User talk:1989/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Ethnographic collection, Boikovo, Bulgaria.jpg

I thought that I fix the categories long time ago, but obviously I didn't, so can you check is it okay? Thanks for the notification ;) VladislavNedelev (talk) 00:17, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Big 12 Conference logo

Hello. Could you possibly fix the Big 12 logo you vectorized? The gap between the "XII" and "Big 12 Conference" is too big. If you look at the PNG version, that is the right gap. You can read the Identity Standards for more information on that. In my opinion, the large gap looks ugly. You don't have to do it, I was just curious if you would. Other than the gap, the file looks good! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 06:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey. I took a look at the two versions of the images and compared them myself, and I did not notice any difference. If you still want something done to the image, you can go to the Graphics Lab, and see what they can do. 1989 14:08, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Alright. I took a closer look at it and it seems fine as there isn't a difference like you said. I'm not sure what I saw the first time, but it didn't seem right. Sorry to bother you about that! Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 23:50, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

English ∙ español ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ∙ Türkçe ∙ +/−

Hi 1989,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Neurergus kaiseri pictures

Hi 1989 ! I uploaded pictures of Neurergus kaiseri larvae, and then saw that I had to provide copyright information to get the pictures restored. I wrote the mail, using the example given, to allow the use of the pictures according to the licence terms.

Can you please indicate when I can hope to be able to see the pictures again, on the page where I initially put them ? https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurergus_kaiseri

Thanks in advance, Fenchurch Fenchurch38 (talk) 08:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

If you already send an email to OTRS, you gonna have to wait until they approved what you send to them. 1989 10:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the answer ! Fenchurch38 (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

User:EoRdE6 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding ~~{{subst:Kitten}}~~ to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with ~~{{subst:Kittynap}}~~

Hey, I have been seeing you around a lot lately, whether helping out with copyvios, or your request over at License Reviewer (good luck with that). Hope you stick around and keep contributing! EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 01:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC) The real template doesn't work on Commons, just en.wiki, so I copied the code, sorry for the clutter :)

Thanks so much! 1989 01:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named `license+` and `license-`.

Hi 1989, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! – Kwj2772 (talk) 12:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Defensa repatría al religioso Miguel Pajares.webm and File:Defensa repatria al segundo español con ébola.webm

Hi, 1989, I've removed you speedydelete templates from the aforementioned files. No copyrighted logo is shown in the videos. File:Logotipo del Ministerio de Defensa.png is not a copyrighted picture and therefore, no reason to speedydelete said files. If you still think there's a problem with them, feel free to open a regular deletion nomination. Best regards --Discasto _{talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis} 22:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

I did not know that the logo is public domain. When I looked at the logo on the video, the art that was on it made me think that it is copyrighted. My bad. 1989 22:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You just keep popping up in my watchlist for license revieing, tagging, nomming etc. Thank you! Josve05a (talk) 01:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

My first barnstar... Thank you so much! 1989 01:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Hi. You can stop requesting deletion of images of structures and vehicles in Norway now. The law, Åndsverkloven, § 24, states: "Byggverk kan fritt avbildes." [1] "Byggverk" here does not only mean building, but structure, including bridges, ships and similar. Source: The booklet "Fotojuss for arkiv, bibliotek og museum", made by The Arts Council Norway in 2012 (?), page 55. [2]

As for text on buildings, I imagine that could be a problem if the text was the main, most important part of the image. As long as it isn't, the text is not protected as such. Blue Elf (talk) 22:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the disruption. I've been here for 3 weeks, and there are some things I don't quite understand. Take a look at my user page for a second, and read what it says. 1989 22:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Request for help

My dear 1989! Many thanks for checking the licenses on mine's several images. Could you please check these stills too in your spare time, the location of frames is noted to assist you in doing that:

And these are coming from the same source and spot:

Thank you in advance, yours --Nabak (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Done 1989 12:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

That unsigned message on your talk page

The user who left the unsigned "obtuse" message on your talk page has a civility problem, and also re-uploads files after they're deleted: see en:User talk:PAPL8S#License plate/Your image on commons. --Closeapple (talk) 01:20, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

And also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PAPL8S. --Closeapple (talk) 22:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Regarding taggings

I started a thread regarding the issues raised at the recent reviewer request at Commons talk:License review#Adding to the workload.

Peter ^Isotalo 14:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

License report

File:Hinkle Amshak.jpg and File:Hinkle old 1982 sep4.jpg are licensed at http://trainweb.org/usarail/ with "You are free to use my photos on my website. No permission is required." Also see previous Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by An Errant Knight. Thank you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your gonna have to talk to INeverCry about that. Not an admin. 1989 23:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

They were not my uploads - but you made the mistake. I don't really care, since they were inferior quality pictures and not worth the effort. Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

IRC

I do not know if you know this or not, but most (at least active) editors hang around something called IRC, Internet Relay Chat. Where we chat, discuss and interact with eachother 24/7. I just wanted to tell you that. Commons:Internet Relay Chat (direct link). It could be interesting for you to introduce yourself with the rest of us and talk, and not just do license reviews all the time, even though it is really appreciated! Josve05a (talk) 01:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. Might consider it. 1989 02:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

File:PerryReno.jpg

No contest, if the file source is wrong, but this was transfered on the basis of the FBI source listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

I changed it after finding the photo was made by the FBI. 1989 13:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

File:How to Create Article in Arabic Wikipedia.ogg

Hi. I wonder if there is still an issue here? I noticed that you've already checked the license on Youtube. Let me know if you need any more clarifications. Thank you! --Ciphers (talk) 20:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

When I saw the video on YouTube, I saw some website screenshots in the video. I don't know if the image will get deleted or not, or if my reason made valid sense. We'll see what the reviewing admin thinks. 1989 20:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Armand Coustenoble.jpg

the licence is not a fake is the same licence of for autorisation it's the same of the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pierre-Charles_Hordelalay.jpg

more sylvain the author of the photo has already sent a permission OSTR --Iffrit51 (d) 08:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

please you can verify the permission of file with

This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.

The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2014042810007131.

If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard. Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2014042810007131
Find other files from the same ticket:

it's the file is not include in permission i send message to sylvain to forward permission

sorry i forgot to sign

have a good day --Iffrit51 (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Deletion notices

I wondered why you would bother to adding extra deletion tags to all the images I had already started a mass deletion request for on Arumpostasest's talk page. In fact I see you adding additional tags to many image I have already tagged for deletion. It seem like a waste of time because usually they will be deleted anyway and adding another tag, sometimes for the same reason and sometimes a different reason, make no significant difference. I always feel we should be editing as productively as possible so spending time retagging seems pointless when you could spend that extra time dealing with other untagged images, unless the existing tag is entirely wrong. Indeed some images may be nominated for both permission and source problems but one tag should be enough. I find myself having to review those same images again to see what has been done as I always add deletion nominations to my watchlist until they are deleted. You are virtually the only editor whose reagging seems to crop up for many such images. The only reason I can think of is that you might be trying to increase your edit count but that seems unlikely, though as a rather new editor it could be the case that you feel this is a meaningfull statistic. Ww2censor (talk) 10:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Mia Ridge at GLAM-Wiki 2013.webm

Hello. Just had a notification that you deleted this video as a copyright violation and I'm curious about why. I recorded the video at a conference that Wikimedia UK hosted. It's my own work and the person being recorded was aware. Could you let me know what was wrong and why you deleted the file please? Thank you. Stevie Benton (WMUK) (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your gonna have to talk to Fastily about that. Not an admin. 1989 14:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Linked Open Data - Europeana - 640x480.ogv

Which images did you find copyrighted? Perhaps we should enquiry Europeana about that. Platonides (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

I can't really explain that because the file has already been deleted. 1989 22:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

The video clearly states (YouTube copy) a CC BY-SA license. I thus requested undeletion. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion to check your edits

I noticed this edit (among others) which seem to have broken templates. Could you please fix that? Ainali (talk) 21:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

The reason that's happening is because there are too many copyvio notices on his talk page, there not broken. 1989 21:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

I am sorry I misphrased it. The rendering of the templates on that page is broken. Could you please add the message you are trying to convey in such a way so that it is human readable? Ainali (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ainali: The massage is posted automatically when doing license reviews/marking for deletions with tools in order to be translated into multiple langs. at the same time etc. One (simple) solution that would work best is if the user (Stefan Elfving (WMSE)) would archive his talk page. There is a stupid MediaWiki-bug/limit to only allow x amounts of "rendered things" on each page... Josve05a (talk) 11:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Merci

Qui est ce FASHIST ? Merci de l'avoir empêché de supprimer ma page. Oursmili (talk) 20:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Vous êtes le bienvenu. 1989 21:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Johnson's Baby Powder massage file

Please review File:Johnsons Baby Powder massage.jpg I have uploaded a totally different version of it (full version). This bigger file, in my view, doesn't violate packaging copyright rule because it is an artistic image of the product. The previous image uploaded was indeed focused on the product (I cropped the product out). -- Ivan Dembicki (talk) 09:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for approving the file. Can you also remove the nomination for the deletion? -- Ivan Dembicki (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Лер Саныч.jpg

Hello. Why have you marked this file with "no permission"? rubin16 (talk) 09:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I marked it no permission because no EXIF data of a identified camera was shown. 1989 12:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I think that is not an sufficient reason for sending image to speedy deletion... though EXIF data is good, its absense is not a certain sign of copyvio. Recent uploads of the user show that user isn't familiar with Commons licensing guidelines but honestly states authorship of other people if images were made not by himself. As image isn't found anywhere and is claimed to be own work, I am restoring all that files. If you have any objections or other thoughts, you can go via regular deletion requests rubin16 (talk) 12:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

@Rubin16: "No permission since" (nps) is not speedy deletion. It raised a problem to the uploader and gives him/her 7 days to prove that it is his own work, which isn't hard to do really. Speedy deletion is only used when there is direct evidence that it is not own work etc. and when unsure, or if any resonable doubt (such as EXIF data, checked by a trusted editor) it should be tagged with a "send us evidence"-template such as nps. Josve05a (talk) 12:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

what permission should uploader sent? That is already his photo, not published anywhere, uploaded by himself. OTRS works with images that are already published somewhere, if image isn't published - uploader's consent during the image upload is a sufficient action. Nothing states EXIF as an obligatory requirement rubin16 (talk) 13:10, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I took this photo camera mobile phone Philips X333 when I was at this concert on December 13, 2013. Chippollino (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Harikalar Diyari Flintstones 06018 nevit.jpg

The files you nominated where already discussed and kept.

