Appropriation in art
• Appropriation refers to the act of borrowing or
  reusing existing elements within a new work.
  Post-modern appropriation artists, including
  Barbara Kruger, are keen to deny the notion of
  ‘originality’. They believe that in borrowing
  existing imagery or elements of imagery, they
  are re-contextualizing or appropriating the
  original imagery, allowing the viewer to
  renegotiate the meaning of the original in a
  different, more relevant, or more current
  context.
Barbara Kruger
 While appropriation in art has
been around for ages, it began to
   gain popularity in the 20th
   century. Most notably with
    “Dada” artists like Marcel
 Duchamp, who championed the
 art of the “ready mades”. Andy
Warhol continued the tradition of
appropriation, but the times were
changing, and borrowing images
to create new ones became more
 controversial with the onset of
           consumerism.
                                    Andy Warhol
Marcel Duchamp
           Marcel Duchamp was a
           pioneer of Dada, a
           movement that
           questioned long-held
           assumptions about what
           art should be, and how it
           should be made. In the
           years immediately
           preceding World War I,
           Duchamp found success
           as a painter in Paris. But
           he soon gave up
           painting almost entirely,
           explaining, “I was
           interested in ideas—not
           merely in visual
           products.”
                     Readymades
• Seeking an alternative to representing objects in paint,
  Duchamp began presenting objects themselves as art. He
  selected mass-produced, commercially available, often
  utilitarian objects, designating them as art and giving them
  titles. “Readymades,” as he called them, disrupted centuries of
  thinking about the artist’s role as a skilled creator of original
  handmade objects. Instead, Duchamp argued, “An ordinary
  object [could be] elevated to the dignity of a work of art by the
  mere choice of an artist.”
• The readymade also defied the
  notion that art must be beautiful.
  Duchamp claimed to have
  chosen everyday objects “based on a
  reaction of visual indifference, with
  at the same time a total absence of
  good or bad taste….”2 In doing so,
  Duchamp paved the way for
  Conceptual art—work that was “in
  the service of the mind,”3 as opposed
  to a purely “retinal” art, intended
  only to please the eye.
           But is it original?
Left: Robert Colesscott, Les Demoiselles d’Alabama, 19855; Right:
Pablo Picasso, Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, 1907
Re-contextualization
      Shepard Fairey
But what about sculpture?
Jeff Koons
      Case 1: Rogers v. Koons
      Jeff Koons is well known
      artist who is know for his
      appropriation of images
      and re contextualizing
      them in his pieces. In this
      case though, he pushed it
      too far and paid the price
      for it. Art Rogers was a
      professional photographer
      and took the picture
      (bottom right). He then
      had the picture printed on
      postcards and sold them.
      Koons in turn saw the
      postcard and decided to
      make a statue of it, most
      notably ripping the
      copyright sticker off of it
      and handing it to his
      assistants with
      instructions on how to
      construct the statue.
             Art fail
• It was inevitable that Rogers
  would find out due to the
  popularity of Koons at the time.
  After the trial, Koons was found
  guilty of misappropriation of the
  photograph and that the pieces
  were found to possess
  “substantial similarity”. Koons
  lost on all accounts.
Damien Hirst
      $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
• The root of all evil stems from money when
  talking about appropriation. If you are using
  appropriation for personal use or for
  Educational use, you are generally safe from
  repercussions, but it is when you publicly
  present your work or try to sell it that the
  problems arise. This is only the tip of the
  iceberg on this topic and as you wade further
  and further into murky waters it only
  becomes more confusing.
Fair Use
 • Fair use is a legal
   doctrine that permits
   limited use of
   copyrighted material
   without acquiring
   permission from the
   rights holders. It is one
   type of limitation and
   exception to the
   exclusive rights
   copyright law grants to
   the author of a creative
   work.
Mixed media appropriation
Questions to ask yourself:
• Who is the original artist?
• How did you appropriate this artwork?
  What media did you choose and why?
• What are the original pieces about?
• What is the meaning of your artwork and
  how do you get that across and connect
  with the audience without giving it away?