Direct Instruction
A Behavioral Approach
Description:
       Involves implementing conditions best suited to bring about certain
        responses to particular stimuli.
       Student learning is the Teacher’s responsibility. “If the student has not
        learned, the teacher has not taught.”
       Most frequently used for basic skills and subject matter in primary and
        elementary school levels.
       Also used for remedial classes at middle and high school level.
       Felt to be best suited for young learners, slow learners, and all learners when
        the material is new or difficult.
       There are several variations.
Main Characteristics:
   1.      Almost all classroom activity is focused on learning academic knowledge.
   2.      Teacher makes all instructional decisions. Highly structured “teacher-
           directed”, or “Teacher-lead” instruction.
   3.      Keeps student “on-task” as much as possible.
   4.      Maintains positive classroom by positive reinforcement.
Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond
DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2004). Models of teaching (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Rosenshine, B. V., & Meister, C. (1994b). Direct Instruction. In T. Husen & T. N.
Postlewhaite (Edc.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1524-
1530). New York: Pergamon.
Rosenshine, B. V. (1987). Explicit teacher. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.),
Talks to teachers (pp. 75-92.) New York: Random House.
Components:
   1.      Orientation – which involves: Overview, Importance, and relation to
           previous knowledge or life experience, learning expectations.
   2.      Presentation – which involves: Explaining, Illustrating, Demonstrating,
           Broken down into small steps, Examples, and Evaluation.
   3.      Structured Practice – which emphasizes accurate execution of the
           particular skill.
   4.      Guided Practice – Where teacher monitors and corrects work.
   5.      Independent Practice – Where students are able to self correct their own
           performance.
* Last 3 components, all dealing with practice are known as “Shaping” in Behavioral
theory, and can be recognized as “Scaffolding” in Constructivism.
Suggestions for Effective Practice:
    Systematically move from Structured  Guided  Independent Practice.
    Frequent, short, intense practice sessions are more effective than longer and
      less frequent practice sessions (especially for younger learners).
    Carefully monitor responses in Structured Practice sessions. Emphasize and
      Reinforce correct response. Correct unacceptable responses immediately.
      Operant conditioning says it’s easier to Do It Right The First Time (DIRT-FT).
      Uncorrected practice impedes future learning.
    To ensure high success in skill mastery, student should not be allowed to
      move from Guided practice  Independent practice until they are achieving
      accuracy 85% of the time.
    Spread practice over several months.
    Space practice close together at first, then spread further apart as you move
      from Structured  Independent practice.
Points/Steps to consider when planning and implementing Direct Instruction:
   1.   Write lesson outcomes
   2.   Select lesson content
   3.   Organize lesson content
   4.   Prepare lesson notes
   5.   Help students to master the language of your subject
   6.   Help students to take notes
   7.   Check learners’ understanding
Effectiveness and Limitations:
(from: Killen, Roy (2006). Effective Teaching Strategies: Lessons from Research and
Practice. Cengage Learning Australia)
Effectiveness                               Limitations
1. Direct instruction can be used to help   1. If the teacher does not appear to be
students achieve many types of learning     well prepared, knowledgeable,
outcomes Direct instruction can also be     confident, enthusiastic and well
used to demonstrate skills to students      organized, the students will become
                                             bored or distracted and their learning
                                             will be hindered. Because of teacher’s
                                             central role in direct instruction, success
                                             of this strategy depends heavily on what
                                             I have referred to as the ‘image’ that the
                                             teacher projects (Killen, 1990)
2. Direct instruction can be an efficient    2. Direct instruction relies heavily on
way to introduce students to a new area      students being able to assimilate
of study by giving them a broad              information through listening, observing
overview that defines key concepts and       and note taking. Students who are not
shows how they are interrelated. This        very good at these skills will find it
helps students to develop the foundation     difficult to learn from direct instruction.
knowledge that they need for later
learning
3. Direct instruction allows you to        3. t is very difficult to cater for the
highlight important points                 individual differences between students’
                                           abilities, prior knowledge, interest in the
                                           subject, rates of learning, levels of
                                           understanding or learning styles during
                                           direct instruction.
4. Direct instruction can be equally       4. There is some research evidence that
effective with large and small classes and the high level of structure and teacher
with students from most cultures.          control that is characteristic of direct
                                           instruction may have negative impact on
                                           students’ problem solving abilities,
                                           independence and curiosity (Ross &
                                           Kyle, 1987)
5. Direct instruction is one of the most   5. If direct instruction does not involve
effective approaches for teaching explicit some students’ participation (such as
concepts and skills to low-achieving       asking and answering questions), their
students (Berliner, 1982; Ross & Kyle,     interest will be lost after 10-15 minutes,
1987)                                      and they will remember little of the
                                           content.
6. Lectures can be a useful way to         6. If used too frequently, direct
provide information for students who       instruction can lead students to believe
are poor readers or who are not very       that it is the teacher’s job to tell them all
skilled at locating, organizing and        they need to know.
interpreting information.
7. Generally, direct instruction allows    7. Because direct instruction involves a
you to create a non-threatening learning lot of one-way communication, they may
environment for students. Those who        be limited opportunities to gain feedback
are shy, not confident or not              about student understanding. The
knowledgeable are not forced to            teacher may not be aware that some
participate and become embarrassed.        students have developed
                                           misconceptions.
Computers can be used to:
   1.     Emphasize specific performance objectives
   2.     Break down learning into small steps
   3.     Immediate feedback
   4.     Consistent Rewards
   5.     Predefine assessment techniques.
Mazyck, M. (2002). Integrated learning systems and students of color: Two decades
of use in K – 12 education. TechTrends, 46(2), 33-39.
Ysseldyke, J., Kosciolek, S., Spicuzza, R., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of a learning
information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure. Journal
of Educational Research, 96(3), 163-173.
Example of Direct Instruction Lesson Plan:
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/24079115/direct-instruction-
lesson-plan-example
References:
Killen, R. (2006). Effective Teaching Strategies: Lessons from Research and Practice.
Cengage Learning Australia
Ross, D. D., and Kyle, D. W. (1987).Helping pre-service teachers learn to use teacher
effectiveness research. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (2), 40-44.
Snowman, J., McCown, R., & Biehler, R. (2009). Psychology Applied to Teaching. (12th
ed.). Boston Massachusetts: Houghton, Mifflin.