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Barney_Rubble_Harikalar_Diyari_Flintstones_06019_nevit.jpg

--Nevit Dilmen (talk) 20:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I reverted my edits I made to the files. 1989 20:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Tnx --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Personal files - two of them you have deleted...

Hello, 1989! In December 2014 I downloaded three files (File:Лер Саныч.jpg, File:Весело, не так ли))).jpg, File:Большевики метро.jpg), two of which you have removed, thinking that the author agrees or does not agree to the download. I am the author of all these three files: I took the pictures and posted here. And the fact that I'm so not in time You write - just not enough time to get out once again on the Commons. Chippollino (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

@Chippollino: I didn't delete the files, I nominated them for deletion. If you want the files back, you can request at the undeletion requests page. 1989 23:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Excuse me! Chippollino (talk) 01:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: Missing info notices

In the upload form, it states that if all the photos came from the same source, a single link may be used. All the photos can be found here. The bot just doesn't know to parse through the subpages hence why it flagged them. Typing in the exact URL for each photo takes considerable time, especially when you're bulk uploading like I have been. It's unclear why this is an issue as I've been doing this for quite a while without question until now. I take it the bot also ignores the autopatrolled user right that I have? Thanks — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for going through all those photos! I would have been happy to do it myself, it was just unclear if it was really necessary. I take it that it is. No problem... I'll go the extra mile moving forward and be sure to add the exact link. I think I've got the source in place for all of the files now, if I'm missing one left me know and I can provide and/or change licensing on Flickr as necessary (I have control of the account). Thanks again, I know that was a lot of work! :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 22:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your welcome. I'm happy to help. 1989 22:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

RE:File:BMO.jpg

That file was on Flickr and marked as licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. --Zack Tartufo (talk) 16:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Doesn't matter. The picture shows a copyrighted character from Adventure Time, which is owned by Cartoon Network. 1989 16:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

RE:Café du Monde in New Orleans.jpg and Canal Streetcar in New Orleans.jpg

User:1989 these media files (File:Café_du_Monde_in_New_Orleans.jpg and File:Canal_Streetcar_in_New_Orleans.jpg) are not missing evidence of permission. I have used all the applicable and proper procedures during upload to ensure explicit permission were granted during the files upload as I granted permission and license under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I have also sent two separate and explicit email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org granting permission (for each file) that complies with the licensing policy using the Commons:Email templates/Consent. There seems to be a double standard here because I am the author, creator, and sole owner of these files and I don't understand why these additional steps were needed, when they are not needed elsewhere but I took them anyway. Please remove and withdraw your requests and explain why your deletion requests were issued in the first place when explicit permission was already given at the time of upload in the first. It will greatly help me better understand your reasoning.--DidierMoise (talk) 23:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

If you have already sent a request to OTRS, you'll gonna have to wait until they approve it, until then, an OTRS member can remove my requests when your emails are being reviewed. 1989 23:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

1989 Thank you for replying and for stating the obvious, but you have not explained the basis or reasoning behind reporting and tagging the related files as missing evidence of permission when in fact they were not. I'm really interested in avoiding additional and potentially unnecessary steps in the future by understanding your rationale.--DidierMoise (talk) 00:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Jason Saul

And, I don't see how you can possibly give File:Headshot Jason Saul.png a good Flick licence review for an obvoiusly false licence which, firstly is under a deletion nomination, and secondly is the only upload by the Flickr user. This immediately puts the image under suspicion and smacks of flickrwashing, so should never be passed until an OTRS ticket has been provided just because the Flickr licence is free. What is your thought process? I get the impression you do not have all your image reviewing skills completely in order, just as you add a second no source tag to images I have already tagged as "no source". Ww2censor (talk) 10:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

The tag says This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 14 January 2015 by the administrator or reviewer 1989, who confirmed that it was available on Flickr under the stated license on that date, which means that the license on the file page is not infringement, and that its the same as the Flickr page, thats why I passed it. Another reason I tagged it is because leaving the tag unreviewed will cause backlogs to be filled, also I did not intend to add a second no source tag, because the JavaScript I'm using automatically does that. I thought that the file was unreviewed, and a non image reviewer tagged it as no source, because the red notice under licensing doesn't change to this, This image was reviewed by FlickreviewR, which could not determine what the source image from Flickr was. After further checks, Username concluded on 2015-01-07 that either the image was not on Flickr, or there was not enough information to find it.1989 15:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyrighted magazine shown at 10:11

Are you kidding? Have you read Commons:De minimis? --Butko (talk) 20:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Uh yes sir, yes I have. 1989 20:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Please restore and put to Commons:Deletion requests. I disagree with deletion without discussion --Butko (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

I can't do that because I'm not an admin. Ask INeverCry. 1989 20:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

I've restored. Please create discussion, and File:СВ-ДНР-298. Гумпомощь от осетин детям Донбасса.ogv also need discussion --Butko (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Done 1989 20:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you --Butko (talk) 21:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Files from the trailer of the movie Le Tatoué.

I don't understand why those files I posted were deleted. All of them were screenshots of the trailer of the movie, a trailer released between 1923 and 1977 in USA : so, these files don't violate the copyrigt ?!!! - Groupir ! (talk) 22:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/146675116 1989 14:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

"Dont remove nsd or nld"

I changed the type of license and removed the npd. I used to use the same type of licenses and additional permits are not required. Do I really need to execute email communication granting permission? Klip game (talk) 17:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes. No EXIF information is available, and I can't tell whether it's really yours or not. 1989 19:24, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	The Special Barnstar is awarded to a user as a gesture of appreciation when there is no other barnstar which would be appropriate. Thanks for all your hard work here on commons! It is highly appreciated. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 19:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your welcome. I'm always here to help.

1989 19:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Re-review

You might now want to re-review File:Hölderlin Lebenslauf 1a.jpg and File:Hölderlin Lebenslauf 2a.jpg now that I found the actual source pages and even though the website provides a CC-by-SA licence, these 1800 pages are without a doubt PD. Ww2censor (talk) 17:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Done 1989 23:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't understand your reasoning. These are 200+ year old books, so PD clearly trumps the copyfraud claim of the Library. Ww2censor (talk) 10:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

The user said the file was posted on Flickr, and it wasn't. Thats why it was tagged no source. 1989 15:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

You missed the point; my last post has nothing to do with the source. I found the source and notified you of that fact after you tagged it as no source BUT you then updated the creative commons licence which I am saying is a redundent copyright tag due to the age of the book. For the third time I suggest these are PD. Do you disagree with me? We don't always just immediately accept what the source says but use our knowledge and experience of copyright to apply the appropriate licence where there is an obvious error or false claim, such as copyfraud. Ww2censor (talk) 22:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

The reason I changed the licenses is because on the permission section, the link says that the photos are cc-by-sa-3.0, thats why I changed it. I don't really understand what the problem is. Are you saying you want me to change the licenses to PD? 1989 23:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

I see you still don't get it. Don't just accept wht you see in front of your face. Sometimes it is not accurate and you need to use your experience and knowledge to decide if the licence claimed is correct or not. We need to think about what we see. It appears to me that you just do drive-by tagging: I easily found sources within a few seconds for images that you had tagged for deletion, like File:Jennifer Siebel Newsom 2.jpg. We should be trying to save images where possible not delete them. I'm just saying stop and think, and look around a bit, it's surprising what you can find and learn. Regarding the above two images I was trying to offer you some freindly education about it but it took another editor to re-reviewed the images and override you; they relicenced them as PD. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 10:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Well, Josve05a has more experience to license reviews than me, so I don't judge him for what he did, and thanks for the luck. I needed it. 1989 15:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Indeed he does, and so do I, which was why I was trying to steer you in the right direction. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

If an image is tagged with a license review tag it's the reviews job to "ckeck" if the image is released under a free licnese on that page. It is up to the original uploader, or a PD reviewer, to check if the image is PD. The whole resaon to have a license review done is if the page changes license etc. In this case it just happened to be that the image was old enough to be under (relicensed) as PD, but 1989 license review was done completely right. Josve05a (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

I was not indending to have a dispute over this and strictly speaking the review was correct but we can also all use our heads a bit and relicence if it is appropriate, as was the case with these two, and that was all I was trying to show 1989. Thanks to both of you for your work. Ww2censor (talk) 20:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your recent speedies on Cydia screenshot

You recently tagged several Cydia screenshots as Copyrighted software. Please note Cydia is released under the GNU General Public License (ALL works released under the GPL hare copyrighted), but efefctively some of these screenshots have non-free elements. Please read the whole GNU GPL before tagging for speedy free software screenshots under the GNU GPL again. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Think tank photos

Hi, thanks for flagging some of these up. If you are identifying a number of these, could you list them for the attention of Pigsonthewing please? I am not sure they are worth a DR as Andy will be going through them and will happily speedy those that are obviously problematic. I ran this batch upload based on his friendly request as part of his residency with the museum. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Done 1989 22:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

YGM!

