Safety and Side Effect Profile of Fluoxetine: Review
Safety and Side Effect Profile of Fluoxetine: Review
General
1. Introduction
Fluoxetine (Prozac, Eli Lilly & Co.) was the first selective serotonin re-uptake
inhibitor (SSRI) to be approved in the USA. Since FDA approval in 1987, it has
been used by millions of patients worldwide, and has been the subject of extensive
literature, both scientific and lay. A Medline search for fluoxetine, conducted in
April 2004, yielded 5832 citations.
Developing a drug that is first-in-class provides the manufacturer with many
advantages, but also creates considerable anxiety on the part of regulators, the medi-
cal community, the public (including patients) and the manufacturer. This is
because there is no experience with this class of drug. In the case of fluoxetine, a
heightened sense of anxiety was created by zimeledine, which had been approved in
Europe, but was withdrawn due to postmarketing reports of a flu-like syndrome,
which was rarely associated with GuillianBarr syndrome. This rare idiosyncratic
reaction appears to be related to the chemical structure of zimeledine, as fluoxetine
and other SSRIs are not associated with such a syndrome [1].
2. Methods
For reprint orders, please
contact:
reprints@ashley-pub.com This review is based on published literature generated by a Medline search. Articles,
the titles of which suggested that they focused on safety issues, were selected for fur-
ther consideration and are reviewed here. Rather than citing every report in the
extensive fluoxetine literature, articles were chosen for their heuristic value. Case
reports are discussed only if they are of particular interest. Comparisons to other
drugs are made only if absolutely necessary.
Ashley Publications
www.ashley-pub.com Adverse event reporting frequencies were based on data reported by
Beasley et al. [2]. The authors reported rates of spontaneously reported (as opposed
to solicited events) adverse events for patients taking fluoxe- can be used safely in patients with panic disorder. A study of
tine and placebo in trials of patients taking fluoxetine at fluoxetine in patients with panic disorder indicates that the
doses ranging 20 80 mg/day, as well as for studies in which adverse event profile is similar to that in patients with
patients took only 20 mg/day. Frequencies from studies depression [7], again suggesting that the adverse event profile
in which fluoxetine 20 80 mg/day was given, as well as does not preclude usefulness of the drug in patients who suf-
for studies utilising fluoxetine 20 mg/day and the respective fer from, or are likely to develop, such complaints.
placebo rates, are shown in this review. To avoid having 3.1.1.2 Long-term treatment
to make comparison to two placebo rates (from studies Although individual depressive episodes may respond to
where fluoxetine was taken at doses of 20 80 mg/day and therapy fairly rapidly, it has become clear that even in these
20 mg/day), fluoxetine rates for the 20 mg/day studies were patients, longer-term therapy is crucial in order to prevent
also adjusted for placebo rates. This was done as follows: relapse. Conducting long-term placebo-controlled studies of
Fluoxetine (FLX)20adjusted = FLX20 observed * (Placebo depressed patients is difficult, although it has been accom-
[PBO]20 80/PBO20) where: plished, and efficacy of fluoxetine in relapse prevention has
been demonstrated [8,9]. Relapse prevention studies, in which
FLX20adjusted = the adjusted rate for patients taking
responders are randomised to continue on a drug or switch to
fluoxetine 20 mg/day
placebo, have provided comparative data on long-term ther-
FLX20observed = the observed rate for patients taking
apy in a controlled setting. Adverse events tend to occur
fluoxetine 20 mg/day
early, and do not usually appear during long-term therapy
PBO20 80 = the observed rate for patients taking pla-
[10]. In a 48-week study, Gilaberte et al. [11] found that
cebo in the studies where fluoxetine was taken at doses of
patients who switched from fluoxetine to placebo were more
20 80 mg/day
likely to report anxiety than those who continued on fluoxet-
PBO20 = the observed rate for patients taking placebo in
ine, but otherwise there were no statistically significant dif-
the studies where fluoxetine was taken at 20 mg/day.
ferences between groups.
During long-term therapy, the initial weight loss experi-
3. Results enced by many patients tends to subside, with mean weight
only slightly lower than when therapy was started [12,13]. In
3.1 Adverse event profile
some studies modest weight gain, associated with relief of
3.1.1 Common events
depression, has been reported [12].
