Dedicated to classics and hits.

Showing posts with label 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2011. Show all posts

Friday, February 17, 2023

2011 The Year Dirty Beaches Broke

2011 The Year Dirty Beaches Broke

    Badlands came out in March of this year, and the single, Lord Knows Best, was released in January.  This was very much a high point for my side hustle as a record label owner/partner.   In January, I was actually in Peru and actually ended up wracking up a thousand dollar data bill- 2011 being prior to when the phone companies had really figured out how to handle international data packages.  Once Lord Knows Best got Best New Track, it was off to the races, and the PR run up for Badlands was truly magical.  Clearly a case of "beginners luck"- which is something I've experienced several times over at this point in my life- it's easy to win the first time, the second time is tough.
   After the vinyl only record came out in March, Revolver/Midheaven offered us a production and distribution deal, which meant they would pay to make the records.  It was a big step forward but it never really paid off beyond the additional Dirty Beaches records and me not having to pay production costs for the flops we put out after Dirty Beaches.   When Revolver put out the CD version of Badlands there was real money coming in but because I actually paid the artist that didn't leave a lot for the label.  One of the things I learned from the books I was reading about the music industry was that if an indie label has a hit there are two things that happen:

1.  The label steals from the hit artist to subsidize the rest of the label.
2.   Label pays the artist and the rest of the label doesn't grow.

  Much of the later part of 2011 was filled with concerns that Alex Dirty Beaches would leave for greener pastures, and I still talk about the fact that he turned down Rough Trade, Matador etc. to stay with me.


Published  1/6/11
Dirty Beaches Lord Knows Best MP3
        
Dirty Beaches Lord Knows Best MP3 is available for free download at the below locations.  The Badlands LP comes out on San Diego's own Zoo Music, run by Brandon Welchez of the Crocodiles and Dee Dee from the Dum Dum Girls.  Dirty Beaches will be opening for Dum Dum Girls and Crocodiles this spring in the United States.  Europe this summer?

Gorillavsbear
Pitchfork Fork Cast
Altered Zones
Weekly Tape Deck (Most Anticipated 2011; Daytrotter Version)
Urban Outfitters Music Monday (Week of January 11th)
Impose Magazine
The Hype Machine

RECENT

Earmilk
See The Leaves
The Off Line People
Silver Rocket

HATERS

 This is a space for the haters. 

Published 1/17/11
Pitchfork BNM's Dirty Beaches Sweet 17 track























Dirty Beaches Badlands LP is out 3/29 on Zoo Music

   It was fantastic to see Pitchfork name Dirty Beaches' Sweet 17 Best New Music on Friday.  Sweet 17 is featured on his forthcoming LP, Badlands, which is being released on the San Diego based record label run by Brandon Welchez of Crocodiles and Dee Dee of the Dum Dum Girls.

    When an Artist gets Best New Music for a track, rather then an album, two possible scenarios suggest themselves.  An album review that also gets Best New Music, confirming the earlier selection.  An album review, that does not get Best New Music.  Obviously, it's in the Artists best interest to obtain the Best New Music designation for the album, but that is entirely outside the control of the Artist.

    There are also secondary effects, the successful harnessing of which require ancillary personnel.  For example, the services of a public relations professional are especially crucial AFTER such a designation occurs.  Additionally, the so-designated artist can expect an increase of attention from entities like: booking agents, record labels and management.  It should be noted, that every opportunity has two potential results, an artist can choose wisely or poorly, and those decisions will shape the future ability of an artist to compete in the market place.

   A significant time interval in this regard is the period between a track becoming Best New Music and the review of the resulting album.  An artist who receives a Best New Music for the album is in a superior bargaining position with any interested entity, whereas a failure to achieve that puts the Artist in an inferior position.  The Artist can also use that time interval to perform live in different markets and reap the rewards (or penalties) of those live performances.  The main thing with a wind fall is to recognize it as something which may not repeat itself due to your hard work: that's the definition of a wind fall, economically speaking.

    Ultimately, the Best New Music designation is what economists would term a windfall gain.  I can't actually find a good definition od this term in the way I want to use it, but I would define it as, "An external stimulus to the level of interest in a specific artist."  Such stimulus' are unrelated to rational economic or artistic activity.  Thus, their occurrence should be accepted but not glorified.  Glorifying a windfall gain is like erecting a temple to yourself because you won 100 million in the lottery: kind of gross.

   Above all, an Artist facing an increased level of attention needs to realize that audiences crave novelty either from the same Artist or a new/different Artist and that every time you do something, it impacts the way the prospective audience perceives you.

Published 1/9/11
Traveling Conversion Suitcase: Peru

This traveling conversion suitcase was used by Catholic Missionaries during the 16th and 17th century in Peru. It actually folds in on itself to the size of a large trunk. The figures tell many of the stories of the Bible, and the idea is that the Priest would point out the stories to the natives and use them to illustrate different Christian ideas. The condition of this piece was excellent, I can only surmise that it was kept well maintained by craftsman or was barely used for it's original purpose.

Published 2/1/11
Dirty Beaches Beijing Show Review


January 22 of the D-22, Rose House analog recording the theme show, Dirty Beaches final appearance.
The band suffering from a severe cold, eating on the stage singing drug blow the nose, but the general cyclone swept through the entire site. Even the most moderate guy who, in the silence after the reading is not a cry sucker half a step from the back and started looking up.


Buyiburao at the request of the audience, Dirty Beaches cover of the Stooges's "No Fun". Not really new, it may not make everyone feel great, there are awkward and dangerous. He put down the guitar pop, the crowd moved away.Liwen Tai in the crowd as he held slide, fall. People continue to Tuikai. Then he came to power and apathy to sing: "NO FUN, My Baby, NO FUN". That explosion of the moment, I think this guy will die of suicide, or drug overdose, or drink too much jump the bridge to swim drowned. (POORQUALITYPRIVATEHOUSESBLOG)


Published 2/7/11
WE JAM ECONO: THE STORY OF THE MINUTEMEN
d. Tim Irwin
p. 2005


     I must confess that while I have found direct inspiration in the DIY culture of early us punk/post-punk/alternative culture that inspiration has been more in terms of business model than music. 924 Gilman streeet directly inspired me in high school, but I was never a huge Lookout Records Fan.  In college, Dischord provided the economic template for all my future music related activity, but the only Dischord record I have in my Itunes is one Fugazi disc and a compilation. Minutemen are in that same category:  I find their largely autochthonous contribution to DIY culture to be directly inspiring, but I don't really listen to the music.  Other then the now ubiquitous Corona, which I hear whenever I see anything related to Jackass.

   I held out on We Jam Econo until last night, when I allowed myself to be drawn into the world of Minutemen.  The story of Minutemen begins in San Pedro, where else? And for the purposes of this movie, San Pedro is literally all you see in that half of the film consists of Mike Watt driving his van around San Pedro and pointing out different places that are important to the history of the Minutemen.  The other half of the film is interviews with people like Ian MacKaye, Thurston Moore and Henry Rollins and some very interesting live performance footage.  The Minutemen were one of those bands who benefited indirectly through personal tragedy.  D. Boon tragically died in a car accident, and the output of the Minutemen directly entered the Canon thereafter.  That's in spite of the fact that even a cursory review of their discography reveals a definite peak and artistic decline BEFORE Boon died (See for example, their Project: Mersh EP released in 1985.

   One aspect that clearly stands out from the Minutemen story is how that band and it's members stood for TRUTH, INTEGRITY & AUTHENTICITY. In fact, it's fair to say that Ian MacKaye's Dischord label must have been directly inspired by the Minutemen's unusual contribution to the early 80s punk scene in the United States.  The Minutemen are perhaps the originator of DIY musical culture in the sense that it was defined until the advent of the mp3:  Locally based, anti-big business, fiercely independent.  It is possible to separate this cultural contribution from the musical contribution.  D Boon's and Mike Watt's San Pedro is a kind of cultural archetype for artists looking to inspire their own change through music.

  Musically, Minutemen were interesting:  First, they had wide ranging musical influence.  To take one of their better known songs, Corona the listener can hear the influence of Western Country music- something pointed out by Sonic Youth's Lee Renaldo. Second, they could play their instruments.  That in itself was eye opening to artists like Ian MacKaye at the time.  Third, they had an engaging live show.  Dean Boon, as is totally clear from this documentary, was an engaging front man who projected exciting energy on stage. Mike Watt and George Hurley also added technical virtuosity and their own charisma to the mix.

 It's important to understand that even while they were still a band, Minutemen did not exist in some idealized punk rock fairy tale.  Their post-Double Nickels on the Dime output shows a hyper awareness of the pressures of music industry business conventions, bringing them out of the universe they had created and back down to earth.

 Perhaps that is the ultimate lesson to be extracted from We Jam Econo:  If you are so fortunate as to succeed in creating your own place in the universe by recording music: Stay in that universe- never come back down.

Published 2/11/11
Recorded Music in American Life:
The Phonograph and Popular Memory 1890-1945
by William Howland Kenney
p. 1999
Oxford University Press

   I've observed that a common mistake that contemporary observers of popular music make is to equate the industry which has developed to sell recorded music with the subject of music itself.  For someone whose time horizon is bounded by the period after WWII, this equation makes some amount of sense.  After all, the story of music between 1945 and say.... 2005 is the story of  the recorded music industry itself.

  But it wasn't always the case, especially when you consider that the phonograph and recorded music itself did not exist prior to 1890.  People had to learn the relationship between recorded sound, music and their own lives.  It's an interesting subject, and quite a pity that it has been so thoroughly neglected- to the point where this was the single book I could find on the subject.  In the first chapter, Kenney defines the significance of recorded music in American life during this period as follows:

  The phonograph and recorded sound served as instruments in an ongoing process of individual and group recognition in which images of the past and the present could be mixed in an apparently timeless suspension that often seemed to defy the relentless corrosion of historical change. (Introduction XIX)
  Unfortunately, the ten page introduction is the high point of this book.  What follows the introduction is occasionally interesting, such as the chapter focusing on the marketing and sale of recorded music prior to the depression.  Kenney points out the development of an industry focused on "hits" was something that arose only AFTER the depression brought the recorded music business to its knees.  Prior to the depression, companies sought to sell and stock the widest possible range of types of recordings in an effort to achieve something like corporate omnipotence.

  Kenney includes chapters on the African American and Hillbilly experience with the recorded music industry that sounded like they had been lifted from other books- nothing new there.  If I have to read one more description of how African American recording artists were stripped of their copyrights and cheated out of money owed them, I will scream.  To his credit, Kenney notes that to a man, all of the artists who are now seen as "victims" were beyond eager to offer up their services- often willing to be recorded for free just to get their music "out there."  Huh- does that sound familiar to anyone in the audience?

  I've been doing my best to read about the history of the recorded music industry in an attempt to find some reassurance that the recent cratering of the sale of recorded music is an anomaly.   Honestly, I do believe that to be the case.  Recorded music sales in the US have cratered on multiple occasions: the introduction of radio in the 1920s, the great depression in the 30s, the ban on recordings during World War II in the 40s and the rise of the mp3 in the 90s.  Recorded music has survived all of these traumas, because, at a very basic level recorded music and the purveyors of recorded music help audiences deal with the confusion, displacement and anomie that seem to characterize modern life.  Record companies may go bankrupt, specific artists may live and die in poverty, but recorded music serves an important function in society as a preserver of collective memory, and that function is stronger then the destruction allegedly wrought by Mediafire and Napster(or the Great Depression, World War II or the invention of Radio.)
  

