"Love follows knowledge."
"Beauty above all beauty!"
– St. Catherine of Siena

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Sunday Meditation: Palm Sunday of the Lord's Passion

We arrive at Holy Week and Jesus’s triumphant entrance into Jerusalem, known as Palm Sunday.  Today at Palm Sunday Mass, sitting next to Olga, who serves as our Eucharistic Minister, she made a palm cross for me.  She is an expert on making these.

 


Thank you Olga.  God bless you.

I have posted quite often on Palm Sunday, and you can peruse the various Palm Sunday posts here.  There is a lot of good stuff in the various posts over the years.  I will try to make this post contain fresh and new material.  First the Gospel reading for Year C.  I cannot post the entire Passion narrative from Luke, but I will post the Gospel reading. 

 

Jesus proceeded on his journey up to Jerusalem.

As he drew near to Bethphage and Bethany

at the place called the Mount of Olives,

he sent two of his disciples.

He said, "Go into the village opposite you,

and as you enter it you will find a colt tethered

on which no one has ever sat.

Untie it and bring it here.

And if anyone should ask you,

'Why are you untying it?'

you will answer,

'The Master has need of it.'"

So those who had been sent went off

and found everything just as he had told them.

And as they were untying the colt, its owners said to them,

"Why are you untying this colt?"

They answered,

"The Master has need of it."

So they brought it to Jesus,

threw their cloaks over the colt,

and helped Jesus to mount.

As he rode along,

the people were spreading their cloaks on the road;

and now as he was approaching the slope of the Mount of Olives,

the whole multitude of his disciples

began to praise God aloud with joy

for all the mighty deeds they had seen.

They proclaimed:

"Blessed is the king who comes

in the name of the Lord.

Peace in heaven

and glory in the highest."

Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to him,

"Teacher, rebuke your disciples."

He said in reply,

"I tell you, if they keep silent,

the stones will cry out!"

~Lk 19:28-40

Fr. Geoffrey Plant has a wealth of information on Palm Sunday.  So do you know which of the four Gospels is the only one that mentions palms for the entry into Jerusalem?  Find out.



Fr. Geoffrey quotes Hans Urs von Balthasar : “Through the cross and only through the cross will the gates of the kingdom be opened.” 

 

Along those same lines of the cross, Bishop Robert Barron gives a homily that knocked my socks off.  This is a must watch.



That is one of the best pastoral homilies I have ever heard.  “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.”

 

Sunday Meditation: "Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord.  Peace in heaven and glory in the highest."

 

For the hymn, let’s double up on the good thief’s contrite words, performed by Taizé. 

 


The images to go with the music are as spectacular as the musical rendition.

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Personal Note: Tiger’s Tenth Birthday

Today was Tiger’s tenth birthday.  Hard to believe it’s been ten years.  If you want to want to read on how we found him, you can look back where I posted here. Actually you can just click the "Tiger" link on the bottom of the page and pull up all the posts over the years on Tiger.  Matthew was five in those pictures!  Where does time go?  

I’m just going to provide some pictures, all taken in the last few days.  We didn’t do anything special for him, except maybe give him a treat. 

Well here he is looking up at me, probably urging me to give him his food.

 


He just loves to rub up against things.  I think it’s an act of marking his scent on things. 

 


Walking by his litterbox.

 


Here he is curled up on the ottoman into a little fur ball covering his eyes. 

 


And when I poked him, he gave a little squint.  I don’t think he was happy I did that.

 


Another time on the ottoman, just stretching out.

 




The life of a cat. 

 


He’s just so darn cute.

Sunday, April 6, 2025

Sunday Meditation: The Finger in the Sand

Today, the Fifth and last Sunday of Lent, the Sunday before Holy Week, in Year C we have the Woman Caught in Adultery.  The Pharisees throw before Jesus a woman who was caught in the act of adultery.  Strangely they only have the woman and not the man.  The key here is that once again the Pharisees are putting Jesus to the test.  They ask Him what should be done.  If Jesus agrees to have her stoned, He will have violated the Roman’s law that executions can only be performed by the Roman authorities.  If He lets her go, He will have violated the law from Leviticus and Deuteronomy. 

 

Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.

But early in the morning he arrived again in the temple area,

and all the people started coming to him,

and he sat down and taught them.

Then the scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman

who had been caught in adultery

and made her stand in the middle.

They said to him,

“Teacher, this woman was caught

in the very act of committing adultery.

Now in the law, Moses commanded us to stone such women.

So what do you say?”

They said this to test him,

so that they could have some charge to bring against him.

