Khwopa College Of Engineering               Lab Report on Transportation Engineering
DETERMINATION OF LOS ANGELES ABRASION VALUE
   1. Objectives
            To determine the Los Angeles abrasion value
            To find out the suitability of the aggregates for use in road construction
   2. Apparatus Required
            Los Angeles Machine
               Abrasive Charge i.e Cast
               iron or steel balls
               Sieves
               Weighing machine
               Aggregates
               Miscellaneous like tray
               etc.                                  Figure 1:- Los Angeles Machine
   3. Theory
Aggregates undergo substantial wear and tear throughout their life. In general, they
should be hard and tough enough to resist crushing, degradation and disintegration from
any associated activities including manufacturing, stockpiling, production, placing and
compaction. Furthermore, they must be able to adequately transmit loads from the
pavement surface to the underlying layers and eventually the subgrade. These
properties are especially critical for open or gap graded HMA, which do not benefit
from the cushioning effect of the fine aggregate and where coarse particles are subjected
to high contact stresses. Aggregates not adequately resistant to abrasion and polishing
may cause premature structural failure and/or a loss of skid resistance. Furthermore,
poor resistance to abrasion can produce excessive dust during HMA production
resulting in possible environmental problems as well as mixture control problems.
       Because of the preceding issues, a test to predict aggregate toughness and
abrasion resistance is valuable. The L.A. abrasion test is the predominant test.
       The L.A. abrasion test measures the degradation of a coarse aggregate sample
that is placed in a rotating drum with steel spheres. As the drum rotates the aggregate
degrades by abrasion and impact with other aggregate particles and the steel spheres
(called the “charge”). Once the test is complete, the calculated mass of aggregate that
has broken apart to smaller sizes is expressed as a percentage of the total mass of
aggregate. Therefore, lower L.A. abrasion loss values indicate aggregate that is
tougher and more resistant to abrasion.The L.A. Abrasion test is an empirical test; it is
  Khwopa College Of Engineering              Lab Report on Transportation Engineering
  not directly related to field performance of aggregates. Field observations generally do
  not show a good relationship between L.A. abrasion values and field performance. Wu
  et al. (1998[2]) found that L.A. abrasion loss was unable to predict field performance.
  Specifically, the test may not be satisfactory for some types of aggregates. Some
  aggregates, such as slag and some limestones, tend to have high L.A. abrasion loss but
  perform adequately in the field. L.A. abrasion loss seems to be reasonable well
  correlated with dust formation during handling and HMA production in that aggregates
  with higher L.A. abrasion loss values typically generate more of dust.
  Table 1: Grading of Test Samples – *Tolerance of ± 12 percent permitted.
Sieve size
(square        Weight of test
               sample in gm
  hole)
Passing
              Retained on (mm)       A        B        C       D        E        F       G
  (mm)
   80                63                                               2500*
   63                50                                               2500*
   50                40                                               5000*    5000*
   40                25            1250                                        5000*   5000*
   25                20            1250                                                5000*
   20               12.5           1250      2500
  12.5               10            1250      2500
   10               6.3                               2500
   6.3              4.75                              2500
  4.75              2.36                                      5000
Khwopa College Of Engineering           Lab Report on Transportation Engineering
Table 2: Selection of Abrasive Charg
  Grading        No of Steel balls         Weight of charge in gm.
     A                  12                       5000 ± 25
     B                  11                        4584 ±25
     C                  8                        3330 ± 20
     D                  6                        2500 ± 15
     E                  12                       5000 ± 25
     F                  12                       5000 ± 25
     G                  12                       5000 ± 25
   4. Procedure
      Los Angeles test was done for Grade A in which 5 kg of sample was taken as
      W1.
      The abrasive charge was choosen as A (i.e. 12 steel balls).
      The cover of Los Angeles machine was opened and the aggregates and steel
      balls were fed into the cylinder. Cover was replaced tightly.
      The machine was rotated at uniform speed 30-33 revolutions per minute.
      The machine was revolved for 500 revolutions for grading A.
      Dust cover was removed and material was taken out carefully.
      The steel ball was separated and the material was sieved on 1.7 mm IS sieve
      and weighted as W2.
      The percentage of loss of material was calculated as follows.
   5. Observation and Calculation
   Grade of aggregates = A
   Original weight of sample (W1) = 5 kg
   Weight of sample retained on 1.75 mm IS sieve (W2) = 2.680 kg
   Loss in weight (W1-W2) =2.320 kg
   Percentage wear or LA value= (W1-W2)/W1 *100% = 46.40%
   6. Result
      Thus the Los Angeles value of the aggregate was found to be 46.40%.
Khwopa College Of Engineering              Lab Report on Transportation Engineering
   7. Discussion And Conclusion
   Los Angeles test is commonly used to evaluate the hardness of aggregates. The test
   has more acceptability because the resistance to abrasion and impact is determined
   simultaneously. Similarly the test can also be used to determine the performance of
   the aggregate in pavement, aggregate must be sufficiently hard to resist the abrasive
   effect of traffic over a long period of time. The soft aggregates will quickly ground
   to dust, while the hard aggregates are quite resistance to the crushing effect. With
   the help of the Los Angeles test we can easily determine the suitability of the
   aggregate for the road construction.
Depending upon the value, the suitability of aggregates for different road constructions
can be judged as per IRC specifications as given:
                                                                     Max. permissible
   Sl.
                             Type of Pavement                        abrasion value in
   No.
                                                                            %
    1             Water bound macadam sub base course                        60
    2          WBM base course with bituminous surfacing                     50
    3                   Bituminous bound macadam                             50
    4                      WBM surfacing course                              40
    5                Bituminous penetration macadam                          40
           Bituminous surface dressing, cement concrete surface
    6                                                                        35
                                 course
    7               Bituminous concrete surface course                       30
   And since the Los Angeles Value was determined to be 46.40 which lies between
   40-50%. Thus the aggregate we choose for the practical was found suitable for three
   types of pavements namely 1. Water bounded macadam sub base course 2. WBM
   Base course with bituminous surfacing and 3. Bituminous bound macadam.
   Hence the practical related with the determination of the Los Angeles value of the
   aggregate was performed.
   8. Precautions
            Instruments must be handled with care.
            Proper counting of the no. of revolutions must be done
            Aggregate must be properly sieve.