Published 2/27/11
The Voices That Are Gone:
Themes in 19th-Century American Popular Song
by Jon W. Finson
p. 1994
Oxford University Press


    The history of American Popular Song is pretty clear over the past one hundred years:  Tin Pan Alley, succeeded by the Brill Building, succeeded by the Beatles and the Summer of Love, drawing on and recombining with separate but related traditions emanating out of rural White (Country/Hillbilly) and Black (Blues) culture.  But what of the period before?  A twenty first century student of popular song might be forgiven for his or her utter ignorance of the popular song tradition in America in the first half of the 19th century.  Between the politically incorrect tradition of minstelry and the largely irrelevant English inspired fascination with the otherness and exoticism of Scotland and Ireland,  it's a tradition which can be profitably ignored.

   However, as I learned in The Voices That Are Gone, there is much to recommend this period to the student of popular music.  When Voices That Are Gone picks up, we are the very early stages of the 19th century, and American Popular Song is largely, if not entirely, derivative of British culture.  At that time British culture was in love with the Scottish exoticism and poetry of Walter Scott and his ilk, and this is reflected in song themes that reflect the ever present specter of death and the realities of lovers separated by long distances.  This older style was supplanted in the middle of the century by a stylistically similar song writing that instead focused on the "close proximity and physical contact." of young lovers.

  These newer songs about courtship begin to take on the shape of what would later be associated with Tin Pany Alley songwriting.  Specifically: short phrases, narrow melodic range and repeated note choruses.  By the 1860s and 1870s, courtship songs begin to share characteristics that fully presage popular song in the Tin Pan Alley era: terse melodic periods, an intermixture of lyrical and declamatory vocal writing, a relatively narrow range, and frequent syncopation imitating the natural rhythms of speech.

   These changes in audience taste were accompanied (or perhaps precipitated) by advances in technology: transit by rail and communication with telegraph.  These two technological advances not only affected audience concerns, they also allowed the formation of the modern publishing industry, which would burst into full flower during the Tin Pan Alley period (and forever after.)  Using modern forms of communication, businessmen in New York City could sell sheet music promoted by traveling musicians.

   With the development of the modern music publishing industry in the post Civil War Period, popular song writing received a new level of attention from artists, businessmen and audiences.  Once formed, the music publishing business continued to be impacted by outside trends.  A significant early influencer was the fast paced German developed waltz.  The waltz sped up the tempo, and it's speed mirrored the increase in speed allowed by technological innovations.  The above description takes you through Part I of this book.  Unfortunately Part II devolves into a tired analysis of the influence of minstelry before and after the Civil War and two bad chapters on the treatment of Native Americans and Western European Ethnicity.  It is almost like Finson wrote half of an amazing book and then ran out of steam.

   The one interesting observation about minstelry that Finson makes is how pre-Civil War minstelry was often a combination of African American themes with older themes and song structures derived from the Anglo/Irish/Scottish continuum.   Finson notes a change in tone between the pre-Civil War minstrels, where claims to "authenticity" were a sly mask for poking fun at the established order, vs. after, when increased proximity between African American's and northern whites let to a situation where claims to "authenticity" were there own justification.   There are some interesting ways to relate this distinction to modern musical genres with their own guidelines about artist authenticity claims: Nashville country or American Indie, for example.  But I will leave that for another time.

Published 3/9/11
Dirty Beaches: Royal Flush Mix Tape

JAMZ. (PITCHFORK)

Published 3/10/11
Badlands LP: Reviews

Bao Le HuOrlando Weekly       


       Indeed, Hungtai deftly invokes all the requisite touchstones like echoes, hiss and distortion. Despite this blurred palette, there's a sharp distillation to the vision behind Dirty Beaches' new 
album, Badlands.
     A vibrant, colorful language, ranging from enigmatic film scores ("Black Nylon," "Hotel") to rock & roll kitsch (rockabilly, surf and oldies) percolates through the vintage lo-fi haze. Key to the album's vitality is the raw conviction of Hungtai's voice. Whether it's his tenderly arabesque crooning on the crestfallen "True Blue" or the rockabilly histrionics of primal surf drones like "Horses" and "Sweet 17," he brings a human heat to the 
restless vagueness.
     Most importantly, Hungtai's vocals and critical instrumental hooks aren't nearly as buried in the mix as is the output of many of his peers. In fact, repeated listens reveal a considerable degree of care in sonic proportioning, separating the punctuation from the patina. This judiciousness is epitomized by "A Hundred Highways," a song made exceptional by the ribs of damaged guitar noise, Hungtai's romantic purring and the signature bass line from Little Peggy March's "I Will Follow Him."
    But when you boil things all the way down to the bone like Dirty Beaches does, the risk is that there may not be much skeleton to show. The razor-thin margin of error of this starkly minimalist approach is what makes Badlands all the more miraculous. And instead of simply being stylishly dissociative, the album's austerity quivers with pulse, spirit and scuffed mystique.


   Read Bao Le-Huu, This Little Underground column in the Orlando Weekly.  Oh and, local journalists- this is how you do it, in case you were wondering.

Published 3/29/11
Washington Post on Dirty Beaches "More Lynchian Than David Lynch Himself"

This year, David Lynch added recording artist to his resume, which probably says something like “director, film noir icon, inspiration for your nightmares” at the top. The results were surprising — straightforward electro-pop that was more bright and bouncy than dark and sinister. So Lynch won’t be providing the soundtrack to his own movies. No problem. Alex Zhang Hungtai is more than up to the task.

As one-man-band Dirty Beaches, Hungtai writes songs with the same vision as the director of “Blue Velvet” and creator of “Twin Peaks.” (WASHINGTON POST)

Published 4/1/11
Crawdaddy: "Dirty Beaches... creates new Genre on Badlands."



           Across the board, reconstituting an already established image is nothing new for musicians—Dylan did it with Guthrie, Gaga with Madonna, and so on—but for something truly successful, it has to remain just that, an image… one that serves as homage or inspiration rather than a template for reproduction. For someone who wears his influences so unabashedly on his sleeve, Dirty Beaches’ Alex Zhang Hungtai makes music that feels surprisingly fresh amongst the ‘90s rock revivalists, garage-pop outfits , R&B renaissance acts, and chillwave sets that are flooding the indie music market. Take one look at a press photo, live clip, or Dirty Beaches music video, and you’ll recognize the look—Hungtai would have fit right in with Ponyboy and the gang had The Outsiders been a little more ethnically diverse. But don’t let Hungtai’s romanticized ‘50s/’60s affectations let you believe he’s some kind of caricature; his work as Dirty Beaches distills and mixes his influences and touchstones into something wholly his own.
          It may sound weird to call music based in samples, loops, and obvious reference points original, but in Hungtai’s hands, Badlands sounds like nothing else on my radar. That’s to say that in a few months, I expect you’ll be much more likely to hear bands described as sounding like Dirty Beaches, rather than Dirty Beaches described as sounding like other bands. Establishing a genre is a big step for someone just releasing his debut, but that’s where Hungtai’s headed.  (CRAWDADDY MAGAZINE)

Published 4/12/11
ONION AV CLUB ON DIRTY BEACHES AND ROBERT JOHNSON

Lo-Fi, high lonesome: The Scratchy Sounds of Dirty Beaches and Robert Johnson (ONION AV FOR OUR CONSIDERATION)


GOOD ARTICLE.


    This blog turned five years old, unnoticed in the middle May.  It seems like an appropriate time to reflect.

    When it comes to past events, all the participant can do is say "this happened."  I've already done a BUNCH of culling of old posts, so that the material I was pulling from was already "highlights."  There is a clear progression between the beginning of this blog in 2006, and the San Diego Fires of October 2007.  Although I continued to blog between October 2007 and mid 2008, the posts were unfocused.  As far as this blog goes, 2008 was a low point, easing into 2009.  The Wavves show review published on 4/20/09 was when I came "back" rediscovering a passion for local music through a new group of Southern California based artists.

      The period of summer and early fall in 2009 was certainly the artistic high point of the five year period covered here.  Within the period of three months, the Crocodiles started playing with a full band, Dum Dum Girls began playing live shows, Best Coast and Pearl Harbor were still accessible- it was a "golden age."  I think, with the sole exception of the Dirty Beaches Show Review in April of 2010, that this blog was spent as a source of information on the local music scene from January 2010 to the present. Although I edited them out, there were a couple of in public temper tantrums that seem to go with regular writing about a subject you are passionate about- perils of the net.  I have noticed that it is not true that something on the internet is "forever," to give a blog related example, the only "Cat Dirt Records" logo used to be on the mast head of this blog and since I deleted it, you can't find another version on the web.

       There is a clear shift of focus and movement away attending live music events and talking about live music and a general diminishing of "relevance" to any possible readership and I expect that to continue.  You could say that five years represents a natural stopping point, but I think as long as you edit the old posts down to a manageable size and number you can keep it going forever.

Published 5/26/11
THIS BLOGS HISTORY IN 25 HEADLINES: 2006-Present

The Extra Long Cat Dirt Weekender: Or There's A Holiday on Monday? (published 5/26/06)
Show Review: Cat Dirt Records Presents Chicken! w/ Fifty on Their Heels, The Power Chords, Atoms (6/18/06)
Los Angeles: 1955-1985 n'aissance de un capitale artistique 6/29/06 @ The Centre Pompidou PARIS, FRANCE  (7/12/06)

Show Review: Golden Hill Block Party (10/29/06)
A Frank Assessment of Cat Dirt's All Ages Show Efforts (10/29/06)
Cat Dirt Sez Welcomes: San Diego: Dialed In (11/07/06)

The Artist and His Role in the Production of Mass Culture (1/17/07) (LINK)
Show Review: Fifty On Their Heels, The Muslims, New Motherfuckers & The Corvinas @ the Che Cafe (5/6/07) (LINK)
Tonight: Skull Cat Kontrol at Beauty Bar (7/7/07) (LINK)

Sessions Fest Photo Gallery (9/16/07) (LINK)
San Diego Fire Photos (10/24/07) (LINK)

The Over Saturation of Local Music Coverage EX. A. San Diego City Beats "OB24" (7/9/08)(LINK)
Show Review: Crocodiles at the Casbah (8/17/08) (LINK)
Just Call Them "Hipster McDouche" (8/21/08)(LINK)

Show Review: Wavves at the Echo (4/20/09)(LINK)
"New" Band Alert: Best Coast (4/30/09)(LINK)
New York Times Loves Crocodiles (5/4/09)(LINK)

The Limits of Amateur Music Enthusiasts (6/11/09)(LINK)
Show Review: Pearl Harbor, Best Coast, Beaters (7/19/09)(LINK)
Local Music Scenes and Interaction Rituals (6/11/09)(LINK)
Show Review:  Dum Dum Girls, Crocodiles *full band*, Best Coast, Pearl Harbor @ The Che Cafe (10/3/09)

The Art of the Renaissance and the Market for Popular Culture (1/10/10)(LINK)
Show Review: Dirty Beaches & Jeans Wilder @ The Whistle Stop (4/1/10)(LINK)
Culture of Hits (5/10/10)(LINK)

Published 5/31/11
12 HRS IN BAKERSFIELD CA.

