0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views4 pages

Great Compromise

The document discusses the Great Compromise that occurred during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It describes the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan, which proposed different representations in Congress, and how Roger Sherman proposed having two chambers to satisfy both large and small states.

Uploaded by

Cherylynn Lima
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views4 pages

Great Compromise

The document discusses the Great Compromise that occurred during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It describes the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan, which proposed different representations in Congress, and how Roger Sherman proposed having two chambers to satisfy both large and small states.

Uploaded by

Cherylynn Lima
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Lima 1

Cherylynn Lima Mrs. Pennington AP Government 9 January 2014 Great Compromise Pre-Constitution times ere an essential perio! o" learning "or the #tates. Loosely $oun! $y the Arti%les o" Con"e!eration& the '# national government su""ere!. (he Arti%les& though representative o" li$erty an! %oalition in theory& reveale! the states) $ro*enness. (he Arti%les ha! no po er to ta+& no e+e%utive $ran%h& an! no po er over amen!ments& sin%e the states ha! to unanimously agree. Passing la s as nearly an impossi$ility ith the 9,1- ma.ority rule. /ithout a sense o" oneness& there as no sta$le e%onomy. An!& perhaps most ironi%ally& the Arti%les ha! little to no %ontrol over its military& though its responsi$ility as %ommon !e"ense. #hay)s re$ellion ma!e plain the piti"ul ea*ness o" the national government& hen it %oul! not put !o n a %oalition o" Massa%husetts resi!ents protesting the e%onomi% %haos. Change ha! to happen. 0n the s eltering summer o" 1121& the states met an! !is%usse! plans "or a ne & more unite! an! sta$le government. 3ut& inevita$ly& there e+iste! !isagreement. Ma!ison& a native 4irginian& "avore! a national government ith $roa! an! !e"ine! po ers. (here oul! $e a $i%ameral legislature& $oth houses) representatives !e%i!e! $y the state population. (he 5+e%utive $ran%h %oul! $e ele%te! an! remova$le $y %ongress& an! the Ju!i%iary $ran%h oul! $e a$le to veto legislation. Legislature %oul! overri!e la s& regulate interstate tra!e& an! use arme! "or%es to en"or%e la s. 6e propose! the 4irginia plan& a plan that "avore! the large an! populous states li*e 78& 4A& PA& #C& an! GA supporte!. 6o ever& terri"ie! $y the potential loss o" authority& the smaller states argue! a !i""erent plan. 6o %oul! a national government representative o" a state)s population $e "air& shoul! the smaller states) voi%es never $e hear!9

Lima 2

/illiam Paterson& on $ehal" o" :5& 7J& C(& 7C& an! M:& argue! "or e;ual representation in a uni%ameral legislature *no n as the 7e Jersey Plan. 5a%h state oul! get 2 representatives& there$y ensuring the less populous states) nee!s oul! $e a%*no le!ge!. (he e+e%utive $ran%h as remova$le $y ma.ority vote. (hough the 7e Jersey plan "avore! a ea*er national government& it %oul! levy ta+es& an! %ompel states) o$e!ien%e to national la s. (hough vastly !i""erent& the 4irginia Plan an! the 7e Jersey plan share! "un!amental similarities. 3oth "ully supporte! a national government& on a%%ount o" the Arti%les o" Con"e!erations) ea*ness< one that as split into - $ran%hes= a legislative& e+e%utive& an! a .u!i%ial. 3oth supporte! the legislative $ran%h)s relative po er over the other t o $ran%hes& $e%ause it as represente! the ill o" the people. 3oth "avore! %he%*s an! $alan%es on po er in the national government& to ;uash any hope o" tyranny. :uring the s eltering summer o" 1121& una$le to rea%h agreement an! ith the smaller states) threatening se%ession& >oger #herman propose! something that $len!e! $oth plans together. (he Great Compromise supporte! a national government suprema%y ith a $i%ameral legislature= one house ?the 6ouse o" >epresentatives@ represente! state population $y ele%ting an o""i%ial every 40&000 people& an! another ?the #enate@ %hose 2 senators "rom ea%h state ? hi%h& in the Committee o" :etail& 3en.amin Aran*lin a!vise! senators) ele%tion must sever "rom state legislatures@. 0t %alle! "or a single e+e%utive& remova$le $y impea%hment& an! a Ju!i%ial 3ran%h ith its mem$ers having li"e tenure. (he plan appeale! to $oth the large an! the small states& $e%ause the 6ouse o" >epresentatives "avore! the populous states& an! the #enate allo e! e;ual voi%e in the less populous. (he Great Compromise serves as a $asis "or our government to!ay. (hrough a ta%t"ul mi+ o" $oth the 4irginia an! the 7e Jersey plans& ea%h state %oul! $e satis"ie! ith its representation "or years to %ome.

Lima -

/or*s Cite! BAssigned Readings: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE VIRGINIA PLAN, THE NEW JERSEY PLAN AND THE GREAT COMPROMISE 7.p.& n.!. /e$. 09 Jan. 2014.

Lima 4

CConne%ti%ut Compromise.C Wi i!edia. /i*ime!ia Aoun!ation& 01 #ept. 2014. /e$. 09 Jan. 2014. C(he Great Compromise o" 1121.C A"#$%&'#( )S G#*e+n(en% In,#. 7.p.& n.!. /e$. 11 Jan. 2014. C6istory o" the 'nite! #tates 6ouse o" >epresentatives.C Wi i!edia. /i*ime!ia Aoun!ation& 1D :e%. 201-. /e$. 09 Jan. 2014. C0nstitution.C )S H#$se #, Re!+esen%a%i*es: His%#+-, A+% . A+'/i*es. 7.p.& n.!. /e$. 09 Jan. 2014. C/hy /e 6ave a 6ouse an! #enate.C A"#$%&'#( )S G#*e+n(en% In,#. 7.p.& n.!. /e$. 09 Jan. 2014.

You might also like