Running head: TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                         1
Technological Challenges Faced By Adult Learners in Higher Education
                                Jennifer H. Stewart
                             University of West Georgia
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                     2
                                            Introduction
        The purpose of this paper is to explore technological challenges that adult learners
experience in their college-level coursework. Many of todays adult learners have the enthusiasm,
drive and determination to familiarize themselves with technology. There are those however who
experience ambivalence and reluctance at the thought of exploring the idea of becoming proficient
in the use of technology.
        The terms technophobia or computerphobia were used to describe this group of
learners dating back to the 1980s. This group has a resistance to talking about computers or even
thinking about computers; fear or anxiety towards computers and hostile or aggressive thoughts
about computers (Jay, 1981). It is safe to say that although these findings are over forty years old,
the issue still remains relevant.
        With the possibility of earning a college degree at no cost for Georgia citizens over the age
of 62, colleges and universities are seeing an increase in this population beginning or returning to
school. Adult learners, also referred to as non-traditional students returning to college, are a global
phenomenon. Today more than ever, adult learners are finding it necessary to update their
knowledge for skills improvement, job advancement, and personal growth and understanding
(Lawson, 2005).
Keywords:       technology; adult learners; non-traditional students; higher education;
                technological challenges
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                     3
                                             Objectives
       Although there is a desire for the adult learner to grasp the use of technology, there is some
anxiety, ambivalence and reluctance present associated with enrolling in courses that are either
hybrid or 100% online. The thought of having to use a computer affects those adult learners in the
age group of 50 and over who are not technology literate, have not been exposed to or have the
experience of modern-day technology, fear and distrust technology.
       Adult learners are typically more results driven. They mainly learn in a direct,
straightforward manner and seek to succeed in their endeavors. They are at a point in their lives
where they have higher expectations of themselves. If they lack the technological skills to learn
with todays tools, they may very well struggle to complete assignments. Regarding technology,
it should be understood that some adult learners will most likely not understand or know how to
use technology. Therefore this research seeks to ask the following questions to determine how to
best help this population overcome existing barriers: What effect does technology have on the
adult learners ability to succeed in higher education? What can colleges and universities do to
assist adult learners become familiar with the use of technology? What role do professors and
instructional designers have on the adult learners success in using technology?
       Considering that this research seeks to look at the technological challenges that the older
adult, non-traditional learner faces, there is an interest in looking at how these and other challenges
effect this population of learners. It furthermore seeks to determine precisely what challenges non-
traditional, adult learners face and look at ways for this group or population to feel less intimidated
and in time, overcome them. This may be achieved by providing the
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                  4
population with the necessary tools and knowledge via surveys, interviews, assessments and
support.
                                       Literature Review
       Since the adult learners presence is a noticeable addition to face-to-face, hybrid or
completely online classrooms in higher education, it is clear that support is needed for those
learners who require assistance with technology. However, what effect does technology have on
this group of learners ability to succeed in their coursework and studies? The following studies
will attempt to demonstrate and support the hypotheses associated with technology and the adult
learner.
       The first step is to understand the adult learner in order to improve their total learning
experience as described in a research article by Pusser, Breneman, Gansneder, Kohl, Levin, Milam
and Turner (2007). There are four objectives cited:
       1. There is no typical adult learner. The adult learner as a diverse set of individuals
           with distinctive demographics, social locations, aspirations and levels of preparation.
       2. A key area of adult learning is poorly understood. A vast world of site-based
           and online, short-term, non-credit classes now serves millions of learners.
       3. The well-worn path will not work for most adult learners. Many adult students choose
           nontraditional paths to postsecondary education because they work, are responsible for
           dependents, and can sometimes obtain tuition assistance from an employer if they
           enroll in a part-time program.
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                     5
       4. To find the right path, adult learners need a guide. Few factors influence adult
           learners success more than student/institutional planning and counseling. Mapping the
           students path to postsecondary success is crucial.
       There are a number of ways colleges and universities can assist adult learners become
familiar with the use of technology. Institutions of higher learning play a vital role in this process.