Padre Hotel - Bakersfield

       My wife and I have a fondness for the second and third tier cities of America.   Many so-called cultured, sophisticated Americans will gladly spend days in rapture traipsing around in like cities in Western European countries (like Bruges, for example.) but disdain the American equivalents. I would argues that a city whose past glory lies in the 1950s is JUST AS INTERESTING as a city whose past glory lies in the 15th century.   Unfortunately I live in the far south-western corner of the United States, so such cities are few and far between .

    This weekend, I did happen to make it as far north as Bakersfield, CA.  My wife and I repeatedly marveled on the four hour (five hour with traffic) drive from San Diego that Bakersfield is actually equidistant between San Diego and San Francisco/Sacramento, making it a natural way station for a grueling one day drive.  We chose to stay at the Shertaon Four Points for reasons that my wife would be better equipped to explain (Here's a hint though.)  Arrival was about 3 PM, so we headed "downtown" to hit a thrift/vintage store my wife was particuarly excited about.  Across the street was the hotel pictured above, "The Padre Hotel."  According to newspaper stories, the Padre was re-vamped in 2010 by a San Diego based partnership including  Graham Downes and Bret Miller.

   The vintage store that got my wife so excited was In Your Wildest Dreams, a three level, 21 thousand square foot consignment shop containing everything from clothes, to furniture, to records.  In Your Wildest Dreams was not particularly cheap, but it was not what thrifters call "picked over" in the sense that SD/LA/SF area thrifters understand the term.  There was PUH-lenty to buy.  From my perspective, the books were poor, but the records, which looked to be the collection of a single guy, were well selected, with some nice represses that I would be stoked to see at a "new" record store.  In Your Wildest Dreams isn't the only thrift/vintage/consignment store in Bakersfield, but you don't have to go to another one unless you are looking for stuff to resell on Ebay.

  After "thrifting" we walked across the street and had a drink at the Brimstone Bar inside the lobby of the Padre Hotel.  My wife and I were both impressed by the quality of the remodeling, the architect clearly had an eye for maintaining some of the better aspects of the original design while updating by removing interior walls- creating a large lobby space that was subdivided into the bar, a cafe and the check in area.  Guests have the opportunity to walk up a central stair case to the rooms, giving the space a constant multi-dimensional flow of people.  The Brimstone Bar was about what you would expect from a would-be boutique hotel in Bakersfield: rough around the edges but satisfactory considering the location.  Were I to return, I would want to give this place a shot.

  Dinner was an easy choice: Buck Owens Crystal Palace, a combination Steak house/Hard Rock style museum and music venue started by the legendary country hit-maker in 1995.  Buck also owns a country radio station in town, which is located next door to the Crystal Palace.  Our dinner at the Crystal Palace was what we expected: A great delight for every sense EXCEPT taste.  I'm not complaining, but my advice if you go there is to have a snack at the Brimstone prior, order the smallest thing off the menu at Crystal Palace and "pre-drink": My Budweiser was something like 5.50, and while I'm happy to pay up, I wouldn't want to do extended drinking here.  The Museum aspect is incredible, with an actual emphasis on his individual hits with the various costumery he used to promote each hit filling the rest of the display cases.  Still, if you have one night in Bakersfield and miss this place, you a sucka.  Call ahead for a reservation and get there after 7:30 PM for the band.

  For a night cap/evening activity I would have preferred to check out a show at Jerry's Pizza, but that was not in the cards.  Instead we went to Guthrie's Alley Cat, which has a decent online reputation, a quirky location in an actual alley and a killer old-school neon sign that still lights up.  Inside it's a little too nice to be a "dive bar" in the sense that I understand the term, but it was a decent "bar" bar.  The bartender was amiable as were the locals- no attitudes here.

  On the ride back to the hotel we stopped at but did not eat at Dewar's Family Ice Cream and Candy Parlor a hundred year old, still FAMILY OWNED and adorable as all get-out.  Inside it was a Saturday night mob-scene, but the ice cream jocks looked like stone-cold assassins of serving ice-cream.  The old timey candy selection didn't get me wet, so to speak, but on the whole it's an amazing place- right across the street from Bakersfield High School.  Standing in the parking lot, the sun setting out on the plains of the Central Valley, I could close my eyes and imagine that I was still in the 50s.  It was a pleasant sensation.

  Give Bakersfield a shot.



Published 7/12/11
Lo Fi Number One Hits: Witch Doctor by David Seville (4/28/58; 2 weeks.)


    Love that super racist clip: Am I only the one who thinks mass-media era specific racist characters "unmask" the mass media Foucault style?

  This past week as I was driving back and forth to Monterey, I heard David Seville's "Witch Doctor" on my Ipod a couple of times.  It's well known to me via the "cover version" done by Seville's own creation, Alvin and the Chipmunks, but it was a number one hit BEFORE the Chipmunks existed- in 1958.

   Here is what the Billboard Book of Number One Hits, Revised and Updated 4th Edition by Fred Bronson has to say about "The Witch Doctor" and how it came to be.

    He got the idea from a book title in his library, "Duel With the Witch Doctor," and with his trusty tape recorder, came up with the idea of playing back music and vocals at different speeds.  The voice of the witch doctor was recored at halfspeed and played back at normal speed, a device that would eventually lead Bagdrasarian to create a multi-million dollar empire centered around three friendly rodents.
     Ross Bagdasarian was born in Fresno, and moved in his teens to New York, hanging out with his cousin William Saroyan.  (Billboard Book of Number One Hits, p. 36)  1958 was a year that had number one's by Elvis (x2), Everly Brothers, Ricky Nelson AND another novelty hit- The Purple People Eater, so you know Witch Doctor must have taken the nation by storm.  In 1958, juke box play would still be a relevant measure of success, so you could well imagine the reaction that the record must have elicited in Los Angeles, the home market of Liberty Records (Hollywood Ca.)  Liberty Records also put out Eddie Cochran (Summertime Blues, specifically.)

      But the reason I'm writing this post is to point out how indie and lo fi the production of this record must have been in 1958.  One, you've got a guy from Fresno who has a connection to the NYC theater, and presumably music industry world.  Two, he comes up with a technical innovation involving the recording medium (tape.)  Recording Tape itself was not widely available in the United States until AFTER World War II, so it was like the Garage Band of it's day.

   So this guy is trying to "make it" and he combines this recording technique with a song that is high on the novelty meter and BOOM number one hit.  And then, in 1961: THE CHIPMUNKS.  Develop, retire.  The Chipmunks ARE STILL PUMPING OUT MOVIES.  That is a lo fi success story, REAL TALK.

Published 10/26/11
david lynch dirty beaches


Published 10/26/11
Ominous Clouds (PHOTOS)















ominous clouds photo, 1.














ominous clouds, 2.














ominous clouds, 3.

  I am a HUGE fan of using the metaphor, "ominous clouds on the horizon."  First, it's something everyone can relate to, in terms of actually having seen it.  Second, it's very accurate in terms of stressing the need to be able to literally look ahead of you and think about issues like, "How fast are those clouds moving towards me?" and "When will the Clouds arrive here?"

  I particularly prefer "ominous clouds on the horizon" or "dark clouds on the horizon" to "sunny skies."  The obvious values of sunny skies are relaxation and general laziness, whereas dark/ominous clouds on the horizon connote a watchfulness and attentiveness- IMPORTANT TRAITS TO HAVE.

Published 11/9/11
Popular Recreations in English Society 1700-1850
by Robert Malcolmson
p. 1973
Cambridge University Press

       The way I see it, the recipe  for writing a book of non-fiction is to take a bunch of books normal people will never read and combine them in new and interesting ways.  This is very much one of those types of books- not particularly interesting as a stand alone book, but incredibly valuable if you are trying to assemble facts about popular culture in the 18th and 19th century.  If you stop and think about how important and fussed over popular culture is TODAY, the comparative lack of regard for it in the 18th and 19th century is somewhat puzzling.  Wouldn't someone writing about American Idol want to know about the cock throwing past time of rural England in the 18th century?  After all, the try out shows of American Idol SHARE ALOT of likeness to the "sport" of throwing rocks at a rooster that is tied to a stake in the ground. SPORTING.
     It's also interesting to read about the "running of the bulls."  This is something that exists only in Spain today, but was widespread in England in the 18th century.
    As for the take away, here's what I wrote, "As economic change accelerated, and as the market economy established a firm grip on social thinking and behavior, many customary practices came to be ignored and the recreations they supported were forced into disuse."

    I also thought this observation was interesting, "In the later seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries many men were still intensely suspicious of 'enthusiasm', of pleas for reform, of moral earnestness, and they reserved their favor for moderation, stability, and a cautious worldliness."


Published 11/18/11
Taking Pictures of Taking Pictures, Dirty Beaches, David Lynch & Lana Del Rey, and the Tumblrization of Indie(RESONANT FREQUENCY PITCHFORK EDITORIAL)


I recently saw Dirty Beaches perform in Paris. It was a fine show, and leader Alex Zhang Hungtai is a magnetic performer, but there was something strange about it. I like Dirty Beaches' record Badlands from earlier this year, but at one point I was joking with some people that his approach to music could be summed up as: "I like Link Wray, Elvis' Sun Sessions, Suicide, and David Lynch." (Of course, Lynch's presence in this particular list is in some ways redundant, because his aesthetic already overlaps with the references in the other three, but the twist he provides is essential.) And sure enough, when he took the stage in Paris, the first sound was him strumming the chords to Wray's "Rumble" (maybe you know it from Pulp Fiction, another cultural artifact littered with pop re-blogs). Hungtai has greased hair and strong features and manages to evoke the vibe of the 50s bad boy, and here he was up there with a saxophone player who had sunglasses and a beret. They were lit by spotlights coming from the rear of the stage, so they appeared in silhouette. The vibe was palpable. I thought for a moment of Bill Pullman in Lost Highway, grinding away on his horn as an outlet for his wife's marital infidelities. The reference was probably not intentional, but that's the way this kind of subconscious imprinting works. When I later heard a rumor that Dirty Beaches had talked to the bookers of the Lynch-designed Paris club Silencio about playing a gig, it brought everything full circle. "I like David Lynch" had become "David Lynch likes me" (Lynch doesn't own the club, so I'm speaking metaphorically here) and suddenly the world of music retro seemed caught in an endless feedback loop.

Also, this article Not Every Girl Is a Riot Grrl, was pretty good:

We are at the Black Cat in Washington, D.C., watching two male guitar techs set up the stage for Dum Dum Girls. The girl continues in the same wide-eyed tone, "Look at these guys setting up the stage for a girl band-- that's how it should be." Quiet for a few moments, her boyfriend seems unsure of how to respond. Then he affects that sarcastic, jokey tone that you're supposed to coat most of your words in when you're 16-- lest you give too much of yourself away-- and says, "See? Sexism is dead!" No one invested in the discussion, myself included, seems sure what he means by this. The comment hovers for a minute, gesturing toward something bigger and stickier than anybody feels like getting into. Talk soon returns to the Harvest Dance.
I have a friend who likes to say that most people still talk about music as though "female" were a genre, but as today's wide stylistic variety of women making independent music attests, there is no "female" sound. There is only the sound of being perceived female: the same old assumptions, conversations, reference points, and language-- all-female, girl band, riot grrrl-- reverberating through an echo chamber, hollow and fatigued.


