0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views7 pages

Collision Theory in Reaction Rates

This document summarizes the derivation of rate constants for bimolecular reactions from microscopic collision theory. It shows that while the gas kinetic collision rate provides an upper limit, the actual reaction rate constant is usually much lower due to an activation energy barrier. The derivation accounts for this by considering the distribution of collision energies and impact parameters, and defines a critical energy and impact parameter for reaction. However, the theory still overestimates rate constants compared to experiments, requiring an additional "steric factor" to account for molecular geometry effects.

Uploaded by

a320neo
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views7 pages

Collision Theory in Reaction Rates

This document summarizes the derivation of rate constants for bimolecular reactions from microscopic collision theory. It shows that while the gas kinetic collision rate provides an upper limit, the actual reaction rate constant is usually much lower due to an activation energy barrier. The derivation accounts for this by considering the distribution of collision energies and impact parameters, and defines a critical energy and impact parameter for reaction. However, the theory still overestimates rate constants compared to experiments, requiring an additional "steric factor" to account for molecular geometry effects.

Uploaded by

a320neo
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

5.

62 Spring 2004

Lecture #33, Page 1

Macroscopic Reaction Rates from Microscopic Properties Bimolecular Reactions Collision Theory A+BC From kinetic theory, we found AB collision rate in a gas:
2 8k BT Z AB = d AB N ANB AB = gas kinetic v N A N B 1/ 2

(cm-3 sec-1)

[Note on notation: to distinguish Boltzmann constant k from rate coefficient k, we will write the former as kB!] Reaction rate

d [C ] = k[ A][ B] dt

Can we simply identify rate constant k with gas-kinetic collision rate vAB? NO typically k << vAB k has Arrhenius type behavior, exp(-Eact/RT), which does not appear anywhere in the expression for gas kinetic collision frequency Arrhenius behavior suggests reactive cross section, R, has energy dependence R(E) or equivalently, velocity dependence R (vAB).

dZ reactive N A N B R (v AB )v AB f (v AB )4 v AB 2 dv AB
or

Z reactive 2 = k = v AB R (v AB ) f (v AB )4 v AB dv AB N ANB 0

5.62 Spring 2004

Lecture #33, Page 2

k = AB 2 k BT

3/ 2

v AB v ( v ) e AB R AB 0

/ 2 k BT

4 v AB dv AB
2

In terms of relative kinetic energy, E=

1 v AB 2 2

1 8 k= k BT AB k BT

1/ 2

E
0

( E )e E / kBT dE

Now we just need an expression for Hard-Sphere limit:

R (E)

or

R (v AB ) .

Preact = 1, rmin d AB Preact = 0, rmin > d AB

2 R ( E ) = d AB

k (T ) = AB 2 k BT

3/ 2

2 AB

v vAB e AB
0

/ 2 k BT

4 v AB dv AB
2

8k T 2 k ( E ) = v R = B d AB AB
Estimate the magnitude of this expression:

1/ 2

d AB 4 108 cm v 5 104 cm / s, 300 K

k 5 1010 cm3molecule1 sec 1 1.5 1011 L mole 1 sec 1

5.62 Spring 2004

Lecture #33, Page 3

t1/2 would be on the order of 10-11 seconds at p = 1 bar (or c=1M)! Also predicted temperature dependence of k is T1/2

Whats missing??
Reactive Hard Sphere Model Both Arrehenius temperature dependence and energy profile for a reaction suggest an energy requirement for reaction to occur. One possibility,

R = 0, if E<E 0
2 R = d AB , if E>E 0

But look at three situations with same kinetic energy E:

(i) (iii)

Impact parameter b=0; maximum impact Impact parameter, b dAB, no collision occurs at all

Therefore we need a more detailed dynamical model. Energy along line of centers (Old Collision Theory)

Partition energy into along line of centers,

tangent to the line of centers, Et

b2 EC = E 1 , if , b dAB d AB
2 1 AB ( v|| ) 2

EC =

1 2 AB ( v ) ; v = v cos ; 2

Et =

5.62 Spring 2004

Lecture #33, Page 4

EC =

1 1 AB v 2 cos 2 = AB v 2 (1 sin 2 ) = E (1 sin 2 ) 2 2


b2 EC = E 1 2 , ( b d AB ) d AB EC = 0, ( b > d AB )

sin = b / d AB , thus

If E < E0 of course, EC < E0, Preact(E)=0, R(E)=0 For any collision energy E > E0, there is some critical impact parameter b0 for which

b2 EC = E 1 2 = E0 d AB E0 2 1 b02 = d AB E
Assume: all collisions with b < b0 (at energy E > E0) are reactive Thus
2 R ( E ) = b02 = d AB 1

R = 0

E0 E

for E E0 for E < E0

Now we only need to insert in previous expression to find k(T).

5.62 Spring 2004

Lecture #33, Page 5


1/ 2

1 8 k= k BT AB k BT 1 8 = k BT AB k BT

E / k BT ( ) E E e dE R
0

1/ 2

E0 E / kBT 2 1 E d dE AB e E E0

1 8 E / k BT 2 dE = d AB ( E E0 ) e k BT AB k BT E0

1/ 2

x=

( E E0 ) ; k BT

dx =

dE k BT

e E / kBT = e E0 / kBT e x

Thus
8k BT E0 / k BT x 2 k = xe dx d AB e AB 0 1/ 2 x 8k BT E0 / k BT x 2 k = d e xe dx ; xe dx = 1 AB AB 0 0 1/ 2

(mean relative speed)

8k T k = B AB

1/ 2

2 d AB

e E0 / kBT
(Arrhenius-type factor with E0 Eact)

(hard sphere gas kinetic speed)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN E0 (critical line of centers energy) and Eact, (empirical Arrhenius energy)

5.62 Spring 2004

Lecture #33, Page 6

k = Ae Eact / kBT d ln k d Eact Eact ln = A = dT dT k BT k B T 2 8k T 2 k CT = B d AB e E0 / kBT AB E0 1 E d ln k CT d 1 8k BT 2 = + + 02 ln ln d ( = AB ) dT dT 2 AB k BT 2T k BT


Now we require that:
1/ 2

d ln k d ln k CT = dT dT 1 Eact E0 = + k BT 2 2T k BT 2 1 Eact = k BT + E0 2
How well does this theory work? Predicted pre-exponential factor is:

2 8k BT d AB AB

1/ 2

( 3 1015 cm 2 )( 4 104 cm / s ) 10 1011 cm3 / sec

or about

6 1010 L / mol s

In most cases, A(T) is much smaller in magnitude! Some examples:

5.62 Spring 2004 Reaction CH3+CH3C2H6 Cl+H2HCL+H NO+O3NO2+O2 CH3+C2H6CH4+C2H5 Eact, kJ/mol 0.0 21 28 43.5 Measured Log10(A/T1/2) 9.32 9.69 8.60 6.99

Lecture #33, Page 7 Calculated Log10(ZAB/T1/2) 9.78 10.38 9.89 10.03 P 0.35 0.20 0.05 0.0009

Clearly the bimolecular rate constant < (sometimes <<) the gas-kinetic collision rate constant, even after accounting for activation energy. Sometimes this is represented by a steric factor p=A/ZAB

So

( corrected )

= p d

2 AB

8k T B AB

1/ 2

e E0 / kBT

But p is strictly a fudge factor! (In a little while, we will give a recipe for fudge.)

You might also like