User talk:MOSSOT

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bonjour,

Pour un guide à paraître sur le couvent de Saorge et les édifices baroques dans la vallée de la Roya, serait-il possible de publier votre photographie de la chapelle Saint Michel de la Brigue ? Et dans la positive, avec quelle mention ? merci, bien à vous,

Bonjour,
Les photos placées sur commons sont libres de droit et peuvent être utilisées à la seule condition d'en indiquer la source. Cordialement. J. MOSSOT


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MOSSOT!



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear MOSSOT,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 23:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Category:Église_Saint-Saturnin_de_Nohic has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:18, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear MOSSOT,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear MOSSOT,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

chateau de bonaguil

[edit]

! Monsieur ou Madame,

est il possible d'utiliser votre jolie photo de Bonaguil pour un petit calendrier sur le Lot et Garonne ou l'Aquitaine ? Si oui, à quelles conditions ?

Cordialement

jehanobellianne

Obellianne.diagram@wanadoo.fr

Bonjour, il est possible d'utiliser les photos librement aux conditions habituelles : citer l'auteur des photos et son origine = J. Mossot, Wikimedia
Cordialement--JMO (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sedan - Eglise Saint-Charles-Borromée - Nef ancien temple.JPG Description 1 Sedan - glise Saint-Charles-Borromée - Nef de l'ancien ... (department)Category:Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Sedan Category: ... (2 019 × 1 501 (751 Kio)) - 28 mars

[edit]

Pour illustrer un livre en cour d'écriture sur l'architecture des temples protestants en Europe, j'aurais besoin de la photo indiquée ci-dessus, mais en définition 300 PPP. Est-ce possible? Pour info, l'église saint-Charles de Sedan est un ancien temple protestant. Les modifications apportées pour en faire une église n'ont pas altéré la structure de son ancienne salle de culte, d'où l'intérêt de cette illustration. Mon adresse e-mail: bernard.reymond@sunrise.ch

File:Issigeac - Ancienne prévôté.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dominique Robert REPERANT (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pontcirq -771.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dominique Robert REPERANT (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Au lieu de renommer une catégorie, on peut très bien en créer une supplémentaire

[edit]

Bonjour Mossot. Chaque monument historique a droit à sa propre catégorie, même si, pour l'instant, il n'y a qu'une seule photo dans celle-ci. Ton renommage de Category:Maison à empilage de poutres de Saint-Germain, spécifique à la commune de Sainte-Sabine-Born, n'est donc pas le bienvenu. Rien te t'empêchait de créer, en plus, ta Category:Maisons à empilage de poutres du Nord-Agenais à laquelle tu aurais pu rattacher l'ancienne catégorie, que je te demande de bien vouloir créer à nouveau. Merci d'avance. Père Igor (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

C'est très facile : il te suffit de supprimer la redirection et de la remplacer par les éléments qui composaient initialement la catégorie : coordonnées, notice Mérimée et catégories dont elle dépendait + la nouvelle catégorie « Maisons à empilage de poutres du Nord-Agenais ». Père Igor (talk) 13:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maison à empilage de poutres du Buzard

[edit]

Bonjour

C'est corrigé.

Cordialement, Trizek from FR 18:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jean Paul Brusset Villefranche001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 13:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Pour les photographies de Seyne-les-Alpes! Aarp65 (talk) 18:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Campagne L'été des villes

[edit]

Bonjour, je vous invite de participer à la campagne L'été des villes et villages en France. Des photo's télechargées entre le 21 juillet et le 21 septembre 2015 peut-on marquer avec la ligne

{{L'été des villes}} [[Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles]]    

ainsi elles compteront pour la campagne et seront montrées ICI . On peut également utiliser la uploadwizard de la campagne, qui ajoute cette ligne automatiquement. Amicalement.--Havang(nl) (talk) 09:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hubert Robert - Projet d'aménagement de la Grande Galerie du Louvre (1796).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 21:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Massay - Église Saint-Paxent – Vitraux -6

[edit]
@MOSSOT:  Bonjour. Comme c'est la première fois que j'utilise une image de Wikimédia Commons, je souhaite m'assurer de la manière de citer votre copyright correctement. Pour l'image qui représente la conversion de Saint-Paul. Je désire l'utiliser comme fond d'une petite affiche qui annonce une conférence intitulée "Terrorisme : trouver son chemin de Damas". Dois-je la ignaler de cette manière : 'Massay - Église Saint-Paxent – Vitraux -6, Par Jacques MOSSOT, Créative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International'. merci pour votre réponse. Brassor11 (discuter)
Bonjour,
Vous pouvez bien sûr utiliser l'image. Je pense que le plus court doit être : Jacques MOSSOT - Wikimedia Commons, Cordialement--JMO (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Coyau (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villefranche-de-Rouergue - Chapelle Sainte-Emilie-de-Rodat -1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sammyday (talk) 16:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villefranche-de-Rouergue - Chapelle Sainte-Emilie-de-Rodat -2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sammyday (talk) 16:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bias (Lot-et-Garonne) - Église Notre-Dame de Bias - Chemin de croix -1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 09:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rion antirion14.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo

[edit]

Je suis tombé par hasard sur quelques photos faites par vous.. Ca m'a donné envie d'en voir d'autres. Félicitation pour les prises de vues toujours très pédagogiques et soignées. Beau travail, utile pour Commons et Wikipédia.. --F. Lamiot (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liste des chapelles de la cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch

[edit]

Bonjour MOSSOT

Je suis en train de verser dans Commons l'ensemble des photos que j'ai prises de la cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch en septembre 2017.
J'essaie de classer les photos des chapelles en fonction de leur nom et de leur numéro. Pour cela je m'aide de deux petits ouvrages que j'ai achetés lors de ma visite :

