Evaluating Expatriate Training
Author(s): Chris Brewster and Juana Pickard
Source: International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 24, No. 3, Current Issues
in Expatriation (Fall, 1994), pp. 18-35
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40397279
Accessed: 06-11-2016 10:26 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International
Studies of Management & Organization
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Int. Studies ofMgt. & Org.9 Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 18-35
M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 1994
Chris Brewster and Juana Pickard
Evaluating Expatriate Training
Cross-cultural training has long been advocated as a means of facilitating adjustment to the expatriate environment (Brislin, 1981; Landis
and Brislin, 1983; Mendenhall and Oddou, 1986; Tung, 1987). However, although there is a substantial literature, mainly from the United
States, on the preparation of expatriates for their foreign assignment,
much of this is anecdotal and prescriptive (Harris and Harris, 1976;
Rahim, 1983). The research that has been done shows, primarily, that
little preparation takes place. Despite the importance of expatriate positions, the high costs associated with expatriation and the extensive
and largely nonproductive "running-in" periods, it is still the case that
most organizations provide no formal training for expatriation.
Studies in the 1970s found that, amongst U.S. MNCs, only twothirds provided any training at all (Baker and Ivancevich, 1971) and
less than a quarter provided any formal orientation training (Baker and
Ivancevich, 1971; Lanier, 1979). In the 1980s, a study of the largest
U.S. MNCs found that "only 25 percent offer extensive pre-departure
orientation training programs" (Baliga and Baker, 1985, p. 35). According to Tung (1982), only 32 percent of U.S. companies surveyed
provided training. European and Japanese MNCs did more: 69 percent
among European, and 57 percent among Japanese.
Evidence for European MNCs is rather sparse. There is some evidence that the Europeans did more training in the 1970s and in the
1980s; more than half of Swedish companies provided formal training
(Torbirn, 1982), as did about half of a general survey of European
corporations (Tung, 1982, p. 66).
Some companies arrange shadowing opportunities in which em-
Chris Brewster is Professor of European Human Resource Management and Juana
Pickard is a Ph.D. student at Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield Institute
of Technology, Cranfield, Bedford, UK, MK43 OAL.
18
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 19
ployees take responsibility for a country operation prior to moving
across to that country.
European MNCs provide a variety of means of preparation. In one
study, informal briefings were used by two-thirds of the MNCs as
standard policy; in other companies, the expatriates often organized
their own briefings. Others use "look-see" visits for all their expatr
ates, and a few attempt to arrange significant overlaps of tours of dut
Most of the European MNCs make explicit provision for languag
training, and nearly all will make arrangements for it "if necessary
Formal training courses were used by nearly half the European MNC
(Brewster, 1988).
Very little is known about the training that is done; but it is encour
aging that nearly all the evidence points in the same direction. The
most important finding here is that training is closely correlated wit
expatriate skills and expatriate performance. Tung (1982) argues that
there is a clear negative correlation between lack of training and expa
triate failure. Statistically, her argument may not be strong, but th
logic is clear. A valuable article by Black and Mendenhall (1990)
reviews U.S. empirical studies on the subject: twenty-nine in all. The
found a positive relationship between cross-cultural training and the
development of appropriate perceptions relative to members of anoth
culture; that training was positively correlated with adjustment; and
that there was a positive relationship to performance.
Studies of the form of training, though sparse, seem to show that i
is the process, rather than the type, of training that is important. Earley
(1987), for example, demonstrates that preparation for managers "ha
beneficial effects on managerial performance overseas" (he is report
ing on managers from the United States sent to South Korea). However, he found that both documentary and interpersonal approaches
were equally effective.
Although business organizations frequently doubt the value of suc
training (Baker and Ivancevich, 1971; Tung, 1982; Zeira, 1975), on
argument is that it is the lack of a theoretical framework that causes the
question about the value of such training to remain unanswered. What
is needed is both a model of the process and more empirical data.