Jesus bent down and began to write on the ground with his finger.

But when they continued asking him,

he straightened up and said to them,

“Let the one among you who is without sin

be the first to throw a stone at her.”

Again he bent down and wrote on the ground.

And in response, they went away one by one,

beginning with the elders.

So he was left alone with the woman before him.

Then Jesus straightened up and said to her,

“Woman, where are they?

Has no one condemned you?”

She replied, “No one, sir.”

Then Jesus said, “Neither do I condemn you.

Go, and from now on do not sin any more.”

~Jn 8:1-11


Jesus defies the Pharisees’ test. They have presented a false set of options.  Three years ago I embedded a clip the movie Jesus of Nazareth with the dramatization of this event.  I also had embedded a clip of Dr. Brant Pitre explaining the various theories of what Jesus was doing by writing in the sand.  You might want to check that out.

But this year, Fr. Tim Peters gives the superb exegesis of this passage.



Oh my Gosh, Fr. Tim finds more wrinkles in this I had not heard before.  This story connects with the false claim of adultery found in the Book of Daniel regarding the story of Susanna.  Fr. Tim also brings out the allusion from the Torah that the commandments were written on stone tablets by the “finger of God.”  Well, Jesus is writing in the earth with His finger, and, yes, the Pharisees have hearts of stone.  Are their hearts softened by whatever Jesus wrote in the sand?  Was the woman even an adulterous or just set up like Susanna?  All questions that show us the depth of this passage.

Fr. Vincent Bernhard O.P., who is slowly becoming one of my favorite homilist, gives a wonderful pastoral homily on this passage.  Strangely Fr. Vincent refers to the woman as Mary Magdalene.  I had never heard anyone connect this woman with Mary Magdalene.  I would love to ask him where he got that.



What is really insightful from Fr. Vincent is that Jesus writing in the dirt is an “image of the new creation.”  Yes, that works too, especially since Jesus calls her “woman,” which is an allusion to Eve in Genesis chapter 3.  Perhaps we can see thise woman as a “new Eve,” not the new Eve as the Virgin Mary, but one who comes out of sin. 

 

Sunday Meditation: “Woman, where are they?  Has no one condemned you?”

 

We sang the Negro Spiritual, “Somebody's Knockin' at Your Door” at our Mass today for the Communion Hymn.  It’s perfect as an ending for this post.

 


“O sinner, why don’t you answer, somebody’s knockin’ at your door.”  I think I love every Negro Spiritual I have ever heard.

Friday, April 4, 2025

Lines I Wished I’d Written: Dr. Manette and Lucy Before the Wedding.

I’ve been reading Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities for the first time.  A lot of people read this much earlier in life but, given I have never, I decided to jump into it on a whim.  I had been meaning to read it for a while. I am a little over half way, and, to be frank, it’s not overwhelming me.  But I am told that the great parts of this book come in the last third.  I’m hanging in there. 


But this scene I wish to highlight comes at just about the very center of the novel.  I am sure that is significant but I am not sure what the significance is since I have no idea how the novel will end.  As some of you may know, this is a story set during the French Revolution, but the actual storming and violence has not occurred yet.  In the first half of the story Dickens provides the context and situation of characters in two cities, as the title indicates, London and Paris. 

This scene is a tender situation between a Dr. Alexander Manette and his daughter Lucy.  At the beginning of the novel Dr. Manette has been released after eighteen years of imprisonment in the Bastille, which was both a fortress and prison in Paris.  He was vindictively imprisoned for revealing corruption by some aristocrats, which signals that he had virtues and ideals.  He was imprisoned just before his daughter Lucy was born, and so the two had never met until Dr. Manette’s release.  While imprisoned, Lucy’s mother died when Lucy was a child, and as an orphan she was taken to England.  But she returned to France on the news of her father being released.

Dr. Manette was severely traumatized while a prisoner in the Bastille.  At his release he barely knew who he was and of his past.  Lucy takes him, brings him to London, and nurses him back to health and functionality.  Her tender love is perhaps at the core of the novel.  This scene takes place several years after Dr. Manette has been in London.  He has regained his senses, though he is frail.  A suitor, Charles Darnay, has asked the doctor for the hand in marriage of his daughter, and he has agreed if she accepts.  She accepted, and this scene occurs the night before the marriage is to take place as father and daughter spend one last night together.  This scene comes from Book II, Chapter 17, “One Night.”  I am quoting almost the entire chapter.