That Dum Dum Girls bit is from yesterday.
Dirty Beaches, David Lynch, Lana Del Rey. (GOOGLE SEARCH)



































         


Published 11/23/11
alex dirty beaches in gq- full page

 This opportunity was developed by Jeff Anderson at Solid Gold Public Relations- now opening an office in New York City.  Dirty Beaches- GQ- tuxedo- from the December issue.
           Jeff Anderson...delivered the goods with the Dirty Beaches Badlands campaign.  Personally, I wanted to hire him for that job because of his work on Best Coast, and for him to turn around and work Best Coast in 2010 and Dirty Beaches in 2011- whatever one's personal preference about either act- the results? Undeniable.
          Alex was essentially an unknown outside of the noise tape underground as of 12/31/10 and within the year- WITHIN THE YEAR- he's doing national print media.  Of course, it's all credit to the artist, but you can't accomplish it, not really, without PR.
         
Published 12/4/11
Champlain's Dream: The European Founding of North America
by David Hackett Fischer
p.  2008
Simon & Schuster


  I don't know if there are more then a handful of history professors who can swagger into the office of a major US publishing company and say, "Seven hundred page biography of the french dude who founded "New France" in the 17th Century... with about 20 color prints... GO!"

  But the fact that Champlain's Dream exists is a testament to the weight that David Hackett Fischer carries in the academic/popular publishing industry.  For example, his last couple forays into historical biography concerned what I would call two "red meat" subjects for American History fans: Washington's Crossing (2006) (Part of the Pivotal Moments in American History series) and Paul Revere's Ride(1995).

  Those are the type of subjects that move units in non-fiction publishing, as witnessed by their continuing sales strength. (1)  On the other hand Champlain's Dream is about a French guy from the 17th century, which is way, way, way outside of the interest field for most of the people who would pick up Paul Revere's Ride paperback at the local Barnes and Noble.

  The fact that Fischer chose to write this book is a testament to his strength as an intellectual.  An effective purveyor of ideas is someone who conveys those ideas to an audience forcefully and with style, and by both measures, Fischer has to be one of the primary operators in the field of academic history.  In this book, Fischer doesn't just write a 500 page biography of the man, he provides a 50 page Appendix concerning the 400 year  historiography of books about Champlain and another fifty pages of End Notes citing many of the books discussed in the historiography appendix.

   Throughout Champlain's Dream Fischer shows himself at the top of his game: combining an understanding of narrow technical literature with an interesting ethical perspective and a mesmerizing command of narrative.    Fischer's break out hit was 1989's, Albion's Seed.  Albion's Seed persuasively described colonial America as the combining of several regional cultures with their roots in different geographic parts of England.   Champlain's Dream represents a kind of extension of those themes into Canada.   Champlain's Dream is different from Albion's Seed in that the technical discussion is cloaked in what is putatively supposed to be a straight-forward biography of  a Canadian "Founding Father."

   Towards the end of this 500 page plus biography, Fischer describes the result of Champlain's Dream as the creation of 3 francophone cultures,  Quebecois, Acadian and Metis.   The Quebecois are the main-line French settlement line, the Acadian's were originally in the coastal area of Canada, the east coast, and they were more from South Western France- and ended up migrating into Louisiana (Cajuns.)

  Finally, and most intriguingly, there are the Metis, a combination of French and Indian cultures, language and customs.  This is a culture that is less studied/understood then the other two- and they were certainly hanging out on the Great Plains and Great Lakes period for the first couple centuries of the United States.  It's fair to say that the Metis have gotten the shaft from American historians.  

  Champlain himself shows many admirable qualities, particularly in his relationship with Native Peoples.  New France was a disease free, almost conflict free oasis in North American for at least a century and Champlain deserves that credit.


NOTES

(1)  For example, Washington's Crossing, published 2006, is 17,000 over-all in "books," #11 in the sub-sub-category of "Books About George Washington," and #40 in History/Americas/United States/Founding Fathers.  Paul Revere's ride is 40,000 over all and #45 in that same Founding Fathers sub-category.

Published 12/5/11
World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War
by Max Brooks
p.  2006


Brad Pitt in World War Z


  I think you could make an argument that Max Brooks and his Zombie Survival Guide deserve credit for single-handedly kick-started the surge in Zombie related literature and popular culture.  The Zombie Survival Guide was published in 2003, World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War, was published by the same author, Max Brooks, in 2006, and continues, in its airport novel edition, to sell strongly- #230 in books overall and in the 10 ten in three different sub-categories of "Horror" over there at Amazon.


  Clearly, the Zombie is a metaphor for contemporary alienation and economic anxiety that is perfectly- PERFECTLY- in tune with the mood of this country over the last five years.  When will our fascination with Zombies end?  Probably when the economic climate improves.  The role of "horror" in literary and genre fiction is as old as novels themselves- Gothicism was one of the first identifiable stylistic trends in the Novel itself.

   However to call World War Z a "novel" is to do it a wee bit too much justice, I think.  World War Z is more like a property, in the same way that the preceding Zombie Survival Guide was something you bought at Urban Outfitters...not Waldenbooks.   World War Z takes the form of an "oral history" a format familiar to readers of such magazines as Spin and Esquire.  The writing is casual to the point of detracting from the over-all merit of the work, but no one is very much concerned with critical acclaim.

   The airport novel version I read was released in September of this year, so you can see a long gestation period at work between initial publication and full-on hit-for-the-ages status- which is where World War Z is right now- five years between initial publication and version suitable for sales in our nations airports and hotel gift shops.   If I was going to right an airport Zombie novel, I would festishize the locations and clip around the world, but keep the focus on one central Zombie Killer- a special forces type or post-apocalyptic anti-hero.

  Historically, the Zombie film was all about the claustrophobia and solitude that budgetary limitations dicatated.  Half a century on, the Zombie novel has merged with the post-Apocalypse fantasy genre, but its appeal in an era of anxiety is all too obvious.  My sense is that World War Z was a hit, first of all because it was published in 2006- after his own 2003 Zombie Survival Guide raised interest levels, but way before The Passage, Zone One, 28 Days Later, etc.  Brooks was first on the ground with the expansive combination of Zombies/Apocalypse.

  Brooks is not much of a prose stylist- both Cronin's The Passage and Whitehead's Zone One run circles around Brooks clumsy magazine speak, but Brooks is laughing all the way to the bank, and considering the gap of time that elapsed between World War Z being released, and the subsequent timing of the books by Cronin and Whitehead, you could argue that they were directly inspired by the success of World War Z.

Published 12/5/11
Cultures Merging: A Historical and Economic Critique of Culture
by Eric L. Jones
p. 2006
Princeton University Press
The Princeton Economic History of the Western World, Joel Mokyr, Series Editor


  I almost certainly read this book because it references Tyler Cowen's In Praise of Commercial Culture, with the same level of respect & admiration that I feel for the same work.  I ordered it on September 28th of this year, and I already finished it- pretty good turn around time, shows I'm interested in the subject matter which is best described as.... I would say a history of ideas.  A cross-disclipinary work, though it's hard to ignore its inclusion in the Princeton Economic History of the Western World series.

  That series features heavy, heavy titles like, Quarter Notes & Bank Notes: The Economics of Music Composition in the Eighteenth and Ninteenth Century, by F.M. Scherer.  And who could forget the immortal classic by Timothy W. Guinnane, The Vanishing Irish: Households, Migration, and the Rural Economy in Ireland, 1850-1914.   That's SNOOZE CITY, BAYBAY.

  Unlike some of the tedious sounding titles that share the Princeton Economic History of the Western World designation, Cultures Merging is a breezy little book, without so much as end notes (foot notes, often to news publications, dot the text in an unobtrusive fashion.  The fact that the Author, Eric L. Jones, has read Cowen's work is key, key, key to animating Cultures Merging.

  Whereas Cowen is very mild about the implications of his argument in Praise, Jones is less so:

    In Praise of Commercial Culture (1998) came as a shock to conventional anti-market wisdom.  Cowen demonstrates that government agencies and public monies are not essential to creating an active and original world of the arts.
   Some of his most intriguing observations are directed at the way individuals form their taste, devise their judgment, and erect their (mis)perceptions about cultural products.

   However, Jones' restatement of the positive impact the Market has on artistic creativity is worth noting, "Markets relax the constraints on internal creativity.  The great thing is to evade single buyers- patrons or Arts Councils- since these are likely to cramp one's style, like that of poor Velasquez, who had to paint eight-one portraits of Philip IV."  Cultures Merging is appropriately sub-titled as a "Critique" of the meaning & impact of Culture, but it's a sensitive, well-reasoned critique that was obviously to sophisticated for the public to grasp.

  All I'm saying is that you take Cowen's critique and then add Jones' stuff and rename it "The Psychology of Culture" instead of trying to pitch it as history or economics. Truly no one gives a shit about history (unless it's the Civil War or World War II) and truly, truly, no one gives a shit about economics, but psychology books are all over the place, and selling.

Published 12/8/11
DIRTY BEACHES IN PALM SPRINGS & SALTON SEA (PHOTOS)


DIRTY BEACHES IN PALM SPRINGS.



















DIRTY BEACHES AT SALVATION MOUNTAIN, SALTON SEA CA.

Monday, June 06, 2022

Collected Writing: Music Business 2011-2012

 Collected Writing: Music Business 2011-2012

    In 2010, I put out a Best Coast 7" with my partner Mario Orduno on Art Fag Recordings.  That was a partnership formed over a shared interest in producing vinyl records- we had both done it already and the fact that I could provide financial backing and Mario could provide artist relationships.  A classic independent record label combination, something I had already learned in 2010.   I also knew starting in 2010/2011 that I wasn't a talent guy, I was a business guy, and maybe a promotions guy.   The Best Coast 7" really blew up in 2010, this must have been one of the last years before digital was even a category outside of Itunes.  There was no digital agreement for the Best Coast record, so it was simply a question of producing and distributing thousands of 7" records.  That is something that happened in my office which was in downtown San Diego.

  Meanwhile, I reached a similar agreement with Brandon Welchez of Crocodiles and Kristin Gundred of Dum Dum Girls, that became Zoo Music.  Brandon found Alex Zhang Hungtai (Dirty Beaches) on YouTube and Alex agreed to put out Badlands on Zoo Music.  That record came out on March 28th, 2011, but the publicity campaign started in January, and was the first direct experience I had with what you might call the national indie scene.   Through the success of that record, I got a production and distribution deal with Revolver/Midheaven in San Francisco, and digital distribution, which became increasingly important.  I was also hearing first or second hand about the relative experiences of bands like Dum Dum Girls, Crocodiles, Best Coast & Wavves, even though I didn't have anything to do with their records or actual music careers, my part always being limited to the record label.

    Moving into 2012 I was becoming increasingly interested in the digital marketplace for indie music.  I was also watching as these local bands I knew became national bands with varying degrees of financial success.

  Something that becomes clear if you actually scroll through these posts, and the stuff from the last post, is that I was definitely educating myself about the history of the recorded music industry as I was getting involved financially.  I'd already had my major insights about the shell job involving paying off succesful independent artists BEFORE it became a potential issue when Badlands became a hit. 

