0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views2 pages

Description: Tags: Maine

This document provides statistics on education in Maine from 1993-94 to 2002-03. It summarizes data on the number of school districts and schools, student enrollment and demographics, staffing levels, finances, course enrollment, and outcomes. Some key findings are that the number of districts increased while enrollment declined, the percentage of students with disabilities or limited English increased, and per-pupil expenditures rose after adjusting for inflation.

Uploaded by

anon-327453
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views2 pages

Description: Tags: Maine

This document provides statistics on education in Maine from 1993-94 to 2002-03. It summarizes data on the number of school districts and schools, student enrollment and demographics, staffing levels, finances, course enrollment, and outcomes. Some key findings are that the number of districts increased while enrollment declined, the percentage of students with disabilities or limited English increased, and per-pupil expenditures rose after adjusting for inflation.

Uploaded by

anon-327453
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Maine http://www.state.me.

us/education
Districts and schools Students Staff

Number of districts 1993-94 2002-03 Public school 1993-94 2002-03 Number of FTE 1993-94 2002-03

(CCD) 226 282 enrollment (CCD) Pre-K 1,036 1,503 teachers (CCD) Elementary 6,658 6,964
K-8 152,981 138,124 Middle 2,835 3,462
9-12 59,632 61,873 High 3,822 4,475
Total (K-12) 212,613 199,997 Combined 329 364
Number of public schools (CCD)
Other 1,700 1,572
Elementary 455 418
Total 15,344 16,837
Middle 125 126
Race/ethnicity (CCD)

High 106 111 Number of FTE non-teacher staff (CCD)
American Indian/Alaskan Native n/a 1%
Combined 14 16 Instructional aides 3,452 5,903
Asian/Pacific Islander n/a 1
Other 2 1 Instructional coordinators 118 218
Black, non-Hispanic n/a 2
Total 702 672 Administrators 1,287 1,493
Hispanic n/a 1
White, non-Hispanic n/a 96 Other 8,664 10,127
Number
of charter schools (CCD) n/a Total 13,521 17,741
Students with disabilities (OSEP) 12% 16%
Finances Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject
taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000
Total current expenditures 1993-94 2001-02 Students with limited 1% 1% English 81% 71%
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to 2001-02, in thousands)
English proficiency (NCELA) Mathematics 68 64
Instructional $1,035,170 $1,208,176 Science 67 63
Noninstructional 56,523 60,634 Social studies 72 56
Support 455,300 543,988 Migrant students
4% 5%
Total 1,546,993 1,812,798 (OME) Percentage of core courses taught by highly qualified
teachers, 2002-03 (As defined and reported by states, collected by ED)
Eighth-grade students enrolled in 1996 2003 Not Available
Per-pupil expenditures $7,129 $8,818 Algebra
I for high school credit 25% 21%
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to 2001-02) (NAEP)

Students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-


Sources of funding
Price Lunch Program, 2002-03 62,047
(CCD, 2001-02) Local
(CCD)
Outcomes
Federal 48%
1993-94 2000-01
8% High school dropout rate
Number of schools, by percent of students eligible to (NCES) 3% 3%
participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, Avg. freshman graduation rate (NCES) 75 76
^
State 2002-03 (CCD)
College-going rate (IPEDS/NCES) 50 54
44%
0-34% 296 NAEP state results (NCES)
Reading, Grade 4 1994 2003
35-49% 193 Proficient level or above 41% 36%
50-74% 147 Basic level or above 75 71
Title I allocation 2001-02 $37,942,178 Math, Grade 8 1996 2003
(ED; Includes Title I, Part A) 75-100% 16 Proficient level or above 31% 29%
Basic level or above 77 74
KEY: * = Less than 0.5 percent
— = Not applicable ^
20 schools did not report.
K n/a = Not available
50 # = Sample size too small to calculate
FTE = Full Time Equivalent
Maine
Statewide Accountability Information Student Achievement 2002-03
Maine Educational Assessment, used for NCLB accountability
See Appendix B for Maine’s definitions of proficient for reading and mathematics for grades 4, 8, and Reading
high school. Proficient level or above for: Grade 4 Grade 8 High school
All students 49% 45% 46%
See http://www.state.me.us/education/profiles/getprofiles.htm for more details on the statewide ac- Economically disadvantaged students 39 27 25
countability system. Migrant students n/a 25 16
State assessment for NCLB accountability: Maine Educational Assessment (MEA) Students with disabilities 10 7 5
State student achievement levels: Does Not Meet the Standard, Partially Meets the Standard, Students with limited English proficiency 29 18 12
Black, non-Hispanic students 30 26 22
Meets the Standard, Exceeds the Standard
Hispanic students 40 41 29
NCLB Accountability Goals White, non-Hispanic students 50 45 47
2001-02 Annual measurable Target Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above
objective starting point (2002-03)
100% 2003
Grade 4 Reading 34% 34%
Mathematics 12 12 75% 2002
Grade 8 Reading 35 35 51 49 49 52 53 2001
Mathematics 13 13 50% 41 43 45 46
High school Reading 44 44
Mathematics 11 11 25%

2002-03 NCLB accountability results, applied to 2003-04 school year 0%


Grade 4 Grade 8 High School
AYP outcomes and consequences* Title I schools All schools All districts
Made AYP n/a n/a n/a Mathematics
Identified for improvement: Proficient level or above for: Grade 4 Grade 8 High school
All students 28% 18% 20%
Year 1 6 (*) 10 (1%) 0
Economically disadvantaged students 20 9 8
Year 2 0 0 0 Migrant students 20 7 <5
Corrective action 0 0 0 Students with disabilities 8 <5 <5
Restructuring 0 0 0 Students with limited English proficiency 18 12 <5
Exited improvement status (made AYP twice 0 0 0 Black, non-Hispanic students 7 6 65
after missing twice or more, includes total Hispanic students 22 10 10
“made” above) White, non-Hispanic students 29 18 20

Other indicator, 2002-03 State target State outcome Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above
Elementary indicator: Average daily attendance Meet or progress toward 96%. Met
100% 2003
Middle indicator: Average daily attendance Meet or progress toward 96%. Met
High school indicator: Graduation rate n/a n/a 75% 2002
NCLB choice participation Number of Title I students Percent of eligible students 2001
50%
Title I school choice: 0 –
28
Supplemental educational services: 0 –
25% 23 23 20 21 18 20 19 20
*Some AYP outcomes for this state are not available due to issues with data collection, measurement, 0%
or other reasons. For more information please visit the state’s Web site, above. Grade 4 Grade 8 High School

51

You might also like