ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
(ENVIROMENT      IMPACT
IDENTIFICATION , PREDICTION
AND EVALUATION)
              Dr. M. Farhad Howladar,
      Dept. of Petroleum & Mining Engineering,
                   SUST, Sylhet
PURPOSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
 • ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT OR
   EIA CAN BE DEFINED AS THE STUDY TO
   PREDICT THE EFFECT OF A PROPOSED
   ACTIVITY/PROJECT ON THE
   ENVIRONMENT.
 • A DECISION MAKING TOOL, EIA
   COMPARES VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES FOR
   A PROJECT AND SEEKS TO IDENTIFY THE
   ONE WHICH REPRESENTS THE BEST
   COMBINATION OF ECONOMIC AND
   ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS AND BENEFITS.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
 IS INTENDED AS AN INSTRUMENT
  OF PREVENTIVE
  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
  IT PROVIDES A FRAMEWORK AND
  AN INFORMATION BASIS FOR
  DECISION MAKING ON
  ACTIVITIES AFFECTING THE
  ENVIRONMENT.
EIA – THREE CORE VALUES
1.   INTEGRITY: THE EIA PROCESS
     SHOULD BE FAIR, OBJECTIVE,
     UNBIASED AND BALANCED
2.   UTILITY: THE EIA PROCESS SHOULD
     PROVIDE BALANCED, CREDIBLE
     INFORMATION FOR DECISION MAKING
3.   SUSTAINABILITY: THE EIA PROCESS
     SHOULD RESULT IN ENVIRONMENTAL
     SAFEGUARDS
“TO SAY THAT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT HAS IMPACT
IS TO STATE THE OBVIOUS. NO INDUSTRIAL COUNTRY HAS
ADVANCED TO SUCH STATUS WITHOUT DEVELOPING SOLID
INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES. AND NO LOW-INCOME COUNTRY
HAS MANAGED TO ESCAPE POVERTY IN THE ABSENCE OF
INFRASTRUCTURE.
IN ADDITION TO ECONOMIC GROWTH, INFRASTRUCTURE
DEVELOPMENT HAS A VERY TANGIBLE IMPACT ON PEOPLE'S
DAILY LIVES, AND ESPECIALLY ON THE LIVES OF POOR PEOPLE
”
  - LIQUN JIN
VICE PRESIDENT, ADB
EIA
APPLIES TO THE ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THOSE
  PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROJECTS WHICH ARE LIKELY TO HAVE
  SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
EIA
PROJECT MEANS:
•   THE EXECUTION OF CONSTRUCTION WORKS OR OF OTHER
    INSTALLATIONS OR SCHEMES
•   OTHER INTERVENTIONS IN THE NATURAL SURROUNDINGS AND
    LANDSCAPE INCLUDING THOSE INVOLVING THE EXTRACTION OF
    MINERALS.
EIA
DEVELOPMENT CONSENT MEANS:
•   THE DECISION OF THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES WHICH ENTITLES THE
    DEVELOPER TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT.
EIA
….. HAVE SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT BY VIRTUE INTER
  ALIA,
OF THEIR:
   NATURE, SIZE, LOCATION.
 EIA
… DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF A PROJECT ON THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:
• HUMAN BEINGS, FAUNA AND FLORA
• SOIL, WATER, AIR, CLIMATE AND THE
  LANDSCAPE
• THE INTER-ACTION BETWEEN THE FACTORS
  MENTIONED IN THE FIRST AND SECOND
  INDENTS
• MATERIAL ASSETS AND THE CULTURAL
  HERITAGE.
 EIA METHODOLOGY:-
METHODOLOGY MEANS THE STRUCTURAL APPROACHES
 FOR DOING ONE OR MORE ACTIVITIES OF EIA.
THERE ARE SOME SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTIC WHICH AN EIA
 METHODOLOGY SHOULD DEPICT.
THESE ARE:-(1)IT SHOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO THE
 NECESSARY TASK OF EIA PROCESS SUCH AS IMPACT
 IDENTIFICATION/COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES.