This role includes administration, professors and instructional designers. The research article by
Rogers (2000) cites that in order for universities to remain competitive in the new millennium,
they must develop cohesive training programs with an emphasis on learning and provide adequate
technical support that will assist faculty in integrating technology into instruction. Research
conducted by Smith (2012) builds upon the study conducted by Knowles (1970) implying that
technological implications of andragogy influence the adult learners learning climate,
diagnosis of needs, planning process, learning experience and evaluation of learning. This work
primarily creates a vehicle that will meet the needs of the adult learner in an online learning
environment.
        The role professors and instructional designers specifically have on the adult learners
success in using technology is paramount. Research conducted by Smith (1997) states that
technology has entered academia as an attractive, even seductive addition to or replacement for
the face-to-face learning experience and and technology is incorporated into course because
administrators expect faculty to create distributed options for the courses. Through
collaboration, both are integral components in creating quality courses, specifically online options.
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                     6
        Institutions of higher learning understand that they must remain relevant in the field of
technology. In order to do so, they must equip its faculty with professional development
opportunities to assist with incorporating technology into the curriculum. By better preparing
faculty and staff, this allows for better-created courses, which will maximize the learning
experience for the adult learner. Faculty and staff are then able to design online learning
environments that are unique to the learner, as emphasized in a study conducted by Cercone
(2008). She further states that educators must understand that culture and society influence each
individual differently. In other words, learners are unique individuals. What may work for one
individual may not be successful for another.
        As the online adult learner becomes more comfortable using technology, it is also key that
designers and professors look to develop and design new and innovative practices. It is just as
imperative that this population of learners remains relevant with the ongoing changes. The research
thus far suggests that there is a correlation between institutions and faculty and staff in contributing
to the success of adult learners comfort level with the use of technology. By becoming involved
and offering pertinent and ongoing support, while building a sense of community, colleges and
universities are the leaders in ensuring their success.
                                               Methods
        Since both qualitative and quantitative approaches will be utilized, mixed-methods
research will be conducted. The mixed-methods approach will allow for the opportunity to collect
and analyze both numerical and narrative-based data. It will also aid in determining
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                      7
precisely what challenges non-traditional, older learners face. Considering that the technological
challenges of adult, non-traditional learner face, survey research and interviews. Given the specific
demographic, this would be most effective in obtaining the sought after results, while being
mindful of and understanding the barriers associated with these approaches. The barriers often
involve honestly, clarity and participation.     Therefore, an ethnographic study will also be
implemented. This type of design will allow for consistent observation of the technology-
challenged adults, as they attempt to navigate an online course during their first semester. By doing
so, it will help identify ways to help these individuals overcome some of the barriers that prevent
them from enrolling or excelling in this type of course. Lastly, action research will also be
implemented by integrating the instructors to test the pre-identified, non-traditional students
technology-related knowledge through the use of technology-readiness tool.
Sample
       The simple random selection sample group will consist of sixteen non-traditional students,
who range in age from 47  75 and attend the University of West Georgias Newnan Center located
in Newnan, Georgia. The male to female ratio will be equal. The sample group will include retirees,
working adults, and the unemployed from Coweta County, Georgia, which includes the cities of
Newnan, Sharpsburg and Grantville. The group will be represented by the following: one upper
class student; six from upper middle class households and four lower middle class groups, as well
as, five students on pubic assistance or living below the poverty line. The students will be accessed
through the Newnan Centers student information system,
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                  8
Banner by Ellucian. The only set criteria for study participation is willingness and time
commitment.
Instrumentation
      Technology will be incorporated in the process of the study. The mobile group-messaging
tool, GroupMe along with email, will be used to maintain contact with the group participants. Data
collection process will include the creation of a survey, using the online survey development tool,
Survey Monkey. Participants will then be interviewed twice. At the beginning of the study, a face-
to-face session will be conducted. At the end of the study, participants will be interviewed using
the video conferencing software tool, Blackboard Collaborate: Ultra Experience. Lastly, the
technology readiness tool, Smarter Measure will be implemented so that a comparison can be
made regarding the challenges of the control group versus the group who scored low on the
readiness tool. All tools listed were selected because technology must be merged into the study
so that participants may be introduced to them and become more comfortable with their use.
