Jump to content

Talk:David Pocock (political party): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 13: Line 13:
:'''Support merge''': if not delete, this article does not pass the [[WP:GNG]], plain and simple. [[User:J2m5|J2m5]] ([[User talk:J2m5|talk]]) 04:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''Support merge''': if not delete, this article does not pass the [[WP:GNG]], plain and simple. [[User:J2m5|J2m5]] ([[User talk:J2m5|talk]]) 04:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''Support merge''' makes sense to do so [[User:GraziePrego|GraziePrego]] ([[User talk:GraziePrego|talk]]) 13:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''Support merge''' makes sense to do so [[User:GraziePrego|GraziePrego]] ([[User talk:GraziePrego|talk]]) 13:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''Support merge:''' definitely support the merge. Party only created to allow Pocock to appear above the line. The party is his, and their is no distinction between him and and the party, with the website. Doesn't meet [[WP:GNG]], previous party section covered the fact he has a party fine. [[User:KarmaKangaroo|KarmaKangaroo]] ([[User talk:KarmaKangaroo|talk]]) 10:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:19, 4 May 2024

Merger discussion

I see no reason why this should be seperate from the David Pocock page - the party's policies are just his policies, he's not recognised as a "David Pocock Party senator" in the senate and there's no indication the party will do anything outside of be used for Senate elections in the ACT

The section on the party that already existed on the David Pocock page worked fine Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge: the party doesn't seem to be notable outside of David Pockock. GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge: if not delete, this article does not pass the WP:GNG, plain and simple. J2m5 (talk) 04:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge makes sense to do so GraziePrego (talk) 13:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge: definitely support the merge. Party only created to allow Pocock to appear above the line. The party is his, and their is no distinction between him and and the party, with the website. Doesn't meet WP:GNG, previous party section covered the fact he has a party fine. KarmaKangaroo (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]