STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION
CAIRO UNIVERSITY 
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING 
PETROLEUM  ENG. DEPARTMENT 
PRE - M.SC. CLASS 2012-2013 
SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY 
Submitted To 
 Dr. : Abdulaziz Mohammed Abdulaziz 
 
12/3/2013  
Presented By 
 Mohammed Abdulmajeed Esmail 
OUTLINES 
1. Introduction. 
2. Stratigraphic units 
3. Space-time concept in correlation 
4. Facies factor in correlation & Correlation markers 
5. Magnitude of correlations 
6. Factors controlling correlation investigations (FCCI) 
7. Time & cost, Quality of personnel 
8. Methods of subsurface correlation 
9. Stratigraphic maps and correlation 
10. Conclusions. 
 
INTRODUCTION 
INTRODUCTION 
What is Stratigraphy ? 
 Stratigraphy is the branch of geology that deals 
with all rock strata forming the Earths crust to 
organize them in Space and time. 
Bio-stratigraphic unit: 
 a body of rock which is defined and characterized 
by its fossil content. 
Unconformity 
 It means a missing in time record via a break in 
sedimentation and or erosion. 
 
 
INTRODUCTION 
Benefits of Stratigraphy 
 Displays the vertical and lateral distribution of 
rock strata and their interrelationship. 
 Displays the stratal geometry, lapout and missing 
intervals 
 Contributes in building static model 
 Contributes in field evaluation and reserve 
estimation 
 Contributes in locating development and 
appraisal wells 
 
INTRODUCTION 
Importance of Correlation of stratigraphic 
 Correlation of stratigraphic units permits 
establishment of formational sequences, 
evaluation of contemporaneous and non-
contemporaneous deposits, recognition of 
unconformities, reconstruction of paleotectonic 
fabrics, and delineation of sedimentation 
patterns. 
 
STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS 
STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS 
 Before the correlation of deposits is attempted, it 
is essential that stratigraphic units be defined 
accurately. 
 Schenck and Muller (1941) recommended that 
continued use be made of three types of 
stratigraphic units as a basis for correlation 
        (1)lithogenetic (rock),  
            (2) time-stratigraphic (time-rock), and  
                (3) time. 
 
STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS 
Figure 1. Time-stratigraphic unit.  
STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS 
 Figure 2. Relationship of time-stratigraphic and lithogenetic units 
STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS 
 Biozones play a major role in establishing 
boundaries of time-stratigraphic units. 
 
STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS 
Figure 3. Biostratigraphic zonation 
SPACE-TIME CONCEPT IN 
CORRELATION 
SPACE-TIME CONCEPT IN CORRELATION 
 Such variables as composition, texture, color, 
porosity, permeability, thickness, and 
paleontology must be evaluated through time and 
along the space components in order to establish 
the contemporaneity or non-contemporaneity of 
deposits. 
 
SPACE-TIME CONCEPT IN CORRELATION 
Figure 4. demonstrates the lateral and vertical variations of three lithologies (facies) in 
space within a time-stratigraphic unit. 
FACIES FACTOR IN 
CORRELATION 
FACIES FACTOR IN CORRELATION 
 "when two deposits of the geologic column 
have been found to hold pretty much the same 
organisms, it has been assumed that the two 
deposits have synchronous relations. It is equally, 
if not more valid, to assume that the two deposits 
were laid down under similar environments and 
may actually be somewhat different in age . . .". 
 
CORRELATION MARKERS 
CORRELATION MARKERS 
 The recognition and the definition of lithologic, 
paleontologic, and seismic markers in controlled 
stratigraphic sequences are of utmost importance 
in all correlation work. 
 
 These markers, including limestone, bentonite, 
coal or lignite, anhydrite, concretions, 
chert, 
 
CORRELATION MARKERS 
Figure 5. Marker beds 
MAGNITUDE OF 
CORRELATIONS 
MAGNITUDE OF CORRELATIONS 
 Correlations may be of local, regional, inter-
regional, or of intercontinental magnitude. 
 Local correlations, for example, within an oil field 
or in a small depositional basin, range from 
simple to complex. 
 Regional correlations between basins of large 
provinces, such as the Rocky Mountain Province. 
 
MAGNITUDE OF CORRELATIONS 
 Interregional correlations, as between sections of 
the Gulf, Pacific, and Atlantic coasts, can be 
determined only approximatelymainly on the 
basis of paleontology. 
 Intercontinental correlations involve those 
between continents. 
 
