Jump to content

Urgesellschaft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Immanuelle (talk | contribs) at 01:51, 2 August 2022 (→top). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Urgesellschaft is a term that, according to Friedrich Engels[1] the original coexistence of Humans in prehistoric times refers, before the first written records. A distinction can be made between the kind of Homo sapiens as humans, who biologically hardly differed from modern humans (although Anthropology raises doubts here), and other representatives of the genus Homo such as the Homo erectus or the Neanderthal. Engels claimed "that animal family and human primitive society are incompatible things" because "the primitive men working their way up out of animality either knew no family at all or at most one that does not occur among animals."[1] The U.S. anthropologist Lewis Henry Morgan and translations of his books also use the term Urgesellschaft .[2]

In detail, this long period of time Historical sources are not directly accessible. Nevertheless, there are various ways to gain knowledge about this period in Archeology through the study of material cultures, as well as in Sociobiology, in religious studies through the analysis of the many myths, or in Social anthropology.

Duration

The so-called primitive society, or more appropriately, the primitive societies probably span by far the longest period in the history of mankind to date, more than three million years, while other forms of society have existed and continue to exist for only a relatively short period in comparison (less than 1 percent of the period).

From archaeology comes the term Stone Age for the period in which stone tools (fist wedges) are the oldest chronologically classifiable and roughly datable finds. Other, even older tools and objects made of natural or animal materials (wood, bones, skins) decayed and did not survive. This Stone Age also includes the development of new Social structures about 20,000 to 6,000 years ago. Generally, the advent of arable farming and livestock rearing is considered to be the transition to the New Stone Age and the end of this phase. The Neolithic Revolution was followed in some areas by the Bronze Age (around 2200 to 800 BC), but in some cases ran in parallel.

Theoretical assumptions

A Society is formed by community acting social groups of different size. At different times in the history of the earth as well as in different climates and Ecozones, human societies were quite different.

The only gradual dispersals of early human groups (estimated at 1 to 10 kilometers per year) initially placed few demands on them and their generational successions-they did not perceive change, especially in equatorial regions. However, drastic environmental changes such as ice and warm periods, to which the migrants were exposed in the target area, caused new forms of adaptation with corresponding social structures. Food gathering and weather protection as well as the use of fire were socially successful. However, a high social differentiation of primitive social forms of organization cannot be assumed. The first graspable societies as well as similar present groups appear relatively equal (egalitarian).

The isolation of individual groups, e.g. during the glacial periods or in insular settlement areas, led to culturally different traditions as well as to phenotypic, also racial theoretical Differentiations.[3] The comparatively rare contacts were found by a pedestrian, overall stationary society in the nearest vicinity. Whether the exogamy (external marriage) indicates that people became aware of reproductive biology (procreation) is doubted; exogamy is sociologically seen rather as a proving safeguard of (re-)integration of diverging groupings (for example, in lineage or clan alliances with intermarriage).

Some religious traditions also speak of a primal society, referring to the preforms of later religions spread across all hunter-gatherer groupings, derived from the social practices of their members. In written cultures, the distinction between shepherds and cultivators that persists to this day is evident, for example, in the biblical Story of Cain and Abel.[4] Still in modern macrosociological theories there are sophisticated assumptions about common features of a primitive society, for instance in Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau or Friedrich Engels.

Whether early humans lived dominion-free or anarchic or already formed consolidated leadership positions (chiefs) is in each case only a justifiable assumption. Also whether they organized themselves as social hordes, cultivated religious Cults (with Ancestor cult or Totemism?) and culturally already knew narrators or familially already the Kernfamilie. Economically, this society is based on a Occupation economy that varies depending on the geological time or vegetation zone.[5] attributed: a life as a hunter, fisherman and gatherer (game-keeper). During the Ice Age, for example, their focus in Central Europe and North America was on hunting, while elsewhere gathering and fishing also became important, as in Central Europe after the migration of large animal fauna in the Middle Stone Age (compare Scandinavian Køkkenmøddinger).

In marxist theory on the social development of mankind, especially in historical materialism, primitive society is also called classless primitive communism[6] because, just as in the "Communism" that followed Capitalism, there was no Private Property in Means of production.

Siehe auch

Literatur

  • Dieter Claessens: Das Konkrete und das Abstrakte. Soziologische Skizzen zur Anthropologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1993, ISBN 3-518-28708-7.
  • Friedrich Engels: Anteil der Arbeit an der Menschwerdung des Affen. SAV, Berlin 2009 (original: 1876).
  • Lewis Henry Morgan: Die Urgesellschaft oder Untersuchung über den Fortschritt der Menschheit aus der Wildheit durch die Barbarei zur Zivilisation. 1891 (Nachdruck: Achenbach, Lahn 1979; US-Original 1877: Ancient Society, Or: Researches in the lines of human progress from savagery through barbarism to civilisation).
  • Hansjürgen Müller-Beck: Die Steinzeit. Der Weg der Menschen in die Geschichte. 4., durchgesehene und aktualisierte Ausgabe. Beck, München 2004, ISBN 978-3-406-47719-5.
  • Joachim Herrmann, Irmgard Sellnow (Hrsg.): Produktivkräfte und Gesellschaftsformationen in vorkapitalistischer Zeit. Akademie, Berlin 1982 (= Veröffentlichungen des Zentralinstituts für Alte Geschichte und Archäologie der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR. Band 12).
  • Wolfgang Currlin (2013-02-13). "Steinzeit". Geschichtszentrum – Lernumgebung für webbasierten Präsenzunterricht. Friedrichshafen. Retrieved 2014-04-21. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |kommentar= ignored (help)

Einzelnachweise

  1. ^ a b F riedrich Engels: Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staats (1884), in: MEW 21, Seite 36-84
  2. ^ Lewis Henry Morgan: Die Urgesellschaft, erste deutsche Übersetzung von 1908
  3. ^ Werner Conze, Antje Sommer: Rasse. In: Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, Reinhart Koselleck (Hrsg.): Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Band 5, Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart 2004, ISBN 3-608-91500-1, S. 135–178, hier S. 137.
  4. ^ Vgl. Carel van Schaik, Kai Michel: Das Tagebuch der Menschheit. Was die Bibel über unsere Evolution verrät. Rowohlt Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg 2016, ISBN 978-3-498-06216-3.
  5. ^ Bernd Andreae: Die epochale Abfolge landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsformen in Steppen und Trockensavannen (= Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Lanbaues e. V. Band 14). Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster-Hiltrup 1977, S. 349–352.
  6. ^ Dieter Reinisch (Hrsg.): Der Urkommunismus. Auf den Spuren der egalitären Gesellschaft. Promedia, Wien 2012, ISBN 978-3-85371-350-1.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Urgesellschaft&oldid=1101834356"