Handbook em Final Eng
Handbook em Final Eng
MEASUREMENT
HANDBOOK
1
Macedonia 12.6.2012
Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 4
2. Requirements for measurement site ........................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 General ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
2.2 Access to measurement site .................................................................................................................................6
2.3 Selection for measurement site and measurement section ...................................................................................7
2.3.1 Selection of measurement point and number ................................................................................................ 8
2.3.2 Fixed measurement equipment of installations ........................................................................................... 10
2.4 Size of measurement ports ................................................................................................................................. 10
2.5 Working space and conditions of the measurement site .................................................................................... 11
2.6 Equipment for the measurement site.................................................................................................................. 13
2.7 Work safety........................................................................................................................................................ 14
3. Determining the flue gas velocity and flow rate ...................................................................................................... 14
3.1 Pitot measurements ............................................................................................................................................ 15
3.2 Determining the water content in the wet gas .................................................................................................... 16
3.3 Determining the wet gas density ........................................................................................................................ 17
4. Particulate measurement .......................................................................................................................................... 18
4.1 General .............................................................................................................................................................. 18
4.2 Factors influencing the reliability of the particulate measurements .................................................................. 19
4.2.1 Filter material ............................................................................................................................................. 19
4.2.2 Weighing .................................................................................................................................................... 19
4.2.3 Field blank .................................................................................................................................................. 19
4.2.4 Isokinetic sampling ..................................................................................................................................... 20
4.2.5 In-stack sampling method ........................................................................................................................... 21
4.2.6 Out-stack sampling method ........................................................................................................................ 22
5. Measurement of gaseous components- continuous methods ................................................................................... 23
5.1 Sampling ............................................................................................................................................................ 23
5.1.1 Sampling line .............................................................................................................................................. 24
5.1.2 Conditioning techniques ............................................................................................................................. 25
5.2 Different measurement techniques for gaseous components ............................................................................. 28
5.2.1 Most common techniques for the measurement of gaseous components ................................................... 28
5.2.2 Standard reference methods SRM for different components in EU ............................................................ 29
5.3 Factors affecting the measurement uncertainty ................................................................................................. 29
5.3.1 Calibration .................................................................................................................................................. 29
5.3.2 Check for the linearity ................................................................................................................................ 30
5.3.3 Undertaken measures in studying interfering gases .................................................................................... 30
5.3.4 Test for NOx-converter ............................................................................................................................... 31
5.3.5 Environmental conditions ........................................................................................................................... 31
6. Measurement of gaseous components- discontinuous methods............................................................................... 31
6.1 Absorption methods ........................................................................................................................................... 32
6.1.1 Sampling for absorption methods ............................................................................................................... 32
6.1.2 Methods for analysis ................................................................................................................................... 35
6.2 Adsorption methods ........................................................................................................................................... 36
7. Emission calculation ................................................................................................................................................ 37
7.1 Calculation of the gas flow rate in stack according to the Finnish standard SFS 3866...................................... 37
7.2 Calculation of the particulates and the emission according to the Finnish standard SFS 3866 ......................... 40
7.3 Changes between different gas component units ............................................................................................... 42
7.4 Conversions between dry and wet concentrations and standardisation to reference oxygen concentration ...... 42
8. Calculation of measurement uncertainty ................................................................................................................. 43
2
9. Reporting of emission measurements ...................................................................................................................... 45
9.1 Reporting of the emission measurement teams.................................................................................................. 45
9.2 Reporting of the emission data by the installations ........................................................................................... 45
9.3 International reporting by MEPP ....................................................................................................................... 45
10. Standardisation of emission measurement ............................................................................................................. 46
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................ 47
ANNEX I ..................................................................................................................................................................... 47
ANNEX II ................................................................................................................................................................... 49
3
1. Introduction
Air Quality continues to be among the main environmental problems in the Republic of Macedonia.
To fulfil the objective of emission reduction, we are using emission monitoring. We are monitoring
and measuring in order to fulfil the measures described in the Plans for air quality improvement.
This refers especially to the installations having significant share in the total emission in the
country, in order to determine whether they abide the prescribed emission limit values.
The implementation of the plans should ensure whether air quality is on a satisfactory level, i.e.
whether concentrations of pollutants in the ambient air are according to the limit values.
The aim of this guideline is to assist the owners of the installations and the consultant-analysts in
performing emission monitoring and measurement, and in order to abide the Law on Ambient Air
Quality article 47 (Official Gazette of RM, No. 67/04, 92/07, 35/10. 47/11, 59/12) and the Rulebook
on the methods, means and methodology for measurement of emissions from stationary sources
(Official Gazette of RM, No.11/2012).
The guideline describes the general aspects of measurement of emissions from stationary sources
and they are further précised with the standards specified in it. The QA/QC procedures of
measurement of emissions from stationary sources have been described.
The ten chapters specify directions for performing the measurement process starting from:
• the requirement for measurement, selection and number of measurement points, the size of
the measurement ports, working area and measurement place conditions, the measurement place
equipment and the work safety;
• determining the velocity of the flue gas, the flow rate, water content in the flue gas and wet
gas density;
• particulate measurement, factors influencing the reliability of the measurement, the
isokinetic sampling, in-stack and out-stack sampling;
• gas components measurement – continuous methods starting from sampling, , most
frequent gas component measurement techniques, other gas component techniques, factors
influencing the measurement uncertainty and calibration;
• gas component measurement – discontinuous methods under absorption methods,
sampling according to absorption methods, analysis methods adsorption methods;
• emission calculation, flow rate calculation, calculation of particulate and emission
calculation, conversion of units of gaseous components from wet into dry concentrations and
normalization of the oxygen reference level
• calculation of the measurement uncertainty
• emission measurement reporting, from the emission measurement teams, from
installations for the emission data, international reporting from MEPP
• standardization of emission measurement
The directions are also invaluable for any company or agency wanting to get accurate assessment
of the environmental impact of their activity.