 

Never did the sun go down with a brighter glory on the quiet corner in Soho, than one memorable evening when the Doctor and his daughter sat under the plane-tree together. Never did the moon rise with a milder radiance over great London, than on that night when it found them still seated under the tree, and shone upon their faces through its leaves.

 

Lucie was to be married to-morrow. She had reserved this last evening for her father, and they sat alone under the plane-tree.

 

“You are happy, my dear father?”

 

“Quite, my child.”

 

They had said little, though they had been there a long time. When it was yet light enough to work and read, she had neither engaged herself in her usual work, nor had she read to him. She had employed herself in both ways, at his side under the tree, many and many a time; but, this time was not quite like any other, and nothing could make it so.

 

“And I am very happy to-night, dear father. I am deeply happy in the love that Heaven has so blessed—my love for Charles, and Charles’s love for me. But, if my life were not to be still consecrated to you, or if my marriage were so arranged as that it would part us, even by the length of a few of these streets, I should be more unhappy and self-reproachful now than I can tell you. Even as it is—”

 

Even as it was, she could not command her voice.

 

In the sad moonlight, she clasped him by the neck, and laid her face upon his breast. In the moonlight which is always sad, as the light of the sun itself is—as the light called human life is—at its coming and its going.

 

“Dearest dear! Can you tell me, this last time, that you feel quite, quite sure, no new affections of mine, and no new duties of mine, will ever interpose between us? I know it well, but do you know it? In your own heart, do you feel quite certain?”

 

Her father answered, with a cheerful firmness of conviction he could scarcely have assumed, “Quite sure, my darling! More than that,” he added, as he tenderly kissed her: “my future is far brighter, Lucie, seen through your marriage, than it could have been—nay, than it ever was—without it.”

 

“If I could hope that, my father!—”

 

“Believe it, love! Indeed it is so. Consider how natural and how plain it is, my dear, that it should be so. You, devoted and young, cannot fully appreciate the anxiety I have felt that your life should not be wasted—”

 

She moved her hand towards his lips, but he took it in his, and repeated the word.

 

“—wasted, my child—should not be wasted, struck aside from the natural order of things—for my sake. Your unselfishness cannot entirely comprehend how much my mind has gone on this; but, only ask yourself, how could my happiness be perfect, while yours was incomplete?”

 

“If I had never seen Charles, my father, I should have been quite happy with you.”

 

He smiled at her unconscious admission that she would have been unhappy without Charles, having seen him; and replied:

 

“My child, you did see him, and it is Charles. If it had not been Charles, it would have been another. Or, if it had been no other, I should have been the cause, and then the dark part of my life would have cast its shadow beyond myself, and would have fallen on you.”

 

It was the first time, except at the trial, of her ever hearing him refer to the period of his suffering. It gave her a strange and new sensation while his words were in her ears; and she remembered it long afterwards.

 

“See!” said the Doctor of Beauvais, raising his hand towards the moon. “I have looked at her from my prison-window, when I could not bear her light. I have looked at her when it has been such torture to me to think of her shining upon what I had lost, that I have beaten my head against my prison-walls. I have looked at her, in a state so dull and lethargic, that I have thought of nothing but the number of horizontal lines I could draw across her at the full, and the number of perpendicular lines with which I could intersect them.” He added in his inward and pondering manner, as he looked at the moon, “It was twenty either way, I remember, and the twentieth was difficult to squeeze in.”

 

The strange thrill with which she heard him go back to that time, deepened as he dwelt upon it; but, there was nothing to shock her in the manner of his reference. He only seemed to contrast his present cheerfulness and felicity with the dire endurance that was over.

 

“I have looked at her, speculating thousands of times upon the unborn child from whom I had been rent. Whether it was alive. Whether it had been born alive, or the poor mother’s shock had killed it. Whether it was a son who would some day avenge his father. (There was a time in my imprisonment, when my desire for vengeance was unbearable.) Whether it was a son who would never know his father’s story; who might even live to weigh the possibility of his father’s having disappeared of his own will and act. Whether it was a daughter who would grow to be a woman.”

 

She drew closer to him, and kissed his cheek and his hand.

 

“I have pictured my daughter, to myself, as perfectly forgetful of me—rather, altogether ignorant of me, and unconscious of me. I have cast up the years of her age, year after year. I have seen her married to a man who knew nothing of my fate. I have altogether perished from the remembrance of the living, and in the next generation my place was a blank.”

 

“My father! Even to hear that you had such thoughts of a daughter who never existed, strikes to my heart as if I had been that child.”

