Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamboozle!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 14:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bamboozle! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has sat with a notability tag for 12 years - it's time we resolved it one way or the other. There is also relevant info on the Talk page. I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 07:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a lot, but I think collectively it demonstrates notability for a pre-internet subject. I added these to the article in a Further reading section so that people can use them to improve the article. -- Toughpigs (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.