(2)IT SHOULD BE SIGNIFICANTLY FREE FROM ASSESSORS
 BIAS
(3)IT SHOULD BE ECONOMICAL IN TERMS OF COSTS, AND ITS
 REQUIREMENT OF DATA ,INVESTIGATING TIME ,
 PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES.
IMPACT ANALYSIS:-
    THIS STAGE OF EIA IDENTIFIES
    AND PREDICTS THE LIKELY
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL
    IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
    AND EVALUATES THE
    SIGNIFICANCE
METHODS FOR IMPACT ANALYSIS:-
1.   IMPACT IDENTIFICATION
2.   IMPACT PREDICTION
3.   IMPACT EVALUATION
                                    Proposal
                                  identification
                 EIA required      Screening                      No EIA
                                      Initial
                   Scoping       environmental
                                  examination
               Impact analysis
                  Mitigation
                 and impact
                management
                                                              *Public involvement
 Resubmit         EIA report
                                                           *Public involvement typically
                                                           occurs at these points.
                                                           It may also occur at any
 Redesign          Review                                  other stage of the EIA   Process
Not approved   Decision-making
                  Approved
                                          Information from this process
                                          contributes to effective EIA    in the future
               Implementation
                and post-EIA
                 monitoring
1. IMPACT IDENTIFICATION:-
IMPACT IDENTIFICATION ATTEMPTS TO ANSWER THE
 QUESTION, “WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN A PROJECT
 ENTERS ITS OPERATIONAL STAGE?”
A LIST OF IMPORTANT IMPACTS SUCH AS CHANGES IN
 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY, CHANGES IN WATER AND SOIL
 QUALITIES, NOISE LEVELS, WILDLIFE HABITATS,
 SPECIES DIVERSITY, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL SYSTEMS,
 EMPLOYMENT LEVELS ETC MAY BE PREPARED.
THE IMPORTANT SOURCES OF IMPACT LIKE SMOKE
 EMISSION, CONSUMPTION OF WATER, DISCHARGE OF
 EFFLUENTS ETC ARE IDENTIFIED.
                       METHODS OF
ENVRONMENT IMPACT IDENTIFICATION:-
WARNER,1973
 AD HOC METHOD
 CHECKLISTS
 MATRICES
 OVERLAYS
 NETWORKS
AD HOC METHOD:-
 SIMPLEMETHOD BASED ON SUBJECTIVE ENVIRONMENT IMPACTS ON
  BROAD ASPECTS.
 AD HOC METHOD IS USEFUL WHEN TIME CONSTRAINTS AND LACK OF
  INFORMATION REQUIRE THAT THE EIA MUST RELY EXCLUSIVELY ON
  EXPERT OPINION.
 IT PROVIDES MINIMAL GUIDANCE FOR TOTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
  WHILE SUGGESTING THE BROAD AREAS OF POSSIBLE IMPACTS AND
  THE GENERAL NATURE OF THESE POSSIBLE IMPACTS.
 WHEN MORE SCIENTIFIC METHODS ARE AVAILABLE, IT IS NOT
  RECOMMENDED.
TYPES OF AD HOC METHOD:-
 OPINION POLLS.
 EXPERTS OPINION.
 DELPHI METHODS ETC.
AD HOC METHOD:-
ADVANTAGE         DISADVANTAGE
                  IT REQUIRE EXPERT.
SPECIALISTS ON   SHORT/LONG TERM
                   IMPACT ARE MERELY
 A PARTICULAR      EXAMINED ON GUESS
 AREA WILL         BASIS.
                  IDENTIFICATION ,
 PROVIDE           PREDICTION AND
 GUIDANCE.         INTERPRETATION OF
                   IMPACTS ARE QUITE POOR
CHECKLISTS METHOD:-
 CHECKLIST MEANS A LISTING OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL
  IMPACTS.
