User talk:Songsblame

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Songsblame/Archive 1

Blocked

[edit]
Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ kurdî ∙ la .lojban. ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

The only intention of this account is to only upload stolen files. Likely a sockpuppet of this LouisPhilippeCharles who also contributed nothing good here. --Martin H. (talk) 20:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to not forget this: The last IPs abused by this Vandal for vandalising in pl and fr wiki with unfree files
--Martin H. (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sockpuppeteer
This user is a suspected sockpuppet of LouisPhilippeCharles.
Please refer to logs and contribs for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

{{unblock|I do not understand? What files have I stolen and how. Any file I have ever upoloaded has been given the correct licence and I have not caused a problem. Nor did I intend to do so. I have no reason to be blocked. I am so confused. I dont even know what a sockpuppet is :\ Songsblame (talk) 16:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

In short:
  • en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LouisPhilippeCharles/Archive identifies the IPs I found out above, independently from my writing here and BEFORE I wrote it here.
  • I have more evidences from Checkuser
  • Same topics like banned user LouisPhilippeCharles
  • Many problems on Wikipedia, on Commons there is slothfulness in providing source and author information, for author information: many false claims such as "unknown" or "anonymous" even if the painter/author is written in the source
  • suddenly starting with batch uploads of stolen files as we can see above, intentionally damaging our projects
  • No one describes "google.com.uk" as a source link. Except one person: you (LouisPhilippeCharles and the abusive sockpuppet zoo).
Besides that I never realy blocked User:LouisPhilippeCharles in good faith and hope. I wrote this at one of the sockpuppet account talkpages and documented it in the Checkuser wiki. This attempt of good faith is now over. The sudden upload of this new batch of stolen files realy did it, there is nothing good with you, only bad intentions. --Martin H. (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I have done nothing wrong. I have done a lot of work and not caused any problems in the Commons. That can not be denied by anybody. I have created at least 100 categories, uploaded countless images (with correct licenses) and created almost 20 galleries. Why should I be punished for making a genuine mistake :\ they were free images so it was in good faith. That is in no way fair. I am a good editor and contributor. That alone should help my case considerably Songsblame (talk) 19:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "Saying "I have done nothing wrong" does not instil trust that you are planning to correct you clearly disruptive behavior. Unblock declined. Tiptoety talk 06:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
 (Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Is anyone going to even acknowledge my unblock? Songsblame (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely. And not as long as you not provide us with any true information. The problem is not that you accidentially copied some unfree files and thought that copyright expired. The problem is that you claimed that files your own work. The problem is that you are an editor with many thousand edits and that you suddenly started vandalizing our project with false own work claims. That was not in good faith. In my eyes this behaviour is a risk for the project, therefore blocked.
And from experience the tons of multiple accounts (even a non-checkuser can see that, its DUCK) I know, that it is not the first time. This sockpuppet account will not receive unblock. And the original account is now blocked for this. --Martin H. (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jean,_Count_of_Paris

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Jean, Count of Paris has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ImperialArchivesRU (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drawing of Armand de Bourbon future Prince of Conti by an unknown artist.png

[edit]
File:Drawing of Armand de Bourbon future Prince of Conti by an unknown artist.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ecummenic (talk) 07:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Songsblame&oldid=672373498"