4
2. Requirements for measurement site
2.1 General
For the measurements to be carried safety and efficiently by the measurement personnel it
is needed to have free access to the sampling plane and appropriate measuring ports and working
platforms for typical sampling equipment.
Representative of the plant should be present for guidance and information about the plant
operating conditions for the measurement objective and further assessment strategy and planning
of the measurements.
The preliminary review of the factory will enable determination of the best measurement
location and determine the number and the scheme of the sampling points.
Working areas should be protected from heat and dust and ensure the necessary
environmental working conditions.
The planning of measurement site and inspections during the use will limit personal
injuries and unnecessary investments.
The access to the site has to be easy and unlimited, the site must have appropriate facilities
and protective equipment in case of emergency and the measurement level must be on the correct
part of the stack. The location of the measurement level is the most significant factor in the
reliability of the results. The size of the measurement port has to be large enough and be located in
a correct place in the canal to ensure good quality results.
The flow of gases has to be stable and homogenic for the measured components, because
the measured emission concentration of the component has to be representative of the emission. If
this is not the case, the result from an individual monitor is not representative of the emission and
the results cannot be used. If the flow conditions of the measurement level are not for all parts
according to the standards MKC ISO 10780 and MKC ISO 9096 and the measurements have to be
done nevertheless, it should be evaluated in the emission measurement report whether the gas flow
conditions have affected the reliability of the measurement results. This impact on the reliability of
the measurement results, should be taken into consideration when determining the total
measurement uncertainty. The requirements for emission measurements should be taken into
account already when planning the structure of a new installation. The changes in the structure of
already constructed installation will create additional expenses but are needed for reliable
emission measurement results and work safety.
5
Figure 1. Selection of level of measurement place of circular duct
Measurement sites shall be installed in such a way as to comply with national safety requirements.
Important to guarantee ergonomically correct access without too heavy physical load to
fixed measurement equipment for maintenance and regular comparison measurements.
The route should be a fixed part of the structure of the installation taking into account the
safety concerns. For example ladders or removable scaffold should not be used in the
measurement site or in the measurements.
To avoid areas of sources that emit unexpectedly such as rupture disks overpressure valves
or steam discharges. Any hazard measures by engineering, areas of positive pressure.
To take into consideration the design of the installation. Many installations were designed
before the time of current level emission measurement practices. Since the emission
measurements activities were not taken into account in planning, the stack often have only
spiral stairs and lifting equipment for maintenance. The emission measurement equipment
are lifted up usually with lifting equipment or if not available, carrying or lifting with rope to
the measurement site.
For large combustion plants and waste incinerators the control measurements are done at
least once per year for several days. If the measurement technician needs go to the site tens
of times per day, which using spiral stairs is very heavy and time consuming, having a
mobile platform is preferable, therefore contributing to the increase of safety and
effectiveness.
6
2.3 Selection for measurement site and measurement section
The following criteria need to be taken into account when selecting the measurement site and
measurement section.
7
Figure 3. Measurement points after the vent (SFS 5625).
In case of circular ducts you can have two options how to choose the location of the
measurement points. In method A, one measurement point is located at the center of the
channel and in method B, there is no measurement point in the center of the channel.
8
Figure 4. The locations of the measurement points in a circular duct , methods A and B
(SFS-EN 13284-1, source Finnish Handbook for Emission Measurements)
9
order to achieve more reliable results. Sampling points shall be located either more than 3
% of the sampling line length or more than 5 cm whichever is the greater value from the
inner duct wall.
10
Figure 6. Size of the measurement ports (SFS 5625)
Source Finnish handbook on emission measurement
11
and gas sampling port). It can be estimated that generally the width of the space needed is
at least the diameter of the stack + 1 meter. If the diameter of a round canal is larger than 2
meters when usually four particle sampling ports and equivalent gas sampling ports are
needed, should the working base be around the stack and the width be 50 % of the diameter
of the stack. The free space in front of the measurement port should be at least the length of
the sampling probe needed in the measurements in order to install and remove the probe
safely and without problems.
Figure 7. Measurement place (SFS 5625, source Finnish Handbook for Emission Measurements)
12
Figure 8. Measurement platform (SFS 5625, source Finnish Handbook for Emission Measurements)
13
2.7 Work safety
Law for Safety and Health at Work (Official Gazette No. 92/07)
Safety precautions:
- helmets
- proper shoes
- personnel alarm systems for example for CO
- protection for ears, eyes…
Instructions how to escape from the measurement place e.g in case of fire
Proper stairs to climb to the measurement place
Data about the gas volume flow is needed in order to determine emission. Volume flow can
be determined by sampling the velocity of the gas flow.
International standards direct to manual methods to determine the velocity and volume
flow of gas streams in ducts, big and small stacks with emissions of pollutants in the
atmosphere. The velocity of the gas flow can be determined with measurements with the so
called Pitot tube.
Rough calculations can be made using data on the fuel type used and the technological
process. To determine the volume flow and emission, the local values of the velocity is also
needed to select the input nozzle for isokinetic sampling when measuring dust. The
emission mass flow is needed to determine the data of the volume of the leaking gas.
The flow can be determined by measuring the velocity of the gas and the diameter of the
measurement plane.
The measurement plane can be determined by determining the inner diameter of the duct,
for example by placing a calibrated stick (meter) through the entrance of the measurement
port and repeating that at the second measurement port at an 90° angle, therefore
determining the diameter of the duct (stack). For rectangular ducts, the plane can be
determined by measuring the external dimensions of the duct, taking into account the
thickness of the duct wall. When it is not possible to measure the diameter of the duct, the
layout of the duct provided by the company can be used.