3.1.1.1 Acute treatment
Reports of adverse events possibly associated with fluoxetine
3.1.2 Uncommon but important events
have appeared in numerous reports of clinical trials. The
3.1.2.1 Sexual dysfunction
first comprehensive review of fluoxetine over the dose range
Sexual desire is often inhibited in depressed patients [14],
20 80 mg/day first appeared in 1985 [1], and was updated in
which complicates assessment of drug effects. Nevertheless,
2000 with much larger numbers [2]. Adverse events reported
fluoxetine is known to delay time to orgasm in men and
by Beasley et al. for > 5% of patients taking fluoxetine at doses
women, and possibly to inhibit libido, but many patients
ranging 20 80 mg/day, adjusted as described above, are
develop tolerance to these effects [15]. Inhibition of orgasm is a
shown in Table 1. Common adverse events reported with the
property that has been exploited to treat men with premature
recommended dose of 20 mg/day are referable to the gastroin-
ejaculation [16]. In addition to disturbances of arousal and
testinal (GI) system (nausea, diarrhoea and anorexia) and the
orgasm, decreased sensation in primary and secondary sex
nervous system (insomnia, somnolence, anxiety and asthenia).
organs has been reported [17].
The approved dose range is up to 80 mg/day, and when 3.1.2.2 Mania and hypomania
higher doses are used, adverse events are more common. Induction of mania, especially in patients with undiag-
However, even the higher doses are quite well-tolerated, nosed bipolar disorder being treated for an episode of
including the 90 mg once-weekly formulation [3]. Adverse depression, is always of concern. Rates of mania or hypo-
events commonly associated with initiation of fluoxetine ther- mania during fluoxetine therapy are considered to be low,
apy tend to subside, and it was found that no adverse events and range 0 15%, depending on the type of patient and
reported initially became more frequent late in therapy [4]. duration of therapy [18]. Hypomania and exacerbation of
The advisability of whether or not to use a drug likely to behavioural abnormalities have been reported in patients
produce undesirable effects already suffered by the patient as with Aspergers syndrome [19]. Hypomania has also been
part of their disorder is relevant. Pretreatment insomnia and reported following a serotonin syndrome (discussed below)
anxiety did not influence the outcome of treatment with associated with concomitant use of fluoxetine and tramadol
fluoxetine [5], and fluoxetine used for treatment of patients [20]. Patients with bipolar disorder who have a deletion in
who suffered insomnia as part of their depression responded the promoter region of the gene that codes for the serot-
just as well to fluoxetine as those without insomnia [6]. Simi- onin transporter have been found to be particularly suscep-
larly, adverse events such as anxiety and nervousness may tible to mania [21], as well as insomnia and agitation [22].
raise questions as to whether or not drugs such as fluoxetine
496 Expert Opin. Drug Saf. (2004) 3(5)
Wernicke
the US and Europe to mandate class labelling, which warns Many depressed patients suffer from illness in addition to their
about this possibility. The actual data on which this warning depression, and these disorders require treatment at the same
is based have not been published. time that the depression is treated. Cardiac disease, especially
in older patients, is among the most common co-morbid dis-
3.2.3 Special populations and conditions orders with depression. In a series of 27 patients with conges-
3.2.3.1 Children and adolescents tive heart failure, conduction disease, and/or ventricular
Children develop steady-state plasma concentrations of arrhythmias, fluoxetine was found to be safe [72], and this was
fluoxetine and norfluoxetine that are approximately twice confirmed in a larger study of patients with congestive heart
those of adolescents, whose pharmacokinetic parameters are failure [31]. Fluoxetine, like other SSRIs, may actually decrease
similar to those of adults [57]. Nevertheless, fluoxetine is the risk of myocardial infarction due to its serotonin-depleting
generally well-tolerated in children and adolescents, with an effect on platelets [73]. Fluoxetine has no effect on blood pres-
adverse event profile similar to that of adults. Safety data sure, either in patients with hypertension or those who are nor-
have been reported for studies of numerous indications, motensive [74]. This does not mean that patients taking
including depression [58], anxiety [59] and obsessive-compul- fluoxetine may not experience cardiac and other events.
sive disorder [60,61]. Indeed, the package insert lists many treatment-emergent
events (first appeared or worsened during therapy). This does St Johns wort is becoming an increasingly popular herbal
not mean that they were caused by the drug, only that they preparation used for self-medication of depression.
first appeared during the study. Proximity does not prove, or Unfortunately, some patients do not consider it as a drug and
even imply, causality. However, infrequent events cannot be fail to mention it when being prescribed an antidepressant.
discounted as unrelated to drug. It is only with the collection St Johns wort contains many pharmacologically active com-
of more data that causal relationships can be determined. pounds, and is capable of inhibiting synaptic serotonin re-
3.2.3.4.2 Stroke uptake [83]. When given with fluoxetine, a serotonergic syn-
Stroke is often followed by depression. Fluoxetine was found drome can ensue, a problem that is compounded by inhibi-
to be safe in this population, and in fact, has been reported to tion of CYPs that metabolise the active ingredient [84].
