Quash Bugs
Agentic End-to-end Mobile testing with UI + API + DB validation.
FreeQAMonitoringWorkflow automation18,949 impressions#3 of its week
Quash Bugs provides scriptless mobile test automation that runs plain-language steps on real Android, iOS and web devices with UI, API and DB validation.
- for
- QA engineers, developers and product managers who need end-to-end mobile testing without code.
- pricing
- contact sales
- license
- MIT
- 1.0.0v1.0.02 years ago
Key features
- Plain-language test steps — Write test intent in natural language; the AI agent translates it into real device actions.
- Real device & browser execution — Runs tests on actual Android, iOS devices and browsers, locally or in the cloud.
- Integrated UI, API & DB validation — Validates frontend interactions and backend API/database checks in the same run.
- Parallel test matrix — Execute multiple tests simultaneously across device models, OS versions and screen sizes.
- Detailed execution reports — Provides screenshots, logs and step-by-step evidence for each test run.
- Editable test cases & suites — Create, edit and group test cases, schedule runs and track version history.
Use cases
- Validate a full user flow on Android and iOS without writing Appium scripts
- Run nightly regression suites across a device farm and get AI-generated failure insights
- Combine UI actions with backend API checks in a single automated test
- Perform secure, on-premise mobile testing for regulated industries
Quash Bugs vs alternatives
| Best for | Scriptless mobile testing with AI-driven execution | Code-based mobile test scripting | Scriptless mobile testing | Cross-browser/device cloud testing | App monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact sales | Free | Free | Free | Subscription |
| DevHunt upvotes | 22 | 82 | 118 | 162 | 76 |
| Launched | Jan 2024 | Mar 2024 | Jan 2023 | Jan 2024 | Apr 2026 |
- Quash Bugs vs QueryPal: Appium requires code scripts and manual maintenance, while Quash uses natural language and AI execution.
- Quash Bugs vs BuildShip: Maestro is a script-based mobile automation tool; Quash offers scriptless AI-driven testing with backend validation.
- Quash Bugs vs Pulsetic: LambdaTest provides cloud device labs but does not offer AI-driven plain-language test execution.
- Quash Bugs vs PostalDataPI: Drizz focuses on monitoring, not end-to-end mobile test automation with AI.
Quash Bugs FAQ
How does Quash differ from Appium or Maestro?+
Quash uses plain-language steps instead of code scripts, adapts automatically to UI changes, and includes backend validation in the same workflow.
Can I run tests on my own devices?+
Yes, Quash supports local execution on private devices with full data control.
Is there a free evaluation?+
A guided evaluation is free and includes a demo call and access to the full platform before committing.
What billing options are available?+
Contracts can be monthly or annual, based on test execution volume.
Does Quash support private or on-premise deployments?+
Enterprise options include private VPC, on-premise deployment, custom data residency and SSO/SCIM.
Summarized by DevHunt from quashbugs.com · Sep 27, 2026. Details may change; check the official site.