Scribd
Upload
440 views2 pages

Election Dispute: Ugdoracion vs COMELEC

The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) cancelled the certificate of candidacy of Jose Ugdoracion, Jr. for the position of mayor after his rival candidate, Ephraim Tungol, alleged that Ugdoracion made false statements in his COC. Specifically, Tungol claimed that Ugdoracion was actually a green card holder in the US and not a true resident of the Philippines as stated. The Supreme Court upheld COMELEC's decision, finding that Ugdoracion's acquisition of permanent resident status in the US in 2001 constituted abandonment of his Philippine residence and domicile, rendering false his statements in the COC. The Court ruled that COMELEC did

Uploaded by

Marchini Sandro Cañizares Kong
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
440 views2 pages

Election Dispute: Ugdoracion vs COMELEC

The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) cancelled the certificate of candidacy of Jose Ugdoracion, Jr. for the position of mayor after his rival candidate, Ephraim Tungol, alleged that Ugdoracion made false statements in his COC. Specifically, Tungol claimed that Ugdoracion was actually a green card holder in the US and not a true resident of the Philippines as stated. The Supreme Court upheld COMELEC's decision, finding that Ugdoracion's acquisition of permanent resident status in the US in 2001 constituted abandonment of his Philippine residence and domicile, rendering false his statements in the COC. The Court ruled that COMELEC did

Uploaded by

Marchini Sandro Cañizares Kong
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Ugdoracion vs comelec

MAYOR JOSE UGDORACION, JR., VS COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND EPHRAIM M. TUNGOL

GR NO. 179851, APRIL 18, 2008

Facts:

1. Ugdoracion and Tungol were rival mayoralty candidates in the municipality of Albuquerque province of Bohol.

2. Tungol filed a petition to deny due course or cancel the certificate of candidacy of Ugdoracion, contending that
Ugdoracion's declaration of eligibility for mayor constituted material misrepresentation because he is actually a green
card holder or a permanent resident of USA.

3. He stated in his COC that he resided in Albuquerque for forty one years before May 14, 2007 and he is not a permanent
resident or an immigrant to a foreign country.

4. It appears that Ugdoracion became a permanent resident in USA on September 26, 2001.

5. Ugdoracion alleged that he retained his domicile of origin notwithstanding his ostensible acquisition of permanent
residency in the USA.

6. COMELEC cancelled Ugdoracion's COC - material representation

Issues:

Whether the COMELEC committed grave abuse of discretion in cancelling Ugdoracion's COC for material
representation

Ruling:

No grave abuse of discretion.

Section 74, in relation to section 78 of the omnibus election code, requires that the facts stated In the COC must
be true, and any false representation therein of a material fact shall be a ground for cancellation thereof. A material fact
refers to a candidate's qualification for elective office such as one's citizenship and residence. It is the deliberate attempt to
mislead, misinform, or hide a fact which would otherwise render a candidate ineligible.

Caasi vs Court of Appeals - that a Filipino citizen's acquisition of a permanent resident status abroad constitutes
an abandonment of his domicile and residence in the Philippines. A green card status in the USA is a renunciation of one's
status as a resident of the Philippines.

Residence, In contemplation of election laws, is synonymous to domicile. Domicile is the place where one actually
or constructively has his permanent home, where he, no matter where he may be found at any given time, eventually intends
to return (animus revertendi ) and remain (animus manendi). It consists not only in the intention to reside in a fixed place
but also personal presence in that place, coupled with conduct indicative of such intention.
Domicile is classified into

1. Domicile of origin - acquired by every person at birth

2. Domicile of choice - acquired upon abandonment of the domicile of origin

3. Domicile by operation of law - which the law attributes to a person independently of his residence or intention.

Three basic rules

1. A man must have a residence or domicile somewhere

2. Domicile, once established, remains until a new one is validly acquired

3. A man can have but one residence or domicile at any given time.

The general rule is that domicile of origin is not easily lost, it is only when there is actual removal or
change of domicile, Nona dude intention of abandoning the former residence and establishing a new one,
and acts which correspond with such purpose. In the instant case however Ugdoracion's acquisition of
lawful permanent resident status in the USA amounted to an abandonment and renunciation of his status
as a resident of the Philippines.

You might also like