User talk:Buho07~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Buho07!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 10:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo Yñigo

[edit]

Podrías modificar o crear el escudo que te detallo a continuación:

ARMAS: Escudo en forma de losange: Escudo cuartelado en cruz: 1º y 4º en campo de plata, una flor de lis de sable; 2º y 3º en campo de azur, una cruz flordelisada de oro. Bordura general de gules, cargada con ocho sotueres de oro. SOPORTES: Un unicornio alado al natural, acollarado con una corona de la que sale una cadena que pasa por detrás de la espalda y termina en un anillo, todo de oro. DIVISA: Veritas ante omnia.

Ahí un escudo subido a commons, quisiera que crearas uno con un diseño tuyo.

Aprovecho para felicitarte por tus trabajos. --Maverick (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

jpg

[edit]

Hello, I notice you have achieved a lot of work as [1]. However, you should have known that especified or recommended wiki format for flags and blazons is png or, the better one, svg. This could be a problem as if anyone creates the same model but as svg, your work will be then superseded. On the other hand, you neither referred your models to any source, so in that way, the images cannot be used on the body of wiki articles. Regards, --SanchoPanzaXXI 08:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Escudo_Pincipe_Asturias_(1388-1516).png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih 21:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Personal Standard of Prince Albert II of Monaco.png

[edit]

Hi, I'm pretty sure you didn't get this form the CoA of Enmark =). probably a typo but if you could fix it it would be nice./Lokal_Profil 14:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fuentes

[edit]

Hola, seria conveniente que vayas citando las fuentes y bibliografía en que te basas para las banderas y estandartes que estas haciendo. En concreto, el estandarte de Franco o el de los Reyes Católicos no me parecen ajustadas a la realidad histórica: más parecen composiciones, ciertamente interesantes, pero de tu propio criterio. Gracias, --SanchoPanzaXXI 23:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Personal Standard of Prince Albert II of Monaco.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Lokal_Profil 18:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

image licences

[edit]

Hello,

I already left you a message last night on Image talk:Grand Duke of Luxembourg Standard.png but I just took a closer look at your contributions and now realise this problem is not limited to this one image. I'll try to explain some more.

When you use someone else's image as the basis for your own image (essentially a modification of the original editor's image) you have to abide by the author's licence. In many cases that means you have to abide by some form of Creative Commons (CC) licence. The first image I contacted you about was based on the work of Spanish Inquisition Image:Coat of arms Henri I of Luxembourg small.png, this image is licenced CC-BY-SA. That means you can share (copy, distribute, transmit) the image, you can remix (adapt, alter) the image, but to do any of this you also have to abide by the licence requisites, in this case these are attribution (usually a link to the original image is sufficient, though the licence per se is stricter) and share alike (if you change the image you have to use an identical or compatible licence (I just looked at [[2]] but that list must be incorrect as it gives only CC-BY-SA as compatible with CC-BY-SA, but in any case, PD is not compatible as it breaks the chain of attribution)). In the case of Spanish Inquisition's image you did not abide by either of the required elements, with other images I notice you did attribute appropriately but did not licence appropriately. You always have to look at the licences of images you use, some might even be entirely incompatible (any with ND, which means no derivatives, though I expect those might be incompatible with commons), others you can use freely because they were placed in the public domain. It takes some time getting used to this but I'm sure you can do it.

Here are some essential links here on commons for more information: Commons:Licensing and Commons talk:Licensing. At the second link you can ask questions about your current way of licencing, most users there have more indept knowledge of this subject than I do (but I know the domaine of coats of arms and related legislation rather well, also I do recognise many heraldic charges used here on commons and who authored them, which was why I knew right away the G-D of Luxembourg Standard was not your original work...). So if you have any questions, aks me or go ask someone there.--Caranorn (talk) 12:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Royal Standard of the Denmark.png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Copyvio since derivative of Image:Denmark large coa.png which is a copyvio/Lokal_Profil 12:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 13:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fuentes

[edit]

Buenas, como ya te ha dicho un compañero, sería apropiado que citaras las fuentes de las que partes para crear los escudos. Concretamente, de donde extraes la información de los escudos de las infantas? Saludos, --HansenBCN (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Buho07~commonswiki!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current Canadian Arms

[edit]

I don't know if I could, it seems to be copyrighted, even if I draw a new one I'm not sure if it will escape the law. Sodacan (talk) 01:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Armes des reines d'Espagne

[edit]

Bonjour, pourriez-vous indiquer a cet endroit les sources que vous avez utilisé pour dessiner les armes des reines d'Espagne Nous nous interrogeons notamment sur les épouses des souverains Habsbourg et sur la forme des blasons. Cordialement Maximus0970 (talk) 18:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo de Ponferrada