{{You've got mail}} Steinsplitter (talk) 18:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Received 1989 19:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

COM:FR

Please do not abuse with file renamings. You should not made such moving. You should reject them. According the COM:FR: Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized (Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages). Please be carefully next time. If you will continue abusing rules, you may lose filemover flag.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/148265416 1989 00:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Renaming of a file

Hello @1989: ,

You refused to rename « File:Insigne du bataillon de Choc Type 8 bis.jpg » into « File:Insigne du bataillon de choc type 8 bis.jpg » for a reason which is really not clear to me.

The name of the file is written in French language and it means « insignia of the storm batallion - type 8 bis ».

Indeed, the spelling appears not to be correct in French as it can be seen reading the name of the article 1er bataillon parachutiste de choc ; too, it is important that you know that the typographic recommandations about the military units stay in that paragraph.

Hoping that you will understand this request, and remaining at tour disposal for any inquiry, I wish you a good day (if you are not too far from Greenwich meridian).

Best regards. --Gkml (talk) 08:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Gkml, i also declined your request. See the rename guidelines, incorrect capitalization is not a valid rename request, que ce soit incorrect en français ou non. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello @1989 and Thibaut120094: ,

I understand the two rules which I quote here « Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized (Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages) » / « If a filename in a local project conflicts with a filename at Commons, the file in the local project should be renamed. Renaming it at Commons would mean changing it in 500+ projects instead of just one. » but those rules do not apply here because :

the language is not English but another one as you know it ;
for the time being, the image file is only used in the « French wikipedia » and it is not a problem to rename it at the Commons level.

However, it may concern you to know the reason why I decided to rename the files : a user — maybe me, I do not remember — decided to correct this page — or another one — because it was not in line with the recommandations I recalled earlier in the text. Doing the job, by mistake the name of a file was modified because it contained characters with bad capitalization, so the associated image naturally disappeared from the page and nobody saw that mistake immediately, but only some days or weeks later. Thus, renaming the file we were speaking of, the name of which has an incorrect capitalization in French, would limit the occurrence of that kind of mistakes.

After that, there will still be four or five image files still to be renamed in the same page. Before launching the end of the operation, I am waiting until the present step is solved.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards. --Gkml (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

It does not apply ONLY for English. It applies for other languages too. There is also reason for not renaming: Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello dear @Ahonc: ,

Who are you ? I only know of you that I recently corrected a spelling mistake in you user page.

Did you read my message until the end ? And did you understand it ? So, you would have seen that it is not a matter of good-looking aspect ; it is for preventing errors.

Thank you very much. And have a good time.

Best regards. --Gkml (talk) 17:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

PS : generally, when I am writing some words to one person, I prefer receiving an answer from him or her. Nevertheless it was so pleasant to have a chat with you.

Caution

File:2015안양대학교 사진4.jpg is currently on DR and FR says not to move in case like this - there is no point moving a file which will be deleted.(unless user success to provide authorization in time) — Revi 15:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, confused with other file. — Revi 15:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Vladimir Padrino

Just wanted to let you know I fixed the source for the Vladimir Padrino file. I'm not as good with Commons as I should be so sometimes I make mistakes. I don't know if you would like to check it now but I'm pretty sure it is correct.--ZiaLater (talk) 23:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, the file is fine now, thank you. 1989 00:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

OTRS ticket 2015013010014845

Hi,

On 4th February you made this edit, adding an OTRS ticket under the name of another contributor. Could you explain why this happened and whether you were acting as a proxy of the OTRS volunteer named? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 23:39, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

The reason it happened is because there was a exact duplicate of the file, File:April Masini 1.jpeg, which had the OTRS tag. I copied the OTRS tag from the image, and placed it on the other image, so it wouldn't be a suspection to other users as a copyright violation. 1989 00:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Unwarranted speedy tag on Mindy Grossman.jpg

Hi, you placed a speedy tag on File:Mindy Grossman.jpg, even though it is clearly licensed under CC BY 2.0, as listed on the source file [3]: "Taken on March 7, 2011 Some rights reserved". Please remove the speedy tag, which I have rebutted on the Talk page. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

@Softlavender: If you looked at the description on the source, it states that the photo is originally owned by Rob Rich, and the photo is copyrighted by him. 1989 17:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Of course it is owned by him, and he released it publicly on Flickr under CC BY 2.0; therefore it is useable by Wikipedia and anyone else who wants to use it. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr, and his release license: [4]. Please remove the tag. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Viva Vivanista is not Rob Rich, if you care to look at the profile of the Flickr user, you'll see what I'm talking about. [5] 1989 17:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

All right, I see now that that uploader has uploaded images by various photographers. I will try to contact Rob Rich via the info on that file, and see if he will release the image under CC. Softlavender (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Contact OTRS if he allows you to have the image here so it can be restored. 1989 17:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for your very fast renaming of File:Val-de-Marne_department_location_map.svg into File:Val-de-Marne_department_location_map_2013-02.svg as well as for two other files. I already uploaded the new versions of these maps. Greetings. Sting (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your welcome. 1989 17:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Regarding File:ಕ್ರಿಯೇಟೀವ್ ಕಾಮನ್ಸ್(Creative Commons) - ಏನು, ಹೇಗೆ, ಏಕೆ?.pdf}}

Hi,

You filed File:ಕ್ರಿಯೇಟೀವ್ ಕಾಮನ್ಸ್(Creative Commons) - ಏನು, ಹೇಗೆ, ಏಕೆ?.pdf for speedy deletion. Its a presentation and all the images used are mentioned in the description to my best knowledge. May I know which image you're mentioning in comment to be having non-free license? Without that info I can't fix the problem. If you can provide info, I can remove or work with the picture owner to fix the licensing issue. ~ Omshivaprakash^{/talk/Contributions} 03:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Replaced the slide and sorted the licensing issue and re-uploaded the presentation. It would be good to avoid speedy deletion as It won't help anyone sort the issues such as this. ~ Omshivaprakash^{/talk/Contributions} 08:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Re to OTRS request for my photo

Why do you request a proof of permission for this photo? It falls into scope of "I took the image myself and it hasn't been previously published (and there is no other copyright involved)." Tuluqaruk (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

"May be" copyrighted

Hi, I saw 30 deletion requests on my talk page. (!!!) Why delete files if you don't know if they are copyrighted? You should prove it and then do a deletion request, isn't it? And did you see theese categories? There are a lot of film costumes and props. Category:Film props, Category:Film costumes If are you 100% sure those files shouldn't be on Commons can you explain it to me, please? I see interesting photos that can be useful in cinema-related articles on wikipedia, why shouldn't upload it? It is also time expensive to upload, write descriptions, add categories... Please, reply. --SunOfErat (talk) 05:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Those pictures you have taken from Flickr are props from films that aren't even that old. Various companies own those props and costumes, and allowed the place to have them. I don't know if they allowed reproductive work (taking pictures and posting them on Commons) to happen, that's why I said the photos may be copyrighted. If the copyright status is undetermined, it shouldn't be here, because we don't know if the items are in the public domain. 1989 12:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Du erhältst einen Orden!

	Der Fleißorden
	Thank you for your quick editing! Badgon (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your welcome.

1989 21:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Need help :-(

Hello, I'd like to rename File:Judicial arrondissement of Eupen location tmpName.svg as File:Judicial arrondissement of Eupen location.svg but a redirection already exists in this name. May you help me to do this ? Thanks Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 16:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. Green Giant (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Green Giant. 1989 17:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

1989, I don't know about other projects but English Wikipedia allows anyone to move a page over a redirect if there are no other edits at the target page. I'm not sure how useful that might be on Commons but I thought it would be useful to mention it. Green Giant (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

:)

Thank you for this change - 1.--Gardmanahay (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your welcome. 1989 16:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Ups...