Data Analysis
       An exploratory sequential research design was the approach used to identify the effects of
technology usage on adult learners in higher education. A qualitative evaluation through initial
interviews with instructors to assess the theories that should be measured to best understand the
struggles adult learner. Based on the outcome of this evaluation, an instrument could be developed
using rigorous scale development procedures (DeVellis, 1991) that is then tested with a sample.
The data derived from the surveys and interviews will then be compiled and placed in a document
for analysis relative to the questions to determine how to best help this population
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                  9
overcome existing barriers. The preliminary results of the exploratory sequential research study
are as follows:
1. What effect does technology have on the adult learners ability to succeed in higher
education?
Participants received information two ways; first in a survey with a follow-up face-to-face
interview. The following question was posed to the group of sixteen:
On a scale from 1-10 (ten being the highest), how much anxiety do you experience when you are
expected to use technology in the classroom? The responses resulted in a mean of their responses
of 8. Based on the result, the researchers will examine through the use of survey methodology, the
students perceived ease of use, anxiety and self-efficacy when it comes to technology.
2. What can colleges and universities do to assist adult learners become familiar with the
use of technology?
Based on the result of the initial response from the study group, it was concluded that there is
a significant amount of anxiety associated with using technology in the classroom. In a face-to-
face interview, the students were asked to elaborate on their level of anxiety and asked how the
university can be useful in assisting them become more familiar with, in most cases, the mandatory
use of technology in the classroom. Thirteen out of sixteen students expressed the desire for
instructors to have more experience and patience with technology. The students also expressed a
need for an online course that was easier to navigate. The most significant influence on the
evolution of virtual learning will not be the technical development of more powerful devices, but
the professional development of wise designers, educators and learners. (Dede, C., Brown-
L'Bahy, T., Ketelhut, D. and Whitehouse, P., 2004).
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                   10
3. What role do professors and instructional designers have on the adult learners success
   in using technology?
In a face-to-face interview with each of the groups instructors, the research sought to determine
of level of expertise from instructors. They also looked at the willingness instructional designers
to adapt their technique when it comes to making course navigation more user-friendly. Designing
instruction around information that adult perceive as relevant and important greatly enhances the
chances for success in adult learners. Online learning also removes many traditional barriers to
learning and makes it easier to distribute information (Gorard, Selwyn, and Madden, 2003).
                            Scholarly Significance and Limitations
       Although this is considered the best method for this study, mixed-methods research
approach does present challenges with implementation. Some of the reasons include difficulty in
planning and conducting the research. Mixed-methods studies require precise planning in every
aspect of the research. The study sample must accurately be described for both the qualitative and
quantitative components. Additionally, the plan for integrating the data is a challenging task for
the researcher.
       Secondly, high-quality mixed-methods studies require a team of researchers with varying
skill sets or areas of expertise. There will be times when these experts must step outside their
comfort zones. For example, qualitative experts will need to somewhat be comfortable discussing
quantitative analyses and vice versa. This too can be challenging in many environments. Given
that each method must adhere to its own standards for rigor, ensuring
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                                   11
appropriate quality of each component of a mixed-methods study can be difficult (Wisdom,
Cavaleri, Onwuegbuzie, Green, 2011).
       Lastly, mixed-methods studies are time consuming and labor intensive. They require a
larger amount of resources than other methods, such as a conducting either a qualitative or
quantitative study. Nevertheless, the integration of both methods has incredible potential and
ability to strengthen the findings of a study.
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES                                                             12
                                               References
    Cercone, K. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for
          online learning design, AACE Journal, 16(2), 137-159.
    Dede, C., Brown-L'Bahy, T., Ketelhut, D. and Whitehouse, P. (2004). Distance learning
           (virtual learning). The Internet Encyclopedia, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons,
           Inc., 558.
    DeVellis RF. (1991). Scale development: theory and application. Retrieved from
          https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=48ACCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT14
          &dq=Scale+development:+Theory+and+application&ots.
    Gorard, S., Selwyn, N. and Madden, L. (2003). Logged on to learning? Assessing the impact of
           technology on participation in lifelong learning. Retrieved from
           https://www.learntechlib.org/p/96408.
