User talk:Wdwd/2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2021

Re: File:F34-Nichtehelichenquote-Europa.png

It's NOT a copyright violation, it's a violation of Wikipedia rules at best, which you can enforce or don't but that has nothing to do with copyright, just to clarify that point. Peteruetz (talk) 18:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

3 files

Hello wdwd! Were these three files at the second part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mgm365: File:Hock Chuan Avalo Chinese Temple.jpg, File:Fort Pilar Shrine 2016.jpg, and File:R.T. Lim Boulevard Zamboanga City 2015.jpg meant to be kept? Or just an oversight? Thanks for response in advance. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi JWilz12345, my mistake, sorry, maybe also a javascript problem in the browser. Thank you for the hint.--Wdwd (talk) 13:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Deletions following problematic speedy deletion requests

Hello, I see that you deleted some of the files listed there. It's not your fault, of course, but I suspect that the deletion requests were abusive. For an explanation, please see my comment in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandstand in the park.jpg. Can you please check again the deleted files and see if the cases were similar, files validly uploaded with FlickrLickr? If so, can you please undelete the files, unless there was another reason for the deletion, other than a change on flickr since the original upload? Thank you in advance. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Asclepias, thank you for the hint. I checked again the list from there:

Fix of own incorrect deletion, sorry; These files has a flickr-change-of-license in the history. Restored:

Keep deleted, because I can't find any clear indication of a valid license review in the history. Files uploaded by a experimental and inactive bot user:FlickrLickr. More weird: the bot, not the reviewer, set a reviewer note in the initial upload. From my point of view, this is an unclear reviewer status and more or less unclear license review procedure. I would be happy if someone with more deep insight could check these license status and/or the past operation of FlickrLickr to validate the former license status. If so, I will restore the files:

--Wdwd (talk) 11:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi Wdwd—your summary closing of my request to delete the old revisions of File:Metro de São Paulo, Luz Station, Brazil (square cropped).jpg was not particularly helpful. You closed it as "no valid reason for deletion" when I articulated what I thought was a reasonable enough reason. I'm just looking to declutter my uploads page; are you able to help me do that? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 16:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sdkb, sorry for the short closing. To delete something here on commons need a specific reason. Details are part of the deletion policy (DP), chapter Reasons for deletion. To declutter or improve in different ways an image is not such a reason - because we try to keep the version history in general for example to refer older version explicitly. So if you just improve an image and want to delete the older versions because to "keep the version history clean" is a perfect example for keep, no deletion. Please see also the discussions and notes on Commons talk:Superseded images policy. HTH,--Wdwd (talk) 05:25, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
There would be no reason to refer to the old versions; they were replaced within minutes without ever being used and differ from the present version only by a few pixels in width. This would seem to be covered by the provisions for courtesy deletions, redundancy, and any IAR policy Commons has. Is that enough? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 07:09, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Other way around: What is the reason for a deletion? Deletion of a file does not free disk space. A deleted file will be kept forever on the storage systems but is not public available. And a "clean upload history" is no reasons as you mention in the deletion request.--Wdwd (talk) 10:21, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Bandera de la Gran Colombia 1821.svg


 File:Bandera de la Gran Colombia 1821.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: unused redirect)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Milenioscuro.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Temporary undelete of The ABC of Relativity

Hi Walter,

Any chance I could get you to temporarily undelete File:The ABC of Relativity.djvu so I can evacuate it to English Wikisource? The work is in copyright in the UK due to a pma. 70 term, but in the public domain in the US due to the pub. + 95 term, and the licensing policy on English Wikisource only requires works to be PD in the US. It's been on a todo list to transfer for a while but has been delayed by technical issues (pywikibot's imagetransfer script has been broken since the introduction of the +reuploadshared permission). I started in on the backlog today and noticed you'd already deleted it. TIA, Xover (talk) 08:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Xover, no problem. I temporarily undeleted the file. Feel free to transfer it to a wikiproject which permits fair use or to a project where the content is legal. Please keep in mind, that the time limit for this temporarily undeletion is two days.--Wdwd (talk) 13:24, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! The file has been evacuated to enWS (here) and the copy here can be deleted again. Xover (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Bill Gates at Singapore FinTech Festival 2020.jpg

Moin Wdwd,

Du hast die Datei am 29. Juli gelöscht. Wir haben eine Freigabe per Ticket:2020121910000289. Hatte ich vergessen, das einzutragen, oder stimmte sonst etwas nicht mit der Datei? Der Einsender hat sich nochmals gemeldet und fragt, warum die Datei jetzt weg ist.

