Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Pattillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Pattillo

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I represent the article subject, he regards himself as a non-notable, private person, and he wants the article to be deleted Fbvs1 (talk) 14:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable individual, Forbes contributor piece by Ashoka is the only ref I can find, and it's not useful. Refs used are all PR-ish or in non-RS. Could be some sort of PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree b. I'm not sure if the articles on two of his ventures, Gray Matters Capital and Village Capital, meet notability requirements either. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - regardless of the subject's purported intentions, there is probably enough notability and coverage for encyclopedic inclusion. For examples, the Stanford Social Innovation Review covered him in this article and Philanthropy Roundtable covers the subject here. There are more sources available online including video interviews. - Indefensible (talk) 18:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NPOL Let'srun (talk) 03:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The subject is not a politician or judge. Did you mean to reply to a different nomination? - Indefensible (talk) 20:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus, even disregarding the vote based on WP:POL.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although the apparent request for removal could be from literally anyone (claiming to represent a person doesn't mean you actually represent 'em), the subject is not actually notable as a businessperson in part because he has kept a relatively low profile for someone who could have made a lot more noise (and therefore been easily identifiable as notable per our guidelines). Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.