 THIS METHOD IS DONE TO ASSESS THE NATURE OF THE IMPACTS
  I.E. ITS TYPE SUCH AS ADVERSE /BENEFICIAL , SHORT TERM OR
  LONG TERM , NO EFFECT OR SIGNIFICANT IMPACT , REVERSIBLE
  OR IRREVERSIBLE ETC
 TYPES OF CHECKLISTS METHOD:-
 SIMPLE LISTS.
 DESCRIPTIVE CHECKLISTS.
 SCALING CHECKLISTS.
 QUESTIONNAIRE CHECKLISTS.
CHECKLISTS :-
    ADVANTAGES        DISADVANTAGES
  SIMPLE TO       DO NOT DISTINGUISH
   UNDERSTAND       BETWEEN DIRECT
   AND USE.         AND INDIRECT
                    IMPACTS.
  GOOD FOR SITE   DO NOT LINK ACTION
   SELECTION AND    AND IMPACT.
   PRIORITY        SOMETIME IT IS A
   SETTING.         CUMBERSOME TASK.
MATRICES:-
 MATRIX AND ITS VARIANTS PROVIDE US A FRAMEWORK OF
  INTERACTION OF DIFFERENT ACTIONS /ACTIVITIES OF A
  PROJECT WITH POTENTIAL EI CAUSED BY THEM.
 A SIMPLE INTERACTION MATRIX IS FORMED WHERE PROJECT
  ACTIONS ARE LISTED ALONG ONE AXIS I.E. VERTICALLY AND EI
  ARE LISTED ALONG THE OTHER SIDE I.E. HORIZONTALLY.
 IT WAS PIONEER BY LEOPOLD ET AL(1971).
 IT LISTS ABOUT 100 PROJECT ACTIONS AND ABOUT 88
  ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTIC AND CONDITION.
IMPACT IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
(EXAMPLE)
                                                                               Airports
                                                                                                                  Projects
                                                    Highways
                                                                                                                Development
                                                               Rapid Transit
                                Oil/Gas Pipelines
Significant Impact
                                                                                          Ports and Harbours
                                                                                                                                 (VEC)
                                                                                                                              Component
                                                                                                                              Valued Env.
                                                                                                               Surface Water Quality
                                                                                                               Air Quality
                                                                                                               Seismology/Geology
                                                                                                               Erosion
                                                                                                               Land Quality
                                                                                                               Fisheries
                                                                                                                                            SECTORAL MATRIX EXAMPLE
                                                                                                               Forests
                                                                                                               Terrestrial Wildlife
Moderate - Significant Impact
                                                                                                               Noise
                                                                                                               Land Use
                                                                                                               Aesthetics
                                                                                                               Industries
                                                                                                               Resettlement
                                                                                                               Archaeological/Historical
                                                                                                               Public Health
                                                                                                               Socioeconomic
Insignificant Impact
MATRICES METHOD :-
                  DISADVANTAGES
   ADVANTAGES
                 DIFFICULT TO
                 DISTINGUISH
                 DIRECT AND
 LINK ACTION INDIRECT IMPACTS
  TO IMPACT
                SIGNIFICANT
 GOOD METHOD POTENTIAL FOR
  FOR DISPLAYING DOUBLE-
  EIA RESULTS    COUNTING OF
                 IMPACTS
                QUALITATIVE
  NETWORK METHOD:-
 IT USES THE MATRIX APPROACH BY EXTENDING IT
                                           TAKE INTO
  ACCOUNT PRIMARY AS WELL THE SECONDARY IMPACTS.
 SHOWN IN THE FORM OF TREE CALLED AS RELEVANCE/IMPACT
  TREE/SEQUENCE DIAGRAM.
 IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECT ,INDIRECT /SHORT AND LONG TERM
  ENVIRONMENT IMPACT IS A CRUCIAL AND INTACT BASIC STEP OF
  MAKING IMPACT TREE.