Sorry, habe eben erst gelernt, dass ein nicht-englischer Dateiname kein Grund zur Umbenennung ist. Hauptsache, erst mal beantragt ;) Badgon (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Sophie Hunter and Benedict Cumberbatch.jpg

The photographer See Li works for London Picture Capital thus the watermark. If you have a problem with this image, thinking it failed copyright then by all means because deleting it would make me happy since it was uploaded by a sockpuppet lol Lady Lotus (talk) 17:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Feminism, VDay 2007 and Me.PNG

I have updated the flickr link to this image in the proper place - you should be able to find it without any problem now (https://www.flickr.com/photos/juliejordanscott/4268761029/in/photolist-7vdvW6-dUKTvV-4ES3fv-7vdv8D-4DVa76-6nMMwZ). Thanks! TMagen (talk) 08:17, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for renaming the two files! Kosboot (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your welcome. 1989 13:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Question

Hi 1989. I see you're pretty active in OTRS and admin stuff. I assume people asked you already, but have you ever considered joining the admin or OTRS team? For both you will be a real asset imo. I think you know where you can request adminship; OTRS can be requested here. Let me know please. :-) Trijnstel_talk 14:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for asking, well I haven't considered doing a self nomination because people may judge my timing of being here for 3 months, but if you really think that I can do the the job, you could nominate me, if you want. As well as OTRS, I'm thinking about joining one day, but not right now. 1989 14:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Then I'll write a nomination now. :-) Trijnstel_talk 14:47, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Done: Commons:Administrators/Requests/1989. Please accept it and transclude the page on Commons:Administrators/Requests. Also, could you please add a babel on your user page? Thanks and good luck! Trijnstel_talk 15:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Done, by the way I didn't know where to put the babel box, so I added categories showing what language I speak. I hope that's ok. 1989 15:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Soyuz 18 mission patch logo.svg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wikiversity-ar-logo.svg

RFA

Hi,

To bad that it ended this way but I hope that you willl try again in some month's. I would have supported you if you hadn't withdrawn but please give me the possibility to vote for you in the future. Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Sure thing. 1989 00:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tringa stagnatilis 2 - Laem Pak Bia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tringa stagnatilis 2 - Laem Pak Bia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello 1989. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Karen and Jeff (8238818005).jpg

File:Karen and Jeff (8239884130).jpg

Thanks

Hello, thank you for renaming files where I had made a mistake. I wish you a good day. Best Regards. François de Dijon (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC) (machine translation)

Bonjour, je vous remercie d'avoir renommer les fichiers où j'avais fait une faute. Je vous souhaite une bonne journée. Cordialement.

(Appareil photo Konica Minolta Dynax 5D)

Your welcome, hope you have a good day too.

1989 15:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

The script to move media apparently has a (race condition) bug

Hello 1989,

I see that you have moved several of the files I nominated for moving. Thanks.

In some cases, like this one: [7] you first performed a move unrelated to my script generated move request, and then you rejected my move request with a summary 'No valid reason stated, see the rename guidelines'.

This sequence of events appear to be triggered by a problem within Wikimedia. When I used the script to create the move request, I clearly indicated that the old and new file name differed in the sense that a typo was fixed ('croped' to 'cropped').

However, by the time you reviewed my move request, the file had already been moved - with no trace of the move in the file history. This is really strange, because the move script will not accept to place the request in the file, unless the old and new names actually differ.

So something strange must be going on. Is it possible that someone else saw my repeated requests to move files that had the typo 'croped' in them, and then did a mass-move that does not show up in the history of each file?

Regardless of what actually explains the events, the move script apparently has a race condition bug. The race condition bug means that given a certain (unfortunate) timing, the move script will process the input from its user and although at the same time the file somehow gets renamed, it will place the move request in the file, without realizing that the move request has become invalid. Unfortunately, the created move template does not contain the old name, so it is not possible for someone like you to see what happened. But the fact that the move script will not accept to place the template on the file, if the old and new names are identical is a clear indication of the problem.

You are welcome to point me to another place, where I can try to resolve this issue.

Thanks.

Lklundin (talk) 23:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

@Lklundin: You could point out this problem in COM:VP or COM:HD. Hope that helps. 1989 00:33, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

your mass NSD taggings

Please manually review these changes or undo them all. The vast majority of these images are sourced, just not properly stated in the infobox section. Please refrain from further mass taggings without properly reviewing them. --Denniss (talk) 17:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

My bad. I'll review them later on. 1989 17:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

No source ?

This concerns the files File:Austrolittorina unifasciata 002.jpg and File:Austrolittorina unifasciata 003.jpg.

Both files had already their source in the description, but a piped link was missing (caused by the upload bot Flickr2Commons ?). I've corrected this. Both files, originating from Flickr, were already checked and approved by the File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske). So there was no cause for alarm. I've removed the templates from the files. JoJan (talk) 18:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I am aware of the situation, and will have it resolved today. Sorry for disruption. 1989 18:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Luscinia cyane - Khao Yai.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luscinia cyane - Khao Yai.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/KTC (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Florianópolis Flag

1989, please check this file was properly corrected: File:Bandeira de Florianópolis.svg. Thank you Plavius (talk) 23:13, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

It looks fine. 1989 00:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Australian Federation Flag.svg

Your leaving a template message on my user talk page, and then edit-warring on the description page itself, was pointless and unhelpful. The flag design dates to 1831, while the first version of the SVG file was uploaded in Feb. 2006 -- when the Information template was most definitely not required -- but nevertheless was accompanied by adequate information to indicate what the file is. Frankly, the "no source" template is supposed to be applied to files where there's an actual real problem, and not automatically and mechanically without real human thinking about whether or not there is a real problem. AnonMoos (talk) 01:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: [8] File source is not properly indicated: File:050419 header.ogg etc.

Feel free to do whatever you want with your automated messages/content.

Also, please delete my user talk page (again).

- Amgine (talk) 03:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop mass tagging with no source

Please do not mass tag files without a source if you can fix the source yourself.

Example:

File:Helsinki districts-LansiPakila.png has the author "Paju" and the uploader is called "User:Paju" and the license is "PD-self". That should lead to the conclusion that it is own work. So just add "Own" to the source and the problem is fixed. If you doubt it is own work you can ask the uploader or start a DR.
File:TN02 109.gif has the source in the image "nationalatlas.gov" and the license is "PD-USGov-Atlas" where it says "This map was obtained from an edition of the National Atlas of the United States." That should lead to the conclusion that the file is from the National Atlas of the United States.

I guess that you want to help clean up Category:Files with no machine-readable source and that is fine. But if we wanted mass tagging without checking we could have a bot do the work. --MGA73 (talk) 12:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your DRs

Hi, Before creating DRs, could you please read previous DRs on the same topic: Commons:Deletion requests/Pokemon Jet, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pornographies of Japan.jpg‎, and do not recreate them unless you have new arguments. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

@Yann: I made those by accident. Could you mark them as keep? 1989 20:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Except for the one Josve05a voted on. 1989 20:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Mistake

I think you made something wrong here. File:Deepika Padukone at Twitter HQ (15374482446).jpg, can you check please?

solved - I found the image after purging the file description page and the article. Thanks for the rename. - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 20:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

File:The Soviet Union 1971 CPA 4060 stamp (Cosmonauts Georgy Dobrovolsky, Vladislav Volkov and Viktor Patsayev) cancelled.jpg

After renaming the file is missing. Malarz pl (talk) 07:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

done. Malarz pl (talk) 08:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Adam Clendening 2013.jpg

Something with this move went wrong (again), could you check that, please? --Xgeorg (talk) 09:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

You'll have to purge the page. 1989 09:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Didn't work at 1st attempt, now it worked. Strange. Thank you anyway! --Xgeorg (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Moving

Hello. Here I think that you did not move the file along with the page. May you fix it? --Horcrux92 (talk) 22:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

You'll have to purge the page. 1989 22:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Question

Hi, you was delete this photo?[9] --6AND5 (talk) 09:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

No. You'll have to purge the page. 1989 09:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks.--6AND5 (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Get well soon

Saddened to read that you are not well. I hope you recover quickly and rejoin us at the earliest opportunity. Green Giant (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I fully align myself 6AND5 (talk) 18:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:White peacock (Anartia jatrophae jatrophae) underside.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White peacock (Anartia jatrophae jatrophae) underside.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Renaming

Hi 1989, the filenames of my pictures include

Date of the game in sortable order
Exact time of the shot
kind of sports
and the filename that i need for recognizing the picture

This is NOT, what criterion 2 says. If you feel the need of adding information, please do this without destroying the informations that are already in the picture. --Ailura (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your gonna have to talk to Bounè rodzo, it was the one who requested the renames. I didn't understand the rhythm until you had said something to me. If you don't agree with the renames, you can always request they be reverted back to the way it was. 1989 00:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

I talked to him as well and i'm already trying to fix this by myself. --Ailura (talk) 00:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok. I didn't notice you were a file mover. 1989 00:33, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Marseille-Alexandrie La Route D'Egypte (4505509584).jpg

Hi, Please do not create a speedy when a DR is already going on. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

I didn't know. I was using VisualFileChange. 1989 21:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tacoma in Pierce County.png

Your notice on User talk:Hedwig in Washington, [10], indicated missing source. The file source field was empty, but the information was below in a note. The file was copied from Wikipedia. Hedwig is apparently not active, so I copied that information. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 21:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images

I mentioned your name in this RFC because one of your Flickr reviews might not have been quite right (accepting the new PD 1.0 a CC0) Ultra7 (talk) 17:46, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop

Instead of adding blank information templates to file page, like you did here, please add content to them. You're causing more harm than good by doing what you're currently doing. Bidgee (talk) 03:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

I said on the edit summary I would fill them in today. I'm not just gonna leave them blank. 1989 03:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

