Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only Love
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Only Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
What on Earth is this? Does it even need to be discussed? At least the talk page made me laugh (Can we keep that?!)--Tuzapicabit (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't know what it is, but it's definitely not something that should remain here. It would be speediable, except that speedying as incoherent requires it to be a short article. Nyttend (talk) 04:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not the novel by Erich Segal; no author, publisher or any indication it has been published. It'd take more than love to save this article. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, fails on so many levels. Speedy Delete per WP:IAR. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete What the heck?? I 100 percent agree with the previous comments. This is ridiculous - It could be speedily deleted if the nonsense was shorter.--Pecopteris (talk) 20:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.