International Academic
International Academic Institute                                     Journal of
                                for Science and Technology                                         Science
                                                                                                     and
                              International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering
                                            Vol. 3, No. 2, 2016, pp. 110-121.                    Engineering
                                                   ISSN 2454-3896                                    www.iaiest.com
 Compare the amount of buffer required to stabilize the single
     and twin road tunnels constructed in jointed rock
                              Ali Kargar a, Sadegh Abdolah Zadeh a
                    a
                        Chemistry Department, Islamic Azad University, Kangan branch, Kangan, Iran
Abstract
To cross the high mountains and steep, rather long and winding path done a lot to reduce the slope length,
can be used out of the tunnel. Road tunnel into two groups, depending on the direction of one-way and
two-way tunnels are divided. Due to the number of lanes on the highway, tunnel consists of two types:
twin tunnels (with two separate small schools with one-way flow) and single tunnel (with a large cross-
section of two-way flow) is used. Costs mainly during tunnel construction, excavation level and
appropriate support systems for stabilizing the wall they depend. The system required maintenance
depends on the terrain and its geotechnical properties. The rock mass, fractures are one of the most
important factors in determining the amount of buffer is considered. In this paper we investigate the
number of joint sets in the stabilizers is required for single and twin road tunnels will be examined.
Keywords: joint, single tunnel, the tunnel twin, cross drilling, numerical modeling, system
maintenance.
Introduction:
  To cross the high mountains and steep, rather long and winding path curves done much to reduce the
slope length, can be used out of the tunnel. With the construction of the tunnel, the distance between two
given points of the route (on both sides of heights) are much shorter, additional arc and remove the
dangers of avalanches (in the snow) and falling rock fragments and soil (in areas falling) has been
resolved as well as maintenance and operation costs, greatly reduced. Road tunnel into two groups,
depending on the direction of one-way and two-way tunnels are divided.
Due to the number of highway lanes, including two types of tunnels: tunnels Twin 1 (with two separate
small schools with one-way flow) and 2 single tunnels (with a large cross-section of two-way flow) is
used. Given that the tunnel construction costs compared with conventional methods is high, so it is
important to choose the kind of tunnel. Costs mainly during tunnel construction, excavation and support
systems suitable for stabilization period depend on their wall. The storage system 3 required depends on
the type of land and its geotechnical properties. The rock mass, fractures are one of the most important
factors in determining the amount of buffer is considered. Accordingly, the number of joint sets is more
                                                          110
                                 International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                  Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
likely that some will fall on the tunnel and on the contrary, by reducing the number of joint sets this
probability decreases. In this paper we investigate the number of sets of 4 single and twin road tunnels in
the buffer needed to be examined. For this purpose, the rock mass with stable characteristics is intended
as a base. Assuming constant joint properties in all cases, several joints in rock mass base is in order. In
order to view the impact of joint sets the parameters of the rock mass basis, the software is used RocLab.
The analysis is based on rock mass was conducted for four items, including the existence of a joint sets,
two sets, three sets and three sets, plus the occasional joint.
View tunnels
   For single and twin tunnels we suppose sections intended vaulted tunnel will be constructed at a depth
of 200 meters from ground level. The cross-sectional size should be selected that meet the minimum
space requirements for traffic. Regulations in different countries, in order to select the minimum space
required for different parts of the tunnel are made various recommendations. Sections considered in this
study, based on a set of regulations designed to suburban highway. Profile of single and twin tunnels is
shown in Table 1.
                          Table 1: The specifications of single and twin tunnels
                                   Characteristic                  Single tunnel       Twin Tunnels
                                 Number of lanes                          4                    2
                              )m( Width of roadway                      3.65                  3.65
                             )m( Right shoulder width                   1.85                  1.85
                              )m( left shoulder width                   1.85                  0.50
                             )m( The middle bar width                   0.70                   -
                        )m(sidewalk The width of the right              0.70                  0.70
                         )m(The width of the left sidewalk              0.70                   -
                                  )m( Free height                       5.20                  5.20
Twin tunnels position relative to the earth surface subsidence and severe effect on the distribution
moment in the tunnel lining 5 [1]. and reducing the distribution moment in the tunnel lining.