    Jay, T. B. (1981). Computerphonia: what to do about it. Retrieved from
            https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03203781.pdf
    Lawson, K. (2005). Using eclectic digital resources to enhance instructional methods for
          adult learners. Retrieved from goo.gl/WCRdG3.
    Pusser, Breneman, Gansneder, Kohl, Levin, Milam and Turner (2007). Returning to
            learning: adults success in college is key to Americas future. Retrieved from
            https://folio.iupui.edu/handle/10244/270.
    Rogers, D.L. (2000). A paradigm shift: technology integration for higher education in
           the new millennium. AACE Journal, 1(13), 19-33.
    Smith, K.L. (1997). Preparing faculty for instructional technology: from education to
           development to creative independence. Retrieved from
           https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/html/cem/cem97/cem9739.html
    Smith, M.K. (2002). Malcolm Knowles, informal adult education, self-direction and
           andragogy. Retrieved from http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-knowl.htm
    Wisdom JP, Cavaleri MC, Onwuegbuzie AT. and Green, C.A. (2011). Methodological reporting
         in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles.
         Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1558689806298224.
Section                               Not Evident      Emerging         Proficient        Exemplary
I. Introduction (1 page)  3 points
This section should include:              0                 1                2                 3
        2. Background                Information    Information is    Information is   Information is
                                    not provided.    provided but      relevant and        relevant,
                                                      is unclear,      adequate for    sufficient, and
                                                     insufficient,    the proposed          clearly
                                                     or irrelevant.       study.        supports the
                                                                                          proposed
                                                                                             study.
       3. Statement of the           Information    The research      The research      The research
          research problem and      not provided.     problem is        problem is       problem is
          rationale for the study                   stated, but is    clearly stated   clearly stated,
                                                     unclear, too          and is       relevant, and
                                                    broad/narrow      researchable.    researchable.
                                                    or irrelevant.        Strong         Rationale is
                                                    The rationale        rationale        extremely
                                                    for the study     provided. The          clear,
                                                     is unclear or       rationale       compelling,
                                                         weak.          statement        and clearly
                                                                         generally      supports the
                                                                       justifies the       research
                                                                         research         questions.
                                                                        questions.        There is a
                                                                                           clear link
                                                                                        between the
                                                                                        rationale and
                                                                                        the research
                                                                                          questions.
Objectives (1 page)  3 points
       4. Purpose                         0                 1               2                 3
                                    The goals are   Purpose is not     Purpose is      Exceptionally
                                     not stated.         clearly         clearly           clear in
                                                       described.      described.         purpose.
                                                       Goals are        Goals are         Goals are
                                                    stated but are      realistic,        realistic,
                                                        unclear,       adequately      clearly stated,
                                                     irrelevant, or    stated and        and clearly
                                                           too          generally       aligned with
                                                    broad/narrow      aligned with      the research
                                                            .         the research        problem.
                                                                        problem.
       5. Research Questions        Information      Questions/        Generally,         Research
          and Hypotheses/           not provided    hypotheses/         questions      questions are
          Propositions                              propositions      have proper      clear, concise,
                                    or no basis for    are missing,     scope, are        feasible, of
                                      judgment.          weak, or        realistic,      proper scope,
                                                         unclear.      feasible, and      and answer
                                                      Questions not     adequately       the purpose.
                                                       of sufficient     phrased.
                                                       scope or are                      Each research
                                                       not feasible.                      question is
                                                                                           correctly
                                                                                         phrased, and
                                                                                           addresses
                                                                                            only one
                                                                                         aspect of the
                                                                                            research
                                                                                           problem.
                                                                                            All key
                                                      Definitions for                    concepts/ter
       6. Definitions of key                                key       Definitions for    ms are clearly
          concepts used in the            Key          concepts/ter        key             defined/
          research questions        concepts/term         ms are      concepts/ter        explained.
                                       s are not       provided but       ms are
                                       defined.       are inaccurate provided and
                                                        or unclear.     generally
                                                                       adequate.