decrease mortality in patients who have suffered a stroke, 3.2.4.2 Non-serotonergic drugs and therapies
regardless of whether or not they are depressed [75]. Patients with complex neuropsychiatric disorders often require
3.2.3.4.3 Diabetes combination therapy, especially with antipsychotics. The com-
Depression is a common co-morbid condition with diabetes. bination of fluoxetine and olanzapine has been studied exten-
Fluoxetine is generally well-tolerated by diabetic patients and sively, and found to be well-tolerated [85]. In fact, this
may actually improve peripheral insulin resistance. The package combination has been marketed under the name of Symbyax
insert cautions that insulin doses may need to be adjusted. A case (Eli Lilly & Co.). Although the fluoxetine package insert cau-
of loss of hypoglycaemic awareness (hunger, diaphoresis and gen- tions that ECT-induced seizures may be prolonged, there is lit-
eralised weakness) while taking fluoxetine has been reported [76]. tle evidence that that this is a problem in clinical practice [86].
3.2.3.4.4 Cancer The concomitant use of oral contraceptives and fluoxetine
Treatment of depression in cancer patients is often complicated has been reported to be safe, with neither drug having a sub-
by the compromised health of these patients and increased stantial effect on the other [87].
potential for drug interactions during cancer therapy. Fluoxet- Excessive bleeding has been reported in patients receiving
ine has been found to be generally well-tolerated in a popula- heparin for anticoagulation [88]. Presumably this is the result
tion of patients suffering from cancer as well as depression [77]. of fluoxetine-associated depletion of platelet serotonin, lead-
ing to platelet dysfunction. Under normal circumstances, this
3.2.4 Drug and other interactions is generally of no consequence. An interaction with warfarin,
3.2.4.1 Serotonin effects manifest as increased anticoagulation, has been reported [89],
Fluoxetine and other SSRIs lead to an increase in serotonin although the hypoprothrombonaemic response of warfarin
through the inhibition of serotonin transport mechanisms. was found not to be altered by fluoxetine [90]. Given the dire
An excessive elevation of serotonin, usually the result of taking consequences of over-anticoagulation, caution is advised.
more than one serotonergic drug, may lead to what is termed Fluoxetine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, which is an
a serotonin syndrome. Signs of the serotonin syndrome important enzyme in the metabolism of 30% of all drugs
include mental status changes (confusion, hypomania), agita- [62]. Thus, plasma concentrations of drugs metabolised by
tion, myoclonus, muscle rigidity (usually lower extremity pre- CYP2D6 are the most likely to be altered by fluoxetine. Due
dominating), hyperreflexia, diaphoresis, shivering, tremor, to relatively wide margins of safety, these changes are not clin-
diarrhoea, incoordination and fever. However, not all of these ically relevant for many drugs, and dangerous drug interac-
are required to make the diagnosis [78], and other signs includ- tions between fluoxetine and other drugs are reported to be
ing apnoea, coma and flaccid paralysis, have been reported rare [91]. CYP3A4 is weakly inhibited by fluoxetine, but
[79]. In severe cases of serotonin syndrome, deaths have been important interactions are less likely than with drugs metabo-
reported, which is why most SSRIs, including fluoxetine, are lised by CYP2D6. Drugs metabolised by these enzymes may
contraindicated with MAOIs. be used in conjunction with fluoxetine, but additional precau-
The nonspecific MAOIs are irreversible inhibitors of the tions must be taken, and sometimes monitoring of plasma
enzyme, requiring 2 weeks before new molecules are synthe- concentrations and dose adjustments are advisable. Examples
sised. Thus, fluoxetine should not be given within 2 weeks of of some of the more important drug interactions related to
discontinuation of an MAOI. Due to the long half-life of CYP inhibition are given in Table 2. This list is given as an
fluoxetine (3 4 days), and the even longer half-life of its example, and should not be considered to be exhaustive.
active metabolite, norfluoxetine (1 2 weeks), MAOIs should Comprehensive and up-to-date information on drug interac-
not be given until 5 weeks (5 half-lifes) after fluoxetine has tions can be found online [202].
been discontinued.