Some interesting training models have been developed, notably by
Tung (1982), Rahim (1983), and Mendenhall and Oddou (1986). The
suggest that the depth of training provided should depend on the task
the environment, and the individual, or on the length of stay, the extent
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
20 BREWSTER AND PICKARD (UK)
of integration into the host culture, and the cultural "difference" of the
host country from the home country.
It was decided to examine more carefully the assumptions that lie
behind much expatriate preparation.
Hypotheses
The provision of training
Most of the studies (including, for example, Murray and Murray, 1986,
and Brewster, 1991) find that, while companies are often uncertain
about the value of training for expatriate assignments, the expatriates
themselves tend to be more positive. This is not surprising. They are
being put into a new and difficult position, in an environment that they
do not understand, and with great expectations of performance weighing on them. The support implicit in the provision of training, the
opportunity to reflect in a time of turmoil, and the chance to absorb
valuable information should lead us to expect that:
HI. Expatriates and their partners will respond favorably to the
provision of specific formal courses and will find them to have
been beneficial to their ability to adapt.
Expatriates and their partners
The importance of the role of the partner, or "spouse" (in most cases)
has received ever more attention in the literature. It is now clear that it
is often the partner's failure to adjust that leads to the early termination
of an assignment (Black and Stephens, 1989; Harvey, 1985), although
most organizations still make assumptions about the partner's willingness to follow when selecting expatriates (Brewster, 1991). Furthermore, it is known that these assumptions are increasingly under threat
as family life-styles change and the number of dual-career couples
increases. It is important not to assume too readily that preparation that
is appropriate for one partner will suit the other. Therefore, we tested
the proposition that:
H2. Expatriates and their partners will respond differently to
training programs.
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 21
Age
Heller (1980) conjectured that the more mature person is more likely to
have the criteria necessary to adjust to working in a foreign environment: experience, ability to do the job, breadth, and broad horizons.
We considered similarly that more mature expatriates are likelier to
have experienced job transition and relocation (whether at home or
overseas), and are likelier to have experienced a wider variety of training (although not necessarily cross-cultural training). They are likely to
hold more senior positions within their organizations and to play different
roles on the foreign assignment. Thus, it was possible to hypothesize:
H3. Younger expatriates will find the training more valuable than
older expatriates.
Previous expatriate experience
It has been argued that previous expatriate experience will facilitate
adjustment to a new expatriate environment (Church, 1982). Torbirn
(1982), however, found that while previous expatriate work experience
was related to higher level of adjustment, the amount did not seem to
matter: adjustment was not related to the duration of previous experience. Later studies by Black (1988) found that previous overseas work
experience was related to work adjustment for expatriates, but not to
general adjustment.
In terms of preparation in general, and the training from which the
data here are drawn in particular, it seemed possible that those with
expatriate experience might well feel that such experience already
went some way towards fitting them for a further adjustment. Expatri-
ates themselves have made this point (Brewster, 1991). This led to
testing the proposition:
H4. Previous expatriate experience will lead participants to see
the training as less useful.
Point of data capture
Perceptions of training programs are subjective, and liable to change
with time: in particular, perceptions held by attendees immediately
following the course might be modified by their actual expatriate experience, and might be modified again by their return from the assign-
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
22 BREWSTER AND PiCKARD (UK)
ment. Furthermore, there is considerable unanimity in the literature to
the effect that an expatriate assignment generally passes through a
"honeymoon" stage during which the expatriate observes but does not
come to terms with the new environment, followed by a learning pe-
riod during which adjustment takes place (Black and Gregersen,
1991; Gullahorn and Gullahorn, 1963; Torbirn, 1982). The length
of the assignment might also be a factor. The literature contains a
variety of estimates for the length of an "average" expatriate assign-
ment. Tung (1987) quotes two to three years for U.S. MNCs and
five or more years for European MNCs; Black (1988) estimates
three to five years; Brewster (1991) found that the "average" varied
with the nationality of the MNC. It is arguable that those assigned
for longer periods would have a greater desire or requirement to
adjust to the foreign assignment, and this would affect their perceptions of the training course.