Gruß und schönes Wochenende, --Mussklprozz (talk) 05:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Wdwd,
ich hab mir mal die Freiheit genommen, die o.g. Datei wiederherzustellen. Mir war bei einem anderen Bild dasselbe passiert; hatte übersehen, dass eine OTRS-bestätigte Genehmigung von einer IP entfernt worden war. --Túrelio (talk) 12:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Danke @Túrelio: . Beide Änderungen kamen von derselben IP. Ich hab mal eine Vandalismusmeldung abgesetzt. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:27, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok, danke. Damit hier erl.--Wdwd (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Milan Tomašík – Media day before WFC 2018.jpg

Hello, you have deleted an image I have uploaded, File:Milan Tomašík – Media day before WFC 2018.jpg, although no discussion happened yet on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Milan Tomašík – Media day before WFC 2018.jpg – may I know why? --Prikryl (talk) 16:35, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, this was a speedy deletion from Category:Recent unfree Flickr images related to file https://www.flickr.com/photos/ceskyflorbal/32126793588/in/album-72157699356656382/. I missed the regular DR, sorry for that. However, we need clarification via COM:VRTS and a statement from the copyright holder to publish this file under a free license. A comment or discussion in the DR in any way is not sufficient for clarification. After okay from the VRTS team any commons admin - eg myself, if you give me a ping - will restore the image.--Wdwd (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File:A Qajar gold-damascened set of armour.jpg

Hi there! I recently filed a deletion request for this piece of art as I believe it violated the guidelines of Commons. I got it from Christie's.[1] My question is; was I actually right in saying that it violated the guidelines of Commons, or was my assertion incorrect? Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 23:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi LouisAragon, the image from Christie's is copyrighted with "All rights reserved". You uploaded a copy without a statement from the copyright holder that you are allowed to publish this image under a free license. That is strictly spoken a copyright violation. So, your assumption was correct. Remark: The copyright is related to the photo, not to the shown artwork.
In this case you started short time after the upload the DR. In my opinion that's a typical mistake and is not such a big deal. It's okay to delete it with "uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content" instead of "copyvio".--Wdwd (talk) 08:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, got it!- LouisAragon (talk) 13:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Mass copyrighted uploads

User Kannansivaram has mass uploaded copyrighted content as his own work. One was recently deleted. There are too many to be manually nominated.--157.46.136.5 17:33, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Hello, how are you? Since you worked out part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Perci Hong (the Rebeca Andrade images are copyrighted), could you see the legitimacy of the following requests (one aren't mine)?:

  1. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Soyuz MS-20 Mission Patch.png - I believe that is non-controversial that the Russian Soyuz patchs are public domain;
  2. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gabriel Stein Barreto - Maybe some are possible to save;
  3. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zayed's Ambition Mission Insignia.png - Non-free image.

Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Erick, I'm not so familiar with some details in this cases. I process DRs were I'm confident.--Wdwd (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! Erick Soares3 (talk) 14:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Kim Jongjin

Hallo ! Das von Ihnen gelöschte Foto von Kim Jongjin war zu alt, um urheberrechtlich geschützt zu sein. Er lebte zu Beginn des letzten Jahrhunderts: vor 100 Jahren! Also bitte übergeben. Wieso den ? Weil ich es für meine Wikipedia-Artikel brauche! Danke. --Pak Jae-sun (talk) 18:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you give the info, that this photo was taken on 2021-05-17. Obvious a wrong date and the correct date of the original photo is unknown. The photograph of the original work is unknown too. It is definitely not "own work".--Wdwd (talk) 21:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Lizenzüberprüfung

Hallo Walter, kannst du dir bitte File:Dr. Rudolf Kirchschläger, Foreign Minister of Austria.jpg anschauen - da werde ich nicht gnaz schlau. Ist das korrekt? ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 09:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Eher nein. Ist m.M. ident zu File:Rudolf Kirchschlager.png zu sehen, welches als copyvio gelöscht wurde.--Wdwd (talk) 08:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

please help me

Hi i want make a page about mehdi rajabian album the name Coup of Gods. this is mehdi album poster: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coup_of_Gods_a_album_by_mehdi_rajabian.jpg it was uploaded by me. Please help me to request the right to publish this photo. im mehdi manager in wikipedia. Help me to prove the ownership of this work. i can send email for you. please writeing your email addres in here for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mif.dang (talk • contribs) 18:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Sources of this photo:

http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/9630715/mehdi-rajabian-prison-new-album-grammy-harvey-mason

https://www.foxnews.com/world/iran-mehdi-rajabian-album-risking-imprisonment.amp

Mif.dang (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

@Mif.dang: Writing the same message in the talk page of several admins will not solve your problem! What you need to do is to ask Mehdi Rajabian to write to COM:VRT, with the photographers in CC, authorising to publish the works under a Creative Commons license. @Jarekt: Ruthven (msg) 20:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

George Ho (talk) 23:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Verständnisfrage

Moin, nur damit ich es für die Zukunft besser verstehe: Ich hatte zwei identische Bild-Duplikate zur Löschung vorgeschlagen, und zu meiner Überraschung hast du eines gelöscht, das andere File:Hamburg Domkirche.jpg aber bestehen lassen. Nach welchen Kriterien entscheidest du, wann ein Duplikat und wann eine "andere Version" vorliegt? --UweRohwedder (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

hi, ist keine exakte Kopie oder herunterskalierte Version sonder "nur" eine andere/ähnliche Dateiversion. Diese werden im Regelfall belassen und (als Info) mit einem Hinweis auf die anderen, ähnlichen Dateiversionen versehen.--Wdwd (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Déri Imre, Szivárvány, 1946.jpg

Vielen Dank, dass Sie das falsch hochgeladene Bild gelöscht haben. :-)) --Bizottmány (talk) 16:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Recreation

Hi Wdwd, I saw you deleted File:Piet Kramer - Oberman.jpg yesterday because of the previous deletion request. The user uploaded the file again this morning, see File:PietOberman.jpg. Could you follow this up? Best wishes, Encycloon (talk) 10:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wdwd/2021&oldid=618142087"