They require manual filling, there is no way you'd fill them in a single day at the rate you're adding blank templates. Bidgee (talk) 03:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

I know that. I will fill the templates, even if it takes me all night. 1989 03:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Really? You will fill the templates? You reverted all - with an automated tool... -sigh- --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

I reverted because there was an issue regarding me implying empty templates, so I'm reverting what I did, then implying information templates with requirements filled, and I have to say that it would of took me a few days (maybe) to get them filled, so its pretty clear that I did not think this through at all, so I took immediate action. 1989 12:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

It'd take you a lot longer than an all nighter to get that them all filled correctly. I suggest you look at the greater issues you're causing. Bidgee (talk) 03:15, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

I agree. Take an image, add the template, fill it in, and move on to the next. Your current methodology is very poor. Please don't do it again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

+1 Sorry guy but add an empty info template is very nonsense (and mischievous like vandalism). ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 06:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

I queried the database... There are 10977 edits by you related to this issue (reverts not included). Please be careful with automated tools... --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

And why you add/remove Category:Temporary Red Link from category's? To collect edits. This is the final warning, stop abusing automated tools. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/159935182 1989 18:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

"Also, my benefits are to make the project better, so I would appreciate it if you don't criticize my edits." Sorry but it has been the opposite, you've been doing more harm than good. Also if you don't like the criticism, don't edit. Bidgee (talk) 05:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, sure. 1989 05:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:George Seward (sprinter).jpg

Could you please, explain why did you request permission for this image and who (in your opinion) should issue permission for anonymous image published 132 years agoin USA? In my opinion it is obviously PD-1923... Can you comment this, please? Ankry (talk) 15:05, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Removing watermark/borders

Hi, when removing watermark and/or borders, could you please also remove the category or the template, e.g. [11], [12]. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Wasn't aware of the category, so sure. 1989 18:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice

Thanks 1989 - I have written to OTRS to inform them that I am indeed the author and give consent for publication on Wikipedia. -65.112.10.21 04:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Notice

Зачем удалять мои собственные работы над программой Blender? [Я не нахожу смысле удалять этот файл - я его автор. С тем, что программа не моя - согласен. Я просто автор учебника ( https://ru.wikibooks.org/wiki/Blender_для_начинающих ) для обучения ей других людей.]. File:BLENDER62.png-File:BLENDER65.png Volobuev Ilya (talk) 04:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

@Volobuev Ilya: Я не заметил, программное обеспечение было GNU General Public License. Я вернулся, что я сделал, и добавил {{GPLv2+}} шаблон. Если вы планируете загрузить больше скриншотов Blender, вы, возможно, потребуется включить шаблон. Lazlo 05:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Не умем да променим, уколико умеš ти промени. Била бих ти захвална --Nenabor (talk) 05:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:พระอาทิตย์ขึ้น บนภูกระดึง.JPG

hi 1989

I received a message "User talk:Beeverbkk" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%A2%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%B6%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%99_%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A0%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B6%E0%B8%87.JPG

I confirm this picture is photograph own I use NIkonmat FT2 & Nikkor 35mm. F2 [ Film Kodak 400 ] this is Full albam https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1634789616748486.1073741892.1455747791319337&type=3

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beeverbkk (talk • contribs)

@Beeverbkk: If you want to confirm that the image is yours, please send an email to OTRS. Thank You. Lazlo 09:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Crested doradito (Pseudocolopteryx sclateri), Ibera Marshes, Corrientes, 2008.jpg

What was wrong with this image? I got it from Flickr, and it is licensed there as CC-BY 2.0. Thanks, Keith the Koala (talk) 08:37, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

@Yann: Lazlo 09:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- It was wrongly tagged as copyvio. Restored. Yann (talk) 10:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Again VisualFileChanges

Hello 1989,

why you made again wrong mass edits?? "Source = Puplic Domain" is not' a source!! Please revert this. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 13:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I did it because it doesn't really need a source. It's in the Public Domain, and it's old art. @Steinsplitter: Should I proceed in reverting it all? Lazlo 13:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

You should never do mass edits if you are not sure... Ask before would be good, I mean this was said to you earlier... ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 13:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

(tps) I would say revert all in good faith. Adding "Public Domain" in the source field is not a Commons norm, nor it is an agreed use of the information template by community agreed guidelines. PD images do need sources quoted, so that we can verify the image is the best possible from the source, any extra information at the source can be added, and the source country of the reproduction may be an issue for interpreting copyright.

Please avoid making mass changes that you are not sure will be uncontroversial or do not reflect an existing consensus. Doing a small test run and then checking on bots/work_requests or the VP may be advisable, before starting untested mass housekeeping bot jobs. --Fæ (talk) 13:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

How much time you have been asked to slow down with automated tools? --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I blocked you for 5 minutes to stop your automated revert script. Flooding watch lists twice. I revert this now with +b. :-( --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh :-( . You used the same edit summary for multiple edits :/ Hard to revert. Maybe you like to check every edit by hand? Maybe @Perhelion: can help with reverting this stuff. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I have reverted what I did in good faith. Thank you all for splashing water in my face, I was still sleep. Lazlo 15:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

О чему се овде ради, зашто ми бришете слику мог магазина и из ког разлога блокирате --Nenabor (talk) 06:17, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

why did you removed lassi image

why did you removed lassi image--Jogi don (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

File Deletions

Hello...

I am wondering why two logos that I uploaded were deleted. The two files in question are Eagle99 AltLogo.jpg and Eagle99Logo.jpg. I work for Eagle Communications who OWNS the station and the rights to the logo. Further, I was asked to update the Wikipedia page for KSKG by the MANAGER of the station. We are trying to preserve the history of this great station and we feel as though our rights have been stepped on here to do so. Those two files were uploaded with COMPLETE CONSENT from Eagle Communications, Inc. and station manager, Lonnie Smith. Please let me know if there is anyway we can work this out.

Thanks, Terry

Escudodecolima.jpg

I make the change of the New coat of arms of COLIMA Because the goverment has made those changes. This is the New official versión Clq2016 (talk) 01:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

@Clq2016: I am unable to assist you because I'm not an admin. Please take this to COM:UDEL. 1989 (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

But in my messages I hace One that you delete my File — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clq2016 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

@Clq2016: Please go to COM:UDEL if you want the file restored. 1989 (talk) 01:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

No worries!!

Don't worry at all about the double tagging, it happens! I accidentally renominated an entire gallery of images today, too... perhaps Saturn is not finished coming out of Retrograde or something (Joke). Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

change.gov

Thank you for this. Is there a way you can generate a list of the pages that aren't from flickr? I want to see them be referenced from archive.org as well. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 20:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Extended content

@とある白い猫: Here's the list. I took care of it already. You owe me a barnstar.

MCMLXXXIX 21:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, what I am looking for is to link to the files themselves on archive.org. The copyright notice isn't important since it is on the license template. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 11:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

When I have the time, I'll review them, but not right now. MCMLXXXIX 19:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Hendrick van Balen (I) 001.jpg

How is this a meaningless name? #2 is only for meaningless names, not for "improving" file names. Please don't do that. Multichill (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

@Multichill: Having an author's name only, and not the title as well is misleading and ambiguous, because people who would want to search for this piece of art may not find it at all if they wish to search the title, even with the author included. Please don't compare this to the examples you saw to make you decide which is right and wrong. I knew very well what I was doing. MCMLXXXIX 22:00, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

No, you're wrong. You're applying the criteria way to liberal. Renaming should be done with caution. Being able to find something based on the file name is absolutely not a reason to rename a file. You're improving file names, that's not what this policy is for. Please stop doing that. Multichill (talk) 22:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, heavens, please don't do anything to improve Commons without a rule specifically telling you to do it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Re:

No, check the sources closer, them are steaming. If the file has a source that is (or at least supposed to be) valid, the source shouldn't be removed: In DVR mode, Youtube stores only 4 hours of stream; any previous stream is lost, but this does not mean that the source is not valid (the same apply to dead links). For complex cases like this, should be better to nominate these files for deletion, and find concensus about that rather than removing the source field manually (and for these purposes exist the Rillke's LicenseReview script). --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 21:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

@Yann: The reason that's not happening is because I was using Rillke's LR tool. It doesn't have an auto mode where it could notify users about copyvio unless it's Flickr related. MCMLXXXIX 21:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Worst, the pictures you tagged are not copyvios. Please look better. Yann (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

@Yann: I was not aware of what you saw, nor was Ronhjones. I'm doing the best I can, and trust me, the last thing I need right now is "look better". Keep that to yourself please. MCMLXXXIX 21:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Photos

Hi 1989. In regards to OTRS permissions for the following files: Drew Tal 1.jpg - Drew Tal 2.jpg - Drew Tal 3.jpg - Drew Tal 4.jpg... Allow me to clarify the situation. The uploader uploaded all 4 files and mistakenly attributed them as "Own work". He later contacted me and informed me that the photographer of these photos is one Stephen L. McRae whom I later contacted in order that he provide you with the proper permission as per Commons:OTRS. Kindly, put up the proper OTRS template. Thanks in advance. --Omert33 (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

The OTRS received template I placed on the images was proper, it tells that the image was sent to OTRS, and that it will soon be reviewed. MCMLXXXIX 11:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Re: OTRS notes

Hey 1989. Rather than leaving notes noting related tickets, please merge tickets together when they're obviously related. See otrswiki:Help:Merge function for an explanation of how to do this. This keeps all articles related to one issue together and being handled by one agent. Thanks! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of how the merge button worked until someone told me about it. Thanks for telling me this though. MCMLXXXIX 11:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Re: deleted files requests

Hi, I perfectly understand what you're saying, but it is how it works. If you aren't admin on Commons, it is much more difficult to process deleted files, and you'd rather work on tickets for new authorizations or do the tickets with the help of an admin that isn't OTRS (otherwise he closes the ticket by himself) that can check the file for you.