In terms of point of data capture, therefore, we tested the hypothesis
that:
H5. Expatriate responses to the value of training will vary with
the point at which they were asked their views (before, during, and
after assignment); and with the anticipated length of the assignment.
Location
For many companies involved in making international transfers, distinctions between different parts of the world are reflected in the most
explicit of ways, by different payments or salaries. The literature too
reflects this distinction, but goes beyond it to argue that it is the "cultural" distance between home and host culture that creates the problem
(Dowling and Schler, 1990; Mendenhall and Oddou, 1986; Tung,
1981). However, the major growth in expatriation in recent years has
been between developed countries; hence, in opposition to these views,
it has been argued that in some ways the lack of cultural awareness that
may occur in transfers to similar cultures can also create problems
(Brewster, 1991). We therefore tested the proposal:
H6. Responses to the provision of formal training programs will
vary with the destination of the expatriate.
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 23
Type of employing organization
Not all people on expatriate training programs are sponsored by com-
mercial organizations: others include, for example, governmental
agencies, charities, and religious organizations. Their requirements of
training courses and their expatriate experiences might be far from
uniform and this in turn might affect their perceptions of the training.
Expatriates were asked to classify their sponsoring organization as:
(1) a commercial organization, (2) a mission organization (such as an
embassy or an armed force), or (3) a teaching, charity, or religious
organization. These are in line with three of Cohen's (1977) four expatriate classifications. (Cohen's fourth classification, leisure seekers,
was not considered relevant to this study). We hypothesized that:
H7. Reactions to a uniform training program will vary with the
type of organization employing the participants.
Influence of the expatriate community
Tung (1982) points to the expatriate community present in the host coun-
try as playing a major role as a mutual support mechanism: she notes the
longer history of overseas operations by European MNCs whose foreign
subsidiaries are often well established with a relatively large expatriate
community, so that new arrivals arc "fairly well looked after." Similarly,
Black (1990) points to the expatriate community as a support mechanism
with information and advice to facilitate cross-cultural adjustment.
We felt that the presence or absence of a significant expatriate community might modify the adjustment processes of expatriates, and thus
modify their perceptions of the training program.
Expatriate communities can be classified as: (1) large enough to
influence the type and availability of, for example, foods and shopping
facilities, medical facilities, schools and recreation opportunities
("large"); (2) visible, but not large enough to modify the local environ-
ment significantly ("medium"), or (3) insignificant or nonexistent
("small"). It could be anticipated that those in the larger communities
would have less need of training:
H8. The larger the expatriate community in the host country, the
less valuable would spouses in that community find a program of
predeparture training.
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
24 BREWSTER AND PICKARD (UK)
Degree of social interaction with host nationals
Gregersen and Black (1989) found a positive correlation between the
level of adjustment to interaction with host-country nationals and the
expatriate's intent to stay in the overseas assignment; Black and
Gregersen (1991) found social support from host-country nationals to
be positively correlated to the spouse's adjustment to interacting with
host-country nationals. According to Furnham and Bochner (1986),
"the evidence suggests that most sojourners lead lives that are relatively isolated from their host society. Those sojourners . . . who do have
some intimate contact with host members seem to be more content, satisfied and successful than sojourners who have no such contact."
We considered that while most expatriates will be in contact with
host-country nationals as part of their work, the degree of contact
between the spouse and host country nationals is likely to vary. Accordingly, we asked the spouses to quantify the extent to which their
social activity included host nationals as: (1) almost none with host
nationals, nearly all with other expatriates; (2) 25 percent host nation-
als, 75 percent other expatriates; (3) 50 percent-50 percent; (4) 75
percent host nationals, 25 percent other expatriates, or (5) almost all
host nationals, nearly none with other expatriates.