Dirty Beaches Explosion: AD Mixtape, BVegan, Johnny Cash Cover (2/10/11)






















   



Dirty Beaches Badlands LP is being released on San Diego's own Zoo Music on March 29th.  The pre-release publicity for this record has been kind of insane.  It has reminded some commentators of the push Best Coast got last year before Crazy For You was released on Mexican Summer.  Here are some recent examples of that pre-release publicity:
   TODAY:  Aquarium Drunkard Presents Dirty Beaches Trans Pacific Mix Tape- Free MP3 Download. (AQUARIUM DRUNKARD)
YESTERDAY: Dirty Beaches releasing New LP, Touring with Dum Dum Girls (who have a new EP)-- MP3's and Dates. (BROOKLYN VEGAN)
LAST FRIDAY:  The Singer Johnny Cash Cover MP3 download. (PITCHFORK FORKCAST)
LAST THURSDAY: The Singer Johnny Cash Cover MP3 download. (ALTERED ZONES)

GOOGLE BLOGSEARCH RESULT ST#"DIRTY BEACHES" LIB#PAST WEEK (GOOGLE BLOGSEARCH RESULTS)

Peter Hoslin's "How to get on Pitchfork's Forkcast" (3/3/11)

How to Get on Pitchfork's Forkcast: A step-by-step guide to making it in the blogosphere. in San Diego City Beat by Pete Hoslin.

  Hey while we are on the subject:  What is up with Seth Combs?  Here there was a new project in the works.  Brand new project.

The Rise of Audience-less Music (3/11/11)

    Among other oft noted impacts, the advent of digital technology has given rise to an enormous and growing class of popular music:   Music without an audience.  In the past, the anticipation of an audience was often times the sole reason for music being created.  To give but one example, Mozart's job was to write background music for various religious services and aristocratic social events.  Like, Mozart would get a letter saying, "The Duke wants you to write some music for his ball next month: Do it."
     Moving forward to the early period of the 20th century in the United States, music was very much a social activity- whether played in the parlor on a player piano, a "Juke Joint" in the rural south or a Fourth of July Parade in the mid-west, the modernization of society in no way tampered with the fundamentally social nature of Music.
   Change was introduced into the equation by advances in technology.   Recorded and Broadcast Music created the possibility of non-social Music, i.e. music with an audience of one- a person and a machine (record player or radio.)  However, the creation of music playing machines did not fundamentally destroy the artist/audience relationship, it merely reduced the average size at the same time it increased the overall size of the audience.
   No, Record Players and Radio didn't create Audience-less Music, it created bigger, more attenuated audiences. The fact was is that not every Joe could create a Record, let alone get it heard, and the same thing went for Music that was played on the radio.
   However, more recent technological changes have given rise of a historic first, music that is created that is completely without audience.  This is now possible because recording costs have dropped to the cost of a single portable computer, and distribution costs have dropped to the cost of a high speed internet connection. All those who can afford those two things can create music, but that does not guarantee that the resulting music will have any audience, whatsoever.
   In fact, the defining characteristic of this era in popular music is exactly that phenomenon: Music without Audience.  It has resulted from the combination of technological progress and the complex of ideas understood as "Romanticism" as it relates to the process of artistic creation (i.e. the lonely, misunderstood, tormented poet,  the beat generation outcast, Rimbaud, Baudelaire, etc.)
  The utter failure of contemporary Musicians to understand the essentially social nature of Music- is their downfall.  The Idea that an unknown Musician can arise from obscurity and ascend to the heights of the music industry is as old as the music industry itself, if not older.
     Everywhere that Idea is bound up with the romantic myth of artistic production and the reality of the every changing modern Music Industry- it is a timeless, epic struggle that links  Beethoven to the Beatles, Miles Davis to Moby and Devo to the Dum Dum Girls.
     Audiences can and do respond to Music which plays upon that Idea, but they don't care about Music the way Artists care about Music.  A Romantic Poet of the 19th century might have been fascinated by the idea of playing his lute in the woods, but it would be pretty tough to carry a harpsichord up a mountain, and he sure as hell couldn't bang out an EP on GarageBand in three weeks.
       The fundamental mistake of would-be professional musicians is that they assume the existence of an Audience, when in fact, there is no Audience, none whatsoever, for someone posting recordings on the internet.  At some point in the last five years, a higher percentage of non professional musicians have recorded and distributed music to the public then at any time in the past hundred years, probably by a factor of 50 or 100.
        Meanwhile, overall Audience increase mirrors the steady but small growth of the overall population, since Music is now available to everyone, always.  Thus, Audience-less Music is inevitable.   Surely it is appropriate for an artist to ask whether an audience exists for his or her music before making recordings available to the general public?  Publishing audience-less music to the public is sad.






Be My Baby: The Ronnie Spector Story (3/3/11)






















RONNIE BENNETT 1965


Be My Baby:  How I Survived Mascara, Miniskirts & Madness, or my Life As A Fabulous Ronette.
by Ronnie Spector
w/ Vince Waldron
Introduction by Billy Joel
Foreword by Cher
p. 1990


   I think it's worth throwing out there the idea that the "Phil Spector story" is the primary narrative in the story of popular music in the 20th century.  First of all, Spector encompassed a large swath of the actual history of popular music in the 20th century:  He has equally interesting chapters dealing with the pre-rock Brill Building songwriters/music industry,  had huge hits DURING the rocknroll era (1953-1963),  recorded a Beatles record and ended up becoming a tabloid specatacle.  What more can you ask for?  And like any good mythic figure, you can look at the story from multipe perspectives.  I prefer to see Spector as a Pre-Christian god:  Remote, Foreboding, Violent Tempered and quite monstrous at times.  Not a god I would choose to worship, but embodying the kind of mythic characteristics that one associates with gods and god-like figures.

      Knowing that Spector is currently serving a life sentence for murder makes the story all the more mythic.  My thought though is that if you were to do say, a film, about Phil Spector, the main setting would be the mansion where he kept Ronnie Spector nee Bennett locked up for a decade or two.  And who better to give a perspective on that location then Ronnie herself?  At least, that seems to be the thesis behind Be My Baby, the clumsily subtitled (How I Survived Mascara, Miniskirts & Madness, or my Life As A Fabulous Ronette) "auto"-biography from Certified Rock and Roll Survivor Ronnie Spector.

      This is book is fascinating because Spector is the Queen to Spector's King- quite self-consciously, I think.  I mean, she kept the last name, through it all.  I totally understand, but Spector's lack of agency is the headline in Be My Baby.  Truly, she was manipulated from the start by a master manipulator.   In my view the key to understand the Phil Spector/Ronnie Spector relationship is 1) Phil Spector hated his mother:  His father committed suicide when he was very young, and it's not hard to imagine that he blamed his Mother, who was also very pushy and bossy well into his adulthood.  2)  Ronnie Bennett wanted to be famous, and she believed that Phil Spector could help her achieve that goal.

    The smell of race and money permeates Be My Baby.  Spector places emphasis on her upbringing in a single-parent household, and her status as a mixed race child in a majority African American environment. Spector was working towards a career as a singer of popular music, but Phil Spector was the first person to really "get" the potential of Ronnie Bennett's voice/style.  To give but one of several examples, an early Brilll Building affiliated writer/agent said that the early Ronettes could be like the Andrews Sisters.  That guy... was just clueless.  The Phil Spector/Ronnie Bennett story has some similarities to the Barry Gordy/Diana Ross story.  In both instances, the male producer was LOOKING for something specific, and was operating in an environment where there was competition among aspiring musicians for music industry attention.
       The Bennett/Ross figure is DRAWN to the male figure by his POWER.  On the other hand, the Spector/Gordy figure is drawn to the physical characteristics of the Bennett/Ross.  In one sense that is "OK"(Spector said to Bennett after hearing her sing "that's the voice I'm looking for.") and in another sense it is creepy and weighted with power inequalities and sexual exploitation.  Shrug.  That's life, or at least- it was back then, because the same facts repeat themselves over and over again with female popular music artists.

Flowers in the Dustbin: The Rise of Rock and Roll 1947-1977 (4/11/11)

BOOK REVIEW
Flowers in the Dustbin:
The Rise of Rock and Roll 1947-1977
by James Miller
p.  1999
Simon and Schuster


   If you can imagine a history of rock and roll that stops before the mp3 and doesn't mention any independent record labels after Motown written by the former 'music critic for Newsweek'(!) and possessor of a phD in the 'history of ideas' (!!) for a popular, rather then academic audience, then you already know what Flowers in the Dustbin: The Rise of Rock and Roll 1947-1977,  a pretentious, fame and sales centered recollection of the key points in the history of the Rock Industrial complex written by a child of the sixties for children of the sixties.

   To be totally fair to the author, Flowers in the Dustbin has it's moments, particularly before the Beatles and Hippies show up in the mid 1960s.  Flowers certainly solidified my opinion that nothing particularly interesting happened in rock and roll between the Beatles and punk rock/no wave.  Miller limits his discussion of punk and post-punk to the Sex Pistols and a sentence about Elvis Costello, but since the book only covers till 1977 he can be forgiven.

  Considering this book was published in 1999, the year Napster went online, it's accurate to observe that Flowers in the Dustbin was obsolete before it hit the shelves- through no fault of the Author.  How could he anticipate what was to come?  Anyway, it's no wonder that this book can be bought for cheap.

Hit Men by Fredric Dannen (6/28/11)

Hit Men
by Fredric Dannen
p. 1990

  You should know what you are in for when the back jacket of a book about the music industry has a big-up from Sinead O Connor. Although the narrative has been tarted up for sales appeal, this is basically a biography/history of the Major Label scene in the "After Hippie Rock" era.  The central theme in Hit Men is the clash between music executives trying to profit from Rock music and Black Pop (R&B, Soul & Disco in this time period) and the corporate brass- uncomfortable with Rock music and doubting it's ability to generate profits.

  If you're like me, you may be suppressing your gag reflex right now, but Hit Men is quite diligently researched and footnoted, and thus it works outside of it's alleged agenda to "expose" the shady business involving Top 40 Radio, Record Labels, The Network & The Mafia.  Seriously, who gives a shit?  You know who "shady business practices" in the Music Industry typically benefit:  Indie Labels.  That's right all you holier-in-thou-live-in-my-Parent's-basement types:  The Mob tends to help out the little guys with suitcases of cash, not the big boys with their Federal Network Licenses (subject to renewal) and publicly traded stock.

  What really struck me about this book is how much the Major Label game is based on spending "Other People's Money" in the same way that high-financiers can bankrupt a billion dollar hedge fund, walk away, and start another hedge fund because IT WASN'T THEIR MONEY.   The business strategies embraced by major labels in the 80s were hardly "text book economics" of the sort one expects from such efficient allocatiors of capital.

  To give but one example, I will quote direct from the book- this is in the context of a "bidding" war over the "talents" of 80s solo McCartney:

  "CBS offered McCartney an unheard-of enticement, a publishing company that held the copyrights of one of America's greatest songwriters, Frank Loesser...It's hard to overstate the value of Frank Music.  Loesser wrote the words and music to Guys and Dolls and other Broadway classics; his catalog included gems such as "Spring Will Be A Little Late this Year," "Standing on the Corner," and "Once in Love With Amy."  p. 127

    We're talking 80s McCartney, not mid 70s McCartney. (PAUL MCCARTNEY DISCOGRAPHY WIKI)

    Here's another observation: With the exception of David Geffen and Irving Azoff (Live Nation Chairman) these guys are basically corporate drones: particularly with Warner and CBS, the executives are just employees- they don't even have internet era stock options.  Clive Davis was actually fired over padding expense reports- and prosecuted by the IRS, over what was a TINY bit of money.  It's almost comical because Dannen actually tells you what some of these guys were making when they were "President of Warner" and it's like the salary of well-paid stockbroker on Wall Street- even adjusted for inflation.  They are hardly industrial tycoons. 

