Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ole SC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 18:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ole SC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced football club that does not meet WP:NCLUB » Shadowowl | talk 19:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - amateur soccer club that existed in 2016 and 2017, but doesn't appear to be the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. The local Grand Rapids Business Journal covers similar clubs like Grand Rapids FC, but has only mentions the name of this club in two articles online (no coverage of the club itself). Seems like a clear failure of WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:32, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Jogurney, no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 14:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, independent coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 13:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that WP:FOOTYN is not an SNG, WP:NFOOTY is, and it clearly states that teams must meet the GNG. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 16:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails to satisfy the GNG. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 16:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely unsourced. On inspection also fails WP:FOOTYN and isn't salvageable. SportingFlyer talk 07:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wholly unsourced article which fails WP:NFOOTY . Kpg jhp jm 05:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.