H9. Expatriate spouses whose social activity included a greater
contact with host nationals would find the training more helpful
than those with less such contact.
Methodology
This study attempted to test these hypotheses by analyzing participant
responses to a well-established and well-supported expatriation program
being run in the United Kingdom. The courses were run by the Centre for
International Briefing at Famham Castle in southern England.
The center is an independent, nonprofit organization that mainly
runs one-week intensive, residential briefing courses for people who
are going to live and work overseas. The courses are designed to help
people who are going to a wide range of assignments; a large majority
come from multinational corporations but courses also include those
from government service, those working in aid programs, and volunteers from charities or churches. The level of training provided approximates Tung's (1981) environmental briefing and cultural orientation
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 25
approaches, and Mendenhall and Oddou's (1986) information-givi
approach.
Information taken directly from the center's 1991 Annual Report
shows that, in 1990-91, the center ran more courses for more participants than in any previous year: in that year 52 full courses were run
for 804 course members.
The population for this study was a sample of 690 expatriates (and
their spouses) who attended courses between 1988 and 1992. The
sample was not entirely random, but consisted of all course members
whose employing organization was able to provide a forwarding address for the expatriate. We have no reason to believe that this sample
is uncharacteristic of the population as a whole.
Two questionnaires were designed, one to be answered by the expatriate and one to be answered by the spouse. In many cases, the ques-
tions were the same, particularly where the answers involved
perceptions of the program. Both questionnaires instructed the respondents to answer the questions without reference to their partner or to
their partner's responses. All expatriates received both questionnaires,
one to be answered by the expatriate and the other to be answered by
the spouse, if there was one. Thus, the selection of the spouses was a
function of the selection of the expatriates: the spouses included in the
study were all partners of expatriates on overseas assignments.
Response rate
Of the 690 questionnaires sent out, 251 expatriate questionnaires were
returned for a response rate of 36 percent. One hundred and sixty-four
spouse questionnaires were returned, and in this case the proportion of
responses can only be indicated indirectly. Completed questionnaires
were received from the spouses of 83 percent of the married expatriates who returned a questionnaire. (Fuller details of the methodology
are available in Pickard and Brewster, 1992).
Population characteristics
The majority of responding course members were male (95 percent),
married (80 percent), British (82 percent; 14 percent were from elsewhere in Europe), and in full-time employment with their sponsoring
organization when selected for the international assignment (95 percent). While course members' ages generally ranged from 25 to 55, the
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
26 BREWSTER AND PICKARD (UK)
most common age group was 31 to 40 (43 percent). Fifty-four percent
had one or more dependent children at the time that they attended the
course. Fifty-six percent had no previous expatriate experience. Course
members were well educated: 53 percent had a university degree,
while 49 percent reported professional qualifications and/or member-
ship of a professional body. Specialization was spread fairly evenly
among technical and managerial disciplines (further details are in Pickard and Brewster, 1992).
Results
Frequencies, means, and standard deviations of the variables characterizing expatriates, spouses, and their expatriate environments are displayed in Table 1. Correlations between these variables are displayed
in Table 2. The relationship between the influence of the expatriate
environment and the extent of social activities with host nationals is
displayed in Table 3. Correlations between these characterizing variables
and the respondents' perceptions of the program and between the spouses'
perceptions of the program and the degree of difficulty they encountered in
adjusting to aspects of the expatriate environment were analyzed. Space
limits their inclusion here (they are available from the authors).
The results in terms of the hypotheses we established are interesting.
First (HI), expatriates and their partners are very positive about the
value of this kind of preparation prior to the assignment. Murray and
Murray (1986) suggest that information briefings make little difference
to subsequent performance on the assignment. While our study did not
address performance specifically, it is clear that the expatriates them-
selves believe firmly that such briefings have helped them in their
assignments.