NEIL BOGART OF CASABLANCA RECORDS (6/30/11)


























NEIL BOGART WIKIPEDIA

Wavves Self-Releasing Next EP (8/15/11)

   I read that Wavves has announced THEY are releasing an EP on front-man Nathan Williams' long-dormant record label GHOST RAMP.  I remember reading a TWEET where Williams said "Fuck 360 Deals" so I guess we know how those talks with Warner Brothers and Columbia worked out.  I think it's incredible that Fat Possum released King of the Beach and Crocodiles Sleep Forever and they both were "sales flops."  Meanwhile, Fat Possum is promoting a young country and western chanteuse. I thought they cut both records off at the knees to spend money on Lissie.  What the fuck- these are two of America's contenders for being a serious, viable rock band: you have to invest a little.  GHOST RAMP.

  AMERICAS MAJOR LABELS- YOU ARE TRULY ASLEEP AT THE SWITCH.

COMPARED:  949 HOLIDAY HOOTENANNY vs. 91X WREX THE HALLS (11/2/11)

FACT:  If there are two things blogs are about they are:

1) PANDERING TO YOUR AUDIENCE.
2) JUDGING THINGS.

  Now, if you take the clock back 12 months ago, I had basically "given" up on writing about both stations because they always get upset about anything "negative" you write about them.  FAIR ENOUGH.  Today?

     I now know that my friends are generating significant, measurable income from Satellite Radio, and that their music is "in rotation" on certain of those stations.  Closer to home, I receive income from "streaming" services like SPOTIFY- which is a MONSTER let me tell you- don't let the haters scare you off on that one.  Let's put it this way- if "sales" of SPOTIFY increases the sales of ITUNES has increased over the last decade, every indie label with a half-way relevant back catalog will be making 2-3k a month, minimum.  MINIMUM.

    At the same time, it is quite clear that the highest levels of music industry success are barred without "radio support."  Bob Lefsetz has his flaws as a journalist, but at least when he addresses a specific subject you know it's "relevant" and he wrote to that effect within the last seven days.  It's true, though- JUST LOOK AT THE 949 HOLIDAY HOOTENANNY vs. 91X WREX THE HALLS

FM 94/9 HOLIDAY HOOTENNANNY (PURCHASE TICKETS 40 DOLLARS)
Saturday, December 3rd, 2011.
JENNY CRAIG PAVILION AT USD

PRESENTED BY COORS LIGHT

MY MORNING JACKET  (15 million last.fm plays)
TWO DOOR CINEMA CLUB  (18 million!)
MATT & KIM (1.3 million)
DELTA SPIRIT (1.9 million)
THE BLACKOUT PARTY (3000)

   The big surprise for me here is Two Door Cinema Club clocking in with 18 million, undoubtedly because of their popularity in the UK over here they have a alt rock radio hit.  The other band that would fit here would be TEMPER TRAP with a similar formula: foreign, have a song currently in rotation on 94/9.  I'm surprised to see that Matt & Kim are only at 1.3 million last.fm plays- that is low for the amount of "push" that they get from having a hipster magazine as their label, but their presence is a testament to the fact that they MIGHT have a song on 94/9 in the near future.  Delta Spirit is the equivalent of a Dum Dum Girls and Crocodiles, but you can see the difference here in that Delta Spirit is playing this show, Crocodiles are mixing their third record in the UK, and the Dum Dum Girls are touring Europe.  I would argue for all three bands they are conscious choices.  I don't know if Delta Spirit is played on Satellite radio or not.
  Blackout Party is the "local opener"- a nice tip of the hat, but def. not going to lead to a song being played on 94/9 in the future.

91X WREX THE HALLS
December 11th, 2011
VALLEY VIEW CASINO ARENA (EX-SPORTS ARENA)
PRESENTED BY LIVE NATION
(DECEMBER 10TH, 2011 PRESALE OVER AT LIVE NATION)

DECEMBER 10th


FLORENCE AND THE MACHINE (21 million)
DEATH CAB FOR CUTIE (128 million)
HIGH FLYING BIRDS (OASIS 94 million)
CAGE THE ELEPHANT (6 million)
THE AIRBORNE TOXIC EVENT  (3.9 million)
THE NAKED AND FAMOUS (5.2 million)

DECEMBER 11th

BLINK 182 (114 million)
SOCIAL DISTORTION (11 million)
PENNYWISE (12 million)
SWITCHFOOT (17 million)
EVERLAST (5 million)
MUTEMATH (8.6 million)

   So you can see it's basically a David vs. Goliath situation here.  You gotta root for the little guy and against Live Nation, don't you?  I feel fortunate not to need to "deal" with Live Nation or live shows generally.  I'm not unsympathetic to the "feelings" of gigantic corporations, but generally I wrote for them to fail, and this show has "success" written all over it.  Several of these Artists have artificially low last.fm plays due to being popular before Last.fm started keeping track: Social Distortion and Pennywise.  The first show will be an interesting data point on the draw of Death Cab For Cutie without an album out and Florence and the Machine.  Florence and the Machine- or more specifically, Florence herself, are on the kind of tear that ONLY a MAJOR LABEL IE UNIVERSAL REPUBLIC can provide.  I think Universal Republic is just the smashing together of Universal itself and Republic.

   I think the proper analysis with Florence is that SHE NEEDS ANOTHER RADIO HIT like their last one.  I think if you really want to cement your status as a major league Artist in the American music industry you either need two hits off the same record OR hits off of subsequent records.  SO NO PRESSURE.

  Social Distortion is an underrated band- their last record was actually number 4 on the pop album sales chart when it came out in January, and their radio catalog is like four or five songs deep.  You can see how 'uncool' Social Distortion is by searching their name over at Pitchfork.  But if you have the catalog, radio play and fan base of Social Distortion, you don't give a fuck what Pitchfork thinks.

  Pennywise is a different story, still active but not as cemented in the music industry as Social Distortion, with one enduring radio hit and a decent back catalog on Epitaph.  They weirdly released a record on Myspace in 2008- I suppose it was self released and then sold by the band rather then on Myspace Records.   Those were the days, huh?  Epitaph must not have wanted the record- you would think an artist would stay with that kind of label but what do I know.

  Everlast and Mute Math are alt rock radio favorites with major label support and middling chart success/presence.  Everlast never really matched his double platinum Whitey Ford Sings The Blues, but then, it was 1998- a time of hope.  "What It's Like" is an enduring alt rock radio classic, even though it topped out at #13 on the singles chart.  Ends also, get's played, but nothing since.  But my sense is that if you still have a song being played on alt rock radio, then you have a career in the sense that you can sustain yourself through music: advances, publishing, song writing, etc.

  I think if there is one Artist that I would expect to see on ONE of the two bills it would be SHE & HIM (16 million)  with  Zooey Deschanel and M. Ward.  Zooey's TV show is a HIT, M. Ward is a savvy music vet and this is an easy way to get one of their Xmas standards on one of the alt rock stations down here, then they play the corresponding show in LA for KROQ and Live 105 in SF and they've got a Xmas radio hit. CHA CHING.   I guess Live Nation can't pull Zooey Deschanel to a radio show in San Diego.

Dean Martin's Palm Springs House (photo) (11/29/11)
















DEAN MARTIN'S PALM SPRINGS HOUSE.


Dean Martin's Palm Springs House. (FLICKR)

2011 My Year In Music (12/16/11)

   2011 My Year in Music actually started in December 2010. It was after Christmas, I was staying with my wife at the Tambo Del Inka Rest & Spa in Valley Sagrado.  You know, trying to get away from it all?  It was there I discovered that the Dirty Beaches Badlands LP had "leaked."

  "Leaked" in the sense that our digital distributor had released the album accidentally, reading the release date is March 30th, 2010 not March 30th, 2011.  As it turns out, my view is that the "leak" actually helped the record obtain a larger audience, and personally converted me from a "leak-fearing" to "leak-embracing" mentality.  That was my first lesson of the year in the music business:

   If you have a product that starts with zero audience, leaking can not hurt you, because the worst thing that can happen is for everything to stay exactly the same, i.e. a product/artist combination with no audience.

  2011 began to go "right" on January 14, 2011- not long after I returned from my very interesting, refreshing Peruvian sojourn.  That was the day that Pitchfork named Dirty Beaches "Sweet 17" "Best New Track."  As it turned out my buddy Josh Feingold over at SONG PUBLISHING was right to counsel me to not get too excited since, "The designation that really matters is Best New Music (Album) not Best New Track (Song.)"  That's actually a reversal of the conventional music industry wisdom, and deserves some recognition as an independent fact, considering the vital role that the Best New Music designation plays for about 10,000 Artists and 1,000 Record Labels.

      After Dirty Beaches, Sweet 17 was named Best New Track, the attention was overwhelming, especially from labels that didn't know that Zoo Music existed.  Solicitations included those directed to the label itself regarding who was "putting out" the Badlands LP.  Clearly something any "bedroom indie" Label needs to consider immediately on the occasion of any kind of market success is the need to react to the needs of the Artist. If you don't react in some positive way to the increased attention that results from success, you will lose your artist nine times out of ten.  Or, as another, wiser person i was talking to put it, "99 times out of a hundred."

   The saving grace for Zoo Music is that the attention for the Badlands LP came within the frame of time designation as the pre-release period- jan- march 2011- and PR had already been arranged, production commenced etc.  From the perspective of "sharks" who wanted to put out Badlands, that was an important distinction and caused many would-be suitors to drop away immediately.

  The next big mile stone was the Pitchfork Album Review of Badlands. At the time, I was aware of the fact that the mere presence of an Album in Pitchfork's Album Review section was significant, but considering that Sweet 17 had been designated "Best New Track" I that Best New Music was, if not a fore-gone conclusion then a high possibility.

        As time dragged on between January 14th and April 4th,  I was less and less sure of the likelihood of getting Best New Music.  The "nail in the coffin" was The Weeknd: House of Ballons receiving Best New Music on March 29th, 20110- the week of Badlands release.  Both reviews were written by the same writer, Joe Colly.  Both Artists are Canadians? Joe Colly gave the Weeknd 8.5 and Badlands 8.2.  I still think about:   On my recent Hawaiian vacation to Princeville, my wife and I were driving back from Waimea Canyon on Kauai to the St. Regis Princeville, listening to this college radio/public radio station, and they played the Weeknd and I was like, "Ohhh."  This was in November.

   After the initial sales period in April, early May, it became clear that Zoo Music's existing capacity couldn't satisfy demand for Dirty Beaches record.  That's a problem that def. fits into the category of what I outlined earlier:
       Clearly something any "bedroom indie" Label needs to consider immediately on the occasion of any kind of market success is the need to react to the needs of the Artist. If you don't react in some positive way to the increased attention that results from success, you will lose your artist nine times out of ten.
    The simple fact is that a small, independent record label doesn't exist without its star Artist.  Record Labels are their Hit Records, and that is always going to be linked to a specific Artist who will receive offers to move "up the food chain" of the music business.  This is the point where having Artists involved in releasing the music is  useful and a reason why an Artist owned label, other factors being equal, will have an advantage in retaining a specific Artist.  Nothing about an Artist owned label cancels out the need to react to the needs of the Artist who is putting out a record, but among roughly equal competitors for a specific Artist its an advantage.

   The Fall of 2011 basically involved holding my breath to see where the follow-up to Badlands would land.  One of the cardinal principles of this level of indie record label-dom is the well framed one album deal, "Put out one album with us, if you want another one... we'd love to."  That is the clear difference between what a Zoo Music represents vs. a larger indie or even indies of the same size.

