User talk:12akd/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Városligeti színház.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Városligeti színház.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 10:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Szia! A közterületek témában a magyar commons megbeszélés alapján csak magyarul szerepelhetnek. Megj. a korábbiak átnevezése folyamatban van. További jó szerkesztést. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 08:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

@Globetrotter19: Rendben. (korábban mások pont ezért kritizáltak), de így akkor már van szabály. Ipari műveknél inkább angol legyen? 12akd (talk) 08:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Tudom engem is (ezért kritizáltak) így került sor a vitára. Az Ipari Művek jó kérdés. Kb. az az általános elv, hogy törekedni kell az angolra, de ha nem biztos az angol pl. szerintem a pl. A Salgótarjáni Öblösüveggyár‎ az 'értelmesen' lefordíthatalan vagyis akkor jó a magyar név, de legalább legyen egyértelmű. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 08:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

@Globetrotter19: Itt van máról 2 példa: [1], [2]. Melyiket részesítenéd előnyben a későbbi időkre vonatkozólag? 12akd (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Mindkettő egyértelmű! A gond esetleg az lehet, hogy a Csavaripari Vállalat-nak három magyar neve is van ezért én úgy érzem itt a magyar változat valamivel jobb lenne, (megj.: én nem nevezném át). Az erőmű szintén egyértemű, de az a https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Power_plants_in_Hungary kategória része így ott lehet, hogy jobb lenne a 'Angyalföld Power Plant', habár... én is csináltam olyat hogy Category:Bakonyi Erőmű épp azért mert van aki az Ajka(i) Erőmű néven ismeri. Még egyszer az a legfontosabb egyértelmű és megtalálható (jól kategórizált) legyen. Ha magyar név akkor egy '~' angol név kellene a leírásba, ha angol akkor pedig legalább magyarul a neve(i) címe. Remélem segítettem. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 08:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

@Globetrotter19: Mindenképpen! 12akd (talk) 08:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Szia! Ezt a fájl. Hová tartozik? Nem lett tévesen áthelyezve? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

@Globetrotter19: De, ez marad az eredeti helyén (tévesen módosítottam.) Itt jó a főcím. 12akd (talk) 11:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Other buildings of Rákosrendező railway station has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 08:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi 12akd. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than using the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

User talk page length

Hi! I see that the length of this talk page is becoming quite long. It is rather difficult to navigate & edit, and includes too many templates such that MediaWiki can't handle displaying it, causing inclusion in Category:User talk pages where template include size is exceeded and a situation in which templates do not not work at the bottom. Some old browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kB. Please archive this talk page in accordance with the guidelines laid out here. You can do this automatically with ArchiverBot, and to quickly use a standard setup for ArchiverBot, simply place "{{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}}" at the top of your user talk page. If you don't setup archiving, someone will. Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: If you want, you can archive the page. 12akd (talk) 08:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, done. Archiving should start in about 22 hours. See also COM:TALK.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:52, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi 12akd. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Popély Gyula választáis plakát 2022 Podmaniczky utca.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 09:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Festetics György utca, Budapest

Jó napot kivánok, you created Category:Festetics György utca, Budapest and emptied Category:György Festetics Street. In such cases it would be better to rename the existing category, thus preserving the history of edits. Now it looks like this category had not existed before. Üdvözlettel -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 09:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

@Renardo la vulpo: Thank you very much for the correction. I wish you more good work! 12akd (talk) 09:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Gogol utca épület27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Chelouche salah Algérie de boura djbhia

Chelouche salah Algérie de boura djbhia مولد في الجزائر ولاية البويرة بلدية الجباحية ان عدن اعيش مع ابي واخي ابي مريض الجسمه لاتتحرك الجديد ابي اقتله الالمانية مزية1844شلوش ربيان

ثم ذهب هرابن من لالمانيّا الي الجزائر 1868 وليد ابنه1836 شلوش موسي ثم عيش في قباءىل تيزي وزو 1895الي غاية18 ثم ولد له ابنه شلوش رابح 1916 في البويرة البلدية الجباحية تدثم ولد له ابنه الاول من الجد الجاء من الخراب لالمانيّا الي الجزائر ثم سماها شلوش موسي 1949 وابنه سماء علي اسم نبي الله محمد صلي الله وسلم ولي مسلم 1950اللخي الابيض ثم عندهم الولد بنات ان اسمي علي اسم نبي الله صالح عليه سلم شلوش صالح وشكرا وعندهم أخي اخر قتلته يدي فرنسا الحوت في بيرو1955 شلوش اسماعيل هذا تاريخ الاموة للعائلة 1844 تاريخ اسرائيل مجهول Salah arabics (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi 12akd, I happened to note this request:

A picture of the railway station that was not intended for uploading, was accidentally included among them, and does not carry any relevant information. The maker. 12akd (talk) 14:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

I cannot take action, because I do not know which image you intended to delete. Can please identify the image and give me ping or a note with my file on my talk page? Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 07:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Please read above template for removing a file if you made a mistake. Ellywa (talk) 07:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

@Ellywa: Sorry, unfortunately I can't remember which picture it was. Since then I've uploaded a lot, I can't find which one it was. 12akd (talk) 07:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Well, no harm done. Ellywa (talk) 08:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata-infobox Wikidata-elem nélkül

Szia! Ide miért tettél be Wikidata-infoboxot? Nem találok semmilyen elemet a Wikidatában az épületre. Pasztilla (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

@Pasztilla: Szia, azért szoktam, mert azzal töltöm fel a képeket. Így a gép az innen feltöltötteknél automatikusan beállítja alul a kategóriát, nem kell utólag bekategorizálni. 12akd (talk) 06:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

De ha ténylegesen nem hozol létre hozzá egy Wikidata-elemet, akkor ott csúfoskodik a lap tetején a kitöltetlen infobox, és áll a zászló, hogy előbb-utóbb egy robot kitörli. Pasztilla (talk) 06:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
@Pasztilla: Értem. Ebben az esetben két dolog történhet: idővel készül hozzá WD és WP lap, vagy kitörli a robot. 12akd (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
A WD-lap létrehozása és a Commons-laphoz kötése a kulcs, mert Wikidata Infoboxot használsz. Ha kitörli a robot az árva Wikidata-infoboxot, a kategóriáknak is annyi. Pasztilla (talk) 07:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Egyébként most nézem, hogy az egész Commons-kategória duplikátum, felesleges. Pasztilla (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)