Expatriates and their partners (H2) tended to be almost equally positive about the program, although there was some variation with regard
to certain of its elements. For example, women were more critical of
the "living in the host community" elements of the program.
Expatriates were divided into three age groups; under 30, 30-39,
over 39. There were no significant differences between the responses
of these age groups (H3).
Expatriates were asked whether this was their first expatriate assignment or they had previous expatriate experience. They were also asked
to list their most recent six expatriate assignment destinations and du-
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 27
Table 1
Personal and environmental variables
Frequency Percentage
Age of the expatriate ("Age")
Up to 29 years 37 15 Cases: 254
30 to 39 years 112 44 Mean: 38.6
40 years and over 105 41 Stddev: 8.83
Previous expatriate experience ("Exp")
1. First assignment 111 44 Cases: 254
2. Previous experience 143 56 Mean: 1.56
Stddev: 0.5
Expatriate status ("Capture")
1. Predeparture 15 6 Cases: 252
2. On assignment 161 64 Mean: 2.24
3.
Returned
76
30
StdDev.:0.55
Type of sponsoring organization
1. Commercial 193 82 Cases: 236
2. Mission 36 15 Mean: 1.18
("Em
3. Teaching, culture 7 3 Stddev: 0.39
Expected length of expatriate assignment (measured in mo
1 year 9 4 Cases: 232
2 years 74 32 Mean: 33.5
3 years 98 42 Stddev: 12.08
4 years 40 1 7
5 years or over 1 1 5
Time on current assignment (measured in month
Up to 2 months 6 4 Cases: 160
3 to 11 months 16 10 Mean: 28.55
12 to 23 months 35 22 Stddev: 14.26
24 to 35 months 60 37
36 to 47 months 32 20
48 months or more 1 1 7
Influence of the expatriate community ("Comm
1. Small 23 14 Cases: 165
2. Medium 41 25 Mean: 2.47
3. Large 101 61 Stddev: 0.73
Extent of socialization with host nationals ("Soc
1. Almost none 68 42 Cases: 162
2. 25% 44 27 Mean: 2.1
3. 50% 24 15 Stddev: 1.21
4.
75%
18
11
5. Almost all 8 5
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
28 BREWSTER AND PICKARD (UK)
Table 2
Correlations between personal and environmental variables
Variables Age Exp Capture Emp Length Part Comm
Exp 0.28***
Capture -0.08 -0.13*
Emp 0.11 0.13* -0.06
Length 0.17** 0.15* -0.22** -0.03
Part 0.00 -0.09 -0.06 -0.14 0.26**
Comm 0.01 0.07 -0.02 -0.02 0.07 0.24**
Socact 0.02 -0.06 0.13 0.17* -0.16 -0.03 -0.54***
Exp = previous expatriate experience; Capture = point
sponsor; Length = expected length of assignment; Part
influence of expatriate community; Socact = socializati
rations. "Previous expatriate experience" wa
spondents who reported at least six months
tion. There were no significant differences
with and those without previous expatriate e
The point of data capture (H5) made little
signment appeared to be a little less positive
and those who had returned from the assig
still. Responses were not significantly modi
assignment, however, which implies that "p
step function, and that the psychological ef
the assigned country take place comparativel
Destination (H6) was a significant variab
way. Responses were broadly similar for a
world, with the exception of North America
for these destinations are comparatively sma
to be treated with caution. Three related reas
First, the Centre for International Briefing
offer courses in these two areas: it is possibl
of experience means that the programs are n
ond, there is evidence (Hofstede, 1980; Laur
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 29
Table 3
Relationship between size of the expatriate community and interaction
with host nationals
Expatriate
community Almost none 25% 50% or more
Small
2
19
cases
9.7 6.2 7.1 expected value
8.7 8.7 82.6 row %
2.9 4.5 38.0 column %
Medium
12
14
14
cases
1 6.8 1 0.9 1 2.3 expected value
30.0 35.0 35.0 row %
17.6 31.8 28.0 column %
Large
54
28
cases
41 .6 26.9 30.6 expected value
54.5 28.3 17.2 row %
79.4 63.6 34.0 column %
Chi-square statistic: 41.2.