Use of other drugs in conjunction with fluoxetine has been 3.2.5 Drug withdrawal
reported to result in a serotonin syndrome. These include tra- Because of the long half-life of fluoxetine and its active metabo-
madol [80] (which is metabolised by cytochrome P450 lite, norfluoxetine, this drug is essentially self-tapering, and
[CYP]2D6, an enzyme inhibited by fluoxetine), sumatriptan abrupt discontinuation is generally well-tolerated [97]. The inci-
[81] (presumably other triptans could interact in a similar dence of discontinuation symptoms tends to be lower than
manner) and meperidine [82]. with other antidepressants, including other SSRIs [98,99], with
headache being the only adverse event reported significantly generally safe and well-tolerated, including in younger and
more often than with placebo [100], although dizziness, light- older patients, pregnant women and those with concomi-
headedness and eye twitching have also been reported [101]. tant illnesses. Common adverse events reported with the
The long half-life of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine may be recommended dose of 20 mg/day are referable to the GI
an advantage in that withdrawal symptoms are expected to be system (nausea, diarrhoea and anorexia), and the nervous
uncommon, but could be of concern when starting other system (insomnia, somnolence, anxiety and asthenia). The
drugs. As noted above, it is recommended that 5 weeks elapse approved dose range is up to 80 mg/day, and when higher
before MAOIs are started. For drugs that are not serotonergic, doses are used, adverse events are more common. The long
for instance reboxetine, which is purely noradrenergic, a half-life of fluoxetine and its active metabolite essentially
switch without tapering of fluoxetine appears to be safe [102]. preclude a withdrawal phenomenon, and the drug can be
Dizziness, unstable gait, nausea, malaise and anxiety have considered to be self-tapering. It is an inhibitor of
been reported in a patient also taking clozapine [103]. CYP2D6 and other CYP enzymes, which increases the
Withdrawal symptoms are also important when patients chances for drug interactions.
intentionally or accidentally interrupt therapy. Five-day inter- The issue of suicidality associated with SSRIs is undergoing
ruption of fluoxetine treatment was found not to be associ- further evaluation. Overall, the risk/benefit ratio of fluoxetine
ated with the emergence of adverse events [104]. is very favourable.
Fluoxetine is an SSRI that has been available for > 15 years, Joachim F Wernicke is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company,
and has been used to treat millions of patients with the manufacturer of Prozac, and participated in the develop-
depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders. It is ment of fluoxetine.
Bibliography 10. TOLLEFSON GD: Adverse drug reactions/ bipolar disorder: preliminary findings.
Papers of special note have been highlighted as interactions in maintenance therapy. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry (2001) 58:539-544.
either of interest () or of considerable interest J. Clin. Psychiatry (1993) 54(Suppl.):48-58. For those interested in the molecular and
() to readers. 11. GILABERTE I, MONTEJO AL, genetic basis of mental illness.
DE LA GANDARA J et al.: 22. PERLIS RH, MISCHOULSON D,
1. WERNICKE JF: The side effect profile Fluoxetine in the prevention of depressive JORDAN W et al.: Serotonin transporter
and safety of fluoxetine. J. Clin. Psychiatry recurrences: a double-blind study. J. Clin. polymorphisms and adverse effects with
(1985) 46(3 Pt 2):59-67. Psychopharmacol. (2001) 21(4):417-424. fluoxetine treatment. Biol. Psychiatry (2003)
2. BEASLEY CM, KOKE SC, 12. MICHELSON D, AMSTERDAM JD, 54:879-883.
NILSSON ME, GONZALES JS: QUITKIN FM et al.: For those interested in the molecular and
Adverse events and treatment Changes in weight during a 1-year trial genetic basis of mental illness.
discontinuation in clinical trials of of fluoxetine. Am. J. Psychiatry (1999) 23. JIMNEZ-JIMNEZ FJ, MOLINA JA:
fluoxetine in major depressive disorder: 156(8):1170-1176. Extrapyramidal symptoms associated with
an updated meta-analysis. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
13. FAVA M, JUDGE R, HOOG SL,
Clin. Ther. (2000) 22:1319-1330. CNS Drugs (2000) 14(5):367-379.
NILSSON ME, KOKE SC:
Large meta-analysis of many clinical trials.
Fluoxetine versus sertraline and paroxetine 24. JIMNEZ-JIMNEZ FJ, PUERTAS I,
3. SCHMIDT ME, FAVA M, ZHANG S, in major depressive disorder: changes in DE TOLEDO-HERAS M:
GONZALES J, RAUTE NJ, JUDGE R: weight during long-term treatment. Drug-induced myoclonus: frequency,
Treatment approaches to major depressive J. Clin. Psychiatry (2000) 61(11):863-867. mechanism and management.
disorder relapse. Part 1: dose increase. CNS Drugs (2004) 18(2):93-104.
14. ROSEN RC, LANE R, MENZA M:
Psychother. Psychosom. (2002)
Effects of SSRIs on sexual function: 25. AKAGI H, KUMAR TM:
71(4):190-194.
a critical review. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Akathisia: overlooked at a cost.
