Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inner Eye
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant advertisement posted by Rolandirwin (talk · contribs) who also has added spam links to other articles. I find it hard to believe that a site that features (according to their own count) 780 pictures should be Australia's "leading travel stock photography library". All the images I checked were taken by either Roland Irwin or Elsie Irwin. Seems to be just someone trying to make some money from their holiday photos. Furthermore, if we assume that Rolandirwin is "Roland Irwin", isn't it also vanity? Delete, including the image Image:Innereye.gif. Lupo 14:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Cut away the content-free promotional language (which I've just done) and you end up with a one-sentence substub. No Alexa rank, and it's impossible to google for sources (in any case, I can't find any). —Cryptic (talk) 15:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete advertising spam per nom MLA 16:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, spam per nom. Kuru talk 20:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spamvertisement for site which does not meet WP:WEB. --Kinu t/c 00:12, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spamvertisement. Mmm...spam. -- Krash (Talk) 17:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. — ApolloCreed (comment) (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.