Significance: 0.0000
are culturally similar to the United King
center programs are less relevant and the
require less preparation. Third, these are a
much more familiar to the mainly British
who attend the center: their knowledge o
through all forms of media and often vi
they start from a higher base and are more
The type of organization that the expat
little difference to responses.
For both expatriate and spouse, the varia
perceptions of the program was "influen
nity" (H8). This variable significantly mo
responses, and 1 1 of the 14 spouse res
spouses in locations with influential expat
likely to recommend the program, more l
met its aim, and more likely to find the p
ment to the environment.
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
30 BREWSTER AND PICKARD (UK)
The influence of the variable "extent of social activity with host
nationals" (H9) significantly modified responses for the spouse, but
not for the expatriate - this despite its high (negative) correlation with
"influence of the expatriate community." Spouses with higher levels of
social interaction with host nationals found the program to have been
more helpful in adjusting to six of the twelve environmental aspects:
these same six environmental aspects were also modified by the variable "influence of the expatriate community."
By contrast, "influence of the expatriate community" modified
spouse responses to four of the twelve questions relating to ease or
difficulty of adjusting to the environment, while "extent of social activ-
ity with host nationals" modified spouse responses to six of the same
twelve questions: the two variables, however, tended to influence different responses so that, between them, nine of the twelve responses
were modified by these two variables.
The interaction of these two variables, then, appears to be as follows: larger expatriate communities lead to lower levels of interaction
with host nationals and easier adjustment to the environment, yet
higher levels of interaction with host nationals also lead to easier adjustment to the environment.
After considering the implications of this interaction, therefore, we
propose the model of the adjustment process that appears in figure
1. This model applies particularly to the spouse, and may be somewhat less valid for the expatriate.
We propose that:
Large expatriate communities provide considerable levels of
support to the newly arrived spouse, and can act to isolate the
spouse from the host environment. This support and isolation
allows the spouse to "adjust" relatively easily, but this "adjustment" may be more to the local expatriate community than to
the host-country environment itself. Finding adjustment rela-
tively easy, therefore, spouses will be more likely to find the
training to have been "very helpful" or "helpful."
In some locations having an influential expatriate community,
a minority of spouses will seek out and/or accept social activity with, and support from, host nationals, in addition to ac-
cepting the mutual support available from the expatriate
community. Having the best of both worlds, as it were, these
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 31
Accepts support ___^_ ____
from expatriate ___^_ Easy I ____ Reports
Large
Mutual
support
Expatriate __ available from from host Helpful"
Community
expatriate
community
Reports
Isolated from I I sy I training
_ host nationals, but __ to _ "Very
accepts support from | adjust Helpful"
expatriate community or
I "Helpful"
Accepts support __ Less easy _ Reports
M from host nationals M to adjust training
expatriate _ support
community available from
expatriate
community
Rejects support _ Difficult __ Reports
__ (or support not 1 to adjust training
available) from | "Unhelpful"
host nationals I
Figure 1 Proposed Model of the Influence of the Expatriate Community
upon Adjustment and Perception of Training
spouses find it comparatively easy to adjust to the host environment. This easy adjustment also leads them to determine
the program to have been "very helpful" or "helpful."
Small expatriate communities will be less able to provide support to the newly arrived spouse, and will have less scope for
isolating the spouse from the host environment. If social interaction with host nationals is possible and is accepted by the
spouse, then this interaction may provide a significant measure
of support and assistance in adjusting to the new environment.
The process of adjustment is, however, likely to be more difficult than it would have been in a location having a significant
expatriate community. A spouse in this situation, therefore,
may have some difficulty in adjusting to the host environment.
This will be reflected back in their attitude to the training,
which they will judge as having been less successful in helping
them to adjust.