The bends of the duct, the valves, the compressors as well as changes to the size of the duct
can cause interferences of the gas flow and therefore, there should be adequate distance
between these disturbing factors and the measurement port Cyclones can additionally
cause turbulences in the flow. These factors have to be taken into consideration when the
measurement level and measurement points are being selected.
The variations in the process cause changes in the gas flow during measurement of the gas
emissions, which can also cause measurement uncertainty. These variations can be noticed
in the industry where continuous measurements are performed when, during the entire
process, there are changes in the dynamic pressure at one individual location. In order to
14
obtain the true velocity during the measurement, if needed, the measurement should be
repeated.
During sampling (taking samples) with Pitot tube, the velocity of the gas is determined
from the dynamic gas flow in the stack and the wet gas density. The dynamic gas pressure
is measured with a Pitot tube and micro manometer. Figure? presents the dynamic
pressure measurement principle used with Pitot sampling tube. The prevailing pressure in
the duct is determined by measuring the difference between the pressure in the duct and
the outside pressure.
There are two types of Pitot-tubes, L and S type. L type tube is used for relatively dry gases
and low concentrations of particles (dust) since the tube could be clogged. S type tubes are
used for gases with high concentration of particles and humidity. The velocity correction
factor for S Pitot-tube varies between 0,82 and 0,83.
Pitot tubes can be calibrated as described in the international standard (ISO 10780).
The main opening of the Pitot tube is directed downwards opposite to the gas flow
direction, as precisely as possible, so that measurement uncertainties do not occur.
15
The dynamic pressure is a function of the flow according to the following equation:
On site, the dynamic pressure values are being measured at several measurement
points of the measurement plane. Therefore, the mean gas flow velocity is :
If the dynamic pressure is determined at 4 points, the mean gas flow can be calculated by
determining the mean at each point:
16
The condensate collection container should be kept at sufficiently low temperature (for
example acclimatized water bath) so that the condensate would be complete. Before and
after the sampling, the sampling line and the gathered condensate water and the silica gel
cartridge are weighed.
Water content can also be determined with the so called “dry-wet-temperature”, the
example is shown in Annex 2 of the Finnish Manual. In this case, in order to perform the
measurement with dry-wet-temperature, the temperature needs to be measured with
thermo-element. The thermo-element is wrapped with wet towel. When it is placed in a
duct, his temperature starts to rise. When the evaporation point is reached, the raise of the
temperature shall stop until there is enough water to evaporate to reach thermic balance,
where the temperature is conducted both ways. When the towel dries out the temperature
shall start to rise again. Water content can also be measured continuously with IR or FTIR-
instrument.
In order to determine the wet gas density we shall need the following data:
temperature
concentrations of gas components O2, CO2 etc.
pressure difference between the stack and the ambient air
ambient air pressure
gas pressure in the stack
water content
17
Information about the difference of pressure between the stack and the ambient air, is
prepared by taking the tube displaying the dynamic pressure and is connected to the part
measuring the static pressure, the tube connected to the part measuring the static pressure
in the Pitot tube is left outside the stack.
Ambient pressure is determined with a barometer or can be found on the internet, can be
obtained from the local meteorological institute etc.
The pressure of the gas in the stack is measured in the following manner:
- when the stack has greater pressure:
the pressure of the gas in the stack = pressure of the ambient air + difference of
the pressure in the stack and the ambient air
- when the stack has too small pressure:
the pressure of the gas in the stack = pressure of the ambient air - difference of
the pressure in the stack and the ambient air
Determining the water content is explained in the previous chapter
18
4.2 Factors influencing the reliability of the particulate measurements
It is usual that quartz fibers are used as particulate filter fabric, since they are relatively
inert to external conditions and can tolerate temperatures up to 950 :C.
Glass fiber filters are usually cheaper compared to quartz fiber filters. However, when
using glass fiber filters make sure that the flue gas does not contain high quantities of sulfur
components, since they easily react with the glass fiber fabric and form sulfates, therefore
increasing filter mass. Usually glass fiber filters tolerate temperatures up to 550 :C.
4.2.2 Weighing
Attention needs to be devoted to the precision in the weighing procedure! For example, the
balance needs to be placed in rooms with stable temperatures, and the humidity of the
ambient air is minimized.
Before measuring the filters, they need to be dried in desiccators.
The balance needs to be regularly calibrated with reference weights.
Several effects contributing to mistakes in weighing need to be taken into consideration,
such as the insufficient temperature equilibrium, the effect of temperature variation, and
the effect of barometric pressure variations. The uncertainty which may occur is usually
not only related to the balance performance, but rather to the procedure applied.
An overall field blank sample shall be taken after each measurement series or at least once
a day, following the normal sampling procedure without starting the suction device. The
sampling nozzle is recommended to be kept in the channel for 15 min at 180 ˚ from the
19
direction of the flow. The measured mass variation provides an estimation of the
uncertainties. The overall blank value, divided by the average sampling volume of the
measurement series, provides an estimation of the detection limit (in milligrams per cubic
metre) of the whole measurement process, as carried out by the operators. The overall
blank includes possible deposits on the filter and on all parts upstream.
The purpose of this sample is to check that there is no contamination of filters and of
rinsing solutions during handling on site, transport, storage, handling in the laboratory and
weighing procedures. Field blank is especially important when the measured dust
concentrations are low.
Note! Field blank cannot be subtracted from the measured result.Field blank values shall be
reported individually in the measurement report. No result below the overall blank value is
valid.
The isokinetic sampling is sampling where the direction and velocity of the gas entering the
sampling nozzle (opening) is equal to the one of the gas in the duct at the measurement
point.