Baseline characteristics of the rock mass
   In this study, sandstone 6 with the number of joints low, as has been the base of the rock mass. It is
assumed joint properties except in the category joints, remain constant in different situations. In various
sets distance of one meter joints and angles of 70 and 130 degrees relative to the horizontal axis is in
order. In Table 2 The mechanical properties of the rock mass and fractures [2,3, 4], and in Table 3 Q
index for the base of the rock mass [4], is shown.
                            Table 1: The mechanical properties of the rock mass
                                                           111
                                  International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                   Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
                                          Specifications                                       amount
                            )GPa( The elastic modulus of the rock mass                          19.8
                                  Poisson's ratio of the rock mass                              0.20
                                     )MPa( Bulk density Stone                                  2600
                         )MPa( The compressive strength of the rock mass                        43
                              )MPa( Tensile strength of the rock mass                           2.1
                                )Rock mass friction angle (degrees                              46.4
                                 )MPa( Adhesion of the rock mass                                9.45
                                   )Joint friction angle (degrees                               20
                                      )MPa( Adhesive joints                                     0.20
                                 )Expansion joints angle (degrees                                0
                             Table 3: Indicators Q for the base of the rock mass
                                   Parameter                                 Description                amount
                          ) RQD ( Rock quality index                          very good                  100
                            )Jr( Number of joint sets                        Low joints                 0.50-1
                        )Jn( Number of joint roughness                   Rough or irregular              1.50
                          )Ja( Joint alteration number                     Little changed
                                                                                                          2
                        )JW( Joint water reduction factor                    Dry drilling                 1
By entering different joints in the rock mass basis, some of its mechanical properties will change. To view
these changes from the application RocLab 7 is based on the criterion of Hoek & Brown. In RocLab GSI
index is one of the parameters. Q system GSI index is obtained from the following equation [4,6]:
          RQD J r 
GSI  9           44
          Jn      Ja 
Where, RQD rock quality index, Jr number of joint sets, Jn number of joint roughness and Ja is a joint
alteration number. Now, hold Jr, Jn and Ja, by applying different sets RQD value will change according to
the following equation [4].
RQD  115  3.3J v
Where the number of joints per unit volume. So by changing the RQD, different values are obtained for
the GSI. According to my values and the values proposed in RocLab, in different sets values for GSI has
been set. Here the analysis was performed in rock mass base for four items, including the existence of
joint sets, two sets, three sets and three sets, plus the occasional joint. Table 4 shows the properties of the
rock mass shows in different situations.
                                                            112
                               International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
Numerical modeling using DEM
 Discrete element method was presented for the first time in 1971 by the Kandal 8. This method is also
known as a solid block. From DEM to analyze the problems in static and dynamic rock mechanics is
used. Unlike other methods, discrete element method for continuous ambient environment consisting of
several blocks, but does not model considers separate. One of the key problems of rock mechanics,
analysis of discontinuous rock masses that contains one or more joints and other discontinuities are.
Therefore, in this study, according to a joint sets of discrete element method is capable of analyzing the
behavior of discontinuous rock masses, in the form of software UDEC, is used.
The modeling process tunnels
- Create model geometry
  Modeling first starts with the delimitation model. On the recommendation of the border should UDEC
guide to five times the diameter of the tunnel it away? Crater and the crater is intended for the bottom
border four times. After determining the overall dimensions of the issue, the cross-sectional geometry of
the tunnel to be introduced to the program
                          Table 4: characteristic of rocks in different situations
             Condition    Ja   RQD        GSI
                                                     C              φ            c          t      Em
                                                   (MPa)        (degrees)       (MPa)       (MPa)   (GPa)
                 1        3     355      9878        3766         78779          4576       5797    3975
                 2        4      ;7      8;7;        473;         77777          3673       5767    3773
                 3        6      ;5      6473        378:         76755           ;73       5747    3379
                 4        8      :5      7:77        3774         74744           976        574     35
Roughly resolve issues associated with N 3/2 where N is the number of blocks [7]. So in a jointed, decide
on the issue so that the program is able to reach a solution acceptable returns at the right time is very
important. Actually applied (Figure 1) At the end of the meshed model is done with the command gen
edge.