4. ZAJECKA J, AMSTERDAM JD, (1999) 19(1):67-85. Br. Med. J (2002) 324:1506-1507.
QUITKIN FM et al.: Changes in adverse
15. NURNBERG HG, HENSLEY P, 26. BEASLEY CM: Fluoxetine-dopamine
events reported by patients during 6 months
LAURIELLO J: Sildenafil in the treatment interaction data. J. Clin. Psychiatry (1994)
of fluoxetine therapy. J. Clin. Psychiatry
of sexual dysfunction induced by selective 55(2):77-78.
(1999) 60(6):389-394.
serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an overview. 27. MATHEN D, MARSDEN CD,
5. SIMON GE, HEILIGENSTEIN JH, CNS Drugs (2000) 13(5):321-335. BHATIA KP: SSRI-induced reversal of
GROTHAUS L, KATON W, REVICKI D:
16. WALDINGER MD, HENGEVELD MW, levodopa benefit in two patients with
Should anxiety and insomnia influence
ZWINDERMAN AH, OLIVIER B: dopa-responsive dystonia. Mov. Disord.
antidepressant selection: a randomized
Effects of SSRI antidepressants on (1999) 14(5):874-875.
comparison of fluoxetine and imipramine.
ejaculation: a double-blind, randomized, 28. PISANI F, OTERI G, COSTA C,
J. Clin. Psychiatry (1998) 59:49-55.
placebo-controlled study with fluoxetine, DI RAIMONDO G, DI PERRI R:
6. FAVA M, HOOG SL, JUDGE RA, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline. Effects of psychotropic drugs on seizure
KOOP JB, NILSSON ME, J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. (1998) threshold. Drug Saf. (2002) 25(2):91-110.
GONZALES JS: Acute efficacy of 18(4):274-281.
fluoxetine versus sertraline and paroxetine 29. BOURGEOIS J, THOMAS D,
17. MICHAEL A, MAYER C: JOHANSEN T, WALKER DM:
in major depressive disorder including
Fluoxetine-induced anesthesia of vagina and Visual hallucinations associated with
effects of baseline insomnia. J. Clin.
nipples. Br. J. Psychiatry (2000) 176:299. fluoxetine and sertraline. J. Clin.
Psychopharmacol. (2002) 22(2):137-147.
18. HENRY C, DEMONTES-MAINARD J: Psychopharmacol. (1998) 18(6):482-483.
7. MICHELSON D, LYDIARD RB,
Avoiding drug-induced switching in 30. WILKINSON T, BEGG EJ, WINTER A,
POLLACK MH et al.:
patients with bipolar depression. SAINSBURY R: Incidence and risk factors
Outcome assessment and clinical
Drug Saf. (2003) 26(5):337-351. for hyponatraemia following treatment with
improvement in panic disorder: evidence
from a randomized controlled trial of 19. DAMORE J, STINE J, BRODY L: fluoxetine or paroxetine in elderly patients.
fluoxetine and placebo. Am. J. Psychiatry Medication-induced hypomania in Br. J. Pharmacol. 47(2):211-217.
(1998) 155(11):1570-1577. Aspergers disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child 31. ROOSE SP, SPATZ E:
Adolesc. Psychiatry (1998) 37(3):248-249. Treatment of depression in patients with
8. MONTGOMERY SA, DUFOUR H,
BRION S et al.: The prophylactic efficacy 20. GONZALEZ-PINTO A, IMAZ H, heart disease. J. Clin. Psychiatry (1999)
of fluoxetine in unipolar depression. PREZ DE HEREDIA JL, 60(Suppl. 20):34-37.
Br. J. Psychiatry (1988) GUITIERREZ M, MIC JA: 32. BAKER B, DORIAN P, SANDOR P et al.:
153(Suppl. 3):69-76. Mania and tramadol-fluoxetine Electrocardiographic effects of fluoxetine
combination. Am. J. Psychiatry and doxepin in patients with major
9. REIMHERR FW, AMSTERDAM JD,
(2001) 158(6):965. depressive disorder. J. Clin.
QUITKIN FM et al.:
Optimal length of continuation therapy 21. MUNDO E, WALKER M, CATE T, Psychopharmacol. (1997) 17:15-21.
in depression: a prospective assessment MACCIARDI F, KENNEDY JL: 33. VARRIALE P: Fluoxetine (Prozac) as a
during long-term fluoxetine treatment. The role of serotonin transporter protein cause of QT prolongation. Arch. Intern.
Am. J. Psychiatry (1998) 155:1247-1253. gene in antidepressant-induced mania in Med. (2001) 161(4):612.