 

“You, Lucie? It is out of the Consolation and restoration you have brought to me, that these remembrances arise, and pass between us and the moon on this last night.—What did I say just now?”

 

“She knew nothing of you. She cared nothing for you.”

 

“So! But on other moonlight nights, when the sadness and the silence have touched me in a different way—have affected me with something as like a sorrowful sense of peace, as any emotion that had pain for its foundations could—I have imagined her as coming to me in my cell, and leading me out into the freedom beyond the fortress. I have seen her image in the moonlight often, as I now see you; except that I never held her in my arms; it stood between the little grated window and the door. But, you understand that that was not the child I am speaking of?”

 

“The figure was not; the—the—image; the fancy?”

 

“No. That was another thing. It stood before my disturbed sense of sight, but it never moved. The phantom that my mind pursued, was another and more real child. Of her outward appearance I know no more than that she was like her mother. The other had that likeness too—as you have—but was not the same. Can you follow me, Lucie? Hardly, I think? I doubt you must have been a solitary prisoner to understand these perplexed distinctions.”

 

His collected and calm manner could not prevent her blood from running cold, as he thus tried to anatomise his old condition.

 

“In that more peaceful state, I have imagined her, in the moonlight, coming to me and taking me out to show me that the home of her married life was full of her loving remembrance of her lost father. My picture was in her room, and I was in her prayers. Her life was active, cheerful, useful; but my poor history pervaded it all.”

 

“I was that child, my father, I was not half so good, but in my love that was I.”

 

“And she showed me her children,” said the Doctor of Beauvais, “and they had heard of me, and had been taught to pity me. When they passed a prison of the State, they kept far from its frowning walls, and looked up at its bars, and spoke in whispers. She could never deliver me; I imagined that she always brought me back after showing me such things. But then, blessed with the relief of tears, I fell upon my knees, and blessed her.”

 

“I am that child, I hope, my father. O my dear, my dear, will you bless me as fervently to-morrow?”

 

“Lucie, I recall these old troubles in the reason that I have to-night for loving you better than words can tell, and thanking God for my great happiness. My thoughts, when they were wildest, never rose near the happiness that I have known with you, and that we have before us.”

 

He embraced her, solemnly commended her to Heaven, and humbly thanked Heaven for having bestowed her on him. By-and-bye, they went into the house.

Not only is it a tender seen between father and daughter before she is given in marriage, we see Dr. Manette’s relief that the care his daughter gave him did not reduce and limit her life, and that she will have the opportunity to love and fulfill herself.  He also recalls the memory of while imprisoned wondering what had happened to his child.  As a father I could have imagined the heart wrenching pain.  He recalls how he had given hope of meeting his child again.  Let me requote this piece of his conversation.


“I have pictured my daughter, to myself, as perfectly forgetful of me—rather, altogether ignorant of me, and unconscious of me. I have cast up the years of her age, year after year. I have seen her married to a man who knew nothing of my fate. I have altogether perished from the remembrance of the living, and in the next generation my place was a blank.”

He had suffered, both physically and emotionally.  His years imprisoned were filled with conjuring up images of his lost daughter.  He even pictured being in her prayers.  And now he will lose his daughter in another sense, but this time he loses her for her joy.  Finally the scene concludes with her being in his prayers.  Such a remarkably tender scene.




Sunday, March 30, 2025

Sunday Meditation: The Shame of the Prodigal Son

In the Fourth Sunday of Lent in year C we get another parable, this time the Parable of the Prodigal Son.  Three years ago when we had this Gospel reading I posted I embedded a clip the movie Jesus of Nazareth with Jesus telling this parable, and I also embedded a clip from Dr. Brant Pitre whose exegesis of the parable focused on the older son.  It’s worth looking back if you have the time.  This year I’d like to focus on the younger son who in many ways stands for all we sinners as we make our way back to our Father in heaven.

 

Tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to listen to Jesus,

but the Pharisees and scribes began to complain, saying,

“This man welcomes sinners and eats with them.”

So to them Jesus addressed this parable:

“A man had two sons, and the younger son said to his father,

‘Father give me the share of your estate that should come to me.’

So the father divided the property between them.

After a few days, the younger son collected all his belongings

and set off to a distant country

where he squandered his inheritance on a life of dissipation.

When he had freely spent everything,

a severe famine struck that country,

and he found himself in dire need.

So he hired himself out to one of the local citizens

who sent him to his farm to tend the swine.

And he longed to eat his fill of the pods on which the swine fed,

but nobody gave him any.

Coming to his senses he thought,

‘How many of my father’s hired workers

have more than enough food to eat,

but here am I, dying from hunger.

