IN THE COURT OF THE 5TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF
METROPLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE
                  P C R No.                of 2009
                                  In
                    CC No.             of 2009
Between:
Mr. Prasad Jayaram
S/o.
Aged about       years
R/a. No. 2418, 18th Main,
Kumaraswamy layout 2nd Stage
Bangalore – 560 078                        COMPLAINANT
And
Panduranaga Reddy
@ Manjunath @ Manju
Memorandum of complaint under Section 200 of Criminal
                 Procedure Code
        The above named complainant most respectfully submit as
hereunder:
1.      The address of the complainant for the purposes of Court
notices, summons, etc., is care of L. S. Shekar and Associates,
Advocates,     No.17,     First   Floor,   6th       Cross,   9th    Main,
Sampangiramanagar, Bangalore – 560 027.
2.      The address of the accused for similar purposes is as
mentioned above in the cause title.
3.      The complainant is the lawful owner of Skoda Car bearing
registration No. KA - 51 - M – 676. The same was purchased by
the complainant after availing fiancé from ICICI Bank Limited,
No.1,    Commissariat   Road,     Bangalore      –     560    001.    The
complainant is producing herewith copy of the RC Book issued by
the registering authority as DOCUMENT – A for the kind perusal
of the Hon’ble     Court. The vehicle was hypothecated to ICICI
Bank Limited. Copy of the B Register Extract issued by the
registering authority is produced herewith as DOCUMENT – B for
the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.
2.    After availing loan, the complainant was regular in making
payment of the loan for nearly 1 one year. During 2007, the
complainant suffered heavy loss in his business and as became
irregular in making payment of monthly EMIs.
3.    At this juncture, the above named accused claiming to be
from the recovery department of ICICI Bank limited, approached
the complainant demanding pending EMIs. The complainant
pleaded inability. The accused put the complainant in touch of
higher   authorities   in   ICICI   Bank    limited   and   after    due
negotiations,    the    Bank   agreed      to   receive   60%   of   the
outstanding amount and settle the loan account.
4.    Accordingly the complainant paid a sum of Rs.1,20,000/-
(Rs. One Lakh and Twenty thousand Only) to the accused on
02.04.2009 and the accused took the complainant to the
Bangalore Head office of the ICICI Bank and issued a letter
stating No Objection for cancellation of Hypothecation along with
Form 35 . Copy of the same is produced herewith as DOCUMENT
– C and D for the kind perusal for the Hon’ble Court.
5.    Thereafter, the complainant submitted the letter issued by
the   accused   to   the   registering   authority   and    got   the
hypothecation cancelled.
6.    Of late, the accused started to call the complainant over
phone and has been sending threatening messages. Some of the
messages sent by the accused are as hereunder:
7.    With a doubt, the complainant approached the ICICI Bank
who informed the accused that the loan account is still pending
and amount as per the earlier settlement is not credited to the
loan account. Surprised by the same, the complainant showed
copies the documents issued by the accused to the officials at
the ICICI Bank Limited, who said they are all forged documents
and the bank has not issued any of them. Further when enquired
about the accused and his status of employment with the Bank,
the complainant was informed that the accused was not
employed with the ICICI Bank. Further they informed that non-
performing loan accounts would be handed over to the private
recovery agencies and the accused might have been an
employee of one such recovery agencies. When enquired more
details, the Bank officials refused to give more details.
8.    It is respectfully submitted that the complainant has been
cheated by the accused by not only collecting money, but also by
handing over forged documents pertaining to no-objection for
cancellation of hypothecation. Also by making threatening calls
and sending threatening sms over phone the accused has made
the daily life of the complainant miserable.
9.    Being   aggrieved,    the   complainant    approached    the
jurisdictional police seeking help. The jurisdictional police have
refused to receive and register any complaint against the
accused. Hence the present complaint.
10.   It is respectfully submitted that it is the belief of the
complainant that the accused has committed offences punishable
under Sections 406, 419, 420, 426 and 506 of IPC.
11.   It is submitted that the complainant handed over money to
the accused and the accused handed over the forged documents
at the residence of the complainant within the jurisdictional
limits of the Hon’ble Court and as such the Court has jurisdiction
to dispose off the present complaint in accordance with law.
12.   It is further submitted that the complainant has not
preferred any other complaint before an other Court of law or
any other authority under law with the same or similar
grievance.
      WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that the
Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to refer the above case
under section 156 (3) of IPC to the Inspector OF Police,
Kumaraswamy Layout Police Station, Bangalore , with a direction
to register the case against the accused and to investigate into
the matter in the best interests of justice and law.
Advocate for Complainant                               Complainant
VERIFICATION: I, the above named complainant do hereby
declare that what is stated above is true and correct to the best
of my knowledge, information and belief.
Bangalore
Date:                                                  Complainant
List of Witnesses:
1. The Complainant
2.
List of Documents:
1.   Copy   of   the   RC Book
2.   Copy   of   the   B Register Extract
3.   Copy   of   the   no objection letter issued by the accused
4.   Copy   of   the   Form 35 issued by the accused
Bangalore
Date:                                            Complainant