34. VILINSKY F, LUBIN A: 48. JICK SS, DEAN AD, JICK H: 59. BIRMAHER B, AXELSON DA,
Severe neutropenia associated with Antidepressants and suicide. MONK K et al.:
fluoxetine hydrochloride. Ann. Intern. Br. Med. J. (1995) 310:215-218. Fluoxetine for the treatment of childhood
Med. (1997) 127(7):573-574. 49. MLLER HJ: anxiety disorders. J. Am. Acad. Child
35. CAPELL D, BRUGUERA M, Antidepressants do they decrease or Adolesc. Psychiatry (2003) 42(4):415-423.
FIGUERAS A, LAPORTE JR: increase suicidality? Pharmacopsychiatry 60. GELLER DA, HOOG SL,
Fluoxetine-induced hepatitis: why is (1992) 25:249-253. HEILIGENSTEIN JH et al.:
postmarketing surveillance needed? 50. WALSH MT, DINAN TG: Fluoxetine treatment for obsessive-
Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. (1999) 55:545-546. Selective serotonin uptake inhibitors and compulsive disorder in children and
36. HENRY JA: Epidemiology and relative violence: a review of the available evidence. adolescents: a placebo-controlled clinical
toxicity of antidepressant drugs in overdose. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. (2001) 104(4):84-91. trial. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry
Drug Saf. (1997) 16(6):374-390. (2001) 40(7):773-779.
51. WERNICKE JF, SAYLER ME, KOKE MS,
37. WITCHEL HJ, HANCOX JC, NUTT DJ: PEARSON DK, TOLLEFSON GD: 61. LIEBOWITZ MR, TURNER SM,
Psychotropic drugs, cardiac arrhythmia, and Fluoxetine and concomitantly centrally PIACENTINI J et al.:
sudden death. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. acting medication use in clinical trials of Fluoxetine in children and adolescents
(2003) 23:58-77. depression: the absence of an effect related with OCD: a placebo-controlled trial.
to agitation and suicidal behavior. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry
38. TEICHER MH, GLOD C, COLE JO:
Depress. Anxiety (1997) 6:31-39. (2002) 41(12):1431-1438.
Emergence of intense suicidal
preoccupation during fluoxetine treatment. 52. KHAN A, KHAN S, KOLTS R, 62. SOLAI LK, MULSANT BH,
Am. J. Psychiatry (1990) 147:207-210. BROWN WA: Suicide rates in clinical POLLOCK BG:
trials of SSRIs, other antidepressants, Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for
39. TEICHER MH, GLOD C, COLE JO:
and placebo: analysis of FDA reports. late-life depression, a comparative view.
Antidepressant drugs and the emergence
Am. J. Psychiatry (2003) 160:790-792. Drugs Aging (2001) 18(5):355-368.
of suicidal tendancies. Drug Saf. (1993)
8(3):186-212. Important review of suicidality data. 63. GOLDSTEIN DJ, HAMILTON SH,
53. BEASLEY CM, POTVIN JH, MASICA DN, BEASLEY CM:
40. GUZE SB, ROBINS E: Suicide and
MASICA DN, WHEADON DE, Fluoxetine in medically stable, depressed
primary affective disorders. Br. J. Psychiatry
DORNSEIF BE, GENDUSO LA: geriatric patients: effect on weight. J. Clin.
(1970) 117:437-438.
Fluoxetine: no association with suicidality Psychopharmacol. (1997) 17(5):365-369.
41. WARSHAW MG, KELLER MB:
in obsessive-compulsive disorder. 64. HENDRICK V, STOWE ZN,
The relationship between fluoxetine use
J. Affect. Disord. (1992) 24(1):1-10. ALTSHULER L, HWANG S,
and suicidal behavior in 654 subjects with
54. WHEADON DE, RAMPEY AH, LEE E, HAYES D:
anxiety. J. Clin. Psychiatry (1996)
THOMPSON VL, POTVIN JH, Placental passage of antidepressant
57(4):158-166.
MASICA DN, BEASLEY CM: medication. Am. J. Psychiatry (2003)
42. LEON A, KELLER MB, WARSHAW MG 160:993-996.
Lack of association between fluoxetine
et al.: Prospective study of fluoxetine
and suicidality in bulimia nervosa. 65. COHEN LS, NONACS R,
treatment and suicidal behavior in
J. Clin. Psychiatry (1992) 53(7):235-241. VIGUERA AC, REMINICK A:
affectively ill subjects. Am. J. Psychiatry
55. GOLDSTEIN DJ, RAMPEY AH, Diagnosis and treatment of depression
(1999) 156:195-201.
POTVIN JH, MASICA DN, during pregnancy. CNS Spectr. (2004)
43. HEALY D: Lines of evidence on the risks of 9(3):209-216.
BEASLEY CM: Analysis of suicidality in
suicide with selective serotonin reuptake
double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of 66. HENDRICK V, SMITH LM, SURI R,
inhibitors. Psychother. Psychosom. (2003)
pharmacotherapy for weight reduction. HWANG S, HAYNES D, ALTSHULER L:
72:71-79.
