Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 6, 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 08:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 6, 2006

A single day - which generally is against article naming/creation ideals. Couple that with a healthy dose of both crystal balls and plain old balls, add in a garnish of incorrect factoids (The anniversary of AIDS is 6/6? Really? Our article says 18/6!), and you get a prime piece of sirloin deletion material. Grutness...wha? 01:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The next Omen movie is said to be released on 6/6/06, if this article is deleted it will just get created again --Ruby 01:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This could have easily went on PROD. Delete, despite the amazing~~ly worthless~~ fact of another Omen movie being released on that date. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 02:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unremarkable and unverifiable. Original research and opinion. Also, WP:NOT a crystal ball. -- Krash (Talk) 02:01, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, crystal balls. Plus, movie release dates can be as unreliable as flight arrival times. When it happens...by all means create. ;) PJM 02:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per those above. Pavel Vozenilek 02:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant with already existing calendars and lists, no need for a whole article for this one particular day. Contributor could very easily make a note on the current June 6 article for the year 2006. --Jay(Reply) 04:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and recreate when it is nearer the time. --Ter e nc e Ong 04:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, recreate on 6/06/06 if the world really does end that day... er... yeah. -GTBacchus^(talk) 04:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice against recreation when timely (but not before) if notable. Daniel Case 04:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete And there's already a mention of this date at Number of the Beast#Astrology Schizombie 05:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the nomination details, and more. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 06:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice to recreate three and a half months from now with (*gasp!*) real, verifiable, non-POV, non-OR content. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - we do have individual day pages for many days in the last few years, which are transcluded into the relevant month pages (see User:Sjorford/DMY pages). However, I agree that there's no good reason to do this for future dates. — sjorford (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I something happens on that day we can always recreate. Batmanand 11:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with everyone else, this date has not even happened yet and it is based purely on opinion. If something DOES really happen, we can create this article again then. ~ NecroWraith
Delete any and all future Armageddon speculation. And anyway, AIDS would be an extremely anti-climactic apocalypse ;-). Grandmasterka 11:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TheRingess 07:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.