20
The permitted deviation during isokinetic sampling according to the 13284-1 standard is -
5% to + 15%.
The filtering method in the stack with the filter and the filter holder placed opposite of the
probe nozzle (opening).
The in-stack method is used when the flue gas temperature is above the water or acid due
point, meaning that the gases are not saturated.
Image 11: In-stack sampling method according to the MKC EN 13284-1 standard.
EN 13284-1 requires:
a) The filters, before the measurements, need to be heated at minimum 180 :C and
always at a temperature for at least 20 :C higher than the flue gas temperature
(meaning, for example, if the flue gas temperature is 350 :C, the filter before the
measurements need to be heated at a temperature of 370 :C.
21
b) The sampling is also performed at the same flue gas temperature (since the filter
itself is within the stack at the same temperature).
c) The filter needs to be heated in a furnace after the measurements at
temperatures of 160 :C
Out-stack method is filtering out of the stack and its heated holder placed away from the
nozzle, at the back side of the probe.
The out-stack method is usually used when flue gases are saturated, meaning that there is a
possibility for condensation. The out-stack method can also be used when measuring non-
saturated gases.
Image 12: Out-stack sampling method according to the MKC EN 13284-1 standard.
22
When the out-stack method is used for saturated gases and the flue gas temperature is
below 160 :C, than:
When the out-stack method is used for saturated gases and the flue gas temperature is
above 160 :C, then:
5.1 Sampling
Continuos measurements of gaseous components can be divided into different types based
on the sampling:
- Extractive methods
- In-situ-methods
23
- Remote sensors
Often the flue gas is hot and moist and it can contain lots of particulates. In order to prevent
the condensation of the moisture in the sampling lines, heated lines and heated filter
holders must be used in the sampling before the cooling unit.
The sampling line and filter must be made from inert material. Most common materials
used in sampling lines are PTFE (Teflon) and polyethylene (PE).
Note! The use of silicone must be avoided because of its “non-inert” properties (it can e.g
adsorb organic compounds quite easily).
Typically the calibration gas is fed to the beginning of the line, so that it follows the same
route to the analyser as the actual sample gas. Then the effect of sampling line is similar
both on the calibration gas and to the sample gas.
When the extractive sampling line is constructed, at least following things must be taken
into account:
24
- Probe: length and material
- Filters: materials, not to cause pressure losses
- Sampling line: material, length, diameter
- Connections, valves
- Pressure meters: reading accuracy
- Calibration gases: accuracy, stability time
- Pumps: type, capacity
- Gas conditioning (drying) techniques
It must be noted that all the cold spots must be eliminated in the whole sampling line in order
to avoid any condensation and losses of components!
There are several conditioning configurations the sample gas, such as:
1. Condensation method.
2. Permeation dryer
3. Dilution probes
4. Heated line and heated analyser
1. Condensation methods
These methods are easy to use, many different methods available on the market.
However, you must make sure that you do not lose the components you are studying in
the condensate. For example, SO2 and NO2 are easily absorbed in the water, however
NO is not. So, make sure you select the right condensation method for your purpose!
Note! It is required in many standards (e.g MKC EN14972) that the temperature of the
sample gas at the exit of the cooling unit needs to be recorded and that it must be < 4 C;
then the gas can be considered to be dry!
A maximum dew-point temperature of 4 °C shall not be exceeded at the outlet of the
sample cooler.
25
Figure 14. Jet stream condenser (source Finnish Handbook for Emission
Measurements)
2. Permeation dryer
There is no need for condensation unit when using this method. On the other hand,
there is a risk that the permeation dryer can be easily blocked if the sample gas contains
lot of particulates or condensating components. Therefore, the sample gas must be
filtered before it is led to the permeation dryer.
The gas temperature in the permeation dryer needs to be above the water dew point.
The gas sample in the permeation dryer is dried while still in gas condition in order to
avoid losses of the water dissolved components (i.e. NO2 and SO2) in the sample.
26
Figure 15. Permeation dryer (source Finnish Handbook for Emission Measurements)
3. Dilution probes
When using dilution probes the sample gas is dried with dry dilution air already when
the sample is taken and as a consequence, there is no need for separate condensation
removal.
Following factors can have an affect to the accuracy of the dilution probe:
- Changes in the flue gas pressure
- Changes in the flue gas density
- Changes in the flue gas temperature
- Quality of the dilution air (how clean it is!)
The dilution air must be clean enough, so that there is no mistake during measurement
and in the result. During the measurements care must be taken that the dilution probe
does not clog because this will change the dilution ratio. The critical orifices that are
used for the control of dilution ratio can be cleaned with ultrasound wash.
Figure 16. Dilution probe (source Finnish Handbook for Emission Measurements)
The most preferable way is to lead the hot and moist sample gas directly to the analyser
without cooling it. By doing this, the risk of losing components in the condensate will be
eliminated To avoid condensation the user shall maintain the temperature of the
sampling line up to the measuring cell. The analyser itself must be also heated.
27
The concentrations are given on wet basis and shall be corrected so that they are
expressed on dry basis. The correction shall be made from the water vapour
concentration measured in the flue gases
Note! As a summary, the measurer must choose the conditioning system that is fit for its
purpose! For some cases, condensation method can be perfect, for some you need to choose
another cooling system in order to avoid the loss of the sample gas in the condensate.
In the Table Z below the most common measurement techniques for different gaseous
components are presented.
