Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CardLife

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 08:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CardLife

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game. I'm not seeing significant coverage as of yet. Strikerforce^Talk 16:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yup, there is a distinct lack of coverage. --Izno (talk) 23:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This was left on my talk page, verbatim. I submit it for others to review in this context. --Izno (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Izno, I have added some new content to the CardLife page in relation to your feedback. The CardLife Page now features information about its creators Freejam Games. I've also added a new Reception category which shows that CardLife has had over 5 million views from prominent YouTube channels with a big following like PaulSoaresJnr (1.5 million subscribers), GrayStillPlays (663k subscribers) and others. I believe this will be enough for you to be satisfied that CardLife is notable enough to be featured on Wikipedia, but I obviously understand if you disagree. Thanks for taking a look and moderating the page. It is very early for CardLife in terms of press coverage, but on YouTube it's already a notable game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gribb85 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- The same comment was left on my talk page. Strikerforce^Talk 14:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article seems to fail WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 20:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but I expect recreation per WP:TOOSOON Daask (talk) 21:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom for failing WP:NGAME. YouTube video subscribers do not contribute notability. Ifnord (talk) 21:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.