Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Redcorn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alexnia (talk) 13:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- John Redcorn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of King of the Hill through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the coverage in List of characters in King of the Hill is enough detail on the character. TTN (talk) 22:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep yet another template AfD nom out of TTN's long running campaign of spite. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- keep on the basis of adequate referencing, but I see no reason for ascribing this campaign to improper motives. It's just a substantial difference of opinion about what should be included in Wikipedia, & that's the way to deal with it. If most of us think such content is proper when referenced it will be kept. If most of us think otherwise, it won't be. DGG (talk) 04:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Nominator attempting to AfD all King of the Hill character articles on basis of single issue. Mjpresson (talk) 04:38, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep mentioned in two other 'pedias. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete reference on the LOC is more than sufficient and there are no grounds for asserting independent notability. So expunge it. Eusebeus (talk) 04:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.