Component Measurement method
28
5.2.2 Standard reference methods SRM for different components in EU
When these European Standards are used as the SRM, the user shall demonstrate that:
performance characteristics are better than the minimum performance criteria
given for each method in the relevant standard; and
overall uncertainty calculated by combining values of standard uncertainties
associated to the performance characteristics given in relevant standard is less than
the requirement stated in the standard
Overall expanded uncertainty for standard reference methods are defined in EN reference
standards :
Expert using the analyser must know the total effect of all possible factors which can have
an influence on the results ! Typically, analyser manufacturer´s give these performance
characteristics in their manual but the user of the analyser must know his own instruments
“behavior”.
5.3.1 Calibration
Calibration of the gaseous analyser is one of the most important things in the QA and
reliability of emission measurements. The aim in the calibration is to have information on
the possible deviation between the concentration and the reading.
29
Typically the calibration is performed before the measurements by feeding into analyser a
certain gas concentration of studied gas and also zero gas which is usually either nitrogen
or synthetic air. This calibration must be performed at the site, before and after the
measurements!!! The calibration of the analyzer needs to be added to the normal working
procedure. Laboratory must define the criteria for the acceptable deviation between these
calibrations. Meaning that if the deviation is larger, then in the worst case, the
measurements have to be rejected.
- The calibration gases must be stored in proper temperature, not too cold, not too
hot!
- The stability time given in the certificate must be respected
- When the pressure in the calibration gas bottle drops below critical limits, there
might be changes in the gas concentrations. Therefore, the minimum pressure info
needs to be respected also!
- It must be noted also that some components might react with each other, for
example it is not possible to have mixture for NO and O2 because NO will react with
oxygen. However, gas manufacturers are experts on this…!
- In some cased the background gas in the calibration gas can have an effect to the
results. For example, if you use UV-fluorescence for SO2-measurements the oxygen
concentration in the calibration gas has an effect to the measured results. Thus, in
this case, it is recommended that the background gas oxygen concentration should
be as close as possible to the stack gas oxygen level.
The linearity of the gas analyzer has to be checked on a regular basis, for example once in a
year. It is checked by feeding different concentrations of the studied gas into the analyser
(0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 % of the measurement range and all the ranges need to be checked).
It must be emphasized, however, that these interferences do not mean that this measurement
method could not be used when interfering components exist in the flue gas!! You can
minimize the effect of interfering substances by feeding the gas mixture with similar gas
composition to the analyser. (However, this means that laboratory has to have a mixing
system for different mixtures…). The test for interfering components must be performed at
least when you take a new analyser into use and when new functional parts have been
30
changed to the analyser. The tests are performed by feeding the components separately to
the analyser and the response of the analyser is registered.
100 n
S i 1
Ri
Mr
Where
S = the sum response of interfering components
Ri = response of individual component
Mr = measurement range of the analyser
n = number of tested components
In many standards it is stated that S must be < ± 4 % of the measurement range studied.
Users of the analyser must respect the recommended operational temperatures that are
given in manuals. Typically, the operation temperatures are + 5 C - +35 C and the relative
humidity of the air 5-95 %. Measurer needs to take into account the conditions at the site
(temperature, humidity, air pressure) and record them for example in the diary. It is
important to mention also if there is lot of vibration, dust, draught etc because these might
affect to the results.
31
6.1 Absorption methods
- Process where the gaseous air pollutant reacts with the liquid reactant to form a
stable, nonvolatile and easily detected product in the liquid phase
- Often used as primary (reference) method
- Absorption solutions used for sampling can be divided into inorganic and
organic dilutions. Most common inorganic solutions are water, different
acids,HNO3 (H2SO4) and bases(e.g. NaOH). Alcohols, e.g. ethanol, are used as
organic absorbing solutions.
1. Isokinetic/Non isokinetic sampling => the choice depends on the flue gas. If there
are droplets present or if the component is “attached” to the particles, then the
sampling has to be performed using isokinetic sampling. For example, inorganic
fluorine components and heavy metals can be combined with the particles present
in the flue gas and therefore, particulates need to be filtered before the absorption
sampling and also analyzed. Isokinetic sampling may be required e.g in those cases
when a wet scrubber is used without subsequent reheating.
Isokinetic sampling requires usually volume flow rates much higher than those
which can be admitted by the washing bottles used for the collection of pollutants.
Therefore, downstream of the filter, only a part of the gases is drawn through the
washing bottle(s) through a secondary line, the main line and the secondary line
having their own gas metering systems and suction devices. The ratio between the
main and the secondary line volume flow rates shall be kept constant. Principles for
this sampling is shown in Fig. X.
32
blank text from this standard:
Field blank
To check the sampling procedure, a field blank shall be performed at
least before each measurement series or at least once a day, following
the whole measurement procedure specified in this European
Standard and including the sampling procedure described in 7.2.3 to
7.3 without the suction step i.e., without starting and operating the
suction device.
The average sampling time shall be used for calculation of the blank
value expressed in mg/m3.
If the equipment in contact with the measured substance is cleaned
and reused in the field, a field blank shall also be taken after the
measurement series. If several measurements are performed at the
same industrial process or on several lines of the same industrial
process, then only one single field blank at the beginning and one at
the end of the series shall be performed.
The field blank shall be less than 10 % of the emission limit value
(ELV). If the calculated value of the measurement is less than the field
blank, the measured value result shall be reported as less or equal to
the field blank.
