Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CGCG 396-2
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Gems of the Galaxy Zoos. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CGCG 396-2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant or non-trivial coverage in media or studies, not in a catalogue of note, not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think this article should be kept. It was notable enough for HST to observe it, being voted by Galaxy Zoo users. "Following a public vote, a selection of the most astronomically intriguing objects from the Galaxy Zoo were selected for follow-up observations with Hubble. CGCG 396-2 is one such object, and was captured in this image by Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys." [1] Phantomdj (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
References
- Keep per Phantomdj ‹hamster717🐉› (discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I'm afraid the Hubble site is the only source that has some non trivial commentary on the object. Don't think it is enough. --C messier (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 23:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Gems of the Galaxy Zoos, where it has a sentence. There is a very brief mention in the Gems of the Galaxy Zoos paper,[1] and articles associated with a news release about the photo. But I think there's not enough to establish notability by itself. Awesome image though. Praemonitus (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Even less of a consensus. I'll try one more relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Gems of the Galaxy Zoos: per WP:NASTRO. SirMemeGod 15:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect per Praemonitus. Although it looks pretty, this clearly fails NASTRO. Toadspike [Talk] 07:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.