
The general solution of this linear homogeneous second order differential equation
𝜂𝑓 =
𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑚𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑓𝑖𝑛
Thus for a fin insulated at tip
tanh(𝑚𝐿) tanh(𝑚𝐿)
heat flow. Upon simplification,
𝜂𝑓 = − − − − − − − −(3.29)
𝑚𝐿
=
√𝑃ℎ⁄𝑘 𝐴𝑐
𝐿
Following poins are noted down from the above equation
tanh(𝑚 1
i For a very long fin
→
𝐿) 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟
𝑚𝐿
For small values of ml, the fin efficiency increases. When the length is reduced to
Obviously the fin efficiency drops with an increase in its length.
tanh(𝑚𝐿) 𝑚𝐿
zero, then,
→ =1
𝑚𝐿 𝑚𝐿
Actually efficiency of fin is used for the design of the fin but it is used for comparision
of the relative merits of fin of different geometries or material.
Note that fins with triangular and parabolic profiles contain less material and are
more efficient than the ones with rectangular profiles, and thus are more suitable for
applications requiring minimum weight such as space applications.
An important consideration in the design of finned surfaces is the selection of the
proper fin length L.
Normally the longer the fin, the larger the heat transfer area and thus the higher the
rate of heat transfer from the fin.
But also the larger the fin, the bigger the mass, the higher the price, and the larger
the fluid friction.
Therefore, increasing the length of the fin beyond a certain value cannot be justified
unless the added benefits outweigh the added cost.
Also, the fin efficiency decreases with increasing fin length because of the decrease
in fin temperature with length.
Fin lengths that cause the fin efficiency to drop below 60 percent usually cannot be
justified economically and should be avoided.
The efficiency of most fins used in practice is above 90 percent.
Effectiveness of fin (𝛜f):
Fins are used to increase the heat transfer. And use of fin can not be recommended
unless the increase in heat transfer justifies the added cost of fin.
In fact, use of fin may not ensure the increase in heat transfer. Effectiveness of fin
gives the increase in heat transfer with fin relative to no fin case.
It represents the ratio of the fin heat transfer rate to the heat transfer rate that
ϵf =
fin heat transfer
without fin
Figure 3.8 shows the base heat transfer surface before and after the fin has been
Heat transfer through the root area Ac before the fin attached is:
attached.
Q = hAc(t0 − ta)
∴ 𝜖𝑓 =
√𝑃ℎ𝑘 𝐴𝑐 (t0
− ta) ℎ𝐴𝑐(t0
− ta)
𝑃𝑘
𝜖𝑓 = √ − − − − − − − −(3.30)
ℎ𝐴��
Following conclusions are given from the effectiveness of the fin
i If the fin is used to improve heat dissipation from the surface, then the fin
effectivenss must be greater than unity. That is,
𝑃𝑘
√ >
1 ℎ𝐴𝑐
𝜂𝑓 =
ℎ(𝑃𝑙) − ta)
(t0
∴ 𝜖𝑓 = 𝜂𝑓 ℎ(𝑃𝐿)(t0 − ta)
ℎ𝐴𝑐(t0 − ta)
= 𝜂𝑓 (𝑃𝐿)
𝐴𝑐
𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑖𝑛
∴ 𝜖𝑓 = 𝜂𝑓 − − − − − − − −(3.31)
𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑖𝑛
An increase in the fin effectiveness can be obtained by extending the length of fin
but that rapidly becomes a losing proposition in term of efficiency.