The result of field blank shall not be subtracted to the result of
measured value. However, it is necessary to take into account the
value of the field blank in the calculation of the uncertainty of the
measured value
4. Requirements for sampling:
- gas residence time should be minimized
- probe, filter and sample lines must be heated
- all parts in the sampling line must be resistant to corrosion and temperature
- sampling line should not consist the elements which are collected (meaning that
for example stainless steel probes cannot be used in heavy metal sampling because
there will be contamination…)
33
Figure 17. Sampling arrangement for iso/non-isokinetic sampling
34
electrode
Ammonia (NH3) VDI 2461 Blatt 1 ja 0,05 M H2SO4 Titration
VDI 2461 Blatt 2
Mercury (Hg) EN 13211 4 % K2Cr2O7 + Cold vapour- atomic
20 % HNO3 absorption
spectrometry (CV-
AAS)
Ethanol and methanol VDI 2457, Blatt 2 Methyldiglykol Gas chromatography
(C2H5OH and CH3OH) (GC)
Gaseous fluorine VDI 2470 Blatt 1 NaOH-liquid Ion selective
compounds electrode
Formaldehyde (HCHO) VDI 3862 Blatt 2 DNPH Liquid
chroomatography
Hydrochloric acid (HCl) EN 1911 H2O Ion chromatography
Reduced sulfur SFS 5727 Hydrogen peroxide liquid Titration
compounds (TRS)
Heavy metals (As, Cd, EN 14385 4,5 % HNO3 +1,7 % H2O2 ICP-AES
Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb,
Sb, Tl ,V)
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) EN 14791 Hydrogen peroxide liquid Titration
Hydrogen syanide SFS 3869 1 M NaOH Polarography
(HCN)
35
6.2 Adsorption methods
Adsorption is merging or attaching of atoms, ions, or molecules of gas, liquid or dissolved solid
substances on a certain area. This process creates an adsorbent film on the surface of the
adsorbent.
There are several materials which are used in the adsorption sampling. The most typically
used substances are active charcoal, Tenax-hartz, polyuretanfoam (PUF).
European Standard EN 1948: 2006 specifies the sampling of PCDDs / PCDFs in stationary
source emissions. The standard is also suitable for the determination of other low-volatile
substances e.g. of dioxin-like PCBs. Standard consists of three parts which are necessary for
the performance of the dioxin measurements
Part 1: Sampling of PCDDs/PCDFs
Part 2: Extraction and clean-up of PCDDs/PCDFs
Part 3: Identification and quantification of PCDDs/PCDFs
36
Figure 18. Principle of dioxin and furan sampling
7. Emission calculation
7.1 Calculation of the gas flow rate in stack according to the Finnish standard SFS 3866
Gas composition
rCO2 = 0,090 = 9,0 % (vol)
rO2 = 0,088§ = 8,8 % (vol)
rCO = 0,00 = 0,0 % (vol)
rN2 = 0,82 (= 1 - rCO2 - rO2 - rCO)
-dynamic pressure
(16 measurement points) pдин = 40 Pa, 50 Pa, 60 Pa, 100 Pa, 95 Pa, 80 Pa,
70 Pa, 60 Pa, 60 Pa, 80 Pa, 100 Pa, 115 Pa,
100 Pa, 80 Pa, 70 Pa, 55 Pa
- mass of water condensate mкв = 100 g
- gas volume achieved with the
measurement rota-meter Vгр = 0,375 m3
- ambient pressure pа = 101,9 kPa
- under pressure pпод = - 0,3 kPa
- stack pressure Pо = pa – ppod =>101,9 kPa – 0,3 kPa =101,6
kPa
- gas temperature in the gas-meter tгм = 27 C
- stack temperature Tо = 131 C
- measurement plane area A = 2,269 m2
- water vapor density ρвп = 0,8038 kg/m3
Calculation in NTP (normal temperature and pressure), 273 K and 101,3 kPa.
Calculation:
37
M CO2 M O2 M N2
ρсгсу rCO2 rO2 rN2 (1)
VCO2n VO2n VN2n
=>
44.01 kg/kmol 32,00 kg/kmol 28,02 kg/kmol
ρсгсу 0,090 0,088 0,82 1,332 kg/m 3
22,26 m3 / kmol 22,39 m3 / kmol 22,40 m3 / kmol
mкв mкв
xs (2)
Vгр ρсгсу Vгр
Tн pa
ρсгсу
Ta pн
0,100 kg
=> x s 0,200 kg/kg
3 273 K 101,3 kPa
0,375 m 1,332 kg/m 3
273 0 K 101,3 kPa
Note! The above mentioned calculation presumes that the values from the roto-meter are
already expressed as NTP, therefore there is no need to correct the temperature or
pressure!!!
1 xs
ρ вгн ρ сгсу (3)
x ρ
1 s сгсу
ρ вп
1 0,200 kg/kg
=> ρвгн 1,332 kg/m 3 1,201 kg/m 3
0,200 kg/kg 1,332 kg/m 3
1
0,8038 kg/m 3
Tн pс
ρвго ρвгн (4)
Tс pн
38
273 K 101,6 kPa
ρвго 1,201 kg/m 3 0,814 kg/m 3
=> 273 131 K 101,3 kPa
2 x pдин 1 - i
vвг 1- i (5)
ρвго
39
Tн pо
q вгн q вг (7)
Tо pн
1
q сгн q вгн (8)
x s ρсгсу
1
ρ вгн
1
=> q сгн 20,81 m3 / s 15,63 m3 / s
0,200 kg/kg 1,332 kg/m 3
1
1,201 kg/m 3
7.2 Calculation of the particulates and the emission according to the Finnish standard
SFS 3866
Measurement data:
- particulate mass
(including the deposition) m = 5,30 mg
- gas temperature in the gas meter tгм = 27 C
- data taken from the gas meter Vгм = 1,346 m3
- ambient pressure Pa = 101,9 kPa (= pa)
- sampling duration T = 48 min
- ratio of the dry gas flow q сгн = 15,63 m3/s
Calculation in NTP (normal temperature and pressure), 273 K and 101,3 kPa.