In a location that has a small expatriate community and where
social interaction is seen as difficult or is rejected by the
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
32 BREWSTER AND PICKARD (UK)
spouse, the support available is limited indeed. Adjustment to
the host environment becomes very difficult in such cases. A
spouse in this situation, therefore, is likely to consider the
program "unhelpful."
Cohen (1977) lends considerable support to some of these propositions. He points out that the expatriate bears a responsibility role to his
company as an employee, to his country as an ambassador, and to the
host country as a temporary citizen. This representational role may add
to the expatriate's prestige, but it also puts constraints on his behavior,
creating strains from which the expatriate may seek to relax in the
privacy of his "environmental bubble." This represents an attempt by
the minority expatriate community to transform its ecological, institutional, and social microenvironment in order to resolve its adjustment
problems by minimizing the degree of adjustment its members are
asked to make. By this means, expatriates can continue to lead much of
their accustomed way of life with comparatively fewer adjustments to
the host environment.
But individuals do not all use expatriate institutions to the same
degree, nor are they equally desirous of the protection of the "environ-
mental bubble" - some find it obnoxious and oppressive, and try to
escape it by "going native," adopting local ways and cutting themselves off from headquarters. It should be noted, however, that even
those expatriates tend to avail themselves occasionally of both its institutions and its social support.
Female spouses experience more severe adjustment problems than
male expatriates. First, because the expatriate community is male-cen-
tered: it is usually the husband's job that is the raison d'tre for the
family's stay abroad. His associates and companions in the sponsoring
organization define the context within which social relationships and
friendship circles are established. Second, while the husband's role is
continuous, it is the wife who must transfer family life to the new
surroundings, build new friendships, and deal with issues of health and
schools. Furthermore, the role of the wife is likely to change: working
women may be unable to continue working, and the accustomed
housewife's role may be changed through different household arrangements and by the availability of cheap household help.
That wives face severe and particular adjustment problems becomes
important when laid against research indicating that spouse adjustment
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 33
is a major factor in the success or failure of expatriates (Harvey, 1985
Tung, 1981). Much of this work relied upon the opinions of U.
human resource managers. Nevertheless, empirical research (Blac
1988; Black and Stephens, 1989) has found a significant and positive
relationship between spouse and expatriate adjustments.
Conclusions
This research program has shown that expatriates and their partners are
very positive towards formal training for expatriation. They believe
that it helps them to make the adjustment to living and working in the
host country. Their belief is not significantly affected by the age at
which they received the training, previous expatriate experience, the
point at which they are asked for their responses, the destination (other
than a difference between underdeveloped and developed societies), or
the type of organization for which the expatriate works. The data captured by this survey suggests that the degree of influence exercised by
the expatriate community may affect the difficulty with which expatri-
ates and (possibly to a greater extent) their spouses adjust to the host
environment. While cross-cultural training may simply assist an al-
ready easy adjustment process for expatriates and spouses who are
supported by a significant expatriate community, a higher degree of
cross-cultural training may be required for expatriates and spouses
assigned to locations having a limited expatriate community in order to
enable them to utilize better the assistance and support of host nationals to ease their adjustment into the new environment.
References
Baker, J.C., and Ivancevich, J.M. "The Assignment of American Executives
Abroad: Systematic, Haphazard or Chaotic?" California Management Review,
13, 3 (1971): 39-44.
Baliga, G.M., and Baker, J.C. "Multinational Corporate Policies for Expatriate
Managers: Selection, Evaluation." Advanced Management Journal, 50, 4
(1985): 31-38.
Black, J.S. "Work Role Transitions: A Study of American Expatriate Managers in
Japan." Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (1985): 277-294.
Expatriate Managers in America." Management Int
(1990): 119-134.
Black, J.S., and Gregerscn, H.B. "When Yankee Comes
Expatriate and Spouse Repatriation Adjustment." J
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
34 BREWSTER AND PICKARD (UK)
Business Studies, 22 (1991): 671-694.