J. Clin. Psychiatry (1993) 54(8):309-316. Birth outcomes after prenatal exposure to
44. OHBERG A, VUORI E, KLAUKKA T, antidepressant medication. Am. J. Obstet.
56. RAMACHANDRI P:
LOONQVIST J: Antidepressants and Gynecol. (2003) 188:812-815.
Treatment of major depressive disorder in
suicide mortality. J. Affect. Disord.
children and adolescents. Br. Med. J. (2004) 67. LAINE K, HEIKKINEN T, EKBLAD U,
(1998) 50:225-233.
328:3-4. KERO P: Effects of exposure to selective
45. TOLLEFSON GD, FAWCETT J, reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy on
57. WILENS TE, COHEN L, BIEDERMAN J
WINOKUR G et al.: serotonergic symptoms in newborns and
et al.: Fluoxetine pharmacokinetics in
Evaluation of suicidality during cord blood monoamine and prolactin
pediatric patients. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.
pharmacologic treatment of mood concentrations. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
(2002) 22:568-575.
and nonmood disorders. Ann. Clin. (2002) 60:720-726.
Psychiatry (1993) 5(4):209-224. 58. EMSLIE GJ, HEILIGENSTEIN JH,
WAGNER KD et al.: 68. NULMAN I, ROVET J, STEWART DE
46. CRUNDWELL JK: Fluoxetine and suicidal et al.: Child development following
Fluoxetine for acute treatment of
ideation a review of the literature. exposure to tricyclic antidepressants or
depression in children and adolescents:
Int. J. Neurosci. (1993) 68(1-2):73-84. fluoxetine throughout fetal life:
a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical
47. LAPIERRE YD: Suicidality with selective trial. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry a prospective controlled study.
serotonin reuptake inhibitors: valid claim? (2002) 41(10):1205-1215. Am. J. Psychiatry (2002) 159:1889-1895.
J. Psychiatry Neurosci. (2003) 28(5):340-347.
69. KELLER F, GRIESSHAMMER M, MANN K: Serotonin syndrome as a result reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of
HUSSLER U, PAULUS W, of fluoxetine in a patient with tramadol depression. Drug Saf. (1998) 18(1):57-82.
SCHWARTZ A: Pregnancy and renal abuse: plasma level-correlated 92. SPINA E, SCORDO MG:
failure: the case for application of dosage symptomatology. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Clinically significant drug interactions
guidelines. Drugs (2001) (2002) 22(4):440-441. with antidepressants in the elderly.
61(13):1901-1920. 81. JOFFE RT, SOKOLOV ST: Drugs Aging (2002) 19(4):299-320.
70. MISRI S, KOSTARAS X: Benefits and risk Co-administration of fluoxetine and 93. PRESKORN S, BAKER B:
to mother and infant of drug treatment for sumatriptan: the Canadian experience. Fatality associated wth combined
postnatal depression. Drug Saf. (2002) Acta Psychiatr. Scand. (1997) fluoxetine-amitriptyline therapy.
25(13):903-911. 95(6):551-552. JAMA (1997) 227(21):1682.
71. CHAMBERS CD, ANDERSON PO, 82. TISSOT TA: Probable meperidine-induced 94. TRUJILLO P, STOKES PE:
THOMAS RG et al.: Weight gain in infants serotonin syndrome in a patient with a Antiarrhythmic agents: drug interactions
breastfed by mother who take fluoxetine. history of fluoxetine use. Anesthesiology of clinical significance. Drug Saf. (2000)
Pediatrics (1999) 104(5):1120-1121. (2003) 98:1511-1512. 23(6):509-532.
72. ROOSE SP, GLASSMAN AH, ATTIA E, 83. BUTTERWECK V: Mechanism of action 95. BROWN CS, FARMER RG,
WOODBRIDGE S, GIARDINA MA, of St Johns wort in depression: what is SOBERMAN JE, EICHNER SF:
BIGGER JT: Cardiovascular effects of known? CNS Drugs (2003) 17(8):539-562. Pharmacokinetic factors in the adverse
fluoxetine in depressed patients with 84. WILIAMSON EM: cardiovascular effects of antipsychotic drugs.
heart disease. Am. J. Psychiatry (1998) Drug interactions between herbal and Clin. Pharmacokinet. (2004) 43(1):33-56.