     One of the down-sides of that from the label position is that it influences you be very passive from a business perspective in the aftermath of a hit record: That's a flaw of the one record deal from the perspective of an Artist seeking to maximize Audience size.  If the Artist isn't concerned about total size of the Audience, it's not an issue.

      That's the only way the Artist and the Label can ever be equals, anyways.  BOTH the Artist AND the Label should be concerned about overly elaborate contractual arrangements. I would argue that written contracts are really only appropriate when there is existing value to the contract.  If the agreement is, "We'll try to do a good job creating an audience for an artist with no audience" you don't need to put that in writing, I'm sorry.  I say that as a lawyer, with all due respect to the respect that Artists and Labels show to the business agreement known as a "contract."

      You know what you need a contract for?  My wife worked on a project where they built a basketball/hockey arena.  It cost 150 million dollars.  That's something where you need good contracts.  Putting out a record with no recording budget and a pr agreement does not require written requirements- it requires honest efforts and good faith- and you don't need to write that down- or you shouldn't have to, anyway.  Any Label/Artist combination should be so fortunate that they've made soooo much money that you need a contract.

    I think though, my 2011 Year in Music was summed up in an interview that Alex Dirty Beaches gave to a French interviewer in response to the question, "What is indie about your music?" or something like that. He said, "It's not about a specific sound, it's about ethics and how you treat each other."  I think it was shortly after that I watched that interview that Alex agreed to put out the follow-up LP to Badlands on Zoo Music.  It happened... a month ago?

  In conclusion, My Year in Music 2011 was basically tracked to the release of Dirty Beaches Badlands, and I spent most of my time dealing with the consequences of that release. 2012 is going to be all about the follow up album.  An answer to the question of what Artists can "do" in the music business besides creating music  is to maintain Artist relationships.  That's a valuable skill set if it can be harnessed to market discipline.   The conflict that the music business causes to Artist relationships is something like trauma.

  If you think about the prototype break-out, economically viable Artist, its someone who has spent some time and energy maintaining authentic relationship with people that exist outside of a business environment.  As a result of their success, these Artists are basically required to form new relationships with people who are only interested in them because of their success.   The Artist wants to embrace the means to leave whatever pre-success environment they've existed in, but is cautious of potential negative consequences.

  Realistically, you can't ask someone who literally didn't care about an Artist before they were successful to care about what they did and who they hung out with prior to achieving success.  That goes without saying. That can be a hard lesson for "local" friends of successful Artists to learn, but it appears to be a universal principle of the relationship between Art and Commerce.
 
   This year I was grateful that I had partners who were Artists because I know my skill set doesn't really include the kind of  personal touch one needs when dealing with Artists on a daily basis.

YEAR END LISTS ARE A DRAG (12/22/11)


    A phenomenon I've found distressing is over-celebration by indie labels about year end publicity via list.  Here's something to consider: EVERY LABEL GETS YEAR END LIST PUBLICITY.  I'm not saying that I ain't privately and occasionally keeping score, far from it.  However I am not bugging people to do numerous facebook posts, tweets or website blog posts from an "official label" perspective.  


 I will simply observe that the sales boost that you can observe from Artist who receives some of the year-end list attention is quantifiable.   Due to a quirk of supply on Amazon, I've been able to actually watch a specific Record sell 15 physical copies in a little over 24 hours.  That may not sound like a lot, but trust me... at the levels I'm working at- it's a lot.

  HOWEVER I did want to point out the Les Indockuptiblies 2011 year end best albums list because I have a fondness from this French, mostly Music oriented magazine.  My wife would get copies sent to her from France, and I even though I can't read French, I simply admired the Magazine as a music Magazine- with a sophisticated understanding of the indie music world.   I think their top 50 Albums of 2011  is my favorite year-end list thus far this year.

FORTUNE'S FOOL: EDGAR BRONFMAN JR. WARNER MUSIC & AN INDUSTRY IN CRISIS (1/23/12)

BOOK REVIEW
Fortune's Fool: Edgar Bronfman Jr., Warner Music, And An Industry in Crisis
by Fred Goodman
p. 2010
Simon & Shuster

  Did you ever wonder what it would feel like to lose twenty billion dollars dabbling in the music business?  If so, Fortune's Fool: Edgar Bronfman Jr., Warner Music and An Industry in Crisis, is the book for you!

  Part obituary for the music business after the internet era, and part cautionary tale about the vagaries of operating at the highest levels of that business, I imagine that Fortune's Fool was a little bit much for the general Audience at the time of publication.

  It also can't help that there is no redemption in the end.  In fact, this book reads like it was written before the end. Specifically, it was written before Universal- run by Vivendi- who Bronfman originally sold Universal to- snatched EMI from his own Warner Music- which he had bought from Time Warner back in 2004- that happened last fall. And then on December 5th, Bronfman Jr. announced he was stepping down from Warner Music, which he sold to Len Blavatnik of Access Industries, for 3.3 billion, this summer.

  To put that in some perspective, Bronfman Jr. was able to get involved at the highest levels in the music business because Seagrams acquired 20% of DuPont in 1981.  At the time, Dupont traded at 7 dollars a share.  Today, Dupont stock is worth 50 bucks, and the companies market cap is 45 billion dollars.  Today, a  20% stake in DuPont would be worth nine billion dollars.  The drink side of business was sold by UniversalVivendi in 2000 for nine billion dollars.  Diageo has a market cap of fifty billion, Pernod Ricard of roughly twenty billion dollars.  So Seagram's is a major part of that income, at least.

  So, to conclude, Edgar Bronfman Jr. LOST at LEAST six billion dollars (what 20% of DuPont is worth today- the 3.3 billion he got for Warner Music.  AND- arguably, let's say 30-40% of BOTH Diageo and Pernod-  we're talking somewhere between 15-20 billion.  Using the low end, that is 21 billion dollars reduced to 3.3 billion dollars.  That is breathtaking in magnitude.

  Is it his fault?  Well, yeah because he took his money from a very stable and dependable part of the global economy and went "all in" on a market segment that imploded just after he sunk a huge amount of money into it.  That is what you call "bad judgment." The sense that you get from reading Fortune's Fool is that Bronfman was motivated by something other business acumen to make the business decisions that he made.

 He was also basically wrong about everything he ever did.

  Bronfman Jr.  is really the spiritual heir to another business man of the 20th/21st century, Steve Ross, only failing from the outset instead of succeeding his whole life and then failing like Ross did. (2)  Ross started with what was essentially a parking lot company, Kinney National Services- which itself contained a parking lot and cleaning service division.  In 1967 Ross acquired Warner Brothers- which had just bought Atlantic- and then they added Elektra shortly thereafter- and it was in THAT configuration that Warner Brothers assumed the structure that it would have until recently- Steve Ross running the show and adding talent as it arose- specifically adding Interscope Records and Def Jam in the 1980s- through Doug Morris.

  Steve Ross's main guy at Warner Records is Doug Morris.  Doug Morris is still around- he was appointed Chairman of Sony/BMG in July 2011- which is kind of like the Yankees manager taking over for the Mets: Still New York city, but not quite the same prestige level. Morris though, came to Warner Brothers Via Atlantic Records.  Thus, within the Warner Records structure there was very loose association of labels, except when it came to distribution. Each label operated independently of the other labels in terms of release scheduling and even competition for Artists.

 Bronfman Jrs. foray into the music business consisted of three steps:

 1) Assembling his own "major label" called Universal Music Group.
 2)  Selling that Label, plus the rest of his families' business' to Viviendi and becoming Chairman of the combined company.
3) Buying back Warner Brothers Music from Viviendi after getting booted off the board of directors.
4.  Selling Warner Brothers Music to Len Blavatnik.
5. Losing about 20 billion dollars in the process.

  First, I bought this book- hard cover- brand new (remaindered) for  a penny from Amazon. (1)  Second, the only fact I knew about the Bronfman family before reading this book is that they used to own Seagram's, and that Edgar Bronfman Junior's son calls himself Ben Brewer, put out a So So Glo's record on his own record label, and showed really good judgment in marrying the artist known as M.I.A.  Yeahhh... good call on the wife, bro.

  The story of Edgar Bronfman Jr. and his simultaneously continuing AND ill fated venture into the world of recorded music is best described in this statistic:

  Edgard Bronfman lost more then three billion dollars of his families money investing in the music business.

  I am not talking about money that Edgar Bronfman Jr. earned himself, and then lost.  I'm not even talking about money his DAD made and that he lost.  I'm talking about money his grand father made, and then invested wisely.  Seagrams earned a bloody mint selling Canadian booze during American Prohibition.  After Prohibition ended they bought up a ton of US assets, making them even richer.  After that, they made an extremely smart investment in DuPont.

   None of that was good enough for Edgar Bronfman- he wanted something that would be his own.  Beginning as a failed singer songwriter (in the book the Author describes James Blunt as being a close approximation to what Bronfman would have wanted to be himself.)

  As Bronfman Jr., assembled his major label, Universal Music Group, he took direction from the business model that was current at the time: Over paying for talent, making a ton of CDs and selling a ton of CDs, "looking for hits."  Bronfman's reaction to the Internet is most kindly described as "un-savvy."  Here, we are talking about the period after 2004, when he bought Warner Brothers from Vivendi Universal.  Bronfman's "second act" as it were was to introduce the "360 Deal" to the record business, and serve as a hawk on issues like "suing fans for illegal downloading."

  The book actually interviewed Bronfman though really, no explanation is necessary- the facts speak well enough for how it went down. He doesn't appear to be sorry for anything.  I suppose his saving grace as far as the family was concerned is that they got 9 billion to split up- although if they got it Vivendi stock we're talking about a drop between 70 dollars a share and 20 dollars a share.


  As for the 360 Deal, which literally appears to be his legacy, his gift, if you will to the music industry, I would like to quote @wavveswavves on twitter, from March of 2011.  I think he speaks for me when he says:

AND WHILE I'M AT IT FUCK YOUR 360 DEAL I'M GETTING $$$$$$ OVER HERE W/O ANY FUCKING LABEL!  (TWITTER)
 


NOTES

(1)  First of all, I bought this book brand new for a penny, which means that they shipped a ton (publication date was July 13th, 2010) and didn't sell many of them.

(2)  Time Warner, of course, was acquired in AOL in 2000, a merger widely described as the "worst of all time."  Time Warner received AOL stock, and so that didn't really work out for anyone, long term.
  
Classical vs. Romantic Aesthetic Principles: Calculated-ness (1/18/12)

  Classical, Romantic and Modern Aesthetics all have their own principles that they use to judge Artists and Art Products.   Classical Aesthetics was very rule-bound, so the judging of Artists was always accompanied by statements about whether specific works of Art obeyed or flouted supposed rules of Art.

  Romantic Aesthetics took the opposite posture, specifically attacking the allegedly unbreakable rules about what constituted good Art, and good Artists within the field of Classical Aesthetics.

  This transition generally took place between the end of the Renaissance and the mid 18th century, but the debate between Classical and Romantic Aesthetics remains a valid jumping off point for evaluating the Aesthetics of a specific Artist or Art product.

 Both Aesthetics have their own principles that they favor and dis-favor.  A main principle where they diverge can be described as the degree to which an Artist or Art work can be said to be "Calculated."

Andy Warhol



  As an example of this debate in the field of studio Art, you can thing of the debate over the aesthetic merit of an Artist like Jeff Coons, Michel Duchamp, and Andy Warhol.  In the field of Music, a relevant debate is the degree to which the work of an unknown Artist is perceived as "calculated" and how that does or does not impact the more substantial principle of Authenticity.