Determine the behaviors and characteristics of materials
   Software UDEC able to model a behavioral model seven blocks and five types of behavioral model for
joints [7]. Including block model can be, elastic model, mohr - coulomb model and the null model, and in
the case of joint models Point contact, Area contact and Barton-Bandis noted. In this study, Blocks of
Mohr and for joints, according to the model surface contact 9 more practical in rock mechanics issues, the
model is used. Mohr each block in the model of behavior that are defined by six characteristics: density,
bulk modulus, shear modulus, angle of friction, cohesion, angle of dilation and tensile strength. Also for
joints six
                                                         113
                                International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                 Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
Initial tensions
Information on the initial stresses through the trials here it comes in. When for some reason, do such
experiments is not possible, the necessary parameters can be selected within a reasonable range and initial
analyzes based on them. Hook and Brown, demonstrated the vertical stresses can be achieved with good
approximation the following equation:
   h
In which the average specific weight of stone and h is the height of overhead. The introduction of initial
stress model has the advantage that the initial convergence process accelerated program-binding. If you
do not define the initial stress for the application, their amount in order to result in zero blocks.
                       Figure 1: Range intended to apply joint spacing in real terms
                                     (border tension)           (Frontiers of Change location)
                         Figure 2: The boundary conditions imposed on modeling
Boundary conditions
After creating the model geometry and the determination of the initial stress Boundary conditions should
be set for modeling. These issue usually two possible events: the borders shift and used the border tension
(Figure 2).
In the first case instead of applying external stress to the border, we shift zero at the nodal points. In the
latter case the lateral boundaries limited by external forces and we will prevent it from moving. Given the
importance of the impact of displacement on the stability of tunnel, select the appropriate boundary
conditions plays an important role. Therefore, in this study the boundaries of tension to achieve primary
balance are used.
Initial balance
                                                          114
                                  International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                   Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
After the models in order to balance the gravitational acceleration is of the order cycle n, where n is the
number of steps taken to achieve primary balance issue. By executing this command the forces that were
previously assigned to the nodes, moving nodes in order to force the equilibrium zone and tensions are
created. After running this command with the convergence control, traction control and control of
primary stresses, accuracy to reach equilibrium models examined in the original state takes.
Dig tunnels:
Tunnel dug by allocating absurd behavior model area
                          (Twin Tunnels)                                  (single tunnel)
                       Figure 3: Mechanism digging the tunnel wall collapses all sections
 Drilling, model unknown [7] Placed considerable drilling of all time, in different percentages of single
and twin tunnels loss occurs in the discharge of tension. Figure 3 loss mechanism in single and twin
tunnels dig up the entire cross-section of the show. Therefore, for a better understanding of the
relationship between the displacement chambers discharge tunnels percent compared to the stress in their
ground reaction curve (GRC) is drawing
Draw the characteristic curve (GRC)
To draw Characteristic curve Land in an underground excavation, As is customary analytical methods,
Internal pressure must be equal to the tension in Enter place on earth to all points around the
school During a gradual process to reduce the amount of pressure Has zero value.
                      1
                     0,9                                                                       twin tunnel
                     0,8                                                                       s ingle tunnel
                     0,7
                     0,6
             pi/p0
                     0,5
                     0,4
                     0,3
                     0,2
                     0,1
                      0
                           0       10             20              30             40              50             60
                                                             u (mm)
                      Figure 4: The Earth characteristic curve (GRC) for rock mass in (1)
                                                            115
                                      International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                       Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
                        1
                      0,9                                                                          twin tunnel
                      0,8                                                                          s ingle tunnel
                      0,7
              pi/p0   0,6
                      0,5
                      0,4
                      0,3
                      0,2
                      0,1
                        0
                             0                 20                     40                    60                      80
                                                                 u (mm)
                              Figure 5: the characteristic curve (GRC) for rock mass in (2
                       1
                      0,9                                                                          twin tunnel
                      0,8                                                                          s ingle tunnel
                      0,7
                      0,6
             pi/p0
                      0,5
                      0,4
                      0,3
                      0,2
                      0,1
                       0
                             0                20                      40                     60                     80
                                                                 u (mm)
                        Figure 6: ground characteristic curve (GRC) for rock mass in (3)
                        1
                      0,9                                                                          twin tunnel
                      0,8                                                                          s ingle tunnel
                      0,7
                      0,6
              pi/p0
                      0,5
                      0,4
                      0,3
                      0,2
                      0,1
                        0
                             0                 20                     40                    60                      80
                                                                 u (mm)
                            Figure 7: ground characteristic curve (GRC) for rock mass in (4)
Sustainable tunnel
One of the main issues in tunnel design specifications Saprtha is. In most tunneling projects of rock bolts,
shot Crete, made of metal and concrete used. Here for sustainable tunnel in different situations, the hybrid
system has been used rock bolt and shot Crete whose characteristics are shown in Table 5. [4,7].