Working on permissions-XXX without being an admin in XXX is very difficult in practice, and it is one of the reasons (maybe the main one) I asked for adminship here. --Ruthven (msg) 11:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Re: File:Martial arts in the sunset Stefano Kocka.jpg

Hi, 1989. The copyright holder for this image is Tomasz Niepsuj, the photographer. I see no permission from Tomasz Niepsuj. Stefano Kocka is not the copyright holder, he is merely the subject. --Rrburke (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@Rrburke: He send in permission for it. I was confused at first, but now I know what's going on. Thanks for the clarification. See [13], if you're part of the permissions queue. MCMLXXXIX 15:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Fake channel?

Hi 1989, can you explain why do you say the channel is fake? LaComarcaTeVe seems to be a local tv station. --Discasto _talk 23:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@Discasto: I already explained why it's fake. Please revert your edits, or I have to take further actuon. MCMLXXXIX 23:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

No, you haven't. You've claimed it's fake but without any proof or evidence. Feel free to open a regular deletion request (it's your "further action", isn't it?). You'll be able to provide your arguments in there. Thank you for your understanding --Discasto _talk 23:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

So, in the end... you had nothing. What a waste of time :-(( --Discasto _talk 23:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

RE: File:Mutand_dAguila_Joan_Castejon_Wax_on_Paper_1982_100x81.jpg

Hi 1989, just read your note at the file of reference File:Mutand_dAguila_Joan_Castejon_Wax_on_Paper_1982_100x81.jpg I am the author of the photo and the author of the painting is the artist, is it the problem? How can we solve this? I followed the template for license, so that should be fine. Let me know how can we solve this. --Raulfoto (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Cat-a-lot

Hello, You did hundreds (or thounsands?) of such edits:

(change visibility) 05:37, 3 December 2016 (diff | hist) . . (+7)‎ . . File:- panoramio - Fakrul (5).jpg ‎ (Cat-a-lot: Copying from Category:Panoramio files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot to Category:Images from Panoramio with bad file names) (current) [rollback: 1 edit] [br]

Why you removed Category:Panoramio files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot? Please elaborate. Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

I didn't remove anything. The category is still there. It says copying, not moving. I added a new category to the files to the bad names of Panoramio category so they can get renamed in the future. The category is still there, if you would of checked, which you didn't. My advice is, stop jumping to conclusions, like you have done in the past. Thanks. MCMLXXXIX 16:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, there was a copy&past error on my part. Why you remove Uncategorized. The file contains no valid category. And regarding your advice: please refrain from making wrong accusations. This is not the language which i expect from an otrs member. Please read into COM:AGF and COM:MELLOW. Needless to say that i asked you friendly (not warned or blocked) you regarding the aforementioned edit(s). --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Cat-a-lot automatically does that. I did not intend in anyway to remove the Uncategorized template. If you want me to re-add it, I will, or you can have your bot do it, because I don't feel like getting another 5 minute timeout. MCMLXXXIX 17:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

OTRS received template

Hi 1989. When you apply {{OTRS received}} to files where you haven't actually reviewed the permission but are just noting the ticket number, please be sure to include reason=1 as a parameter. This alters the text of the template to make clear the ticket is awaiting processing. If this isn't done, then the text of the template suggests the permission is deficient in some way, usually prompting an administrator to delete the file after 30 days. Given the current length of the backlog, this would be problematic. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

My apologies. That's happening because I use this gadget for OTRS reviewing. I wish it could automatically give reason for you, or at least options. MCMLXXXIX 13:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Typically, in the rare cases that I mark OTRS pending without processing the ticket myself, I manually go back and add the reason. Note that you also need to manually remove the reason if you review a ticket for a file marked as pending and it's unsatisfactory. Kind of hassle; hopefully someone will add the option to the gadget. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Aix galericulata (Male), Richmond Park, UK - May 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aix galericulata (Male), Richmond Park, UK - May 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Permission uploaded file, OTRS ticket #2016111010028884

I understand that the email uploaded (OTRS ticket #2016111010028884) to confirm the permission to use https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1705_agent_side_grinder.jpg was not sufficient. It's not clear to me what's missing in the permission confirmation. Can you tell me what's the best way to confirm permission --Marcfrijns (talk) 14:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Responded MCMLXXXIX 17:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Ticket 2016112910030998

Hello, please help me with this issue : I've sent a first mail but "the message was not sufficient" , I've sent a second mail with a valid proof (original file with Exif info that mention the website, the email adress can be found on this very website), there is no better proof but nothing changed on the file and it is still planed to be deleted in 7 days... What can I do please ? Thanks a lot for your help... Tprgrr (talk) 18:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

The link if you need it https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2016112910030998 Tprgrr (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Please go to COM:OTRSN. MCMLXXXIX 17:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Permissions of the photo

Hi! the file I've just uploaded (File:Kim Druzhinin.jpg) references this page (English version), with the gallery of photos. You can see right after the gallery the phase All the materials on this page can be accessed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Licence, is it enough? Katkov Yury (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes. -- MCMLXXXIX 19:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Re:File:Sesia tibialis-orig-P9030693.JPG

Hi, 1989. Do you know why this file needed an OTRS ticket in the first place? Is it because it was already online at http://stuff.rubypanther.com/images/Sesia_tibialis.jpg ? I was going to tag it OTRS Permission until I saw your OTRS Received tag and thought it was better to talk to you about it first. --Rrburke (talk) 14:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

No. When I saw the ticket in the queue section, I tagged it so it wouldn't be deleted so soon. From the link your referencing, which I was not aware of, I guess that is why someone send in a ticket confirming permission. If you think the ticket has sufficient info to be tagged valid, then I don't mind. -- MCMLXXXIX 15:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, 1989!

Happy New Year!

1989, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: Don't worry, I plan to. Happy New Years to you as well. -- MCMLXXXIX 18:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I give this barnstar to you!!!! Congratulations! Hide&Seek (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Wiki Loves Women event in Nigeria with W.tec 45.jpg,

Hi

Thank you for your good work on commons.

I am sorry because it took a while before my reply, it wasn't intentional. I am only busy off wiki. I noticed the file has been deleted. If you saw vividly by most of my uploads you will see that I am conversant with some of our policies here. This file is for education purpose and proper authoritative had been obtained from the owner. Since, it has been deleted, i dont know the exact image that is in focus.How can i view so that i can confirm mail sent to the OTRS?. Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 08:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Olaniyan Olushola, User:1989 cannot undelete the file as they have no sysop flag. Pinging Jcb who deleted the file. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 14:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

See here - Jcb (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello 1989, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Rename requests

Unless you're going to complete said renames then please don't remove the rename templates, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 19:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

@Davey2010: I moved all of the images to the Category:Files from Flickr with bad file names category, so I could clear up the main rename category. Since the rename template automatically puts the file in the main one, I removed it, since the category is redundant. -- 1989 19:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi 1989, I hadn't realised we had "Files from Flickr with bad file names" however there's over 18 thousand images in that category so IMHO they're better off at the category it's at, Also I sincerely apologise for the thousands of notifications you've just recieved, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:59, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Images

You propose to delete a lot of my uploads. I don't understand the problem. The author as wel as the website and copyright status are mentioned.!! Other uploads with the same information are excepted. So what is the probelem?Rasbak (talk) 06:42, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rasbak: Not really. Some of your images had links that would send me to the direct image link (which doesn't prove the licensing status you have), and some did not have licenses at all. -- 1989 06:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

I have put more information or correct the link to all the pictures. Hopefully this is enough. If not please inform meRasbak (talk) 07:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rasbak: I fixed the ones that were accurate, whiles others were untouched. The link you provided to the Camelina alyssum images is not valid. It doesn't discuss the images (and the website that has the image is not ran by the Wikimedia Foundation). If the file descriptions don't show a license like the others, then it can't be here. -- 1989 07:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

The link Flickr2Commons tool don't work. I click on it but the link stays turning. What can I do?Rasbak (talk) 07:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

You'll need to ask the user who recommended the tool. -- 1989 07:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

What is still wrong with this upload? File:Carex extensa inflorescens (5).jpg Rasbak (talk) 08:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Again new information for some uploads.Rasbak (talk) 08:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rasbak: I fixed it except File:Carex oederi subsp. oederi herbarium (2).jpg. Link doesn't work. -- 1989 08:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

I fixed the typing errror of the last picture.Rasbak (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

I fixed the LRs. -- 1989 09:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rasbak: You're linking to direct images again with File:Bunias orientalis plant (4).jpg. -- 1989 15:17, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry. The original link seems no longer working. I am still searching.Rasbak (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

I give it up. You may delete this picture.Rasbak (talk) 16:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

This situation

Dear User 1989,

Just thought you should know that you were mentioned in the situation/mess above....under the paragraph “Resignation statement by Daphne Lantier”. Its unpleasant reading. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:57, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm aware and I'm not surprised he mentioned me; I was mentioned to be a sock of him here and enwiki, but I came out unrelated... -- 1989 12:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

That is good to know that you are aware of this de-Adminship. I trusted Daphne but it was just INC in another form. Such is life. --Leoboudv (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Yep... -- 1989 18:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

nosource when a source exists

Hi, I do not understand diff. If there are other problems with a file and a source of any kind is quoted, then marking as nosource seems misleading. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 10:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

@Fæ: The file was placed under a license review. At the time, I was unable to find anything on the source that verified the license that was placed on the file, and for the script I was using from Rillke, it would do that if the LR failed. I'll from now on add the no-permission tag instead, since it's more accurate to the situation than no-source. Thanks for the feedback! -- 1989 12:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Tasnim images

Don't forget to remove the "Tasnimnews review needed" category after you give Tasnim images a good review. It's easy to miss at the bottom of the page. Ww2censor (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your email

You did not send me an email address for any form of confidential reply. If you'd like this discussed on open pages, it rather defeats the purpose of your original sending. Thank you for the "you've got email" reply on my talk page; if I had previously had a reply address I would have used it.