MAGNITUDE OF CORRELATIONS 
 Paleontology is the primary basis for these 
correlations. 
 In general, it may be said that the greater the 
distance between stratigraphic sections, the more 
difficult and uncertain the correlation. 
 
FACTORS CONTROLLING 
CORRELATION INVESTIGATIONS 
(FCCI) 
FCCI 
 Some of the more critical factors controlling the 
solution of correlation problems are the following: 
 
1. Lateral Continuity of Deposits 
 The more uniform the lithology and paleontology 
of a stratigraphic sequence, the less difficult the 
correlation of surface and subsurface units. 
 
FCCI 
2. Structural Complexity of Section 
 In areas where the section is highly folded and 
faulted, and unconformities are present, 
correlations are frequently complicated-at least, 
until a normal stratal sequence has been 
established 
 
3. Availability of Basic Data 
 In some areas stratigraphic data are extremely 
meager or absent. In such cases the geologist is 
greatly handicapped and must bide his time until 
data become available. 
 
TIME & COST 
TIME AND COST 
 Some oil companies follow an ultraconservative 
attitude in their stratigraphic programs and make 
every attempt to reduce or even eliminate coring, 
taking ditch samples, or running an electrical log. 
 
 On the other hand, many companies spend great 
sums in obtaining basic stratigraphic information. 
 
QUALITY OF PERSONNEL 
QUALITY OF PERSONNEL 
 For one to become familiar with the various 
methods of correlation; their uses and limitations, 
requires time, experience, and integrated 
reasoning. 
 A company having young, inexperienced 
geologists must expect correlation errors. 
 
METHODS OF SUBSURFACE 
CORRELATION 
METHODS OF SUBSURFACE 
CORRELATION 
 All methods and techniques listed in next Figure 
are applicable to correlating subsurface 
stratigraphic units; but to apply any one of them 
out their limitations generally initiates poor 
results. 
 
METHODS OF SUBSURFACE 
CORRELATION 
Figure 6. Procedures  applied in correlation of strata 
STRATIGRAPHIC MAPS AND 
CORRELATION 
STRATIGRAPHIC MAPS AND 
CORRELATION 
 During the past 10 years, great advances have 
been made in presenting stratigraphic data in the 
form of contour maps. 
 The philosophy of preparing stratigraphic maps is 
based on the idea that any stratigraphic variable 
(color, texture, composition, thickness, etc.) that 
can be expressed numerically can be contoured. 
 
 To initiate construction of a series of stratigraphic 
maps, the following procedure is recommended. 
 
STRATIGRAPHIC MAPS AND 
CORRELATION 
 Measure, describe, and sample, in detail, surface 
and subsurface sections; define the boundaries 
of stratigraphic units and establish their lateral 
equivalents; prepare the following maps: isopach, 
which is the basis for all subsequent stratigraphic-
type maps; lithofades, including clastic and non-
clastic (percentage or ratio) ; biofades 
(percentage or ratio of variables) ; and tectofades 
and paleogeographic. 
 When these maps are completed; then comes the 
stage of integration and interpretation of the data. 
STRATIGRAPHIC MAPS AND 
CORRELATION 
 After proper integration of such maps, much may 
be learned of the tectonic and sedimentation 
history of the region. 
 
 These maps could not have been prepared until 
fundamental stratigraphic units had been defined 
and correlated. 
STRATIGRAPHIC MAPS AND 
CORRELATION 
Figure 7. Isopach and sand-shale for the Dakotan and Coloradoan rocks 
DIFFICULTIES OF 
CORRELATION 
DIFFICULTIES OF CORRELATION 
 Some of the more common difficulties 
encountered in correlation work are: 
(1) discontinuity of stratigraphic units 
(2) structural complexity 
(3) lateral variations in thickness, lithology, and 
     paleontology 
(4) poor development or absence of marker beds 
(5) presence of unrecognized unconformities 
DIFFICULTIES OF CORRELATION 
(6) multiplicity of lithogenetic and time-stratigraphic 
nomenclature 
(7) erroneously compiled data  
(8) lack of experienced personnel assigned the 
problem. 
CONCLUSION 
CONCLUSION 
 Stratigraphic units 
 Space-time concept in correlation 
 Facies factor in correlation & Correlation markers 
 Magnitude of correlations 
 Factors controlling correlation investigations (FCCI) 
 Time & cost, Quality of personnel 
 Methods of subsurface correlation 
 Stratigraphic maps and correlation 
 Difficulties of correlation 
 
REFERANCE 
 Subsurface Geology in Petroleum Exploration; edited by 
John D. Haun and L. W. LeRoy, Colorado School of Mines 
Golden, Colorado 1958