Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amphyl
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:47, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Amphyl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment found this study that mentions 2 amphyl products (paragraph 6) but not much else. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Chemicals are notable, but brands are not. Bearian (talk) 21:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.