 USED TO IDENTIFY CAUSE-EFFECT LINKAGES
 VISUAL DESCRIPTION OF LINKAGES
EXAMPLE OF A NETWORK ANALYSIS
                  Salmonoid
                  populations
 Fishing                            Spawning
    Temperature      Flow         Water Quality
                                (Suspended Matter)
     Access       Dredging          Clearing
NETWORKS METHOD:-
   ADVANTAGES        DISADVANTAGES
LINK ACTION TO     CAN BECOME
 IMPACT              OVERLY
USEFUL IN           COMPLEX IF
 SIMPLIFIED FORM     USED BEYOND
 IN CHECKING FOR     SIMPLIFIED
 SECOND ORDER        VERSION
 IMPACTS            QUALITATIVE
HANDLES DIRECT
 AND INDIRECT
 IMPACTS
 OVERLAYS:-MC HARG(1968,69)
RELY ON A SET OF MAPS OF A PROJECT AREA’S
 ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS COVERING
 PHYSICAL , SOCIAL, ECOLOGICAL, AESTHETIC ASPECTS.
SEPARATE MAPPING OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
 FEATURES AT THE SAME SCALE AS PROJECT'S SITE PLAN
  E.G. WETLANDS, STEEP SLOPES, SOILS, FLOODPLAINS, BEDROCK
    OUTCROPS, WILDLIFE HABITATS, VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES,
    AND CULTURAL RESOURCES...
OLDER TECHNIQUE: ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES ARE
 MAPPED ON TRANSPARENT PLASTIC IN DIFFERENT
 COLORS.
NEWER TECHNIQUE: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
 SYSTEMS (GIS).
OVERLAYS METHOD:-
  ADVANTAGES         DISADVANTAGE
EASY TO            ADDRESS ONLY
 UNDERSTAND          DIRECT IMPACTS
 AND USE            DO NOT
GOOD DISPLAY        ADDRESS IMPACT
                     DURATION OR
 METHOD
                     PROBABILITY
GOOD FOR SITE
 SELECTION
 SETTING
TYPES OF IMPACTS:-
 A. BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSIO -CHEMICAL IMPACTS.
 B. SOCIAL IMPACTS.
C. HEALTH IMPACTS.
D. ECONOMIC IMPACTS.
A. BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSIO-CHEMICAL
IMPACTS:-
 IT RELATE TO EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SUCH AS
  VEGETATION ,WILDLIFE , CROPS AND AQUATIC LIFE.
 INTERACTION  WITH PHYSICAL ELEMENTS LIKE AIR ,WATER ,
  SOIL, ROCKS AND SOLAR RADIATION.
 CHEMICAL IMPACTS LIKE CHEMICAL CHANGE IN AIR , WATER ,
  SOIL QUALITY ETC.
B. SOCIAL IMPACTS:-
DEMOGRAPHIC
            – DISPLACEMENT AND
RELOCATION EFFECTS AND CHANGES IN
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS.
CULTURAL –
           TRADITIONAL PATTERNS , FAMILY
STRUCTURE ,RELIGIOUS, ARCHAEOLOGICAL
FEATURES , SOCIAL NETWORKS.
GENDER
      – IMPLICATION OF PROJECTS ON
ROLES OF WOMEN IN SOCIETY , EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY AND EQUITY
INSTITUTIONAL –
              HOUSING , SCHOOLS,
CRIMINAL JUSTICE , HEALTH, WELFARE
      C.of health
Examples   HEALTH impacts IMPACTS:-
                          by sector
                 Communicable         Non          Nutrition          Injury         Psychosocial
                   disease       communicable                                        disorder and
                                    disease                                           loss of well-
                                                                                         being
Mining            Tuberculosis    Dust induced                       Crushing       Labour migration
                                  lung disease
Agriculture         Parasitic      Pesticide        Loss of
                   infections      poisoning      subsistence
Industry                          Poisoning by                     Occupational     Disempowerment
                                   pollutants                         injury
Forestry                                          Loss of food     Occupational
                                                   production         injury
Dams and          Water borne     Poisoning by   Increased food      Drowning         Involuntary
irrigation         diseases        pollutants      production                        displacement
schemes
Transportation     HIV/Aids      Heart disease                     Traffic injury      Noise and
                                                                                     induced stress
Energy                             Indoor air                     Electromagnetic     Community
                                    pollution                        radiation       displacement
D. ECONOMIC IMPACTS:-
 DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION
 WORKFORCE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH PERIOD
 SKILL REQUIREMENTS (LOCAL AVAILABILITY)
 EARNING
 RAW MATERIAL AND OTHER INPUT PURCHASES
 CAPITAL INVESTMENT
 OUTPUTS
 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LOCAL ECONOMY
2. IMPACT PREDICTION:-
 THE ACCUMULATED KNOWLEDGE OF THE FINDINGS OF THE
  ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS FORM THE BASIS FOR THE
  PREDICTION OF IMPACTS.
