Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paatti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paatti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unknown film with poor sources. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. DragoMynaa (talk) 03:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 03:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 03:52, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I can't find any English sources, but if someone who speaks the language could give feedback about the sources in the article, I'd feel more comfortable providing a vote. Dflaw4 (talk) 06:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:@Dflaw4: The sources in the article - official website, Indiaglitz, Sify are all film related websites and are not notable. Times of India and The Hindu are notable examples for good websites. --DragoMynaa

Thank you, DragoMynaa. The sources contained in the article aren't very good, there's no doubt about that. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete: Given that I don't feel too well-placed to judge this article as regards notability, I'm giving it a tentative "Weak Delete". To me, the film doesn't appear notable, and I've struggled to find any sources, especially given how common the word "Paatti" is in online searches. I'd be more than willing to take on the thoughts of other editors, but for now I think a "Weak Delete" vote is fair. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.