[edit]

Hola, como supongo que podrás comprender, el trabajo que hacemos para los armoriales de wiki es para, por un lado, dar a conocer los principios heráldicos y por otra parte, para que puedan visualizarse de manera cuidada y armoniosa, dando asi a los lectores una imagen de calidad algo que considero crucial en un tiempo además en el que se critica (con alguna razón) la edicion española de wiki precisamente por ligera y falta de rigor. Entre cumplir con estos objetivos y "calcar" modelos oficiales que no simpre van en el sentido conveniente a los fines enciclopédicos, elegimos lo primero. Como sabemos, los modelos oficializados suelen estar diseñados por gabinetes graficos con el fin de cumplir con el gusto de la autoridad política eligiendo a menudo el consejo pseudoheráldico o la reproducción sin más criterio que dar una imagen de "antiguo", de "ese escudo viejo pintado aqui" o "labrado allí". Poner o no un pergamino no es más o menos heráldico, de hecho, es un simple adorno gráfico sin significado efectivo, aunque bueno, casi en el sentido contrario con el significado de decir "no tengo idea de heráldica". Usar una corona con floron más grande, lo mismo: mientras sea reconociblemente abierta, no importa que sea asi o asi, pero no puede darse la impresión de que se difunde un modelo "ponferradino" de corona abierta por que eso no existe. Ahora bien, si quieres hacer un modelo de acuerdo a tu criterio, yo no tengo nada que decir, se supone que eres editor y sabras justificar tus elecciones. Sí, en cambio, tengo bastante que objetar a que se edite sobre un trabajo anterior dando pie a confusiones y rompiendo la armonia del armorial donde aparece este escudo junto con otros cuantos más. Un saludo, --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 20:07, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Great_Crown_of_Victory_.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xiengyod (talk) 10:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Manteau abeilles roi d'Espagne

[edit]

Bonjour, GJo, viens de me parler de votre requette mais moi aussi j'ai une source http://armorial-du-souvenir.fr/archives/img/famille/josephespagne.PNG

et comme joseph etait un napoléonien et non un bourbon... il est peut etre preferable de laisser les abeilles cordialement bon dimanche--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


blason Julie Clary Reine Consort d'Espagne

[edit]

Bonsoir, j'espere que vous allez bien, je n'arrive pas à trouver le blason de la Reine Consort d'Espagne épouse de Joseph Bonaparte, auriez quelques sources s'il vous plait merci d'avance bonne soirée--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bonsoir et merci beaucoup --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


rebonsoir, une petite question est il possible de mettre cet aigle s'il te plait

et pourrais tu me faire le meme mais pour Reine Consort du Royaume de Naples s'il te plait

merci bonne soirée--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 19:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moravian eagle in the Crown of Bohemia CoA is wrongly coloured

[edit]

Proper traditional colours of Moravian eagle are red & silver/white (and the eagle lies on blue shield). Red-golden checking – as it is presented in your version – was officially, i.e. by Austro-Hungarian authorities – used only for 3 years (1915–18)! (Cf. for example Moravian eagle's colours on Austrian CoA from 18th century with that of 1915.) Although the Diet of Moravia adopted new "enhanced" golden checks as early in 1848, this decision wasn't entered into a permanent validity: in spite of golden-red colours were enforced by the Moravian Germans, Slavonic population (Czechs) predominantly rejected them and further used medieval red-silver checks. Moreover, in 1749 the Crown of Bohemia was de facto dissolved (by abolishing of the Česká dvorská kancelář/Böhmische Hofkanzlei by Maria Theresa) so, strictly speaking, the red-golden checked eagle hardly can be depicted on the Crown's coat of arms...
By the way, you cite this file as your source. Where on that CoA you see golden checks? They are obviously silver! All in all, you have to repair your mistake. --Iaroslavvs (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rege2.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Darwin Ahoy! 00:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Standard of Queen Mary of the United Kingdom.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alkari (?), 15 February 2013, 23:50 UTC 23:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danmarks rigsvåben 1819-1903.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Flag of Swaziland.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Standard of Tonga.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

20:08, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

02:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Arms of Francis of Assisi (1822-1902), King consort of Spain.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.47 15:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaime de Marichalar, Duke of Lugo Coat of arms.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MaroneLeone (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Standard of Hendrik of Mecklenburg-Schwerin as Royal consort of the Netherlands.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quistnix (talk) 16:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Standard of Lesotho.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ColorfulSmoke (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Standard of Lesotho.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 09:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]