Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Glasman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Glasman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The history shows only two significant contributions to this article, created by an SPA in 2011 and then a large-scale update by an IP SPA in 2014.

None of the sources are RSs. It's self-promotional, for a career of little achievement - nothing that can justify GNG. Rayman60 (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Plenty of issues with this one, including the non-independent sources used, the article being highly promotional, etc. But basically this individual appears non-notable. There is simply no SIGCOV, nor does he satisfy any of the MUSICIAN criteria. PK650 (talk) 21:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - winning a Clio is a big award per WP:CREATIVE. I'd like to see better sourcing. Bearian (talk) 21:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: I couldn't find reliable sourcing for the Clio. In fact, most of the awards can't be verified. PR fluff like "has received 30 international awards for his work, including Clios, Mobius and D&ADs" rings highly of paid editing, don't you think? And are the Clio awards even notable/significant? They used to be a business charging for tickets and nominations, so their relevance is questionable at best. PK650 (talk) 23:19, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonable persons can disagree on the value of a Clio. Bearian (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Winning the Clio may or may not be notable, but since there's no proof that he actually won one, that's irrelevant. None of the "sources" I checked for the other "international awards" mention him. The claim that he worked on Superman IV and the Deathwish series isn't supported by his IMDb entry. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.