Calculation:
Tн pa
Vсг Vгм (9)
Tгм pн
273 K 101,9 kPa
=> Vсг 1,346 m3 1,232 m3
273 27 K 101,3 kPa
40
Particulate concentration in the dry gas, NTP
m
cсгн (10)
Vсг
5,3 mg
=> cсгн 4,3 mg/m 3
1,232 m 3
For particulate concentration, for more than one gas sample (and filtration) in the measurement plane
k
mi
Cсгн i 1 (12)
k
Vсгi
i 1
where
mi particulate mass [g] on filter + deposition
Vсгi sampled dry gas volume, NTP [m3] during sampling
(isokinetic sampling and sampling duration at each measurement point is the same)
Aпмр m
q осигурање x (13)
A пн T
where
qе = particulate emission = 242 g/h (calculated normally)
Aпмр = measurement plane area = 2,269 m2
Aпн = nozzle area = d2/4 = 3,14 x 0,00842 /4 = 0,0000554 m2
m = sampled particulate + deposit = 3,5 mg = 0,00350 g
T = sampling duration = 48 min
41
2,269 m2 0,00530 g min g
=> qосигурање 2
x x60 271,4
0,0000554 m 48 min h h
Where
271,4 g g
=> q осигурање,корегиран 242
1,12 h h
Gas density
M
c mg/m 3 c ppm (15)
22,4
where
c mg/m 3 = concentration in units mg/m3
cppm = concentration in units ppm
M = molar mass (g/mol)
7.4 Conversions between dry and wet concentrations and standardisation to reference
oxygen concentration
Wet concentration in dry concentrations:
42
cвлажни
cсуви (16)
c
1 H2O
100
where
cвлажн = we concentrations
cH2O = water vapor (%)vol.
cH2O
cвлажни cсуви (1 ) (17)
100
Where we appropriately refer the concentration to specific concentration gas component of gas
mixture for example oxygen concentration.
20,9 O2,селектиран
cO 2 редукциа cсув (18)
20,9 O2,измерен
Many things can undermine a measurement (Bell, Stephanie, 2001, NPL). Flaws in the
measurement may be visible or invisible. Because real measurements are never made
under perfect conditions, errors and uncertainties can come from:
• The measuring instrument - instruments can suffer from errors including
bias, changes due to ageing, wear, or other kinds of drift, poor readability,
noise (for electrical instruments) and many other problems.
• The item being measured - which may not be stable. (Imagine trying to
measure the size of an ice cube in a warm room.)
• The measurement process - the measurement itself may be difficult to
make. For example, measuring the weight of small but lively animals presents
particular difficulties in getting the subjects to co-operate.
• “Imported” uncertainties - calibration of your instrument has an uncertainty
which is then built into the uncertainty of the measurements you make. (But
remember that the uncertainty due to not calibrating would be much worse.)
• Operator skill - some measurements depend on the skill and judgement of
the operator. One person may be better than another at the delicate work of
setting up a measurement, or at reading fine detail by eye. The use of an
43
instrument such as a stopwatch depends on the reaction time of the operator.
(But gross mistakes are a different matter and are not to be accounted for as
uncertainties).
• Sampling issues - the measurements you make must be properly
representative of the process you are trying to assess. If you want to know the
temperature at the work-bench, don’t measure it with a thermometer placed
on the wall near an air conditioning outlet. If you are choosing samples from a
production line for measurement, don’t always take the first ten made on a
Monday morning.
• The environment - temperature, air pressure, humidity and many other
conditions can affect the measuring instrument or the item being measured
There are two approaches to estimating uncertainties: ‘Type A’ and ‘Type B’ evaluations. In
most measurement situations, uncertainty evaluations of both types are needed.
Type A evaluations - uncertainty estimates using statistics (usually from
repeated readings)
Type B evaluations - uncertainty estimates from any other information. This
could be information from past experience of the measurements, from
calibration certificates, manufacturer’s specifications, from calculations, from
published information, and from common sense.
From NPL (National Physical Laboratory) - webpages you can find some excel-sheets
where calculation examples for gaseous components and particulates are given. Here is the
web-address .
http://www.npl.co.uk/environmental-measurement/products-and-services/emissions-
measurement-guidance-and-training
In the appendix II you can find examples of NPL calculation sheets as well as an example on
the calculation of the measurement uncertainty for gaseous analyser with the use of EN ISO
14956 standard.
44
9. Reporting of emission measurements
9.1 Reporting of the emission measurement teams
The working team performing the measurements prepares a report for all activities according to
the measurement plan. The working team hands over the report to the responsible person in the
laboratory. That person verifies the report and sends it to the installation and the competent
authorities.
The reporting of the installations that are sources of ambient air pollution towards MEPP is defined
in article 45 of the Law on ambient air quality (Offical gazette of RM num 67/2004, 92/2007,
35/2010, 47/2011). In this article the frequency of data submission to MEPP by installations as
well as manner on which emission data are gained is defined.
The form and content of the forms for submitting data of emissions in the ambient air from
stationary sources, the manner and the time period for submission in accordance with the capacity
of the installation, the content and manner of keeping the emission diary are prescribed in the
Rulebook on the form and the content of the forms for submiting data and the form, the content and
the manner for keeping the diary for emissions in the air (Official gazette of RM num 79/2011)
which is available on the following web side www.moepp.gov.mk.
The emission data reported by the installations (previous chapter) are used and will be
used for international reporting by MEEP.
45
Ratified
Gothenburg
protocol
The focus areas of ТC17-Air quality are methods for air quality characterization of emissions,
ambient air, indoor air- gases in and from the ground and deposition- in particular measurement
methods for air pollutants (for example particles, gases, odours, micro organisms) - methods for
the determination of the efficiency of gas cleaning systems. TC17 committe consist of 7 members
(from the relavant institutions IPH and HMA and the major industries) under ledearship of MEEP.