Black, J.S., and Mendenhall, M. "Cross-Cultural Training Effectiveness: A Review and a Theoretical Framework for Future Research." Academy of Management Review, 15, 1 (1990): 113-136.
Black, J.S., and Stephens, G.K. "The Influence of the Spouse on American Expatriate Adjustment and Intent to Stay in Pacific Rim Overseas Assignments."
Journal of Management, 15, 4 (1989): 529-544.
Brewster, C. The Management of Expatriates: A Report on the Selection and
Training of Expatriates by European MNCs. Cranfcld School of Management
Human Resources Research Centre, Monograph 2, Cranfield, United Kingdom, 1988.
Brislin, R.W. Cross Cultural Encounters. New Yor
Church, AT. "Sojourner Adjustment." Psycholog
572.
Cohen, E. "Expatriate Communities." Current Soc
ine, 24, 3 (1977): 5-133.
Dowling, P.J., and Schler, R.S. International D
Management. Boston: PWS Kent Publishing, 199
Earley, P.C. "Intercul turai Training for Managers:
and Interpersonal Methods." Academy of Man
685-608
Furnham, A., and Bochner, S. Culture Shock: Psychological Reactions to U
miliar Environment. London: Routledge, 1986.
Gregersen, H.B., and Black, J.S. "The Relationships of Commitment and A
ment with Expatriate Employees' Intent to Stay." Proceedings at the T
International Conference of the Eastern Academy of Management, H
Kong, 1989, pp. 30-34.
Gullahom, J.T., and Gullahom, J.E. "An Extension of the U-Curve Hypot
Journal of Social Issues, 19. 3 (196): 33-47.
Harris, P.R., and Harris, D.L. "Intercultural Education for International Managers." International and Intercultural Communications Annual, 3 (1976): 7085.
Harvey, M. "The Executive Family: An Overlooked Variable in International
Assignments." Columbia Journal of World Business, 10 (1985): 84-92.
Heller, J.E. "Criteria for Selecting an International Manager." Personnel (MayJune 1980): 47-55.
Hofstede, G. Culture's Consequences: International Differences: Work-Related
Values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1980.
Landis, D., and Brislin, R. Handbook on Intercultural Training, vol. 1. New
York: Pergamon Press. 1983.
Lanier, A.R. "Selecting and Preparing Personnel for Overseas Transfers." Personnel Journal, 58,3 (1979): 106-163.
Laurent, A. "The Cultural Diversity of Western Conceptions of Management."
International Studies of Management and Organization, 13, 1-2 (1983): 7596.
Mendenhall, M., and Oddou, G. "The Dimensions of Expatriate Acculturation; A
Review "Academy of Management Review, 10, 1 (1985): 39-47.
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
EVALUATING EXPATRIATE TRAINING 35
Cultural Training Programs." Columbia Journal
(1986): 73-79.
Murray, F., and Murray, A. "Global Managers for Global Business." Sloan Management Review. 27. 2 986): 75-78.
Pickard, J., and Brewster, C. An Evaluation of Expatriate Training. Cranfield,
UK, Cranfield School of Management Report, 1992.
Rahim, A. "A Model for Developing Key Expatriate Executives." Personnel
Journal, 62, 4 (1983): 312-317.
Torbim, I. Living Abroad: Personal Adjustment and Personnel Policy in the
Overseas Setting. New York: Wiley, 1982.
Tung, R.L. "Selecting and Training of Personnel for Overseas Assignments."
Columbia Journal of World Business, 16, 1 (1981): 68-78.
tinationals." California Management Review, 25, 1
Academy of Management Executive, 1, 2 (1987):
Zeira, Y. "Overlooked Personnel Problems of Mul
lumbia Journal of World Business, 10, 2 (1975): 9
This content downloaded from 14.142.16.3 on Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:26:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms