Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Yeary
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 18:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aaron Yeary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:ANYBIO. Affiliated with one blue-linked entry, Pine River Capital Management, which appears to be part of a promo walled garden. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, not independent of the subject's company, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/OnceaMetro currently indef blocked as a spam-only account. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 16. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: A CV-like article on a man with a job. No independent evidence of biographical notability provided or found. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Some mentions in reliable sources ([1]), but they are just brief mentions about Aaron Yeary managing Pine River Capital Management. Naming him on the company article should be enough. --MarioGom (talk) 13:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No indepth independent coverage. --GRuban (talk) 12:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks "significant" independent coverage. WP:SIGCOV. doesn't qualify the notability criteria. --DBigXrayᗙ 20:11, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.