The duty of this committe is to translate the standards titles and adopt the air quality and air
emission standards by the method of indorsment. Regarding the different types of standards in EU
Member Countries it is mandatory to use EN-standards if they are available. In case, EN-standards
do not exist, it is allowed to use ISO-standards if they exist. In non candidate countries the both type
of standards for emission measurements are used. The national standards are also allowed to be
used. However, it must be ensured that the data will have equivalent scientific quality when other
than EN-methods are used. The list of the adopted МКС EN emission standards and МКС ISO
emission standards and MKC ISO emission standards by the TK17 that we refer to in this guidebook
are specified in Annex of the Rulebook, as well as Technical Specifications (TS)- and Technical
References (TR)- referred in this guidelines are given in Annex I of this guidelines. The updated list
of standards and information how to purchase them is available on the following web side of the
institute for standardisation of the Republic of Macedonia www.isrm.gov.mk.
46
REFERENCES
ANNEX I
МКС EN emission standards
EN 1911-1:1998-04 Air quality – Stationary source emissions – Manual method of determination of HCl -
Part 1: Sampling of gases
EN 1911-2:1998-04 Air quality – Stationary source emissions – Manual method of determination of HCl –
Part 2: Gaseous compounds absorption
EN 1911-3:1998-04 Air quality – Stationary source emissions – Manual method of determination of HCl –
Part 3: Absorption solution analysis and calculations
EN 12619:1999-06 Stationary source emissions – Determination of the mass concentration of total gaseous
organic carbon at low concentrations in flue gases – Continuous flame ionisation detector method
EN 13211:2001-01 Air quality - Stationary source emissions - Manual method of determination of the
concentration of total mercury
EN 13284-1:2001-11 Stationary source emissions – Determination of low range mass concentration of dust
– Part 1: Manual gravimetric method
47
EN 13284-2:2004-09 Stationary source emissions – Determination of low range mass concentration of dust
– Part 2: Automated measuring systems
EN 13526:2001-11 Stationary source emissions – Determination of the mass concentration of total gaseous
organic carbon at high concentrations in flue gases – Continuous flame ionisation detector method
EN 14385:2004-02 Stationary source emissions – Determination of the total emission of As, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu,
Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Tl and V
EN 15267-2:2009-03 Air quality – Certification of automated measuring systems – Part 2: Initial assessment
of the AMS manufacturer's quality management system and post certification surveillance for the
manufacturing process
EN 15445:2008-01 Fugitive and diffuse emissions of common concern to industry sectors – Qualification of
fugitive dust sources by Reverse Dispersion Modelling
EN 15446:2008-01 Fugitive and diffuse emissions of common concern to industry sectors – Measurement of
fugitive emission of vapours generating from equipment and piping leaks
EN ISO 14956:2002-08 Air quality – Evaluation of the suitability of a measurement method by comparison
with a stated measurement uncertainty (ISO 14956:2002)
ISO 10780 Stationary source emissions – measurement of velocity and volume flow rate of gas streams in
ducts;
ISO 9096 Stationary source emissions – Manual Determination of Mass Concentration of Particulate
Matter;
ISO 12039 Stationary source emissions-Determination of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen –
Performance characteristics and calibration of automated measuring systems;
ISO 7935 Stationary source emissions-Determination of the mass concentration of sulphur dioxide –
Performance characteristics of automated measuring methods;
ISO 10849 Stationary source emissions- Determination of the mass concentration of nitrogen oxides –
Performance characteristics of automated measuring methods.
Technical specifications
ANNEX II
NPL- Spreadsheets for uncertainty calculations in accordance with the referred standards
49
According to the requirements laid down in the standard MKC EN 14789
50
According to the requirements laid down in the standard MKC EN 14792
51
ISO 14956, ”EVALUATION OF THE SUITABILITY OF A MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE BY
COMPARISON WITH A REQUIRED MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY” (1)
Combined standard uncertainty is sum of all partial standard uncertainties:
2
uc
p
u p
52
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
uc ulin ur ud ut up uhv uk ucal
where ulin = the standard uncertainty of the unlinearity of the analyser
ur = the standard uncertainty of the repeatability
etc….
PRINCIPLES OF ISO14956 (2)
The expanded uncertainty is:
U c k uc
Where
- k = the coverage factor (= 2 (normal distribution,
level of confidence 95 %)
- uc= combined standard uncertainty
53
PRINCIPLES OF ISO14956 (5)
If the extremes are symmetric about zero, standard uncertainty can be presented as:
x j, p
u( x j )
3
Performance characteristic that is not able to create a standard uncertainty of more than 20%
of the highest standard uncertainty of the others may be excluded from the selections
2 100
Non-linearity 1,15 1,33
100 3
1 70
Pressure dependence 0,5 0,20 0,04
100 3
1 100
Drift 0,58 0,33
100 3
54
0,3 70
Temperature dependence 5 0,61 0,37
100 3
0,5 70
Repeatability 0,20 0,04
100 3
2 70
Uncertainty of calibration gas 0,70 0,49
100 2
2 70
Drying of sample gas 0,81 0,65
100 3
1 100
Selectivity (interfering gases) 0,58 0,33
100 3
SUM 3,68 ppm
When calculating if the analyser fulfills the criteria which is set for it, the relative expanded
uncertainty is calculated at the selected concentration.
For example, emission limit value is 200 mg/m3 (=c) and previously calculated expanded
uncertainty was = 3,74 ppm => 1,25 x 3,74 = 4,67 mg/m3 (conversion factor : 1 ppm CO = 1,25
mg/m3)
=> Relative expanded uncertainty is thus:
=( Uc/c) x 100 % = 2,3 %
55
56