Since we have no private way to discuss this and you gave me very little time before putting out the "you've got mail notice" to consider your request, I am going to say that I cannot help you in this matter at this time. I apparently did not move at the desired speed, despite attempting to recover from pneumonia and being on my actual annual work vacation; so please find someone speedier to assist you in this regard as I will not be moving fast enough any time soon. Cheers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

I would appreciate if you would not delete items from my talk page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: The email notification had nothing to do with "speed", I simply forgot to notify you as I am aware that most do not check their emails often. Seeing how you're very busy, and a little rude, I'll find someone else who will consider myself worthwhile, or will probably abandon this place. Cheers. -- 1989 15:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

rq

@Taivo: May you remove my user rights? Thx. -- 1989 02:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Done Taivo (talk) 09:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	j'aime beaucoup cette page sur Albert Einstein que j'admire éternellement ZINMONSE Houngla Jules (talk) 20:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

File:131025 뮤직뱅크 출근 박서준 직찍.jpg

Excuse me 1989, maybe you are busy to your real life, Can you give some help? the file had been successfully reviewed by you but it has been deleted per a copyvio claim, with a link to a pinterest post. I think that the pinterest post copied from original tistory source, so it is not copyvio. Puramyun31 (talk) 03:07, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Face on face... (9419929965).jpg

File:Face on face... (9419929965).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Joschi71 (talk) 17:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Good to have you back!!! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I feel refreshed from taking a year off. Good to be back. -- 1989 (talk) 02:25, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Regarding reviewer request

Hello! I mostly tag blatant copyvios for speedy deletions. I did not keep track of them but https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/commons.wikimedia/Roy17 says there are about 160.--Roy17 (talk) 16:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

I can see that, the problem is you just recently started contributing to it, while still no contribution to COM:DR. If you really want the role, I’d suggest you gain more experience. -- 1989 (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

I first started tagging copyvios about half a year ago (I can't remember exactly), for mostly photos in China. Then I started to look at other images, especially new users' uploads, and look for FOP violations in other countries and images taken from the Internet. I started to batch upload images much later last November, because I did not know the existence of flickr2commons until then. I did have one DR for out-of-scope images Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ling Chen V. To be honest, I don't like to DR, so I focused on speedy ones, and only one of them survived so far, while about 30 others are pending. Now I have confidence I can handle different cases, even for unfamiliar countries.--Roy17 (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

In my batch uploads, there are photos of US, Mexico, Germany and Australia, apart from China and Southeast Asia that I am most familiar. I would always check FOP and TOT requirements in each country before I picked on flickr. So far there's only one file nominated for out of scope.--Roy17 (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

I have already made my decision. You cannot convince me otherwise. If you rather not take my advice to receive consensus for the LR right, that’s your choice. Your nomination was supposed to be closed days ago, but no one chose to comment and I explained why in my reason to deny you the role. -- 1989 (talk) 16:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

I apologise if I said too much, but I just hoped that you could see why I had only one DR, since you could not see my deleted revisions. I do take your advice sincerely, but what else can I do to improve, unless I always DR instead of tagging for speedy? In the past candidates were often given some questions to test their knowledge of CC licenses, custom licenses, FOP, TOT and other matters. It was also puzzling no one else commented at all (perhaps because it was festive season). Could you please at least open it for a bit more, so that I could comment there? I actually had wanted to clarify what I wrote here when I applied, but I believed users would look at my records carefully and there would be no need unless prompted. Thank you.--Roy17 (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your nomination already exceeded the time limit, so it can’t be reopened. If you disagree with my decision, you can nominate yourself again if you wish. -- 1989 (talk) 16:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

mail

After a year of beauty sleep I'd wait. Happy New Year! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:55, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! You too. -- 1989 (talk) 04:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Ticket review

Hi, can you please review the ticket request 2018111610002628. It's permission for some images on a website. Kindly please reply.--137.97.135.255 09:05, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

No thanks. See COM:OTRS/N and ask there for assistance. -- 1989 (talk) 14:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank You for renaming

Thank You for renaming batch of files I have requested. --Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 05:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

No problem. -- 1989 (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your comment on the file I uploaded File:Jimmy_scuba.jpg

Hi 1989! Thank you for your feedback on the photos I uploaded. I am a bit of a novice Wikimedia/pedia user so I hope you can help. I have updated the description for the Jimmy_scuba.jpg.

Is this update along the lines of what you were suggesting? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeannoneal (talk • contribs) 23:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

@Leeannoneal: No. You still need permission from wherever you got it from. If not, it can’t be here. -- 1989 (talk) 00:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@1989: I see. In progress -- leeannoneal (talk)

Rename rather than redirect

Hi 1989! Could you actually delete the page File:Bataille de Platée Georges Rochegrosse 1859.jpg since the name is wrong (wrong attribution by me, it is actually the Battle of Marathon), and it should not even be a redirect. Only the file File:Les Héros de Marathon Georges Rochegrosse 1859.jpg should remain. Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 14:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Apparently resolved... Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 14:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Help to fix a template

Hi 1989, Thanks for having renamed this File:Five_children_on_a_motorcycle.jpg. Could you also help me to fix the related FP template on the same page ? Perhaps this page should be renamed similarly : Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Five_children_on_a_motorycle.jpg (same spelling mistake on "motorcycle"). Kind regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Done -- 1989 (talk) 14:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Greetings and thank you! …

… for renaming most of the files from the Allgemeiner Harz-Berg-Kalender 1918! This was a nice division of labour: I had just handled the rename requests for the first 20 (or so) files, then I had to answer the phone, and when I came back to the computer you already had renamed the remaining files. Thank you, it’s nice to divide such rather boring tasks ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Admin Request Vote

Since I cannot edit on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Elisfkc anymore, I wanted to reach out and thank you for your support on my admin request. Even though it didn't end the way I wanted, I appreciate your support. --Elisfkc (talk) 02:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Michaela Dietz at the Florida Supercon 2016 (12).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 10:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Info Admin nomination

Hello 1989, for voting in your Admin nomination I would like to know more.

a. what/how did you become interested in wikipedia (and commons)?

b. what concept/idea is the most important, for you personally, with wikipedia/wikimedia?

c. what do you think is the most important/useful work you can contribute with?

d. what wikipedia/wikimedia activities (in general) are you aware of? What activites directly by WMF are you aware of?

Thanks for any info you can give! --Janwikifoto (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

@Janwikifoto: Hi. I moved and answered your questions on my RfA to keep things in place. — 1989 (talk) 14:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Request

Can you replace the File:A coat of arms design for Turkey.svg on the Russian, Ukrainian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch Wikipedias with the File:Emblem of Turkey.svg? I mean you to put the "Emblem of Turkey.svg" in these Wikipedis instead of the "A coat of arms design for Turkey.svg". Thanks. - 46.155.12.128 05:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I don’t do GlobalReplace requests. 1989 (talk) 13:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

1989, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin ^webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--Krd 07:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Sweet! 1989 (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Good luck with everything! --Ruthven (msg) 08:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations 1989! Reh man 11:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Congrats

Congrats on your adminship. Look forward to working with you Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

+1. Welcome to the team! Yann (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Regret

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Enrique Ortiz Martinez

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Files uploaded by Enrique Ortiz Martinez - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:48, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Gyps fulvus in flight.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gyps fulvus in flight.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Ray Evrard Photo

Hi 1989, you recently deleted File:Raymond Evrard 1960s.jpg and File:Raymond Evrard 1960s Cropped Square.jpg as a possible copyvio. Specifically, it was noted that the copyright was held by the Green Bay Packers. However, this photo was first published much earlier than 2018 and is not held. As an example, the photo was published in the Green Bay Press-Gazette in 1974 (see here). I have also seen the photo in a few offline sources. The photo itself has never been published with a copyright notice. As such, I believe it fits {{PD-US-no notice}} and kindly request you review your deletion. Thanks, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Done I restored and converted the notices to DR. -- 1989 (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Undeletion request closure