  An Artist embodying Classical Aesthetics is one who sees a specific "truth" and seeks to provide order and harmony in his/her Artistic universe.  An Artist who embraces Romantic Aesthetics would become enraged at the prospect of being deemed Calculated by a Critic, presumably because it conflicts with the core Romantic principle of Authenticity.

Andy Warhol Campbell's Soup Can


  The role of the Market in all this is to encourage Artists who can understand while ALL POPULAR MUSIC EMBODIES Classical Aesthetic principles or order, harmony and technical excellence, while paying lip service to the Romantic principles that the contemporary audience for Art desires from it's Artists:  Alienation, Isolation, Dissatisfaction with "the way things are."   A specific Artist given commercial success will have to adjust his or her principles with the growth of an Audience:  As an unknown, it is best to embody Romantic Aesthetic principles to appeal to the "hard core" fans of a particular genre, much in the same way a Politician will "secure his base" in a Primary campaign, before "moving to the center" for a general election.

  Here, the successful embodiment of Romantic Aesthetics in early Artistic products is the equivalent of "securing your base" and the shift to embracing Classical Aesthetics the functional equivalent of "moving to the center."

  In this way, a young Artist is well advise to be conversant with Romantic AND Classical Aesthetic principles.  A common mistake is to IGNORE Classical Aesthetics on the theory that they 'don't matter'- but they do- because Classical Aesthetics appeal to a greater portion of the Audience for any Art then those who support Romantic principles.

Sony To Buy The Orchard & IODA, Which Are Merging (3/6/12)

          The Orchard is merging with IODA and Sony Music is making a major investment in the new company, according to several reports. Sources tell Hypebot that talks began with The Orchard hoping to purchase IODA, which Sony owns a major stake in. Dimensional Associates, the private equity arm of JDS Capital Management and owners of The Orchard, had reportedly hoped to roll up several distributors including The Orchard, The Orchard and IRIS into a digital music powerhouse. But Sony had other plans. (HYPEBOT)


    Not sure what that means for the physical and digital distribution elements of IODA and The Orchard, but considering that IODA stands for, "Independent Online Distribution Alliance." It does not seem like a particularly positive development for independent music.  Then again, Ingrooves is straight up owned by Universal Music, so pick your poison I suppose. 

STAX RECORDS RELEASES 27 LPs IN MAY 1969 (3/8/12)

 

 People ask me, "Why do you read books about music history?" and I say, "To avoid others mistakes."

  Here's one from the authoritative book about Stax Records,  Soulville USA: The Story of Stax Records by Rob Bowman, and published by Shirmer Trader Books in 1997.

       In 1968, Stax Records had a falling out with it's major label sponsor, Atlantic Records, which resulted in them losing the rights to all of the Records they had released under that Agreement. In response, Al Bell, the head of Stax Records, came up with the idea to simultaneously release 27 LP's in May of 1969.  It was almost certainly the worst music business decision of all time.  Out of that 27 LP release, one record, Hot Buttered Soul by Issac Hayes was a chart success, everything else failed.  This decision, the first significant decision that Stax Records made as an independent label, was, itself, enough to doom Stax Records.  Bowman tells the story:

    [Everyone] at Stax were in an absolute frenzy attempting to ready twenty-seven albums for simultaneous release in May.  This audacious move was orchestrated by Al Bell with the singular purpose of creating an instantaneous catalog to replace what had been lost in the termination of the Atlantic distribution deal.  To put the size of this release in perspective, the company had issued only forty-three albums in total from inception through the dissolution of the agreement with Atlantic.

    Stax Records was bankrupt and indicted by 1972, and although they experienced interim sales success, this one illustration shows the kind of ship they were running at that label.  I love a good music industry flame-out- Casablanca Records in Los Angeles CA is another classic.   But Stax Records putting out 27 records in one month is up there.

Comparing Netflix and Spotify In Terms of Subscriber Growth (8/1/12)

  I think it's accurate to compare Spotify to Netflix because they both provide the same function: streaming, Spotify for music and Netflix for film/television.  Each have their own competitors who do the same thing but not as well.  For Spotify that's Pandora, for Netflix, Hulu maybe...Amazon Prime.

  But I agree with others who say that the appropriate way to forecast Spotify's growth is buy looking at Netflix subscriber growth.  Here is a chart:


















       Personally, I think that Spotify should be able to post similar numbers over time.  Presently, Spotify has 20 million "users" and 4 million "paid users," which is a million more paid users then they had last year.


What is the Audience Size For Animal Collective (8/20/12)

  Last Fm is the best way to measure the Audience size for a specific Artist, because of the major Social Music services (Spotify, Pandora, Last FM) they are the only one that actually publish statistics for Artists.



  On this Graph, "0" is in 2008 for Spotify, mid 2005 for Last Fm, and 2005 for Pandora. So you can see here that Last Fm is a pretty big user group to be drawing statistics from.

  On Last FM, Animal Collective has close to one million listeners,  almost 55 million library plays and is #190 on the very excellent Last FM Top Artist Chart.  The record itself comes out on September 4th, so it would be good to check on the statistics a month from now to see the rate of increase.


Bruce Springsteen & Jon Landau (10/17/12)


Bruce Springsteen and Jon Landau


    in May 1974, 25-year-old Bruce Springsteen played at the Harvard Square Theater in Cambridge. Although popular with the college crowd in the Northeast, Springsteen was not yet a star. That night, he and the E Street Band opened for Bonnie Raitt. The influential music critic Jon Landau was in the audience. Overwhelmed by what he heard, Landau wrote, "I saw my rock and roll past flash before my eyes. I saw something else: I saw rock and roll's future and its name is Bruce Springsteen." In the years since that momentous spring night in Cambridge, the Boss has had 14 albums go platinum, has won20 Grammies and an Oscar, and has been inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

    In May of 1974, Bruce Springsteen was still just one of hundreds of young rock musicians hoping to make it big. His early work, and particularly his performances on college campuses, had earned him a small but devoted following. His hard-driving manager, Mike Appel, had helped him get a record contract with Columbia. But most reviewers were at best lukewarm, and Columbia executives were becoming impatient. The record company had already lost $150,000 on Springsteen's albums; there seemed little prospect that the young singer would ever become a star.

    When Springsteen performed at the Harvard Square Theater in Cambridge that spring, his life — and the future of rock and roll — changed forever. Springsteen's albums were uneven, but his live performances were sensational. Onstage, the skinny, shy kid from the New Jersey shore transformed himself into a dynamic and powerful rocker. The influential music critic Jon Landau was in the audience on May 9th, and he was captivated by Springsteen. A regular writer for Rolling Stone and the Real Paper, Landau could make or break a career. In the next issue of the Real Paper, he made Bruce Springsteen a star.

      "Tonight," his column began, "there is someone I can write of the way I used to write, without reservations of any kind. Of Springsteen's recent concert in Harvard Square, he wrote: "On a night when I needed to feel young, he made me feel like I was hearing music for the very first time. When his two hour set ended I could only think, can anyone really be this good, can anyone say this much to me, can rock and roll speak with this kind of power and glory? And then I felt the sores on my thighs where I had been pounding my hands in time for the entire concert and knew that the answer was Yes.
    Springsteen does it all. He is a rock'n'roll punk, a Latin street poet, a ballet dancer, an actor, a joker, bar band leader, rhythm guitar player, extraordinary singer, and a truly great rock'n'roll composer. He leads a band like he has been doing it forever. I racked my brains but simply can't think of a white artist who does so many things so superbly. There is no one I would rather watch on a stage today."

        Columbia was quick to take advantage of Landau's enthusiasm.  Rolling Stone and other papers were soon trumpeting Landau's endorsement:"I have seen rock and roll's future and its name is Bruce Springsteen,"declared full-page ads. But the Real Paperreview had even more far-reaching consequences. It marked the beginning of a relationship between Springsteen and Landau that would be key to transforming the singer into a superstar.
       In October of 1974, Springsteen returned to Boston to play at the Music Hall. After the concert, he and Landau sat down for a long discussion of how Springsteen could make the leap from his amateurish first albums to serious recordings. Shortly afterward, Landau joined Springsteen's management team as co-producer with Appel. With Landau behind him, Bruce Springsteen recorded Born to Run, the first of his records to go platinum, selling over a million copies.

Sources

The Mansion on the Hill: Dylan, Young, Geffen, Springsteen, and the Head-On Collision of Rock and Commerce, by Fred Goodman (Vintage Books, 1998).


2012 My Year In Music (1/8/13)

   I did a 2011: My Year In Music post in December of 2011.  In that post I mostly discussed the experience of Dirty Beaches Badlands coming out in March of 2011.  I think the essence of this post is contained in this paragraph:

    After Dirty Beaches, Sweet 17 was named Best New Track, the attention was overwhelming, especially from labels that didn't know that Zoo Music existed. Solicitations included those directed to the label itself regarding who was "putting out" the Badlands LP. Clearly something any "bedroom indie" Label needs to consider immediately on the occasion of any kind of market success is the need to react to the needs of the Artist. If you don't react in some positive way to the increased attention that results from success, you will lose your artist nine times out of ten. Or, as another, wiser person i was talking to put it, "99 times out of a hundred."

   For me, 2012 in music was all about restraint and not doing something that would erase the success of 2011.  It's normal for ambitious people in all walks of life to tie success to being very active, but in my experience, people who are actually successful often spend most of their time not doing stuff that would ruin or compromise the existing sources of their success.

   2012 was also instructive for me in terms of understanding the relationship between a bedroom indie label and a successful artist.   The 50/50 split of profit minus costs "standard" indie business model should mean that an Artist with a selling records gets money in relatively short order.  The dilemma for every indie label is what happens when you have one hit record and then 20 records that are break even or lose money.  In that situation it's very easy for the indie label to "rob Peter to pay Paul."  Avoiding this situation requires restraint on the part of the label by not releasing a ton of break-even records following the release of a successful record.

  This business problem is not a matter of a record label "screwing" an Artist out of royalties on purpose necessarily  it just results from a  business model where only 10 percent of the product line generates revenue.  So let's say Record Label releases 10 records and spends 5-10k per record on physical production- that is going to cost 75,000.  

     Now let's say that 9 of those records break even-  that is revenue of 67,500.  For the tenth record, the revenue is ten times the cost of the record-   75,000.  So for this time period- the outlay is 75,000 and the receipts are 142,000.

      However, the label owes the successful Artist half of all the money above what the record cost- so 75,000 - 7500 /2 = 33,000.  So really, under this very realistic scenario the record label makes 109,000 and spends 75,000 in this initial time period.

  So now move to the next time period- the label is starting with 34,000- less then half of what they need to produce the same amount of music.  In the first time period, successful artist got 33,000- or roughly the amount that Record Label needs to finance their records for time period two.  Now,  Record Labels often figure this out BEFORE they've actually paid the successful Artist their royalties from time period one, and that realization is at the root of all of the very many examples of record labels screwing Artists out of royalties through history

  The only way to avoid this mistake is by reducing your number of releases so that you don't have as many break even records and can afford to pay the successful artist without compromising your ability to continue releasing new records.  I mean, that's what I did . So paradoxically I basically spent 2012 not making new records, or making as few as possible so I wouldn't be caught in the trap that I described above.

 The result of 2011 success was doing less in 2012, but hopefully that restraint will set the table for more activity in 2013- that's my hope anyway.

  



Blog Archive