  • La cathédrale d'Auch, de l'abbé Jacques Fauré, édition Sud Ouest, 2007
  • Stalles et vitraux de la cathédrale d'Auch, de Raymond Montané, paroisse de la cathédrale, 1996

Ainsi que d'une photo que j'ai prise d'un plan à l'intérieur de la cathédrale [1]

Les deux ouvrages contiennent un plan de la cathédrale avec le numéro des chapelles et cela correspond au plan que l'on voit sur ma photo. Or cette numérotation est différente de celle qui apparait sur votre image. La différence se situe au sujet des cinq chapelles n° 6 à 10 (celles du côté droit en entrant). Dans les ouvrages, elles sont numérotées en ordre décroissant de 10 à 6 en allant du portail vers le choeur, alors que dans votre dessin elles sont numérotées en ordre croissant de 6 à 10.

Outre la différence des numéros, il y a aussi des différences dans les noms par rapport à l'article de Wikipedia : Liste des chapelles de la cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Auch

Liste des chapelles dans WP-Fr vs les 2 ouvrages
Numéro
Nom dans WP-fr (noms actuels) Nom dans les 2 ouvrages
1 Immaculée Conception Immaculée Conception
2 Sainte-Thérèse-d'Avila Nativité de la Vierge
3 Présentation Présentation
4 Saint-Joseph Saint-Joseph
5 Annonciation Annonciation
6 Assomption Saint-Jean-Baptiste
7 Notre-Dame des Agonisants Nativité du Christ
8 Purification Purification
9 Nativité du Christ Notre-Dame des agonisants
10 Saint-Jean-Baptiste Assomption
11 Purgatoire Purgatoire
12 Saint-Cœur de Marie Saint-Cœur de Marie
13 Notre-Dame de Pitié Notre-Dame de Pitié
14 Sainte-Anne Sainte-Anne
15 Sainte-Catherine Sainte-Catherine
16 Saint-Sacrement Saint-Sacrement
17 Saint-Sépulcre Saint-Sépulcre
18 Saint-Louis Saint-Louis
19 Compassion ou Passion Compassion ou Passion
20 Notre-Dame d'Espérance Notre-Dame d'Espérance
21 Notre-Dame Notre-Dame

Qu'en pensez-vous ?
Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 14:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Le nom des chapelles est tiré de l'article d'Henri Polge sur la cathédrale d'Auch publié dans le Congrès archéologique de France - Gascogne - 1970. Par rapport au plan donné à la page 355, j'ai en effet inversé les numéros 6 à 10, mais les noms des dédicaces des chapelles sont bien celles données dans le Congrès, à leur bonne place, c'est-à-dire que ce que j'ai nommé 6 sur le plan, correspond au 10 sur le plan du Congrès et elle est dédiée à l'Assomption. Donc, je ne sais pas s'il y a une inversion dans les noms des chapelles sur le plan du Congrès archéologique de 1970. Je n'ai pas trouvé de site me permettant de confirmer le nom des chapelles. Malheureusement, dans le doute, la seule façon de trancher, c'est de retourner dans la cathédrale et de regarder les dédicaces de ces chapelles. Si je prends le Guide du voyageur dans l'église métropolitaine de Sainte-Marie d'Auch, 1845, on s'aperçoit que la dédicace des chapelles a changé, mais quand on part du bras sud du transept, la première chapelle est dédiée à saint Jean et la dernière à l'Assomption. Cordialement --JMO (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour vos explications.
En fait, si on remet les numéros des chapelles de la nef dans le bon ordre : de 1 à 10 dans le sens horaire (celles du chevet étant numérotées aussi dans le sens horaire de 11 à 21 en partant du transept Nord vers le transept Sud), on retombe bien sur les noms des chapelles :
  • 1 : Immaculée Conception
  • 2 : Nativité de la Vierge (Sainte-Thérèse-d'Avila)
  • 3 : Présentation
  • 4 : Saint-Joseph
  • 5 : Annonciation
  • 6 : Saint-Jean-Baptiste
  • 7 : Nativité du Christ
  • 8 : Purification
  • 9 : Notre-Dame des agonisants
  • 10 : Assomption
J'ai pris des photos des petites pancartes qui se trouvent devant les chapelles et elles nomment bien les chapelles ainsi.
Souhaitez-vous que je change votre plan avec les numéros ou voulez-vous le faire ? Idem pour l'article WP-fr ?
Je vais pouvoir télécharger maintenant mes photos des chapelles et les ranger dans des catégories avec ces noms là.
Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 15:23, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Je vous laisse changer les numéros des chapelles sur le plan. Cordialement--JMO (talk) 15:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear MOSSOT,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear MOSSOT,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear MOSSOT,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Renommage catégorie église de Sireuil

[edit]

Bonjour MOSSOT. J'ai renommé la Category:Église Saint-Pierre de Sireuil que tu as créée en 2012 en Category:Église Saint-Marcel de Sireuil. Tu peux voir le justificatif sur cette page.

Peux-tu modifier la légende et faire renommer chacune de tes photos ? Si tu n'as pas le temps, je peux m'en charger. Merci d'avance. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basilique Notre-Dame-des-Enfants

[edit]

Bonjour MOSSOT, accepteriez-vous de déposer sur wikimedia commons des photos du clocher-porche de la Basilique_Notre-Dame-des-Enfants ? Merci beaucoup. Cordialement.--Ideefixe (talk) 12:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Droits photo

[edit]

Bonjour, je vous remercie pour votre réponse. Pourriez m’indiquer la mention exacte à faire figurer ? Bien à vous 2A04:CEC0:11FD:AE75:5825:3EFA:8528:A7A7 17:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]