Literature Review (2 pages)  3 points
Criteria:                                    0               1                 2                3
 Critical review of literature      Information is   Findings from         Some          Evidence of
 Relevance                          not provided,       leading         evidence of          sound
 Conceptual/Theoretical                irrelevant,    researchers       satisfactory     knowledge
    framework                         incomplete,      are included      knowledge        and critical
 Alignment                                and or     with minimal       with limited    review of the
                                       inaccurate.        critical     critical review     literature
                                                      commentary.           of the        relevant to
                                                                           relevant        the study.
                                                            Cited      literature, but
                                                      literature may   with gaps and     Developed a
                                                            not be      or omissions.        clear,
                                                         relevant to                     appropriate,
                                                          the study.    Conceptual/      and justified
                                                                         theoretical     conceptual/
                                                                       framework is       theoretical
                                                                          included;       framework
                                                                       however it is
                                                                          not fully         for the
                                                                        developed or       research.
                                                                          justified.
Methods (1.5 pages)  16 points
Type of study and research design           0                1                 2                 3
                                    No selection or    Research         Research         Research
                                    justification of   approach and     approach and     approach and
                                    research           design are       design           design are
                                    approach and       unclear,         minimally        realistic,
                                    design.            inappropriate,   address the      feasible,
                                                       or               research         clearly
                                                       underdevelop     questions and    described,
                                                       ed.              goals.           and aligned
                                                                                         with the
                                                                                         research
                                                                                         questions and
                                                                                         goals.
Sampling                                    0                 1                2                3-4
                                    Little or no       Limited          Reasonable       Sampling
                                    evidence of a      evidence of      evidence of a    procedure is
                                    sampling           an               feasible         optimally
                                    procedure.         appropriate      sampling         chosen, fully
                                                       sampling         procedure.       justified, and
                                                       procedure.                        feasible.
Instrumentation                            0                  1                 2               3-4
                                    No                 Information is   Instrumentati    Instrumentati
                                    information        limited or       on is            on is
                                    provided.          instrumentati    described and    optimally
                                                       on is            can provide      chosen,
                                                       inadequate.      the              clearly
                                                                        information      described,
                                                                        needed to        and feasible.
                                                                        respond to
                                                                        the research
                                                                        question(s).
Data Analysis                               0                1                2-3              4-5
                                    Little or no       Limited          Reasonable       Clear
                                    evidence of a      evidence of      evidence of a    evidence of
                                    data analysis      an               realistic data   applying
                                    plan.              appropriate      analysis plan.   appropriate
                                                       data analysis                     data analysis
                                                       plan.                             procedures,
                                                                          A general        which
                                                         The              description of   adequately
                                                         description of   the data         address
                                                         data analysis    analysis         research
                                                         procedures is    procedures is    questions and
                                                         incomplete or    provided.        goals.
                                                         contains                          Procedures
                                                         inaccuracies.    Criteria for     are
                                                                          the              adequately
                                                         Criteria for     interpretation   described.
                                                         the              of results are
                                                         interpretation   incomplete.      The type of
                                                         of results are                    results
                                                         incorrect or                      provided by
                                                         are not                           these
                                                         provided.                         methods is
                                                                                           indicated and
                                                                                           criteria for
                                                                                           interpretation
                                                                                           are fully and
                                                                                           accurately
                                                                                           explained.
Scholarly Significance and Limitations (1/2 pages)  3 points
Criteria:                                   0                   1                2                3
 Practical and theoretical           No                 Minimal          Recognition      Recognition
    implications                      information        recognition of   of some          and adequate
 Limitations                         provided.          the              contributions    explanation of
                                                         contributions    and/or           the practical
                                                         and              limitations of   and
                                                         limitations of   the study.       theoretical
                                                         the study.                        contributions
                                                                                           and
                                                                                           limitations of
                                                                                           the study.
Presentation and Writing - 2 points
Criteria:                                     0                 1               2
     Clarity                         Generally poor      Reasonably        Clear and
     Writing mechanics                use of English      clear and      correct use of
     APA                              characterized     correct use of      English
                                       by numerous          English       characterized
                                      errors, unclear,   characterized      by a clear
                                         incorrect        by generally       style of
                                                              clear        expression,
               and/or illogical    expression,        with few
                statements.       with relatively    imprecise
                                  few imprecise        and/or
                                      and/or          incorrect
                                     incorrect      statements.
                                   statements.
Total:   /30