Showing posts with label cold war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cold war. Show all posts

1960 ... mixin' it up with The Mix!


 

... notice there is no mention of Polaris Ballistic Missile Submarines? They won't come on duty till next year (1961). Instead of a 'mix' it will be the 'Triad'.

 

all images - Right Click - Open in New Window or Tab = super size! 

 

 

 



1980 ... ballpoint pens keep the Peace!

 ... from those patriotic warhawk fellows at the 'National Lampoon'. They hit the nose on the button! There isn't a male Boomer that I've met who doesn't confirm that he kept America safe and strong with an arsenal five and dime pens at the ready! Only possible with Space-Age industrial giants like Bic and Fisher. (Imagine the catastrophic loss of life and environmental damage if fountain pens had been deployed!)

Face of the Cold War ... Korean War

 

all images - Right Click - Open in New Window or Tab = super size!


1959 ... 'Fallout: When and How to Protect Yourself'

 ... time to put some popcorn on the 'ol uranium cooker! 

A lot of these Cold War education films felt obligated to scare everyone into paying attention with some weird scary music at the start!

 


 



...shoot! Shoot! SHOOT!!!


... promo for a version of the 'Stinger' man-mounted anti-aircraft missile.

(does anyone else have recurring nightmares like this?)


1952 ... the British are coming!




all images- Right click- open in New Window or Tab = super colossal size!


1951 ... what we got!



all images- Right click- open in New Window or Tab = super colossal size!


1948 ... B-45 "Tornado"

... the first US operational jet bomber, the "Tornado" gained importance as it assumed a tactical nuclear delivery assignment when atomic bombs became smaller and lighter.




... 36 hour war - catastrophe!



... my jaw dropped when I found this sensationalistic warning of a possible Atomic War in an issue of LIFE magazine - dated November 19, 1945!  Just a few months after the World War II ended with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the head of the US Air forces, Gen. 'Hap' Arnold, lays out in remarkable accuracy the future dangers of a war fought with nuclear tipped ICBM's.


all images- Right click- open in New Window= super colossal size!

... 36 hour war - incoming!




... 36 hour war - tracking the attack!



... in 1945 RADAR (RAdio Detection And Ranging) was still pretty whiz bang, high tech stuff. Searching outer-space for incoming rockets was at least a decade away. This illustrations reminds me of scenes from the 'B' science fiction classic 'Fiend Without a Face' . The AV Kid has the whole movie here.  In the movie the search for atomic powered Radar has the side-effect of producing  invisible brain sucking monsters - of course!  

Wonder if 'Hap' Arnold didn't want to tell us about that?

all images- Right click- open in New Window= super colossal size!


... 36 hour war - missile interception!





... 36 hour war - atomic missile complex!




... 36 hour war - paratroop invasion!


...LIFE magazine was never shy about including a buxom blond for reader appeal!


all images- Right click- open in New Window= super colossal size!

... 36 hour war - rubble of New York!


1953 ... big-nose sub!

... USS Bonita of the 'Barracuda' Class.

all images- Right click- open in New Window= super colossal size!

... pre-fab fallout shelter!


1986 ... multiple warhead strike!

... time exposure showing re-entry paths of 8 MIRV missile warheads from a single 'Peacekeeper' missile. MIRV stands for( Multiple Independent targetable Re-entry Vehicle).
I don't know where they lost the 'T' in the acronym.
Each of these warheads could have the explosive force of up to 300 Kilotons- or 14 times the power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Fortunately for the test they were dummies.

... holy crap is right. The effects of eight detonations are much higher than one big bomb of the equal megatonage.
Having multiple warheads gives defensive systems more threats to track and neutralize. Since each re-entry vehicle can follow a pre-programmed independent ballistic path- one missile can take out different targets. The current Minuteman III force has only 3 MIRVs per missile. Before taking their seperate firey re-entry paths they ride on a last rocket stage called the 'bus'. The Peacekeeper, which was never actually deployed, could have carried up to ten. There were rumors that the USSR had designs for a missle that could have carried 30 MIRVs!

This was all part of the chess game of targeting the other sides missile and silos. In theory a 'first strike' could wipe out the opponents missile force. Obviously both sides adopted a 'launch on warning' protocol. As soon as the early warning system of satellites and radar spotted the incoming missile barrage a massive retaliation would be launched. It was also known as the 'use them or lose them' strategy.

Both sides had (have) a 'Nuclear Triad' of silo based missiles, bombers and ballistic missile submarines. This ensures that enough of a superpower's nuclear forces will always survive to launch a devastating counterattack. This maintained the wobbly balance of Assured Mutual Destruction'. Each piece of technology being advanced and then counter-advanced across the chess board that was known as The Cold War.

Flight time to target for an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile is between 15 and 20 minutes. Missiles launched from enemy submarines lurking off the coast have flight times of only 5 minutes to some of their primary targets. It is a very good thing that the 'high readiness' of the Cold War has been greatly lowered.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIRV

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeper_missile

... oh boy, here's the AV Kid with an official Air Force film on the Peacekeeper missile. It was tested but never deployed.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPhjMHBBdbM


ABM site- Grand Forks- 1975





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-ballistic_missile

Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) systems have always been controversial. Expensive, prone to technical glitches. They seemed to motivate the opposing cold-war side to just build more missiles. Early systems relied on atomic warheads to zap the incoming missiles and only had to get close for a kill. Later and present day technology pushes for a 'hit and kill' non-nuclear defense. The defensive missile must hit or get very close to the incoming warhead.