User talk:Gabldotink

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gabldotink!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:12, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bible, King James Version.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TilmannR (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

[edit]

Congrats on your success on the holiday. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

Plz review this image Thanks BlackOrchidd (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Seems to be in order! — gabldotink talk | contribs | global account ] 19:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help

[edit]

Hello @Gabldotink hope you are doing well and this finds you good. Can you please review some GODL-India uploads by me.

Reviewed

The list is quite long so you can do it as per your comfort. Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 02:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll take a look at them! — gabldotink talk | contribs | global account ] 03:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gabldotink just a gentle reminder to finish the list. Its been more than a month now. ShaanSenguptaTalk 10:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Gabldotink Will you be reviewing any more? It looks like File:Shri Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India.jpg has been reviewed by a user who most probably doesn't have the rights to do so. Also the list is pending since long. Thank you for your consideration. ShaanSenguptaTalk 08:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Shaan Sengupta. Thanks for notifying me about that user’s invalid license reviews; I have fixed them.
I apologize for my slowness in reviewing these images; it hasn’t been on my mind much recently. I will get more done as time allows, and I’ll try to maintain the above list as well. Thanks for your understanding. — gabldotink talk | contribs | global account ] 14:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Sol Levante title card.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 10:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden steps down from reelection.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 00:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something is wrong

[edit]

Hello @Gabldotink I see that you have successfully reviewed File:C. P. Radhakrishnan with Narendra Modi - 2nd August, 2024 - 1.png and File:Telangana CM Revanth Reddy and Telangana Deputy CM Bhatti Vikramarka Mallu with PM Narendra Modi - December 2023.png and some more. It is taken from X (Twitter). GODL-India isn't applied there. Also as stated above it seems like Skratata69 has made so many invalid license reviews. Also if you could continue with license review requests made by me above. ShaanSenguptaTalk 03:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{GODL-India}} says:

applies to all shareable non-sensitive data available either in digital or analog forms but generated using public funds by various agencies of the Government of India

If I understand this correctly, works published on the PMO’s official X account meet these criteria as much as they do on the website. Is there something that indicates otherwise? — gabldotink talk | contribs | global account ] 05:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There have been previous instances when files with source to any social media have been deleted. There are many contradictions in the licence. For example works by Ministry of External Affairs too shall come under this license. But MEA's website copyright policy says something else. So unless stated, its better not to assume that everything comes under the License. Nowhere on the social media accounts is there a disclaimer about the licence. Maybe I am not able to explain better. This contradiction might need a broader discussion. ShaanSenguptaTalk 07:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daffy The Commando.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrek02 (talk) 12:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ICarly (2021) intro 1080p.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Clovermoss (talk) 04:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]