 ONCE A POTENTIAL IMPACT HAS BEEN DETERMINED DURING
  SCOPING PROCESS ,IT IS NECESSARY TO IDENTIFY WHICH
  PROJECT ACTIVITY WILL CAUSE IMPACT , AND ITS MAGNITUDE
  AND EXTENT.
METHODS OF IMPACT PREDICTION:-
       BEST ESTIMATE PROFESSIONAL
       JUDGEMENT .
    QUANTITATIVE   MATHEMATICAL
       MODELS .
    EXPERIMENTS AND   PHYSICAL MODELS .
    CASE   STUDIES AS ANALOGUES OR
       REFERENCES .
POINTS TO CONSIDER FOR IMPACT
PREDICTIONS:-
1.   BASELINE CONDITION
2.   UN CERTAINTY
3.   SPATIAL LIMITS
4.   TEMPORARY BOUNDARIES
5.   INCREMENTAL CONDITION
6.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODS
3. IMPACTS EVALUATION:-
 ITS PURPOSE IS TO ASSIGN RELATIVE SIGNIFICANCE TO
  PREDICTED IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECTS AND TO
  DETERMINE THE ORDER IN WHICH IMPACTS ARE TO BE
  AVOIDED , MITIGATED OR COMPENSATED
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING
POTENTIAL EFFECTS:-
       IMPORTANCE OF AFFECTED RESOURCE
       MAGNITUDE AND EXTENT OF DISTURBANCE
       DURATION AND FREQUENCY
       RISK/LIKELIHOOD OF OCCURRENCE
       REVERSIBILITY
       CONTRIBUTION TO CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
EVALUATION OF EIA SYSTEM
EFFECTIVENESS:-
  BE CONSIDERED EFFECTIVE IF
    •   INFORMATION GENERATED IN THE EIA CONTRIBUTED TO DECISION
        MAKING.
    •   PREDICTIONS WERE ACCURATE
    •   PROPOSED MITIGATORY AND COMPENSATORY MEASURE ACHIEVED
        APPROVED MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES
  EFFICIENCY CRITERIA ARE SATISFIED IF
    •   EIA DECISIONS ARE TIMELY RELATIVE TO ECONOMIC AND OTHER
        FACTORS DETERMINE PROJECT DECISIONS
    •   COSTS OF CONDUCTING EIA CAN BE DETERMINED AND ARE
        REASONABLE.
                                                                  42
   FIVE STEP PROCESS FOR EVALUATION
   OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS :-
 The area in which the effects of the proposed action will
  occur
 The impacts that are expected in that area from the
  proposed action
 Other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions
  that have or are expected to have impacts in the area
 The impacts or expected impacts from those other
  actions
 The overall impact that can be expected if the individual
  impacts are allowed to accumulate
IMPACT MITIGATION
                                  Review Applicable
      Evaluate Environmental
                                     Standards
             Impacts
                     Design Environmental
                      Protection Measures
MITIGATION DEVELOPMENT
                    Develop Alternative
                  Environmental Protection
                         Measures
        Evaluate                      Assess Environmental
     Implementation                       Effectiveness
         Costs
                 Select Final Environmental
                    Protection Measures
THANK
 YOU