Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Ding Dongs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Ding Dongs

Repeatedly resubmitted AfC draft with little to no improvement. Author has been warned many times that failure to significantly improve the draft after addressing the concerns would be grounds for a MfD discussion. Author repeatedly pushes unreliable sources and sources that name them on a card of fights. This does not confer the level of notability necessary for inclusion. As a ended group, there is little probability of this subject ever gaining notability. CC @Crystallizedcarbon, DrStrauss, Onel5969, Primefac, GeneralizationsAreBad, and SwisterTwister: as AFC decliners to provide any additional feedback. Hasteur (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - other than trivial mentions or unreliable sources, not enough in-depth coverage to show notability. And, as Hasteur points out, since they are defunct, unlikely to ever gain enough notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I tried multiple times, in multiple locations, to explain to the creator about what could be used to change the draft in order to make it acceptable, in particular writing about either Greg Evans or Richard Sartain specifically. They clearly have not chosen to listen, and it might be time to take this dog out behind the shed... Primefac (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't seem to muster any real citations from independent reliable sources. bd2412 T 03:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete After so many tries it seems clear that neither the author or the many reviewers involved in this draft can find the in-depth coverage from multiple reliable sources needed to establish notability. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:17, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.