155(5):660-665. prescription medicines. Drug Saf. (2003) 96. BARRETT J, MEEHAN O, FAHY T:
73. SAUER WH, BERLIN JA, KIMMEL SE: 26(15):1075-1092. SSRI and sympathomimetic interaction
Effect of antidepressants and their relative 85. TOHEN M, VIETA E, CALABRESE J (letter). Br. J. Psychiatry (1996) 168(5):653.
affinity for the serotonin transporter on the et al.: Efficacy of olanzapine and 97. ZAJECKA J, FAWCETT J,
risk of myocardial infarction. Circulation olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in AMSTERDAM J et al.: Safety of abrupt
(2003) 108:32-36. the treatment of bipolar 1 depression. discontinuation of fluoxetine:
74. AMSTERDAM JD, GARCIA-ESPANA F, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry (2003) 60:1079-1088. a randomized, placebo-controlled study.
FAWCETT J et al.: Blood pressure changes 86. NAGUIB M, KOORN R: J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. (1998)
during short-term fluoxetine treatment. Interaction between psychotropics, 18(3):193-197.
J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. (1999) 19:9-14. anaesthetics and electroconvulsive therapy: 98. HADDAD PM: Antidepressant
75. JORGE RE, ROBINSON RG, ARNDT S, implications for drug choice and patient discontinuation syndromes: clinical
STARKSTEIN S: Mortality and poststroke management. CNS Drugs (2002) relevance, prevention and management.
depression: a placebo-controlled trial of 16(4):229-247. Drug Saf. (2001) 24(3):183-197.
antidepressants. Am. J. Psychiatry (2003) 87. KOKE SC, BROWN EB, MINER CM: 99. JUDGE R, PARRY MG, QUAIL D,
160:1823-1829. Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine in patients JACOBSON JG:
76. SAWKA AM, BURGART V, who receive oral contraceptive therapy. Discontinuation symptoms: comparison
ZIMMERMAN: Loss of hypoglycemia Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. (2002) of brief interruption in fluoxetine and
awareness in an adolescent with Type 1 187:551-555. paroxetine treatment. Int. Clin.
diabetes mellitus during treatment with 88. DE MAISTRE E, ALLART C, Psychopharmacol. (2002) 17(5):217-225.
fluoxetine hydrochloride. J. Pediatr. LECOMPTE T, BOLLAERT PE: 100. ROSENBAUM JF, FAVA M, HOOG S,
(2000) 136: 394-396. Severe bleeding associated with use ASCROFT RC, KREBS WB:
77. HOLLAND JC, ROMANO SJ, of low molecular weight heparin and Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
HEILIGENSTEIN JH, TEPNER RG, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. discontinuation syndrome: a randomized
WILSON MG: A controlled trial of Am. J. Med. (2002) 113:530-532. clinical trial. Biol. Psychiatry (1998)
fluoxetine and desipramine in depressed 89. SAYAL KS, 44:77-87.
women with advanced cancer. DUNCAN-MCCONNELL DA, 101. EINBINDER E: Fluoxetine withdrawal?
Psychooncology (1998) 7(4):291-300. MCCONNELL HW, TAYLOR DM: Am. J. Psychiatry (1995) 152(8):1235.
78. ARNOLD DH: The central serotonin Psychotropic interactions with warfarin.
102. FAVA M, MC GRATH PJ, SHEU WP
syndrome: paradigm for psychotherapeutic Acta Psychiatr. Scand. (2000)
et al.: Switching to reboxetine: an efficacy
misadventure. Pediatr. Rev. (2002) 102(4):250-255.
and safety study in patients with major
23:427-432. 90. FORD MA, ANDERSON ML, depressive disorder unresponsive to
79. CHECHANI V: Serotonin syndrome RINDONE JP, JASKER DW: fluoxetine. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.
presenting as hypotonic coma and apnea: Lack of effect of fluoxetine on the (2003) 23:365-369.
potentially fatal complications of selective hypoprothrombinemic response of warfarin.
103. LU ML, LANE HY, CHANG WH:
serotonin receptor inhibitor therapy. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. (1997)
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
Crit. Care Med. (2002) 30(2):473-476. 17(2):110-112.
syndrome: precipitated by concomitant
80. LANGE-ASSCHENFELD C, 91. MOURILHE P, STOKES PE: clozapine? J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.
WEIEGMANN H, HIEMKE C, Risks and benefits of selective serotonin (1999) 19(4):386-387.
Websites
201. http://www.acnp.org/exec_summary.pdf
Preliminary report of the task force
on SSRIs and suicidal behaviour in
youth (2004).
202. http://medicine.iupui.edu/flockhart/
Drug interactions.
Excellent website for current information
on drug interactions of all types.
Affiliation
Joachim F Wernicke PhD MD
Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis,
IN 46285, USA
Tel: +1 317 433 5793; Fax: +1 317 655 9063;
E-mail: jfwernicke@lilly.com