I shall get up and go to my father and I shall say to him,

“Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you.

I no longer deserve to be called your son;

treat me as you would treat one of your hired workers.”’

So he got up and went back to his father.

While he was still a long way off,

his father caught sight of him, and was filled with compassion.

He ran to his son, embraced him and kissed him.

His son said to him,

‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you;

I no longer deserve to be called your son.’

But his father ordered his servants,

‘Quickly bring the finest robe and put it on him;

put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet.

Take the fattened calf and slaughter it.

Then let us celebrate with a feast,

because this son of mine was dead, and has come to life again;

he was lost, and has been found.’

Then the celebration began.

Now the older son had been out in the field

and, on his way back, as he neared the house,

he heard the sound of music and dancing.

He called one of the servants and asked what this might mean.

The servant said to him,

‘Your brother has returned

and your father has slaughtered the fattened calf

because he has him back safe and sound.’

He became angry,

and when he refused to enter the house,

his father came out and pleaded with him.

He said to his father in reply,

‘Look, all these years I served you

and not once did I disobey your orders;

yet you never gave me even a young goat to feast on with my friends.

But when your son returns

who swallowed up your property with prostitutes,

for him you slaughter the fattened calf.’

He said to him,

‘My son, you are here with me always;

everything I have is yours.

But now we must celebrate and rejoice,

because your brother was dead and has come to life again;

he was lost and has been found.'"

~Lk 15:1-3, 11-32

Fr. Geoffrey Plant has a great explanation of what a parable is, and what this parable means. 



I thought it insightful that this parable in Chapter 15 of Luke is the culmination of a series of parables, three in all, where something lost is found.  As to what a parable is, Fr. Geoffrey quotes a C.C. Dodd on the four aspects of a parable:

·         A metaphor or simile

·         Drawn from nature or common life

·         Arresting the hearer by its vividness or strangeness

·         Leaves the mind in sufficient doubt about its precise application to tease it into active thought

I would add something else from my reading of Jesus’s parables over the years.  A parable is so simple a narrative construct that we can apply it to our lives rather than project a self-contained story.  The meaning is only fulfilled by projecting our lives into the story.

There is so much other good information in Fr. Geoffrey’s homily, such as who were the Pharisees, what should the name of the parable be, and the concept of shame and honor.  Also Fr. Geoffrey questions the sincerity of the returning son.  Do you think the son was sincere?  I think so, but I can see Fr. Geoffrey’s point.  What do you think?

For the pastoral homily I really liked Fr. Joseph Mary of the Capuchin Franciscans with his vlog, A Simple Word. 

 


 

Sunday Meditation: “Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. I no longer deserve to be called your son”

 

For the hymn I may shock people with this selection.  It’s from the Rolling Stones—yes, the famous rock group that has a number of songs idolizing intemperance.  But they also recorded a cover version of a Gospel/Blues song, “Prodigal Son,” written and performed by Reverend Robert Wilkins.    Here is the Stones’ version.

 


If you didn’t catch the lyrics, here they are:

 

Prodigal Son

(Wilkins)

 

Well a poor boy took his father's bread and started down the road

Started down the road

Took all he had and started down the road

Going out in this world, where God only knows

And that'll be the way to get along

 

Well poor boy spent all he had, famine come in the land

Famine come in the land

Spent all he had and famine come in the land

Said, "I believe I'll go and hire me to some man"

And that'll be the way I'll get along

 

Well, man said, "I'll give you a job for to feed my swine

For to feed my swine

I'll give you a job for to feed my swine"

Boy stood there and hung his head and cried

`Cause that is no way to get along

 

Said, "I believe I'll ride, believe I'll go back home

Believe I'll go back home

Believe I'll ride, believe I'll go back home

Or down the road as far as I can go"

And that'll be the way to get along

 

Well, father said, "See my son coming home to me

Coming home to me"

Father ran and fell down on his knees

Said, "Sing and praise, Lord have mercy on me"

Mercy

 

Oh poor boy stood there, hung his head and cried

Hung his head and cried

Poor boy stood and hung his head and cried

Said, "Father will you look on me as a child?"

Yeah

 

Well father said, "Eldest son, kill the fatted calf,

Call the family round

Kill that calf and call the family round

My son was lost but now he is found

'Cause that's the way for us to get along"

Hey 

 

It’s not exactly a well-known Stones song, but it’s a great rendition.  Actually it’s better than the original.  You can find the Wilkins’ version on the internet.  The Stones version is condensed into a sharper song structure.