Table 5: Profile rock bolts to stabilize the tunnels In this study, they compared the amount of support the
single and twin tunnel is considered in a number of different sets, Assumed to tunnels in different
situations, Saprtha clearance in 80% of the initial tension mounted. Also to More reasonable comparison,
                                                                116
                                         International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                          Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
Saprt tunnels in various positions chosen so that almost have the same confidence. Accordingly
confidence Saprtha according to Figure 8 obtained from the following equation: (4)
         Ps max
F S 
          Pi
Where confidence Saprt, maximum pressure and the pressure at the point of intersection of the two
curves Saprt. Saprt by determining the amount required stabilizing the tunnel, the curve of the Earth
system interactions holder for single and twin tunnels have been drawn in different situations (see Figures
9, 10, 11, 12). Based on the analysis occur, the rock bolt and shot Crete required for stabilization of
tunnels in different conditions were determined that their values are shown in Tables 6 and 7.
                            Table 5: characteristic of the rock bolt and shot Crete
                                                )mm( Diameter                                  25
                                               )kg/m3( Density                               7500
                                          )GPa( Modulus of elasticity                         200
                                            )kN( Tensile strength                             240
                                       )GPa/m/m( Shear stiffness slurry                        5
                                        )kN/m( Adhesive strength grout                        300
                            1
                                                                                             GRC for single tunnel
                          0,9
                                                                                             support for sigle tunnel
                          0,8
                          0,7                                                                GRC for twin tunnel
                          0,6                                                                support for twin tunnel
                  pi/p0
                          0,5
                          0,4
                          0,3
                          0,2
                          0,1
                            0
                                0       10          20          30         40          50             60                70
                                                                     u (mm)
                                Figure 9: Interaction curve of the earth and holder system (1)
                        1
                                                                                              GRC for single tunnel
                      0,9
                                                                                              support for sigle tunnel
                      0,8
                      0,7                                                                     GRC for twin tunnel
                      0,6                                                                     support for twin tunnel
              pi/p0
                      0,5
                      0,4
                      0,3
                      0,2
                      0,1
                        0
                            0          10          20          30           40          50               60              70
                                                                     u (mm)
                            Figure 10: Curve interaction of land and maintenance system (2)
                                                                     117
                                     International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                      Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
                           1
                                                                                         GRC for single tunnel
                         0,9
                                                                                         support for sigle tunnel
                         0,8
                         0,7                                                             GRC for twin tunnel
                pi/p0    0,6                                                             support for twin tunnel
                         0,5
                         0,4
                         0,3
                         0,2
                         0,1
                           0
                                0   10          20         30            40         50             60               70
                                                                  u (mm)
                           Figure 11: Curve interaction of land and maintenance system (3)
                           1
                                                                                         GRC for single tunnel
                         0,9
                                                                                         support for sigle tunnel
                         0,8
                         0,7                                                             GRC for twin tunnel
                         0,6                                                             support for twin tunnel
                 pi/p0
                         0,5
                         0,4
                         0,3
                         0,2
                         0,1
                           0
                                0   10          20         30            40         50            60                70
                                                                  u (mm)
                           Figure 12: Curve interaction of land and maintenance system (4)
Economic Analysis
 To determine the amount of required storage systems, tunnels in the costs are compared with each other.
The twin tunnels to determine the amount Saprt, should be given the same two periods, Saprt amount
needed to sustain one point, the number is multiplied by two. Crete shot in Figures 13 to 16 compare the
size and length of rock bolts needed to stabilize the single and twin tunnels in different situations to show
us.
