Talk:Q544

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

@Infovarius:, hi, thank you for reverting my mistake. Unfortunately, I don't understand what the mistake is - why is it the wrong relation? I read the documentations on parent astronomical body (P397) and child astronomical body (P398), and it seems that this seems to cover the relation between the Sun and the Solar System? So I am probably missing something, and wanted to understand the relation better. Cheers! --Denny (talk) 15:47, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Denny: Correct relation is
⟨ Sun (Q525)  View with Reasonator View with SQID ⟩ part of (P361) View with SQID ⟨ Solar System (Q544)  View with Reasonator View with SQID ⟩
+
⟨ Solar System (Q544)  View with Reasonator View with SQID ⟩ has part(s) (P527) View with SQID ⟨ Sun (Q525)  View with Reasonator View with SQID ⟩
. P397/P398 are for gravitational center and orbiting body. Solar system isn't a center, it's a container. Compare with also correct
⟨ Earth (Q2)  View with Reasonator View with SQID ⟩ parent astronomical body (P397) View with SQID ⟨ Sun (Q525)  View with Reasonator View with SQID ⟩
+
⟨ Sun (Q525)  View with Reasonator View with SQID ⟩ child astronomical body (P398) View with SQID ⟨ Earth (Q2)  View with Reasonator View with SQID ⟩
. --Infovarius (talk) 19:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Infovarius: OK. I am not sure that I saw this in the discussion in Property_talk:P398, but it also doesn't contradict it. I removed the statement, and made sure that it has part/part of on both sides. Thanks for the explanation! --Denny (talk) 20:13, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am ok with removing but it was not necessary. On the contrary, these deprecated claims helped in some way - they showed that this relation is wrongly desirable. --Infovarius (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]