Hi! You left the whole Union Jack outside the cropping. Maybe it was not neccesary wrt copyright issues (a thin strip of the Union Jack with the letters "Brexitovka" is (maybe) under the threshold of originality (or even de minimis). Anyway it would be nice if you re-open discussion and leave the closure to an uninvolved third-party-admin. Third-party opinions are usually useful. Cheers. Strakhov (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Done -- 1989 (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

[14] I meant reopening the undeletion request, not the deletion request. Strakhov (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Done -- 1989 (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Email

I've send a release email for https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Megamanarchiec055-1.jpg

It said they should respond in two days. IdeaFan128 (talk) 00:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Fair use material is not allowed here. -- 1989 (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Archive links

Hello.
Can you please put {{Archive box}} or alike onto this talk page? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Done 1989 (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Sock busting

The puppeteer fooled me into thinking that the fresh sock is a genuine clueless newb. I demonstrated an uncharacteristic stupidity not checking namespace-14 records of the known accounts. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Revue plastir.jpg

Hello 1989,

Please note that this photograph of the Revue Plastir has been taken by myself with the approval of the editor himself (Plasticité Science et Arts, Mr M-W Debono). There is no copyright on this photo and the editor wishes it to be published. Please take the copyvio tag away and allow publication. Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emi21701 (talk • contribs) 07:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@Emi21701: OTRS permision is needed for this file. -- 1989 (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Processing {{copyvio}}

Hello.
Surely it is better to demonstrate over-caution hundred times rather than fulfill a bad request one time. But in this case things to be checked were:

Licensing on the site (copyrighted);
HTTP(s) Last-Modified: (May 2, 2018) vs upload date (2019);
Age of the domain (18 years!);
Age and reputation of the uploading account (negligible).

In these circumstances IMHO it would be safe to proceed with deletion. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Eriogaster catax

Sorry for the speedy deletion case a while ago. I didn't know before, that the images on Commons needed to be comerically useable. Noticed that too late. Won't happen again. --GeXeS (talk) 13:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi. Thanks again for your kind offer. I answered you with a joke because the issue is of zero interest to me. Later I felt it was not an educated reply and wrote to you a mail. I hope you have read it. Good-bye. --E4024 (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Rottweil

Hi 1989, I am surprised my foto Testturm disappeared from page Rottweil. Can you explain ? It's my own photo ... no Copyright violation. Thanks in advance ! --Olga Ernst (talk) 09:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Olga Ernst: What file are you referring to? -- 1989 (talk) 09:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, wrong link to Rottweil ! It's German Wiki de:Rottweil. This file : Testturm. Thanks. --Olga Ernst (talk) 09:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Olga Ernst: Do you mean this file? This isn't one of your uploads. -- 1989 (talk) 09:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

No, this one File:ThyssenKrupp Test Tower, Rottweil.jpg. I don't really understand, because the file still exists on Commons. Maybe I must just undo on "View history" ? --Olga Ernst (talk) 09:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Olga Ernst: The file you're talking about was never deleted. Undoing the edit will leave a red link as the file I'm referring to is deleted. -- 1989 (talk) 09:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Wow, I think I got something wrong :-( !! This wasn't my file. So sorry to bother you !! But for me this was a good training in how to communicate if something goes wrong ! Thanks so much for helping !! Regards --Olga Ernst (talk) 09:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

futagoestudio

Hello, I got a message saying that the images I'm using are copyrighted at http://futagoestudio.com.br/futagostudioenglish.html but this site is mine and the designs too. How do I prove that I own the image rights? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vitral_manga.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vitral_ilustration_art_2018.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soniaalva (talk • contribs) 21:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Soniaalva: Please see COM:OTRS. -- 1989 (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

İrmaşlı Alban Kilsəsi.jpg and Zaqatala Kilsəsi.jpg

Hi. These files - File:İrmaşlı Alban Kilsəsi.jpg and File:Zaqatala Kilsəsi.jpg and etc. don't violate copyright rules. Their author is HulaguKaan. Please re-upload them. Have a good day. --►Cekli 829 11:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

@Cekli829: I’m not sure about that. One of the uploads you linked doesn’t say they’re their author, but instead Blogspot. I’d recommend going to COM:UDR for this one. -- 1989 (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

@1989: if you mean this blog, this blog belongs to the user - HulaguKaan. --►Cekli 829 19:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

@Cekli829: I’m still not sure if they’re the author of the images. Make a request at UDR if you’re determined. -- 1989 (talk) 19:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi there

If you're not sleeping (or if another admin sees this) could you be so kind to stop the IP vandalizing my and other people's TPs? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 02:43, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Done -- 1989 (talk) 02:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Check requested

Hello 1989. You recently deleted File:Couple nudity mirror.jpg. On french Wikipedia, it has been replaced by Artwork nudity.jpg (in red here, but still existing on french WP - one of the case).Could you please tell me if the files really differs ? --Pa2chant. (talk) 15:38, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

They don't. -- 1989 (talk) 16:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I thought it was a case for speedy deletion "Has previously been deleted under Commons deletion guidelines" ? --Pa2chant. (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

A cat for you!

Hi. I made a cat for this cat (File:Şero CHP.jpg). However, I could link it only with the article on EN:WP although it seems to have another on Vi:WP. (Is it possible they wrote it with a different "ş"? Can you give a helping hand to solve the issue? (I told you I do not have the technical abilities needed for superior positions. :) P.D. I see that people write "on WP". As I'm not a native speaker I followed suit, but "in WP" sounds better to me... What do you think on this detail? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

@E4024: The “ş” seems to be the same on all of them. I don’t know what you’re trying to do where I need to assist. Wikipedia can be referred to whatever appropriate. -- 1989 (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

I think it was a browser or connection problem that did not let me link the two articles to the new cat through WD. I just succeeded making it. Thanks anyway. --E4024 (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

New Version

Hello Mr. 1989, I am writing to ask you for a favor of overloading a new version of an 18th century portrait. look at the current uploaded file, it's too small. I had found this old file deleted in the past, and I was thinking about asking you if you could kindly take this old file and override it on what exists now???--87.14.89.224 20:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Getty Images

Is there any way we could use images from Getty Images ?--Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 07:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@Let There Be Sunshine: No. See COM:NETCOPYVIO. -- 1989 (talk) 07:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

What did I do wrong?

Hi 1989 You have recently deleted two pictures that I uploaded yeaterday. What did I do wrong?

The Picture of Inger Askehave: I have made a link to the licence. They have agreed that all pictures taken are free to use. And Inger aaskehave has actually told me that we can use this picture on Wiki. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/dk/deed.en

The picture of Annnete Borchhorst is mine as I wrote when I uploaded it.

What can I do?

Best, BHornemann — Preceding unsigned comment added by BHornemann (talk • contribs) 09:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@BHornemann: That license is not acceptable here. See COM:L. -- 1989 (talk) 09:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Can you help me? again?

Thank you for your mails and your comments.

Thank you for your reply. I will not upload more pictures until I find out what to do. The pictures I have uploaded are from aau.dk and the licence is this: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/dk/deed.en

Is there any way where theese pictures can be uploaded? Then I can ask the photographer to can the license. They say it is licence 2.5.

Best, BHornemann — Preceding unsigned comment added by BHornemann (talk • contribs) 10:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@BHornemann: As I said above, that license is not allowed here. Refrain from uploading any more images with that license. -- 1989 (talk) 10:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

За изтритите файлове на Katev2019

Здравей те! Казвам се Серьожа Вълков и съм фотограф на снимките и автор на книгите в посочените файлове. Ако е необходимо пишете по какъв начин да го докажа?

• File:Серьожа Вълков 11.06.2016.JPG

• File:Корица на Моята автобиография, ч. 1.jpg

• File:Обложка на CD на История на град Брусарци, т. 2.jpg

• File:Обложка на CD на Истоия на град Брусарци, т. 1.jpg

• File:Корица на том втори на История на град Брусарци.jpg

• File:Корица на История на град Брусарци.jpg

• File:Корица на Годишник на военна академия Г. С. Раковски, 2007.jpg

• File:Корица на Военноисторически сборник, 3, 2007.jpg

--Katev2019 (talk) 14:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@Katev2019: Моля виж COM:OTRS. -- 1989 (talk) 16:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Can you check my OTRS ticket

Please check this File:Hình ảnh chiếc áo Latex mặc trên người.jpg Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2019022610007192 Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suho226 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright Violations of Images Uploaded

Hello,

I have received messages indicating that several images I uploaded to Wikipedia Commons were possible copyright violations. I am now being threatened with a block for “continuing” to upload images that are copyright violations. I am not continuing to violate copyright. The images I uploaded were uploaded a while ago. The deletion of the images and copyright violation notices were sudden. If there are any more images I uploaded that get deleted in the future due to copyright, it will not be because I did not comply with various warnings because they were uploaded in the past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryantriplex (talk • contribs) 22:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Not sure what his issue is Gbawden (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Dr hab. Rafał Wiśniewski.jpg

Could you undelete the file: File:Dr hab. Rafał Wiśniewski.jpg. A proper agreement has been sent to OTRS. See: ticket:2019030510003296. Polimerek (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

@Polimerek:

Done -- 1989 (talk) 12:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)