                   Table 6: The rock bolts and shotcrete for the stabilization of twin tunnels
Condition   Shotcrete(cm) in roof        Shotcrete (cm) in wall         Spacing bolt=3,6 m in roof                 Spacing bolt=3,2 m in wall
   3                       5                       5                                5                                          5
   4                      10                      7.5                               4                                          4
   5                     12.5                     7.5                              377                                        377
   6                     12.5                     7.5                              377                                        377
                 Table 7: The rock bolts and shotcrete required to stabilize the single tunnel
Condition   Shotcrete(cm) in roof        Shotcrete(cm) in wall          Spacing bolt=5,2 m in roof                 Spacing bolt=3,6 m in wall
   3                     12,5                     7,5                               2                                          2
   4                      15                      7.5                              377                                        377
   5                      20                      10                               377                                        377
   6                     22.5                    12.5                              377                                        377
                                                                  118
                              International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                               Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
                                                          100                                   84
                                                                         61,6
                               bolt length (m)
                                                          80
                                                          60
                                                          40
                                                          20
                                                           0
                                                                 tw in tunnel          single tunnel
                                                                                            3,6875
                                                          4
                                         shotcrete (m3)
                                                          3           2,315
                                                          0
                                                                tw in tunnel          single tunnel
Figure 13: Size of shotcrete and rock bolt length needed to stabilize the single and twin tunnels for the
                                        length of the tunnel (1)
                                                                                                112
                                                                         88,8
                                                          100
                               bolt length (m)
                                                          80
                                                          60
                                                          40
                                                          20
                                                           0
                                                                 tw in tunnel          single tunnel
                                                                                              4,275
                                                          4,3
                                 shotcrete (m3)
                                                          4,2
                                                                        4,085
                                                          4,1
                                                          3,9
                                                                 tw in tunnel          single tunnel
Figure 14: Size of shotcrete and rock bolt length needed to stabilize the single and twin tunnels for the
                                        length of the tunnel (2)
                                                                                119
                                 International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                  Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
                                                                            116                    112
                                                             100
                                  bolt length (m)
                                                             80
                                                             60
                                                             40
                                                             20
                                                              0
                                                                    tw in tunnel          single tunnel
                                                                                                 5,7
                                                             6           4,6975
                                            shotcrete (m3)
                                                             0
                                                                   tw in tunnel          single tunnel
  Figure 15: Size of shotcrete and rock bolt length needed to stabilize the single and twin tunnels to the
                                          tunnel length unit (3)
                                                                            116                    112
                                                             100
                                  bolt length (m)
                                                             80
                                                             60
                                                             40
                                                             20
                                                              0
                                                                    tw in tunnel          single tunnel
                                                             8                                 6,5375
                                            shotcrete (m3)
                                                             6           4,6975
                                                             0
                                                                   tw in tunnel          single tunnel
  Figure 16: Size of shotcrete and rock bolt length needed to stabilize the single and twin tunnels for the
                                          length of the tunnel (4)
Conclusion
In the present study, the number of joint alteration Ja of rock, in the buffer required for the stabilization of
single and twin road tunnels, using distinct element method was studied. Accordingly, given the number
of joint rock mass displacement in a tunnel to control the hybrid system was used rock bolt and shot
Crete. The results show that the preservative system needed to stabilize the single tunnel is more than
double tunnels. Finally, based on the amount of buffer required in the tunnel, Economic Survey was
                                                                                   120
                               International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering,
                                                Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 110-121.
conducted. Studies show that, in the rock mass joint studies with different, more economical twin tunnels
implementation of the single tunnel.
References:
    1.  Hage, Ch.F. and Shahrour, I. (2012). “Numerical analysis of the interaction between twin-
        tunnels: Influenceof the relative position and construction procedure” Tunnelling and
        Underground space Technology, (2007).
    2. Hoek, E. and Diederichs, M.S. (2005). “Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus.”
        Internaional Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences (2006),pp. 203-215.
    3. Rahn, P.H.(1986). “Engineering Grology an Environmental approach” Tunnelling and
        Underground space Technology.
    4. Hoek, E., Kaiser, P.K. and Bawden, W.F. (2000). “Support of Underground Excavation in Hard
        rock” A.A. Balkema,Rotterdam,Brookfield,(2000).
    5. Barton, n.,lien, R. and Lunde, J. (1974). “Engineering Classification of Rock Masses for the
        Design of tunnel support” Springer-Verlag.
    6. Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T. (1980). “Underground Excavation in rock.” London, Instn. Min.
        Metall.
    7. ITASCA CONSULTING GROUP, Inc. (2000). “Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC)
        User’s Manuas” First Edition Januaryb(2000).
    8. Brady, B.H.G. and Brown, E.T. (1985). “Rock mechanics for Underground Mining” Gorge
        Alleh and Unwin (Publisher) Ltd.
    9. Bardy, B.H.D. (1992). “stress analysis for rock masses” Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
    10. Haruyama, K. & Taira, K. (2012). “Construction of large cross-section double-tier Metropolitan
        Inter-city Highway (Ken-O-Do) Ome Tunnel by NATM” Tunnelling and Underground space
        Technology.
                                                         121