Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airbrite
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Airbrite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable company. Participated in YCombinator and received the normal amount of tech-press coverage there, other refs are about inflammatory comments by a cofounder. The company appears to now be called "Celery". power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The company is notable since the co-founder has said a lot of controversial comments. —Eli355 (talk | contribs) 01:34, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment No. Notability isn't inherited applies. HighKing++ 15:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I haven't been able to find any substantial coverage in reliable sources beyond the two TechCrunch pieces cited in the article, one of which has only a couple of short paragraphs on the company, the other of which deals mostly with a product (called Celery but apparently unrelated to Celery (software)) rather than the company behind it. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: sources are too indiscriminate to count towards notability. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:PROMO. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: references fail the criteria for establishing notability, either failing ORGIND and/or CORPDEPTH. Topic fails NCORP. HighKing++ 15:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.