Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janette Geri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus, defaulting to keep. --Polaron | Talk 18:28, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Janette Geri

Article was deleted in January 2007 and recreated a week or so later with some additional content. Main editor User:Halftonerecords appears to have a conflict of interest through username [1] and states he is Geri's husband. Article was proded today on the basis of it not meeting WP:MUSIC and contested by Halftonerecords. I believe that the subject is a non-notable singer songwriter according to our notability inclusion criteria. —Moondyne 08:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seems to me that [2] satisfies #11 on the list at WP:MUSIC. Xiong Chiamiov ::contact:: ^help! 09:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to fail WP:MUSIC and a web search doesn't bring up much to support her being notable or "internationally acclaimed" despite the record company's claims. Mostly being promoted by their own sites, article is a promo/ad piece from husband/company. If kept, smack the creator with a COI tag or something and see if a neutral editor, maybe from the music project, will "adopt" to clean up and keep an eye on it.Collectonian (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. —Collectonian (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. —Collectonian (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nn music artist, seems to also fail WP:MUSIC. STORMTRACKER 94 12:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quite notable according to Google hits. Music is featured on Rhapsody.com which is Real Audio's music sales portal similar to iTunes and you don't just say "Hey! I want to sell my music on Rhapsody!" and it's done. Several other notable hits including the Australian government, numerous radio and TV stations, and several colleges/universities. While I got into issue with User:Halftonerecords over the spam links and promotional statements of the article, we eventually cleared that up and he knows what Wikipedia is not. The subject herself however, is notable. -- ALLSTARecho 17:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per ALLSTAR. Dr.K. (talk) 17:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets criteria 11 of WP:MUSIC through rotation on ABC Radio National. The lack of Google sources is probably explained by the fact that she was big before the Internet came around, and also occupies a rather niche sub-genre. Lankiveil (talk) 03:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Comment No one said "lack" of Google hits. I said "quite notable according to Google hits". That means I found lots of Google hits for her. ;) -- ALLSTARecho 04:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.