Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neros
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:09, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I prodded this as unverifiable but an artists name has now been added which does throw up a small number of Ghits (although none for that inconjuction with the article name). So, I'd have to say not sufficiently notable at this time.
- Delete as per my nom. Dlyons493 Talk 00:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO. Monkeyman(talk) 00:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Siva1979Talk to me 05:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. pschemp | talk 07:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN bio. OhNoitsJamieTalk 08:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn bio. --Terence Ong 10:47, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN bio.--Francisco Valverde 18:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all. —Eternal Equinox | talk 21:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 05:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.